Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > The clearest example is this one:
> >
> > http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1097177,1097443
> >
> > “. . . Now when you go to look at
> > his private journal, as I did, I managed to track
> > his private journal, his handwritten notes,
> > they’re located in a small archive library, in
> > the North of London. I found these and I was
> > reading through them—I managed to find the first
> > chamber that Colonel Vyse entered was
> > Wellington’s Chamber. This is the first chamber
> > that he managed to blast his way into, with
> > gunpowder. Now when he, visited this chamber on
> > two occasions, on the second occasion, he writes,
> > in his, private notes, that, there was nothing in
> > the chamber that looked like hieroglyphics. Now
> > when Vyse uses the term ‘hieroglyphics’ he’s
> > talking about these quarry marks (Right), and
> > these are the marks that the gangs would paint,
> > their gang name or crew name, onto their block
> > that they cut—they took pride in these, so they
> > made sure that their gang name was stamped on
> > these blocks or painted, onto these blocks. So
> > Vyse tells us that there’s nothing, in, this
> > chamber—Wellington’s Chamber—that looked
> > like that—and then, three years later, we find
> > that his published account, of the very same
> > night, Richard, the very same night—remember
> > this guy’s want to find a cartouche. He writes
> > in his published book, ‘On this night we found
> > the quarry marks.’ (In Wellington’s Chamber.)
> > In Wellington’s Chamber. (The same chamber that
> > he said he found nothing in earlier.) Yes. In his
> > private notes, his private thoughts, of his time
> > at Giza—so we know that’s authentic, that’s
> > his real thoughts—he found nothing—and then in
> > his published book he says he found the quarry
> > marks—and then when you go and look to see,
> > well, what quarry marks had he found, he got, one
> > of his assistants to basically copy, the quarry
> > marks that were allegedly painted in these
> > chambers. I mean you go and look at the quarry
> > marks from Wellington’s Chamber, what do you
> > find? A cartouche—and that’s the very thing
> > Vyse wanted to find, and the remarkable thing is
> > in his private notes there’s not a single
> > mention of him finding a cartouche, and that was
> > the very thing he wanted to find. (Right, so that
> > . . .) There’s no ‘eureka’ moment, nothing,
> > completely silent, and yet he found a cartouche
> > allegedly. (Very suspicious, very
> > suspicious.)”

> >
> > M.
>
> Hmmm, what are we to make of such?
>
> So between 25th January 2019 the date of SC
> rather exuberant declaration on "Beyond Reality"
> show were he declares Vyses private journal says
> there wasn't any marks in Wellington's Chamber
> (with hearty chortles ) and now , after
> being challenged reminded he believes some
> graffiti /glyphs are probably genuine (apparently
> always has?), that he chooses the very ones, which
> for years he has gained trash radio mileage out of
> declaring they must have been faked?

It is of course very wrong of us to notice his u-turn.

> Does this mean he has changed his mind and learnt
> something?
> Or
> Does it mean there are at least two made up
> stories, one for more knowledgeable folk on GHMB
> and a different story for the naïve listeners of
> some wacko CT podcast? ( Oh! and LonelyAngel)
>
> Why choose Wellington's as the "genuine" is it
> because they are the least legible and least
> damming to his
> HOAX? Or just now scrambling to find some answer
> as to what he thinks is genuine?

It would not entirely surprise me if his next move were to tell us that the “secret cache” is in the chambers themselves.

> "Operations" is rather clear
> that on March 30th 1837 Vyse went into Wellington
> twice and he makes clear it was only in the
> evening after Mr Perring and Mr Mash had arrived
> did they find or confirm they were hieroglyphics.
> Seems to me Vyse knew so little about the subject
> that Perring was the more knowledgeable on
> hieroglyphics?

Vyse knew what his guidebook told him. It was quite a good one, Topography of Thebes and General View of Egypt, written by Wilkinson and published in 1835. He had by March 1837 seen quite a few hieroglyphs, but these were hieroglyphs, the carved, formal things. His first impression of the cursive characters (hieratic or closely related to hieratic) roughly painted in red was that they were “nothing like hieroglyphics”—but, he caught on. At one point in the journal, there is a sketch of the cartouche name “Khnum Khufu” in cursive, with hieroglyphic equivalents underneath. Look out for this spun as “Vyse planning forgery” in Creighton’s next opus.

Later in the journal and certainly by the time he was writing all this up for publication, he was calling the “quarry marks” “hieroglyphics”.

Perring most likely knew less than Vyse.

> Somewhere in Operations Vyse does state that
> something to the effect that... it would be good
> to find a cartouche to date the pyramid …..but
> his and all the growing teams interest seems far
> more emphatically interested in other projects
> seemingly with the aim of finding a tomb or burial
> place rather than a cartouche: eg The air shaft
> clearance, Campbells Tomb, The removable of debris
> to find the entrance. The hieroglyphs found on
> backing blocks on South side, barely rate a
> mention or description.

Operations I, p. 238, has this:

“I examined the rocky ground to the westward of the Great Pyramid, and the tombs and buildings to the north
of the Second. Foundations might every where be traced under the sands; and shafts lined with unburnt bricks,
amongst which probably a cartouche might be found, which would determine the date of the constructions. . . .”

—with footnote:

“Much information might possibly be obtained from the cartouches on the bricks in the various ruins in Egypt.”

Shafts and bricks, so not the pyramids. He had by this point seen quite a few bricks stamped with cartouches, during his trip to Upper Egypt. He had no reason to expect anything equivalent on the stone blocks of the pyramids. To your shock and amazement, Creighton has misrepresented this, certainly in the podcasts and there grossly.

> Again clearly all 7 Horus name renderings must be
> genuine. No one then (1837) could have forged
> them!
> Why fake 10 Khnum Khuf cartouches if the 'grand
> dastardly plan' was to place the more identifiable
> least controversial - Khufu cartouche?
>
>
> Hilariously, Creighton suggests to his listeners
> they should look here for more information.!!!
> (If you do, the I recommend search for
> contributions by contributor and expert and
> scholar "Martin Stower" on the subject!)

Where might I find this paragon? I have questions he might help me with.

> Edit to help LA find something to snipe at!!!!

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Pyramid Hoax Observations 2496 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 03:51
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 333 Racho 05-Feb-19 03:55
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 309 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 04:16
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 364 DUNE 05-Feb-19 08:22
Who was Thoth? serious question... 303 Racho 05-Feb-19 16:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 300 LonelyAngel 05-Feb-19 20:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 296 cladking 05-Feb-19 20:29
Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 254 Racho 05-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 254 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:01
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 262 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:02
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 208 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:52
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 220 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:01
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 233 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:23
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 255 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 224 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:46
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 167 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:26
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 194 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 02:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 173 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 163 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:48
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 162 cladking 06-Feb-19 14:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 185 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 14:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 206 Lee McGiffen 08-Feb-19 10:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 186 cladking 08-Feb-19 15:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 186 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 15:29
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 154 cladking 08-Feb-19 16:42
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 264 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 189 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:10
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 188 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 194 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:25
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 202 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:36
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 142 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 18:35
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 145 cladking 08-Feb-19 17:19
Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 179 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 20:17
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 213 cladking 08-Feb-19 21:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 169 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 22:14
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 143 cladking 08-Feb-19 22:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 147 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 170 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 22:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 211 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 155 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 06:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 158 cladking 09-Feb-19 15:28
gunpowder 141 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:08
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 156 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 21:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 126 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 159 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:41
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 150 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 162 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 147 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 22:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 130 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 151 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:47
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 143 cladking 10-Feb-19 01:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 147 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 129 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:26
Research methodology 133 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:06
Happy news on the Furphy front 150 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 179 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 180 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 18:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 145 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 158 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 20:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 146 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:21
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 127 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 227 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 13:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 151 Warwick 11-Feb-19 18:02
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 164 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 19:03
The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 163 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:05
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 146 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:25
Elbonian methodology 130 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 185 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:38
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 135 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:46
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 146 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 136 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:52
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 169 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 139 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:08
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 158 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:19
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 138 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 145 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:28
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 137 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:33
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 159 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:36
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 145 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:47
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 160 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:48
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 142 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:55
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 153 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 20:04
Scott wipes the floor with them again 153 LonelyAngel 11-Feb-19 21:03
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 200 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 21:31
Get the hell out of dodge and go write another book... 162 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:04
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 163 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 22:08
Aye - facts are chiels that winna ding. 142 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:15
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 161 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 145 cladking 11-Feb-19 23:09
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 155 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 23:35
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 141 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 11:07
Oooooh Scott... 165 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 11:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 163 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:06
Re: Oooooh Scott... 173 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 14:40
Re: Oooooh Scott... 154 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Oooooh Scott... 141 Corpuscles 13-Feb-19 22:01
Re: Oooooh Scott... 147 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:11
Re: Oooooh Scott... 135 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 142 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:45
Re: Oooooh Scott... 150 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:24
Re: Oooooh Scott... 143 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 19:33
Re: Oooooh Scott... 143 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:02
Re: Oooooh Scott... 116 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:55
Re: Oooooh Scott... 131 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:59
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 154 Warwick 11-Feb-19 22:20
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 158 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:45
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 189 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 15:12
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 150 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:21
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 157 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 16:44
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 130 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:18
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 136 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:31
Angel wishes to wallow in the past 153 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:58
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 153 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 17:58
A Perfect example of Obfuscation 140 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:00
The Charlatan and the Truckler 170 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:25
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 179 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-19 23:15
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 173 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 01:28
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 249 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 11:26
excerpt from the New Age Dictionary 145 Warwick 14-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 137 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 134 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 21:07
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 165 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 21:34
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 127 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 15:52
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 143 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 22:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 149 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 23:02
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 173 Morten 15-Feb-19 12:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 172 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 14:19
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 176 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 16:21
Vyse's Journal and the Mason's Marks 134 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:23
His podcast lies 169 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 20:00
Re: His podcast lies 118 Warwick 17-Feb-19 16:44
Re: His podcast lies 136 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 16:54
Re: His podcast lies 134 Warwick 17-Feb-19 18:06
Re: His podcast lies 130 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 20:07
Re: His podcast lies 131 Warwick 17-Feb-19 20:28
Re: His podcast lies 128 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 21:30
Re: His podcast lies 141 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 22:00
Re: His podcast lies 141 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:57
Re: His podcast lies 185 Warwick 18-Feb-19 16:47
Re: His podcast lies 124 Warwick 17-Feb-19 22:07
Re: His podcast lies 155 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 21:46
Re: His podcast lies 120 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:47
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 157 sfbey 14-Feb-19 16:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 146 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 17:40
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 140 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:10
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 140 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 18:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 123 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 139 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 19:09
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 127 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:35
curious minds want to know 135 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:56
Re: curious minds want to know 157 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: curious minds want to know 124 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:13
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 144 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 134 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 131 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 17:42
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 132 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 153 Corpuscles 16-Feb-19 01:02
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 156 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:14
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 143 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 145 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:04
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 142 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:20
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 162 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 19:17
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 149 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:22
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 144 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:59
It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 144 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:17
Re: It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 176 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 21:16
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 153 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 20:12
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 135 Warwick 10-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 141 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 20:49
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 138 Warwick 10-Feb-19 21:15
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 166 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 23:40
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 150 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 11:00
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 219 Corpuscles 12-Feb-19 01:03
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 143 Merrell 12-Feb-19 09:44
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 222 Martin Stower 12-Feb-19 12:00
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 158 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 22:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 156 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:45
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 192 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 133 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 23:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 161 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 152 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:24
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 136 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:30
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 160 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:34
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 147 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:39
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 160 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:22
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 150 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 142 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:28
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 127 Barbelo 09-Feb-19 23:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 161 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 148 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:58
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 145 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:20
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 162 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 141 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:35
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 139 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 149 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 01:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 151 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:16
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 161 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 01:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 168 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 157 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 205 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:29
Intro for new tv show 146 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:31
Re: Intro for new tv show 147 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 10:39
Re: Intro for new tv show 130 Warwick 09-Feb-19 19:58
Re: Intro for new tv show 149 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Intro for new tv show 129 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:15
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 191 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:13
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 162 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:19
The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 204 Barbelo 06-Feb-19 04:16
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 173 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:57
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 146 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 17:53
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 133 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:29
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 140 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:31
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 145 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:48
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 125 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:54
A Soft Cock 159 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:29
Keep it Civil 162 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 09:57
Re: Keep it Civil 163 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 10:48
Re: Keep it Civil 167 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 11:38
Re: A Soft Cock 129 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:28
Re: A Soft Cock 193 Barbelo 15-Feb-19 20:31
Re: A Soft Cock 128 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:10
Re: A Soft Cock 175 Barbelo 16-Feb-19 20:44
Re: A Soft Cock 140 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 11:45
Re: A Soft Cock 140 Corpuscles 20-Feb-19 20:19
Re: A Soft Cock 135 Warwick 21-Feb-19 18:01
Re: A Soft Cock 120 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 18:37
Re: A Soft Cock 135 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 18:49
Re: A Soft Cock 125 Warwick 21-Feb-19 19:42
Re: A Soft Cock 133 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:16
Re: A Soft Cock 130 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 20:30
Re: A Soft Cock 131 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:33
Completely Flaccid 152 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 05:59
Re: Completely Flaccid 133 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 12:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 119 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 12:53
Re: Completely Flaccid 148 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 138 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Completely Flaccid 139 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 149 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 14:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 132 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 19:06
Re: Completely Flaccid 141 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 19:17
Re: Completely Flaccid 162 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 22:44
Re: Completely Flaccid 125 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 11:16
Re: Completely Flaccid 138 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:40
Re: Completely Flaccid 150 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 02:35
simply put 118 Warwick 24-Feb-19 16:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 128 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 10:49
Re: Completely Flaccid 127 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 137 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 17:47
Re: Completely Flaccid 128 LonelyAngel 24-Feb-19 15:39
Re: Completely Flaccid 127 Corpuscles 24-Feb-19 15:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 123 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:42
Re: Completely Flaccid 126 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 19:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 118 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 20:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 120 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 21:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 149 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 22:07
factoid 141 Warwick 24-Feb-19 17:03
Re: factoid 125 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:31
Re: factoid 134 Warwick 26-Feb-19 19:39
Re: factoid 126 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 10:09
Re: factoid 158 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 11:00
Re: factoid 117 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 13:35
Re: factoid 164 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 14:33
Re: factoid 125 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:24
Re: factoid 136 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 16:52
Re: factoid 128 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:55
Re: factoid 136 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:11
Re: factoid 135 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 17:18
Re: factoid 154 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:42
Re: factoid 112 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:49
Re: factoid 121 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 13:12
Re: factoid 140 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 13:21
Re: factoid 149 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 15:19
Re: factoid 128 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:11
Dusty? 125 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:05
Re: Dusty? 131 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:52
Re: Dusty? 133 Warwick 28-Feb-19 17:56
Re: Dusty? 156 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 17:59
Re: Dusty? 140 Warwick 28-Feb-19 18:36
Re: Dusty? 136 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 12:05
Re: Dusty? 126 Warwick 01-Mar-19 18:14
Re: Dusty? 127 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 21:57
Re: Dusty? 122 Warwick 01-Mar-19 22:11
Re: Dusty? 129 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 12:58
unbelievable 133 Warwick 02-Mar-19 15:27
Mod Caution > Warwick Off-Topic Posts 132 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:57
I apologise 138 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 16:59
Re: I apologise 195 Warwick 02-Mar-19 17:48
Mod Caution > LonelyAngel Off-Topic Posts 135 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:54
Re: A Soft Cock 156 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 12:09
Re: A Soft Cock 143 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 12:44
Re: A Soft Cock 168 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 13:11
Re: A Soft Cock 145 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 16:02
Re: A Soft Cock 133 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:12
Re: A Soft Cock 124 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 15:53
Re: A Soft Cock 115 Warwick 19-Feb-19 17:37
Re: A Soft Cock 139 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:06
Re: A Soft Cock 128 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:16
Re: A Soft Cock 127 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:23
Re: A Soft Cock 138 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:28
Re: A Soft Cock 157 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:31
Re: A Soft Cock 161 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:40
Re: A Soft Cock 173 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 22:11
Re: A Soft Cock 145 LonelyAngel 20-Feb-19 12:52
Re: A Soft Cock 135 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 18:14
Re: A Soft Cock 117 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:22
Re: A Soft Cock 118 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 201 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 00:46
Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 190 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 06:14
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 187 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:50
I am not surprised at all 166 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 15:41
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 187 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 16:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 221 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 18:10
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 163 cladking 06-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 161 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:00
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 158 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 170 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:51
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 179 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:49
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 149 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 15:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 165 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:10
Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 168 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:07
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 208 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 22:31
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 228 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:12
More .. 166 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 23:00
Re: More .. 155 sfbey 07-Feb-19 23:13
Re: More .. 168 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 23:33
Re: More .. 182 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:01
Re: More .. 171 sfbey 08-Feb-19 02:42
Re: More .. 157 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 00:26
Re: More .. 151 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:26
Re: More .. 154 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 02:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 183 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 23:03
Why is it so IMPORTANT? 182 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 01:45
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 163 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:52
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 176 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:48
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 187 cladking 07-Feb-19 14:30
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 219 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 18:08
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 201 cladking 07-Feb-19 22:27
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 245 Warwick 08-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 193 JuhaS 13-Feb-19 22:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.