Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > The clearest example is this one:
> >
> > http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1097177,1097443
> >
> > “. . . Now when you go to look at
> > his private journal, as I did, I managed to track
> > his private journal, his handwritten notes,
> > they’re located in a small archive library, in
> > the North of London. I found these and I was
> > reading through them—I managed to find the first
> > chamber that Colonel Vyse entered was
> > Wellington’s Chamber. This is the first chamber
> > that he managed to blast his way into, with
> > gunpowder. Now when he, visited this chamber on
> > two occasions, on the second occasion, he writes,
> > in his, private notes, that, there was nothing in
> > the chamber that looked like hieroglyphics. Now
> > when Vyse uses the term ‘hieroglyphics’ he’s
> > talking about these quarry marks (Right), and
> > these are the marks that the gangs would paint,
> > their gang name or crew name, onto their block
> > that they cut—they took pride in these, so they
> > made sure that their gang name was stamped on
> > these blocks or painted, onto these blocks. So
> > Vyse tells us that there’s nothing, in, this
> > chamber—Wellington’s Chamber—that looked
> > like that—and then, three years later, we find
> > that his published account, of the very same
> > night, Richard, the very same night—remember
> > this guy’s want to find a cartouche. He writes
> > in his published book, ‘On this night we found
> > the quarry marks.’ (In Wellington’s Chamber.)
> > In Wellington’s Chamber. (The same chamber that
> > he said he found nothing in earlier.) Yes. In his
> > private notes, his private thoughts, of his time
> > at Giza—so we know that’s authentic, that’s
> > his real thoughts—he found nothing—and then in
> > his published book he says he found the quarry
> > marks—and then when you go and look to see,
> > well, what quarry marks had he found, he got, one
> > of his assistants to basically copy, the quarry
> > marks that were allegedly painted in these
> > chambers. I mean you go and look at the quarry
> > marks from Wellington’s Chamber, what do you
> > find? A cartouche—and that’s the very thing
> > Vyse wanted to find, and the remarkable thing is
> > in his private notes there’s not a single
> > mention of him finding a cartouche, and that was
> > the very thing he wanted to find. (Right, so that
> > . . .) There’s no ‘eureka’ moment, nothing,
> > completely silent, and yet he found a cartouche
> > allegedly. (Very suspicious, very
> > suspicious.)”

> >
> > M.
>
> Hmmm, what are we to make of such?
>
> So between 25th January 2019 the date of SC
> rather exuberant declaration on "Beyond Reality"
> show were he declares Vyses private journal says
> there wasn't any marks in Wellington's Chamber
> (with hearty chortles ) and now , after
> being challenged reminded he believes some
> graffiti /glyphs are probably genuine (apparently
> always has?), that he chooses the very ones, which
> for years he has gained trash radio mileage out of
> declaring they must have been faked?

It is of course very wrong of us to notice his u-turn.

> Does this mean he has changed his mind and learnt
> something?
> Or
> Does it mean there are at least two made up
> stories, one for more knowledgeable folk on GHMB
> and a different story for the naïve listeners of
> some wacko CT podcast? ( Oh! and LonelyAngel)
>
> Why choose Wellington's as the "genuine" is it
> because they are the least legible and least
> damming to his
> HOAX? Or just now scrambling to find some answer
> as to what he thinks is genuine?

It would not entirely surprise me if his next move were to tell us that the “secret cache” is in the chambers themselves.

> "Operations" is rather clear
> that on March 30th 1837 Vyse went into Wellington
> twice and he makes clear it was only in the
> evening after Mr Perring and Mr Mash had arrived
> did they find or confirm they were hieroglyphics.
> Seems to me Vyse knew so little about the subject
> that Perring was the more knowledgeable on
> hieroglyphics?

Vyse knew what his guidebook told him. It was quite a good one, Topography of Thebes and General View of Egypt, written by Wilkinson and published in 1835. He had by March 1837 seen quite a few hieroglyphs, but these were hieroglyphs, the carved, formal things. His first impression of the cursive characters (hieratic or closely related to hieratic) roughly painted in red was that they were “nothing like hieroglyphics”—but, he caught on. At one point in the journal, there is a sketch of the cartouche name “Khnum Khufu” in cursive, with hieroglyphic equivalents underneath. Look out for this spun as “Vyse planning forgery” in Creighton’s next opus.

Later in the journal and certainly by the time he was writing all this up for publication, he was calling the “quarry marks” “hieroglyphics”.

Perring most likely knew less than Vyse.

> Somewhere in Operations Vyse does state that
> something to the effect that... it would be good
> to find a cartouche to date the pyramid …..but
> his and all the growing teams interest seems far
> more emphatically interested in other projects
> seemingly with the aim of finding a tomb or burial
> place rather than a cartouche: eg The air shaft
> clearance, Campbells Tomb, The removable of debris
> to find the entrance. The hieroglyphs found on
> backing blocks on South side, barely rate a
> mention or description.

Operations I, p. 238, has this:

“I examined the rocky ground to the westward of the Great Pyramid, and the tombs and buildings to the north
of the Second. Foundations might every where be traced under the sands; and shafts lined with unburnt bricks,
amongst which probably a cartouche might be found, which would determine the date of the constructions. . . .”

—with footnote:

“Much information might possibly be obtained from the cartouches on the bricks in the various ruins in Egypt.”

Shafts and bricks, so not the pyramids. He had by this point seen quite a few bricks stamped with cartouches, during his trip to Upper Egypt. He had no reason to expect anything equivalent on the stone blocks of the pyramids. To your shock and amazement, Creighton has misrepresented this, certainly in the podcasts and there grossly.

> Again clearly all 7 Horus name renderings must be
> genuine. No one then (1837) could have forged
> them!
> Why fake 10 Khnum Khuf cartouches if the 'grand
> dastardly plan' was to place the more identifiable
> least controversial - Khufu cartouche?
>
>
> Hilariously, Creighton suggests to his listeners
> they should look here for more information.!!!
> (If you do, the I recommend search for
> contributions by contributor and expert and
> scholar "Martin Stower" on the subject!)

Where might I find this paragon? I have questions he might help me with.

> Edit to help LA find something to snipe at!!!!

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Pyramid Hoax Observations 2387 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 03:51
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 286 Racho 05-Feb-19 03:55
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 265 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 04:16
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 299 DUNE 05-Feb-19 08:22
Who was Thoth? serious question... 256 Racho 05-Feb-19 16:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 249 LonelyAngel 05-Feb-19 20:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 247 cladking 05-Feb-19 20:29
Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 212 Racho 05-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 210 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:01
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 220 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:02
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 155 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:52
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 179 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:01
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 194 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:23
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 195 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 172 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:46
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 139 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:26
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 154 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 02:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 149 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 134 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:48
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 131 cladking 06-Feb-19 14:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 144 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 14:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 154 Lee McGiffen 08-Feb-19 10:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 141 cladking 08-Feb-19 15:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 148 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 15:29
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 121 cladking 08-Feb-19 16:42
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 204 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 146 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:10
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 148 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 154 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:25
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 162 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:36
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 121 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 18:35
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 120 cladking 08-Feb-19 17:19
Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 146 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 20:17
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 168 cladking 08-Feb-19 21:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 134 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 22:14
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 120 cladking 08-Feb-19 22:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 120 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 135 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 22:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 170 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 128 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 06:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 131 cladking 09-Feb-19 15:28
gunpowder 113 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:08
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 116 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 21:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 104 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 126 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:41
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 107 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 119 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 120 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 22:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 101 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 126 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:47
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 119 cladking 10-Feb-19 01:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 116 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 105 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:26
Research methodology 111 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:06
Happy news on the Furphy front 118 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 153 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 144 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 18:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 120 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 130 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 20:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 122 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:21
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 103 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 166 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 13:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 121 Warwick 11-Feb-19 18:02
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 131 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 19:03
The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 118 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:05
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 114 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:25
Elbonian methodology 103 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 163 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:38
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 112 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:46
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 120 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 115 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:52
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 135 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 117 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:08
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 119 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:19
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 110 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 122 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:28
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 114 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:33
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 132 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:36
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 117 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:47
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 132 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:48
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 114 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:55
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 123 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 20:04
Scott wipes the floor with them again 128 LonelyAngel 11-Feb-19 21:03
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 159 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 21:31
Get the hell out of dodge and go write another book... 132 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:04
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 134 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 22:08
Aye - facts are chiels that winna ding. 122 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:15
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 133 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 118 cladking 11-Feb-19 23:09
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 128 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 23:35
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 117 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 11:07
Oooooh Scott... 137 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 11:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 126 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:06
Re: Oooooh Scott... 132 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 14:40
Re: Oooooh Scott... 125 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Oooooh Scott... 110 Corpuscles 13-Feb-19 22:01
Re: Oooooh Scott... 118 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:11
Re: Oooooh Scott... 113 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 115 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:45
Re: Oooooh Scott... 125 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:24
Re: Oooooh Scott... 111 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 19:33
Re: Oooooh Scott... 102 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:02
Re: Oooooh Scott... 92 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:55
Re: Oooooh Scott... 106 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:59
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 130 Warwick 11-Feb-19 22:20
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 131 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:45
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 153 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 15:12
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 114 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:21
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 120 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 16:44
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 106 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:18
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 109 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:31
Angel wishes to wallow in the past 114 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:58
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 120 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 17:58
A Perfect example of Obfuscation 114 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:00
The Charlatan and the Truckler 140 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:25
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 156 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-19 23:15
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 150 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 01:28
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 202 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 11:26
excerpt from the New Age Dictionary 114 Warwick 14-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 111 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 111 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 21:07
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 124 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 21:34
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 106 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 15:52
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 113 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 22:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 124 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 23:02
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 121 Morten 15-Feb-19 12:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 135 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 14:19
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 133 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 16:21
Vyse's Journal and the Mason's Marks 109 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:23
His podcast lies 135 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 20:00
Re: His podcast lies 99 Warwick 17-Feb-19 16:44
Re: His podcast lies 107 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 16:54
Re: His podcast lies 109 Warwick 17-Feb-19 18:06
Re: His podcast lies 100 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 20:07
Re: His podcast lies 99 Warwick 17-Feb-19 20:28
Re: His podcast lies 99 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 21:30
Re: His podcast lies 110 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 22:00
Re: His podcast lies 118 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:57
Re: His podcast lies 142 Warwick 18-Feb-19 16:47
Re: His podcast lies 104 Warwick 17-Feb-19 22:07
Re: His podcast lies 124 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 21:46
Re: His podcast lies 100 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:47
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 128 sfbey 14-Feb-19 16:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 113 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 17:40
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 113 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:10
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 111 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 18:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 99 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 116 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 19:09
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 102 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:35
curious minds want to know 110 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:56
Re: curious minds want to know 114 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: curious minds want to know 98 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:13
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 117 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 106 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 102 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 17:42
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 105 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 119 Corpuscles 16-Feb-19 01:02
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 118 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:14
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 114 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 122 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:04
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 108 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:20
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 123 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 19:17
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 125 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:22
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 123 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:59
It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 121 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:17
Re: It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 145 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 21:16
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 115 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 20:12
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 111 Warwick 10-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 114 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 20:49
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 116 Warwick 10-Feb-19 21:15
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 139 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 23:40
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 127 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 11:00
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 170 Corpuscles 12-Feb-19 01:03
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 117 Merrell 12-Feb-19 09:44
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 182 Martin Stower 12-Feb-19 12:00
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 134 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 22:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 120 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:45
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 151 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 106 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 23:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 130 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 122 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:24
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 117 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:30
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 134 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:34
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 122 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:39
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 124 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:22
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 128 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 115 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:28
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 102 Barbelo 09-Feb-19 23:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 130 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 116 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:58
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 122 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:20
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 126 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 118 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:35
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 114 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 123 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 01:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 121 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:16
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 132 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 01:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 138 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 111 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 159 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:29
Intro for new tv show 120 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:31
Re: Intro for new tv show 120 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 10:39
Re: Intro for new tv show 103 Warwick 09-Feb-19 19:58
Re: Intro for new tv show 114 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Intro for new tv show 102 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:15
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 144 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:13
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 129 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:19
The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 162 Barbelo 06-Feb-19 04:16
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 142 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:57
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 118 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 17:53
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 104 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:29
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 108 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:31
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 116 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:48
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 107 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:54
A Soft Cock 133 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:29
Keep it Civil 134 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 09:57
Re: Keep it Civil 135 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 10:48
Re: Keep it Civil 141 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 11:38
Re: A Soft Cock 103 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:28
Re: A Soft Cock 139 Barbelo 15-Feb-19 20:31
Re: A Soft Cock 102 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:10
Re: A Soft Cock 136 Barbelo 16-Feb-19 20:44
Re: A Soft Cock 107 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 11:45
Re: A Soft Cock 111 Corpuscles 20-Feb-19 20:19
Re: A Soft Cock 103 Warwick 21-Feb-19 18:01
Re: A Soft Cock 94 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 18:37
Re: A Soft Cock 110 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 18:49
Re: A Soft Cock 93 Warwick 21-Feb-19 19:42
Re: A Soft Cock 98 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:16
Re: A Soft Cock 99 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 20:30
Re: A Soft Cock 102 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:33
Completely Flaccid 121 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 05:59
Re: Completely Flaccid 98 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 12:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 95 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 12:53
Re: Completely Flaccid 114 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 101 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Completely Flaccid 104 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 106 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 14:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 108 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 19:06
Re: Completely Flaccid 108 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 19:17
Re: Completely Flaccid 137 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 22:44
Re: Completely Flaccid 94 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 11:16
Re: Completely Flaccid 110 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:40
Re: Completely Flaccid 119 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 02:35
simply put 95 Warwick 24-Feb-19 16:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 105 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 10:49
Re: Completely Flaccid 97 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 113 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 17:47
Re: Completely Flaccid 103 LonelyAngel 24-Feb-19 15:39
Re: Completely Flaccid 98 Corpuscles 24-Feb-19 15:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 98 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:42
Re: Completely Flaccid 103 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 19:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 96 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 20:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 98 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 21:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 110 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 22:07
factoid 113 Warwick 24-Feb-19 17:03
Re: factoid 101 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:31
Re: factoid 100 Warwick 26-Feb-19 19:39
Re: factoid 99 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 10:09
Re: factoid 119 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 11:00
Re: factoid 93 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 13:35
Re: factoid 124 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 14:33
Re: factoid 98 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:24
Re: factoid 102 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 16:52
Re: factoid 98 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:55
Re: factoid 105 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:11
Re: factoid 106 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 17:18
Re: factoid 123 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:42
Re: factoid 84 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:49
Re: factoid 90 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 13:12
Re: factoid 104 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 13:21
Re: factoid 102 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 15:19
Re: factoid 97 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:11
Dusty? 92 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:05
Re: Dusty? 108 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:52
Re: Dusty? 97 Warwick 28-Feb-19 17:56
Re: Dusty? 111 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 17:59
Re: Dusty? 111 Warwick 28-Feb-19 18:36
Re: Dusty? 105 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 12:05
Re: Dusty? 105 Warwick 01-Mar-19 18:14
Re: Dusty? 99 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 21:57
Re: Dusty? 99 Warwick 01-Mar-19 22:11
Re: Dusty? 103 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 12:58
unbelievable 104 Warwick 02-Mar-19 15:27
Mod Caution > Warwick Off-Topic Posts 107 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:57
I apologise 94 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 16:59
Re: I apologise 153 Warwick 02-Mar-19 17:48
Mod Caution > LonelyAngel Off-Topic Posts 102 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:54
Re: A Soft Cock 122 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 12:09
Re: A Soft Cock 110 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 12:44
Re: A Soft Cock 139 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 13:11
Re: A Soft Cock 105 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 16:02
Re: A Soft Cock 104 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:12
Re: A Soft Cock 103 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 15:53
Re: A Soft Cock 90 Warwick 19-Feb-19 17:37
Re: A Soft Cock 108 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:06
Re: A Soft Cock 94 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:16
Re: A Soft Cock 96 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:23
Re: A Soft Cock 92 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:28
Re: A Soft Cock 107 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:31
Re: A Soft Cock 113 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:40
Re: A Soft Cock 132 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 22:11
Re: A Soft Cock 116 LonelyAngel 20-Feb-19 12:52
Re: A Soft Cock 100 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 18:14
Re: A Soft Cock 91 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:22
Re: A Soft Cock 95 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 165 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 00:46
Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 156 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 06:14
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 145 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:50
I am not surprised at all 134 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 15:41
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 158 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 16:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 164 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 18:10
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 139 cladking 06-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 133 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:00
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 126 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 136 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:51
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 133 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:49
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 121 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 15:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 132 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:10
Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 132 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:07
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 162 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 22:31
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 156 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:12
More .. 127 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 23:00
Re: More .. 116 sfbey 07-Feb-19 23:13
Re: More .. 127 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 23:33
Re: More .. 142 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:01
Re: More .. 139 sfbey 08-Feb-19 02:42
Re: More .. 130 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 00:26
Re: More .. 124 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:26
Re: More .. 126 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 02:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 143 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 23:03
Why is it so IMPORTANT? 151 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 01:45
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 142 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:52
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 152 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:48
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 152 cladking 07-Feb-19 14:30
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 186 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 18:08
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 175 cladking 07-Feb-19 22:27
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 202 Warwick 08-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 168 JuhaS 13-Feb-19 22:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.