Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > The clearest example is this one:
> >
> > http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1097177,1097443
> >
> > “. . . Now when you go to look at
> > his private journal, as I did, I managed to track
> > his private journal, his handwritten notes,
> > they’re located in a small archive library, in
> > the North of London. I found these and I was
> > reading through them—I managed to find the first
> > chamber that Colonel Vyse entered was
> > Wellington’s Chamber. This is the first chamber
> > that he managed to blast his way into, with
> > gunpowder. Now when he, visited this chamber on
> > two occasions, on the second occasion, he writes,
> > in his, private notes, that, there was nothing in
> > the chamber that looked like hieroglyphics. Now
> > when Vyse uses the term ‘hieroglyphics’ he’s
> > talking about these quarry marks (Right), and
> > these are the marks that the gangs would paint,
> > their gang name or crew name, onto their block
> > that they cut—they took pride in these, so they
> > made sure that their gang name was stamped on
> > these blocks or painted, onto these blocks. So
> > Vyse tells us that there’s nothing, in, this
> > chamber—Wellington’s Chamber—that looked
> > like that—and then, three years later, we find
> > that his published account, of the very same
> > night, Richard, the very same night—remember
> > this guy’s want to find a cartouche. He writes
> > in his published book, ‘On this night we found
> > the quarry marks.’ (In Wellington’s Chamber.)
> > In Wellington’s Chamber. (The same chamber that
> > he said he found nothing in earlier.) Yes. In his
> > private notes, his private thoughts, of his time
> > at Giza—so we know that’s authentic, that’s
> > his real thoughts—he found nothing—and then in
> > his published book he says he found the quarry
> > marks—and then when you go and look to see,
> > well, what quarry marks had he found, he got, one
> > of his assistants to basically copy, the quarry
> > marks that were allegedly painted in these
> > chambers. I mean you go and look at the quarry
> > marks from Wellington’s Chamber, what do you
> > find? A cartouche—and that’s the very thing
> > Vyse wanted to find, and the remarkable thing is
> > in his private notes there’s not a single
> > mention of him finding a cartouche, and that was
> > the very thing he wanted to find. (Right, so that
> > . . .) There’s no ‘eureka’ moment, nothing,
> > completely silent, and yet he found a cartouche
> > allegedly. (Very suspicious, very
> > suspicious.)”

> >
> > M.
>
> Hmmm, what are we to make of such?
>
> So between 25th January 2019 the date of SC
> rather exuberant declaration on "Beyond Reality"
> show were he declares Vyses private journal says
> there wasn't any marks in Wellington's Chamber
> (with hearty chortles ) and now , after
> being challenged reminded he believes some
> graffiti /glyphs are probably genuine (apparently
> always has?), that he chooses the very ones, which
> for years he has gained trash radio mileage out of
> declaring they must have been faked?

It is of course very wrong of us to notice his u-turn.

> Does this mean he has changed his mind and learnt
> something?
> Or
> Does it mean there are at least two made up
> stories, one for more knowledgeable folk on GHMB
> and a different story for the naïve listeners of
> some wacko CT podcast? ( Oh! and LonelyAngel)
>
> Why choose Wellington's as the "genuine" is it
> because they are the least legible and least
> damming to his
> HOAX? Or just now scrambling to find some answer
> as to what he thinks is genuine?

It would not entirely surprise me if his next move were to tell us that the “secret cache” is in the chambers themselves.

> "Operations" is rather clear
> that on March 30th 1837 Vyse went into Wellington
> twice and he makes clear it was only in the
> evening after Mr Perring and Mr Mash had arrived
> did they find or confirm they were hieroglyphics.
> Seems to me Vyse knew so little about the subject
> that Perring was the more knowledgeable on
> hieroglyphics?

Vyse knew what his guidebook told him. It was quite a good one, Topography of Thebes and General View of Egypt, written by Wilkinson and published in 1835. He had by March 1837 seen quite a few hieroglyphs, but these were hieroglyphs, the carved, formal things. His first impression of the cursive characters (hieratic or closely related to hieratic) roughly painted in red was that they were “nothing like hieroglyphics”—but, he caught on. At one point in the journal, there is a sketch of the cartouche name “Khnum Khufu” in cursive, with hieroglyphic equivalents underneath. Look out for this spun as “Vyse planning forgery” in Creighton’s next opus.

Later in the journal and certainly by the time he was writing all this up for publication, he was calling the “quarry marks” “hieroglyphics”.

Perring most likely knew less than Vyse.

> Somewhere in Operations Vyse does state that
> something to the effect that... it would be good
> to find a cartouche to date the pyramid …..but
> his and all the growing teams interest seems far
> more emphatically interested in other projects
> seemingly with the aim of finding a tomb or burial
> place rather than a cartouche: eg The air shaft
> clearance, Campbells Tomb, The removable of debris
> to find the entrance. The hieroglyphs found on
> backing blocks on South side, barely rate a
> mention or description.

Operations I, p. 238, has this:

“I examined the rocky ground to the westward of the Great Pyramid, and the tombs and buildings to the north
of the Second. Foundations might every where be traced under the sands; and shafts lined with unburnt bricks,
amongst which probably a cartouche might be found, which would determine the date of the constructions. . . .”

—with footnote:

“Much information might possibly be obtained from the cartouches on the bricks in the various ruins in Egypt.”

Shafts and bricks, so not the pyramids. He had by this point seen quite a few bricks stamped with cartouches, during his trip to Upper Egypt. He had no reason to expect anything equivalent on the stone blocks of the pyramids. To your shock and amazement, Creighton has misrepresented this, certainly in the podcasts and there grossly.

> Again clearly all 7 Horus name renderings must be
> genuine. No one then (1837) could have forged
> them!
> Why fake 10 Khnum Khuf cartouches if the 'grand
> dastardly plan' was to place the more identifiable
> least controversial - Khufu cartouche?
>
>
> Hilariously, Creighton suggests to his listeners
> they should look here for more information.!!!
> (If you do, the I recommend search for
> contributions by contributor and expert and
> scholar "Martin Stower" on the subject!)

Where might I find this paragon? I have questions he might help me with.

> Edit to help LA find something to snipe at!!!!

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Pyramid Hoax Observations 2557 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 03:51
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 367 Racho 05-Feb-19 03:55
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 345 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 04:16
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 397 DUNE 05-Feb-19 08:22
Who was Thoth? serious question... 324 Racho 05-Feb-19 16:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 335 LonelyAngel 05-Feb-19 20:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 332 cladking 05-Feb-19 20:29
Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 285 Racho 05-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 287 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:01
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 309 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:02
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 232 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:52
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 249 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:01
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 263 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:23
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 289 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 256 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:46
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 195 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:26
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 222 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 02:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 201 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 194 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:48
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 190 cladking 06-Feb-19 14:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 214 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 14:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 235 Lee McGiffen 08-Feb-19 10:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 223 cladking 08-Feb-19 15:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 213 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 15:29
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 185 cladking 08-Feb-19 16:42
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 306 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 222 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:10
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 219 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 226 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:25
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 234 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:36
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 168 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 18:35
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 169 cladking 08-Feb-19 17:19
Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 210 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 20:17
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 245 cladking 08-Feb-19 21:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 195 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 22:14
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 167 cladking 08-Feb-19 22:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 170 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 199 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 22:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 234 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 180 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 06:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 187 cladking 09-Feb-19 15:28
gunpowder 168 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:08
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 182 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 21:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 159 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 188 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:41
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 181 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 186 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 171 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 22:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 162 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 177 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:47
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 170 cladking 10-Feb-19 01:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 175 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 157 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:26
Research methodology 152 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:06
Happy news on the Furphy front 177 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 207 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 214 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 18:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 166 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 182 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 20:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 171 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:21
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 156 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 257 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 13:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 177 Warwick 11-Feb-19 18:02
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 196 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 19:03
The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 192 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:05
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 188 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:25
Elbonian methodology 156 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 204 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:38
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 166 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:46
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 175 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 161 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:52
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 200 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 169 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:08
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 183 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:19
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 171 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 169 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:28
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 165 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:33
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 186 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:36
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 169 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:47
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 193 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:48
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 175 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:55
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 183 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 20:04
Scott wipes the floor with them again 182 LonelyAngel 11-Feb-19 21:03
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 232 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 21:31
Get the hell out of dodge and go write another book... 192 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:04
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 190 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 22:08
Aye - facts are chiels that winna ding. 172 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:15
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 187 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 163 cladking 11-Feb-19 23:09
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 181 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 23:35
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 162 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 11:07
Oooooh Scott... 195 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 11:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 195 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:06
Re: Oooooh Scott... 201 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 14:40
Re: Oooooh Scott... 180 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Oooooh Scott... 177 Corpuscles 13-Feb-19 22:01
Re: Oooooh Scott... 179 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:11
Re: Oooooh Scott... 164 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 173 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:45
Re: Oooooh Scott... 183 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:24
Re: Oooooh Scott... 176 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 19:33
Re: Oooooh Scott... 173 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:02
Re: Oooooh Scott... 139 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:55
Re: Oooooh Scott... 158 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:59
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 182 Warwick 11-Feb-19 22:20
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 194 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:45
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 222 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 15:12
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 184 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:21
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 187 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 16:44
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 149 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:18
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 165 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:31
Angel wishes to wallow in the past 184 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:58
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 178 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 17:58
A Perfect example of Obfuscation 168 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:00
The Charlatan and the Truckler 198 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:25
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 207 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-19 23:15
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 198 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 01:28
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 286 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 11:26
excerpt from the New Age Dictionary 179 Warwick 14-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 168 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 153 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 21:07
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 192 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 21:34
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 151 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 15:52
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 177 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 22:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 175 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 23:02
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 211 Morten 15-Feb-19 12:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 199 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 14:19
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 216 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 16:21
Vyse's Journal and the Mason's Marks 164 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:23
His podcast lies 203 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 20:00
Re: His podcast lies 146 Warwick 17-Feb-19 16:44
Re: His podcast lies 170 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 16:54
Re: His podcast lies 163 Warwick 17-Feb-19 18:06
Re: His podcast lies 156 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 20:07
Re: His podcast lies 157 Warwick 17-Feb-19 20:28
Re: His podcast lies 157 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 21:30
Re: His podcast lies 169 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 22:00
Re: His podcast lies 159 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:57
Re: His podcast lies 218 Warwick 18-Feb-19 16:47
Re: His podcast lies 153 Warwick 17-Feb-19 22:07
Re: His podcast lies 174 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 21:46
Re: His podcast lies 139 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:47
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 188 sfbey 14-Feb-19 16:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 181 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 17:40
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 168 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:10
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 170 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 18:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 149 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 166 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 19:09
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 152 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:35
curious minds want to know 164 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:56
Re: curious minds want to know 187 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: curious minds want to know 157 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:13
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 164 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 158 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 164 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 17:42
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 153 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 182 Corpuscles 16-Feb-19 01:02
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 185 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:14
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 170 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 175 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:04
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 181 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:20
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 191 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 19:17
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 178 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:22
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 173 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:59
It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 168 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:17
Re: It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 204 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 21:16
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 177 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 20:12
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 162 Warwick 10-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 171 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 20:49
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 165 Warwick 10-Feb-19 21:15
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 197 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 23:40
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 170 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 11:00
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 252 Corpuscles 12-Feb-19 01:03
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 168 Merrell 12-Feb-19 09:44
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 255 Martin Stower 12-Feb-19 12:00
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 184 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 22:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 189 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:45
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 226 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 158 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 23:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 190 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 172 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:24
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 168 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:30
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 190 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:34
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 167 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:39
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 189 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:22
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 173 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 171 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:28
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 159 Barbelo 09-Feb-19 23:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 192 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 174 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:58
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 169 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:20
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 195 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 161 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:35
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 183 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 181 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 01:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 183 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:16
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 188 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 01:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 197 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 198 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 233 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:29
Intro for new tv show 175 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:31
Re: Intro for new tv show 179 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 10:39
Re: Intro for new tv show 159 Warwick 09-Feb-19 19:58
Re: Intro for new tv show 178 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Intro for new tv show 158 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:15
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 218 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:13
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 185 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:19
The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 241 Barbelo 06-Feb-19 04:16
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 201 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:57
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 172 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 17:53
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 162 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:29
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 164 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:31
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 175 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:48
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 153 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:54
A Soft Cock 183 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:29
Keep it Civil 181 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 09:57
Re: Keep it Civil 192 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 10:48
Re: Keep it Civil 191 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 11:38
Re: A Soft Cock 162 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:28
Re: A Soft Cock 231 Barbelo 15-Feb-19 20:31
Re: A Soft Cock 154 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:10
Re: A Soft Cock 205 Barbelo 16-Feb-19 20:44
Re: A Soft Cock 171 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 11:45
Re: A Soft Cock 165 Corpuscles 20-Feb-19 20:19
Re: A Soft Cock 163 Warwick 21-Feb-19 18:01
Re: A Soft Cock 151 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 18:37
Re: A Soft Cock 163 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 18:49
Re: A Soft Cock 156 Warwick 21-Feb-19 19:42
Re: A Soft Cock 156 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:16
Re: A Soft Cock 160 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 20:30
Re: A Soft Cock 163 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:33
Completely Flaccid 181 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 05:59
Re: Completely Flaccid 165 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 12:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 140 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 12:53
Re: Completely Flaccid 182 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 170 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Completely Flaccid 165 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 184 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 14:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 161 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 19:06
Re: Completely Flaccid 169 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 19:17
Re: Completely Flaccid 188 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 22:44
Re: Completely Flaccid 155 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 11:16
Re: Completely Flaccid 166 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:40
Re: Completely Flaccid 189 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 02:35
simply put 145 Warwick 24-Feb-19 16:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 157 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 10:49
Re: Completely Flaccid 159 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 166 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 17:47
Re: Completely Flaccid 156 LonelyAngel 24-Feb-19 15:39
Re: Completely Flaccid 155 Corpuscles 24-Feb-19 15:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 154 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:42
Re: Completely Flaccid 159 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 19:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 150 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 20:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 146 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 21:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 177 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 22:07
factoid 163 Warwick 24-Feb-19 17:03
Re: factoid 155 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:31
Re: factoid 171 Warwick 26-Feb-19 19:39
Re: factoid 155 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 10:09
Re: factoid 194 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 11:00
Re: factoid 143 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 13:35
Re: factoid 201 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 14:33
Re: factoid 173 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:24
Re: factoid 167 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 16:52
Re: factoid 154 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:55
Re: factoid 163 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:11
Re: factoid 173 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 17:18
Re: factoid 182 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:42
Re: factoid 143 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:49
Re: factoid 150 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 13:12
Re: factoid 171 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 13:21
Re: factoid 188 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 15:19
Re: factoid 156 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:11
Dusty? 159 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:05
Re: Dusty? 152 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:52
Re: Dusty? 165 Warwick 28-Feb-19 17:56
Re: Dusty? 191 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 17:59
Re: Dusty? 168 Warwick 28-Feb-19 18:36
Re: Dusty? 166 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 12:05
Re: Dusty? 163 Warwick 01-Mar-19 18:14
Re: Dusty? 153 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 21:57
Re: Dusty? 151 Warwick 01-Mar-19 22:11
Re: Dusty? 161 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 12:58
unbelievable 165 Warwick 02-Mar-19 15:27
Mod Caution > Warwick Off-Topic Posts 154 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:57
I apologise 168 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 16:59
Re: I apologise 226 Warwick 02-Mar-19 17:48
Mod Caution > LonelyAngel Off-Topic Posts 160 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:54
Re: A Soft Cock 184 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 12:09
Re: A Soft Cock 173 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 12:44
Re: A Soft Cock 204 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 13:11
Re: A Soft Cock 170 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 16:02
Re: A Soft Cock 163 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:12
Re: A Soft Cock 159 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 15:53
Re: A Soft Cock 142 Warwick 19-Feb-19 17:37
Re: A Soft Cock 171 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:06
Re: A Soft Cock 159 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:16
Re: A Soft Cock 161 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:23
Re: A Soft Cock 169 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:28
Re: A Soft Cock 190 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:31
Re: A Soft Cock 190 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:40
Re: A Soft Cock 217 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 22:11
Re: A Soft Cock 182 LonelyAngel 20-Feb-19 12:52
Re: A Soft Cock 167 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 18:14
Re: A Soft Cock 144 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:22
Re: A Soft Cock 144 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 228 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 00:46
Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 225 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 06:14
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 220 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:50
I am not surprised at all 191 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 15:41
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 220 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 16:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 247 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 18:10
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 187 cladking 06-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 184 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:00
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 187 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 199 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:51
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 211 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:49
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 184 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 15:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 191 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:10
Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 195 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:07
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 229 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 22:31
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 251 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:12
More .. 197 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 23:00
Re: More .. 195 sfbey 07-Feb-19 23:13
Re: More .. 188 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 23:33
Re: More .. 222 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:01
Re: More .. 201 sfbey 08-Feb-19 02:42
Re: More .. 187 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 00:26
Re: More .. 178 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:26
Re: More .. 189 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 02:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 212 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 23:03
Why is it so IMPORTANT? 219 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 01:45
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 191 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:52
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 201 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:48
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 223 cladking 07-Feb-19 14:30
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 249 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 18:08
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 225 cladking 07-Feb-19 22:27
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 275 Warwick 08-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 218 JuhaS 13-Feb-19 22:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.