Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > The clearest example is this one:
> >
> > http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1097177,1097443
> >
> > “. . . Now when you go to look at
> > his private journal, as I did, I managed to track
> > his private journal, his handwritten notes,
> > they’re located in a small archive library, in
> > the North of London. I found these and I was
> > reading through them—I managed to find the first
> > chamber that Colonel Vyse entered was
> > Wellington’s Chamber. This is the first chamber
> > that he managed to blast his way into, with
> > gunpowder. Now when he, visited this chamber on
> > two occasions, on the second occasion, he writes,
> > in his, private notes, that, there was nothing in
> > the chamber that looked like hieroglyphics. Now
> > when Vyse uses the term ‘hieroglyphics’ he’s
> > talking about these quarry marks (Right), and
> > these are the marks that the gangs would paint,
> > their gang name or crew name, onto their block
> > that they cut—they took pride in these, so they
> > made sure that their gang name was stamped on
> > these blocks or painted, onto these blocks. So
> > Vyse tells us that there’s nothing, in, this
> > chamber—Wellington’s Chamber—that looked
> > like that—and then, three years later, we find
> > that his published account, of the very same
> > night, Richard, the very same night—remember
> > this guy’s want to find a cartouche. He writes
> > in his published book, ‘On this night we found
> > the quarry marks.’ (In Wellington’s Chamber.)
> > In Wellington’s Chamber. (The same chamber that
> > he said he found nothing in earlier.) Yes. In his
> > private notes, his private thoughts, of his time
> > at Giza—so we know that’s authentic, that’s
> > his real thoughts—he found nothing—and then in
> > his published book he says he found the quarry
> > marks—and then when you go and look to see,
> > well, what quarry marks had he found, he got, one
> > of his assistants to basically copy, the quarry
> > marks that were allegedly painted in these
> > chambers. I mean you go and look at the quarry
> > marks from Wellington’s Chamber, what do you
> > find? A cartouche—and that’s the very thing
> > Vyse wanted to find, and the remarkable thing is
> > in his private notes there’s not a single
> > mention of him finding a cartouche, and that was
> > the very thing he wanted to find. (Right, so that
> > . . .) There’s no ‘eureka’ moment, nothing,
> > completely silent, and yet he found a cartouche
> > allegedly. (Very suspicious, very
> > suspicious.)”

> >
> > M.
>
> Hmmm, what are we to make of such?
>
> So between 25th January 2019 the date of SC
> rather exuberant declaration on "Beyond Reality"
> show were he declares Vyses private journal says
> there wasn't any marks in Wellington's Chamber
> (with hearty chortles ) and now , after
> being challenged reminded he believes some
> graffiti /glyphs are probably genuine (apparently
> always has?), that he chooses the very ones, which
> for years he has gained trash radio mileage out of
> declaring they must have been faked?

It is of course very wrong of us to notice his u-turn.

> Does this mean he has changed his mind and learnt
> something?
> Or
> Does it mean there are at least two made up
> stories, one for more knowledgeable folk on GHMB
> and a different story for the naïve listeners of
> some wacko CT podcast? ( Oh! and LonelyAngel)
>
> Why choose Wellington's as the "genuine" is it
> because they are the least legible and least
> damming to his
> HOAX? Or just now scrambling to find some answer
> as to what he thinks is genuine?

It would not entirely surprise me if his next move were to tell us that the “secret cache” is in the chambers themselves.

> "Operations" is rather clear
> that on March 30th 1837 Vyse went into Wellington
> twice and he makes clear it was only in the
> evening after Mr Perring and Mr Mash had arrived
> did they find or confirm they were hieroglyphics.
> Seems to me Vyse knew so little about the subject
> that Perring was the more knowledgeable on
> hieroglyphics?

Vyse knew what his guidebook told him. It was quite a good one, Topography of Thebes and General View of Egypt, written by Wilkinson and published in 1835. He had by March 1837 seen quite a few hieroglyphs, but these were hieroglyphs, the carved, formal things. His first impression of the cursive characters (hieratic or closely related to hieratic) roughly painted in red was that they were “nothing like hieroglyphics”—but, he caught on. At one point in the journal, there is a sketch of the cartouche name “Khnum Khufu” in cursive, with hieroglyphic equivalents underneath. Look out for this spun as “Vyse planning forgery” in Creighton’s next opus.

Later in the journal and certainly by the time he was writing all this up for publication, he was calling the “quarry marks” “hieroglyphics”.

Perring most likely knew less than Vyse.

> Somewhere in Operations Vyse does state that
> something to the effect that... it would be good
> to find a cartouche to date the pyramid …..but
> his and all the growing teams interest seems far
> more emphatically interested in other projects
> seemingly with the aim of finding a tomb or burial
> place rather than a cartouche: eg The air shaft
> clearance, Campbells Tomb, The removable of debris
> to find the entrance. The hieroglyphs found on
> backing blocks on South side, barely rate a
> mention or description.

Operations I, p. 238, has this:

“I examined the rocky ground to the westward of the Great Pyramid, and the tombs and buildings to the north
of the Second. Foundations might every where be traced under the sands; and shafts lined with unburnt bricks,
amongst which probably a cartouche might be found, which would determine the date of the constructions. . . .”

—with footnote:

“Much information might possibly be obtained from the cartouches on the bricks in the various ruins in Egypt.”

Shafts and bricks, so not the pyramids. He had by this point seen quite a few bricks stamped with cartouches, during his trip to Upper Egypt. He had no reason to expect anything equivalent on the stone blocks of the pyramids. To your shock and amazement, Creighton has misrepresented this, certainly in the podcasts and there grossly.

> Again clearly all 7 Horus name renderings must be
> genuine. No one then (1837) could have forged
> them!
> Why fake 10 Khnum Khuf cartouches if the 'grand
> dastardly plan' was to place the more identifiable
> least controversial - Khufu cartouche?
>
>
> Hilariously, Creighton suggests to his listeners
> they should look here for more information.!!!
> (If you do, the I recommend search for
> contributions by contributor and expert and
> scholar "Martin Stower" on the subject!)

Where might I find this paragon? I have questions he might help me with.

> Edit to help LA find something to snipe at!!!!

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Pyramid Hoax Observations 2446 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 03:51
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 317 Racho 05-Feb-19 03:55
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 286 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 04:16
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 334 DUNE 05-Feb-19 08:22
Who was Thoth? serious question... 287 Racho 05-Feb-19 16:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 277 LonelyAngel 05-Feb-19 20:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 274 cladking 05-Feb-19 20:29
Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 237 Racho 05-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 235 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:01
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 244 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:02
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 178 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:52
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 205 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:01
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 214 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:23
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 226 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 196 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:46
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 155 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:26
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 170 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 02:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 159 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 148 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:48
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 150 cladking 06-Feb-19 14:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 159 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 14:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 180 Lee McGiffen 08-Feb-19 10:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 164 cladking 08-Feb-19 15:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 170 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 15:29
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 134 cladking 08-Feb-19 16:42
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 230 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 173 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:10
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 172 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 175 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:25
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 180 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:36
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 131 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 18:35
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 133 cladking 08-Feb-19 17:19
Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 163 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 20:17
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 196 cladking 08-Feb-19 21:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 147 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 22:14
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 131 cladking 08-Feb-19 22:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 133 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 147 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 22:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 198 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 140 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 06:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 140 cladking 09-Feb-19 15:28
gunpowder 129 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:08
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 127 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 21:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 112 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 137 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:41
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 116 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 150 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 133 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 22:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 109 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 135 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:47
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 130 cladking 10-Feb-19 01:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 131 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 116 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:26
Research methodology 121 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:06
Happy news on the Furphy front 134 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 164 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 157 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 18:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 128 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 144 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 20:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 134 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:21
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 115 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 187 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 13:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 134 Warwick 11-Feb-19 18:02
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 147 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 19:03
The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 130 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:05
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 126 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:25
Elbonian methodology 117 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 174 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:38
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 123 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:46
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 133 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 126 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:52
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 147 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 126 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:08
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 140 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:19
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 123 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 132 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:28
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 125 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:33
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 147 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:36
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 126 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:47
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 146 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:48
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 126 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:55
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 137 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 20:04
Scott wipes the floor with them again 138 LonelyAngel 11-Feb-19 21:03
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 178 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 21:31
Get the hell out of dodge and go write another book... 147 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:04
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 147 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 22:08
Aye - facts are chiels that winna ding. 130 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:15
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 146 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 133 cladking 11-Feb-19 23:09
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 140 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 23:35
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 128 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 11:07
Oooooh Scott... 150 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 11:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 137 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:06
Re: Oooooh Scott... 153 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 14:40
Re: Oooooh Scott... 139 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Oooooh Scott... 126 Corpuscles 13-Feb-19 22:01
Re: Oooooh Scott... 131 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:11
Re: Oooooh Scott... 124 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 125 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:45
Re: Oooooh Scott... 135 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:24
Re: Oooooh Scott... 126 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 19:33
Re: Oooooh Scott... 117 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:02
Re: Oooooh Scott... 102 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:55
Re: Oooooh Scott... 119 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:59
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 143 Warwick 11-Feb-19 22:20
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 146 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:45
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 172 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 15:12
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 125 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:21
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 141 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 16:44
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 116 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:18
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 121 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:31
Angel wishes to wallow in the past 128 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:58
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 135 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 17:58
A Perfect example of Obfuscation 128 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:00
The Charlatan and the Truckler 157 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:25
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 167 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-19 23:15
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 162 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 01:28
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 229 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 11:26
excerpt from the New Age Dictionary 124 Warwick 14-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 126 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 124 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 21:07
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 137 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 21:34
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 116 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 15:52
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 125 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 22:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 135 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 23:02
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 148 Morten 15-Feb-19 12:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 154 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 14:19
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 148 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 16:21
Vyse's Journal and the Mason's Marks 122 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:23
His podcast lies 147 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 20:00
Re: His podcast lies 108 Warwick 17-Feb-19 16:44
Re: His podcast lies 118 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 16:54
Re: His podcast lies 120 Warwick 17-Feb-19 18:06
Re: His podcast lies 116 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 20:07
Re: His podcast lies 117 Warwick 17-Feb-19 20:28
Re: His podcast lies 113 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 21:30
Re: His podcast lies 129 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 22:00
Re: His podcast lies 128 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:57
Re: His podcast lies 165 Warwick 18-Feb-19 16:47
Re: His podcast lies 112 Warwick 17-Feb-19 22:07
Re: His podcast lies 142 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 21:46
Re: His podcast lies 109 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:47
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 140 sfbey 14-Feb-19 16:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 126 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 17:40
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 125 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:10
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 127 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 18:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 110 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 126 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 19:09
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 115 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:35
curious minds want to know 123 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:56
Re: curious minds want to know 141 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: curious minds want to know 110 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:13
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 130 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 121 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 114 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 17:42
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 116 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 138 Corpuscles 16-Feb-19 01:02
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 132 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:14
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 130 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 133 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:04
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 129 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:20
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 145 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 19:17
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 134 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:22
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 131 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:59
It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 133 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:17
Re: It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 155 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 21:16
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 138 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 20:12
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 124 Warwick 10-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 126 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 20:49
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 127 Warwick 10-Feb-19 21:15
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 152 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 23:40
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 136 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 11:00
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 201 Corpuscles 12-Feb-19 01:03
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 130 Merrell 12-Feb-19 09:44
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 203 Martin Stower 12-Feb-19 12:00
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 147 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 22:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 135 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:45
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 172 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 120 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 23:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 146 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 140 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:24
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 125 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:30
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 145 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:34
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 132 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:39
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 145 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:22
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 140 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 130 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:28
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 112 Barbelo 09-Feb-19 23:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 138 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 128 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:58
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 135 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:20
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 145 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 127 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:35
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 126 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 133 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 01:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 136 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:16
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 145 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 01:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 153 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 125 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 189 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:29
Intro for new tv show 133 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:31
Re: Intro for new tv show 132 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 10:39
Re: Intro for new tv show 117 Warwick 09-Feb-19 19:58
Re: Intro for new tv show 130 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Intro for new tv show 115 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:15
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 168 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:13
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 150 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:19
The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 183 Barbelo 06-Feb-19 04:16
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 159 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:57
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 129 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 17:53
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 120 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:29
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 126 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:31
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 130 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:48
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 116 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:54
A Soft Cock 147 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:29
Keep it Civil 145 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 09:57
Re: Keep it Civil 146 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 10:48
Re: Keep it Civil 153 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 11:38
Re: A Soft Cock 114 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:28
Re: A Soft Cock 161 Barbelo 15-Feb-19 20:31
Re: A Soft Cock 114 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:10
Re: A Soft Cock 155 Barbelo 16-Feb-19 20:44
Re: A Soft Cock 125 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 11:45
Re: A Soft Cock 128 Corpuscles 20-Feb-19 20:19
Re: A Soft Cock 119 Warwick 21-Feb-19 18:01
Re: A Soft Cock 107 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 18:37
Re: A Soft Cock 121 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 18:49
Re: A Soft Cock 103 Warwick 21-Feb-19 19:42
Re: A Soft Cock 111 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:16
Re: A Soft Cock 113 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 20:30
Re: A Soft Cock 113 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:33
Completely Flaccid 139 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 05:59
Re: Completely Flaccid 119 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 12:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 107 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 12:53
Re: Completely Flaccid 131 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 121 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Completely Flaccid 125 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 122 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 14:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 117 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 19:06
Re: Completely Flaccid 119 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 19:17
Re: Completely Flaccid 150 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 22:44
Re: Completely Flaccid 108 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 11:16
Re: Completely Flaccid 125 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:40
Re: Completely Flaccid 131 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 02:35
simply put 107 Warwick 24-Feb-19 16:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 116 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 10:49
Re: Completely Flaccid 111 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 124 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 17:47
Re: Completely Flaccid 115 LonelyAngel 24-Feb-19 15:39
Re: Completely Flaccid 115 Corpuscles 24-Feb-19 15:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 111 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:42
Re: Completely Flaccid 113 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 19:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 107 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 20:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 108 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 21:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 126 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 22:07
factoid 127 Warwick 24-Feb-19 17:03
Re: factoid 114 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:31
Re: factoid 114 Warwick 26-Feb-19 19:39
Re: factoid 113 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 10:09
Re: factoid 142 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 11:00
Re: factoid 105 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 13:35
Re: factoid 140 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 14:33
Re: factoid 108 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:24
Re: factoid 116 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 16:52
Re: factoid 114 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:55
Re: factoid 124 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:11
Re: factoid 123 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 17:18
Re: factoid 134 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:42
Re: factoid 100 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:49
Re: factoid 106 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 13:12
Re: factoid 124 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 13:21
Re: factoid 116 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 15:19
Re: factoid 107 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:11
Dusty? 109 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:05
Re: Dusty? 118 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:52
Re: Dusty? 111 Warwick 28-Feb-19 17:56
Re: Dusty? 125 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 17:59
Re: Dusty? 123 Warwick 28-Feb-19 18:36
Re: Dusty? 123 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 12:05
Re: Dusty? 115 Warwick 01-Mar-19 18:14
Re: Dusty? 114 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 21:57
Re: Dusty? 111 Warwick 01-Mar-19 22:11
Re: Dusty? 115 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 12:58
unbelievable 119 Warwick 02-Mar-19 15:27
Mod Caution > Warwick Off-Topic Posts 118 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:57
I apologise 105 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 16:59
Re: I apologise 180 Warwick 02-Mar-19 17:48
Mod Caution > LonelyAngel Off-Topic Posts 112 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:54
Re: A Soft Cock 137 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 12:09
Re: A Soft Cock 124 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 12:44
Re: A Soft Cock 154 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 13:11
Re: A Soft Cock 117 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 16:02
Re: A Soft Cock 121 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:12
Re: A Soft Cock 114 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 15:53
Re: A Soft Cock 104 Warwick 19-Feb-19 17:37
Re: A Soft Cock 118 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:06
Re: A Soft Cock 110 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:16
Re: A Soft Cock 109 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:23
Re: A Soft Cock 113 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:28
Re: A Soft Cock 126 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:31
Re: A Soft Cock 128 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:40
Re: A Soft Cock 148 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 22:11
Re: A Soft Cock 128 LonelyAngel 20-Feb-19 12:52
Re: A Soft Cock 114 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 18:14
Re: A Soft Cock 106 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:22
Re: A Soft Cock 107 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 179 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 00:46
Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 172 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 06:14
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 171 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:50
I am not surprised at all 155 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 15:41
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 173 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 16:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 203 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 18:10
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 149 cladking 06-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 150 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:00
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 142 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 156 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:51
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 165 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:49
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 133 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 15:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 152 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:10
Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 149 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:07
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 186 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 22:31
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 204 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:12
More .. 142 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 23:00
Re: More .. 135 sfbey 07-Feb-19 23:13
Re: More .. 154 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 23:33
Re: More .. 165 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:01
Re: More .. 155 sfbey 08-Feb-19 02:42
Re: More .. 142 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 00:26
Re: More .. 139 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:26
Re: More .. 138 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 02:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 161 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 23:03
Why is it so IMPORTANT? 168 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 01:45
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 153 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:52
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 163 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:48
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 165 cladking 07-Feb-19 14:30
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 199 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 18:08
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 184 cladking 07-Feb-19 22:27
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 226 Warwick 08-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 181 JuhaS 13-Feb-19 22:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.