Warwick Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> This webpage is Hoax's bibliography, after all. A
> fact, which when I discovered it at the back, blew
> my mind.
>
>
> Oh the Scholarship!!!
>
>
> Warwick

I forgot to congratulate you on your admission by decree to the SC "ignore list".

The "independent researchers" (GHMB flunkies) concentrated on one Khufu cartouche.

I wonder whether M Stower can advise us as to whether SC has ever attempted to address the kings Horus name?
Is there any chance LonelyAngel could make himself a little interesting and useful and ask SC for us and his own benefit?

IF no satisfactory answer then it completely makes this back cover claim (amongst others) ridiculous and clearly fraudulent.

"Proving Zechariah Sitchin’s claim that the quarry marks are forgeries and removing the only physical evidence that dates the Great Pyramid's construction to the reign of Khufu, Creighton's study strikes down one of the most fundamental assertions of orthodox Egyptologists and reopens long-standing questions about the Great Pyramid’s true age, who really built it, and why. "

Which was and is his, obvious, major aim!

Btw: If Creighton figuratively "lives by the sword" (defaming for gain and notoriety ) a whole group of deceased people, then he ought to "die by the (his own) sword"

DEAD & BURIED long ago, just the he deserves the ridicule .
When, if ever, will he come clean and fess up to his mistakes? He seems to be making baby steps^?