Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Scott Creighton Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > SC: Genuine marks are almost certainly those
> that
> > > Vyse writes about in his private journal,
> > > (discovered upon his second visit) on the
> east
> > > wall of Wellington's Chamber
. . .
> >
> > You mean the ones
> you told your podcast dupes Vyse
> > wrote weren’t there?
> >
> > Almost certainly.
> >
> > > EDIT TO ADD: And, as I have oft stated - if
> just
> > > ONE mark in those chambers is found to have
> been
> > > fraudulently placed then it automatically
> calls
> > > everything therein into question
> (excepting
> > > those already accepted as genuine from other
> > > evidence e.g. Vyse's private journal). . . .
> >
> > Reminder:
> >
> > “For the avoidance of doubt, it's my view,
> and
> > always has been [sic], that there are some
> marks
> > in these 'Vyse Chambers' that I believe are
> > probably genuine and others that are probably
> not
> > so. We just have to figure out which is
> which.”
> >
> > To which we now find added:
> >
> > “. . . (excepting those already accepted as
> > genuine from other evidence e.g. Vyse's private
> > journal) . . .”
> >
> > Hypocrisy turned up to 11.
> >
> > M.
>
> The clearest example is this one:
>
> http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1097177,1097443
>
> “. . . Now when you go to look at
> his private journal, as I did, I managed to track
> his private journal, his handwritten notes,
> they’re located in a small archive library, in
> the North of London. I found these and I was
> reading through them—I managed to find the first
> chamber that Colonel Vyse entered was
> Wellington’s Chamber. This is the first chamber
> that he managed to blast his way into, with
> gunpowder. Now when he, visited this chamber on
> two occasions, on the second occasion, he writes,
> in his, private notes, that, there was nothing in
> the chamber that looked like hieroglyphics. Now
> when Vyse uses the term ‘hieroglyphics’ he’s
> talking about these quarry marks (Right), and
> these are the marks that the gangs would paint,
> their gang name or crew name, onto their block
> that they cut—they took pride in these, so they
> made sure that their gang name was stamped on
> these blocks or painted, onto these blocks. So
> Vyse tells us that there’s nothing, in, this
> chamber—Wellington’s Chamber—that looked
> like that—and then, three years later, we find
> that his published account, of the very same
> night, Richard, the very same night—remember
> this guy’s want to find a cartouche. He writes
> in his published book, ‘On this night we found
> the quarry marks.’ (In Wellington’s Chamber.)
> In Wellington’s Chamber. (The same chamber that
> he said he found nothing in earlier.) Yes. In his
> private notes, his private thoughts, of his time
> at Giza—so we know that’s authentic, that’s
> his real thoughts—he found nothing—and then in
> his published book he says he found the quarry
> marks—and then when you go and look to see,
> well, what quarry marks had he found, he got, one
> of his assistants to basically copy, the quarry
> marks that were allegedly painted in these
> chambers. I mean you go and look at the quarry
> marks from Wellington’s Chamber, what do you
> find? A cartouche—and that’s the very thing
> Vyse wanted to find, and the remarkable thing is
> in his private notes there’s not a single
> mention of him finding a cartouche, and that was
> the very thing he wanted to find. (Right, so that
> . . .) There’s no ‘eureka’ moment, nothing,
> completely silent, and yet he found a cartouche
> allegedly. (Very suspicious, very
> suspicious.)”

>
> M.

Hmmm, what are we to make of such?

So between 25th January 2019 the date of SC rather exuberant declaration on "Beyond Reality" show were he declares Vyses private journal says there wasn't any marks in Wellington's Chamber (with hearty chortles ) and now , after being challenged reminded he believes some graffiti /glyphs are probably genuine (apparently always has?), that he chooses the very ones, which for years he has gained trash radio mileage out of declaring they must have been faked?

Does this mean he has changed his mind and learnt something?
Or
Does it mean there are at least two made up stories, one for more knowledgeable folk on GHMB and a different story for the naïve listeners of some wacko CT podcast? ( Oh! and LonelyAngel)

Why choose Wellington's as the "genuine" is it because they are the least legible and least damming to his
HOAX? Or just now scrambling to find some answer as to what he thinks is genuine?

"Operations" is rather clear that on March 30th 1837 Vyse went into Wellington twice and he makes clear it was only in the evening after Mr Perring and Mr Mash had arrived did they find or confirm they were hieroglyphics. Seems to me Vyse knew so little about the subject that Perring was the more knowledgeable on hieroglyphics?

Somewhere in Operations Vyse does state that something to the effect that... it would be good to find a cartouche to date the pyramid …..but his and all the growing teams interest seems far more emphatically interested in other projects seemingly with the aim of finding a tomb or burial place rather than a cartouche: eg The air shaft clearance, Campbells Tomb, The removable of debris to find the entrance. The hieroglyphs found on backing blocks on South side, barely rate a mention or description.

Again clearly all 7 Horus name renderings must be genuine. No one then (1837) could have forged them!
Why fake 10 Khnum Khuf cartouches if the 'grand dastardly plan' was to place the more identifiable least controversial - Khufu cartouche?


Hilariously, Creighton suggests to his listeners they should look here for more information.!!!
(If you do, the I recommend search for contributions by contributor and expert and scholar "Martin Stower" on the subject!)

Edit to help LA find something to snipe at!!!!


Edit 2: I also find the earlier SC rant interesting with regard to the inference of "three years after".

Does SC realise that between 30th March and by the 17th April 1837 that Perring's drawings had ben made and sent on 20th March 1837 to Mr Hamilton at the British Museum. Also (without counting precisely) it seems at least a dozen dignitaries had examined the marks in the month of April 1837. There is no relevance to the comment that the book was written 3 yrs later as clearly he was relying on the journal notes themselves in writing the book....


" the very same night, Richard", ... LOL!!!



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 17-Feb-19 21:04 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Pyramid Hoax Observations 2512 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 03:51
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 341 Racho 05-Feb-19 03:55
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 318 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 04:16
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 375 DUNE 05-Feb-19 08:22
Who was Thoth? serious question... 309 Racho 05-Feb-19 16:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 309 LonelyAngel 05-Feb-19 20:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 305 cladking 05-Feb-19 20:29
Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 263 Racho 05-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 264 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:01
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 273 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:02
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 220 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:52
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 228 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:01
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 242 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:23
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 264 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 235 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:46
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 173 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:26
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 201 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 02:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 180 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 170 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:48
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 169 cladking 06-Feb-19 14:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 194 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 14:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 214 Lee McGiffen 08-Feb-19 10:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 196 cladking 08-Feb-19 15:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 190 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 15:29
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 160 cladking 08-Feb-19 16:42
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 276 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 198 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:10
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 197 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 200 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:25
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 213 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:36
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 148 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 18:35
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 153 cladking 08-Feb-19 17:19
Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 187 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 20:17
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 222 cladking 08-Feb-19 21:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 174 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 22:14
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 148 cladking 08-Feb-19 22:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 151 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 176 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 22:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 215 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 163 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 06:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 168 cladking 09-Feb-19 15:28
gunpowder 149 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:08
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 162 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 21:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 134 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 166 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:41
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 160 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 166 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 153 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 22:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 137 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 157 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:47
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 151 cladking 10-Feb-19 01:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 152 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 136 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:26
Research methodology 140 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:06
Happy news on the Furphy front 156 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 185 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 187 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 18:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 153 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 163 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 20:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 153 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:21
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 136 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 235 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 13:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 159 Warwick 11-Feb-19 18:02
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 174 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 19:03
The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 170 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:05
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 162 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:25
Elbonian methodology 136 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 193 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:38
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 142 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:46
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 156 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 141 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:52
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 178 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 148 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:08
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 164 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:19
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 148 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 150 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:28
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 144 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:33
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 166 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:36
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 151 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:47
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 170 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:48
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 149 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:55
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 163 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 20:04
Scott wipes the floor with them again 162 LonelyAngel 11-Feb-19 21:03
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 212 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 21:31
Get the hell out of dodge and go write another book... 170 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:04
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 171 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 22:08
Aye - facts are chiels that winna ding. 152 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:15
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 168 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 152 cladking 11-Feb-19 23:09
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 162 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 23:35
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 150 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 11:07
Oooooh Scott... 173 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 11:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 174 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:06
Re: Oooooh Scott... 182 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 14:40
Re: Oooooh Scott... 163 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Oooooh Scott... 151 Corpuscles 13-Feb-19 22:01
Re: Oooooh Scott... 158 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:11
Re: Oooooh Scott... 144 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 151 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:45
Re: Oooooh Scott... 158 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:24
Re: Oooooh Scott... 153 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 19:33
Re: Oooooh Scott... 151 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:02
Re: Oooooh Scott... 121 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:55
Re: Oooooh Scott... 140 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:59
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 162 Warwick 11-Feb-19 22:20
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 168 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:45
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 198 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 15:12
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 158 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:21
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 166 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 16:44
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 140 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:18
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 145 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:31
Angel wishes to wallow in the past 161 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:58
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 158 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 17:58
A Perfect example of Obfuscation 148 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:00
The Charlatan and the Truckler 178 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:25
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 187 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-19 23:15
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 180 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 01:28
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 260 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 11:26
excerpt from the New Age Dictionary 155 Warwick 14-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 149 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 139 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 21:07
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 172 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 21:34
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 132 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 15:52
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 151 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 22:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 156 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 23:02
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 183 Morten 15-Feb-19 12:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 179 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 14:19
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 189 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 16:21
Vyse's Journal and the Mason's Marks 144 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:23
His podcast lies 179 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 20:00
Re: His podcast lies 126 Warwick 17-Feb-19 16:44
Re: His podcast lies 147 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 16:54
Re: His podcast lies 143 Warwick 17-Feb-19 18:06
Re: His podcast lies 138 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 20:07
Re: His podcast lies 138 Warwick 17-Feb-19 20:28
Re: His podcast lies 136 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 21:30
Re: His podcast lies 150 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 22:00
Re: His podcast lies 148 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:57
Re: His podcast lies 197 Warwick 18-Feb-19 16:47
Re: His podcast lies 132 Warwick 17-Feb-19 22:07
Re: His podcast lies 160 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 21:46
Re: His podcast lies 129 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:47
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 166 sfbey 14-Feb-19 16:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 154 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 17:40
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 147 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:10
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 146 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 18:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 128 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 145 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 19:09
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 134 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:35
curious minds want to know 144 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:56
Re: curious minds want to know 168 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: curious minds want to know 135 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:13
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 153 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 142 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 142 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 17:42
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 140 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 162 Corpuscles 16-Feb-19 01:02
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 164 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:14
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 151 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 153 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:04
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 152 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:20
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 173 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 19:17
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 158 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:22
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 151 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:59
It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 149 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:17
Re: It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 183 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 21:16
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 160 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 20:12
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 143 Warwick 10-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 150 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 20:49
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 143 Warwick 10-Feb-19 21:15
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 175 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 23:40
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 158 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 11:00
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 229 Corpuscles 12-Feb-19 01:03
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 152 Merrell 12-Feb-19 09:44
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 227 Martin Stower 12-Feb-19 12:00
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 164 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 22:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 167 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:45
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 204 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 138 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 23:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 171 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 161 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:24
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 145 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:30
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 169 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:34
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 153 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:39
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 167 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:22
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 156 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 150 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:28
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 136 Barbelo 09-Feb-19 23:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 171 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 157 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:58
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 150 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:20
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 172 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 149 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:35
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 154 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 160 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 01:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 161 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:16
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 169 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 01:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 173 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 172 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 214 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:29
Intro for new tv show 155 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:31
Re: Intro for new tv show 156 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 10:39
Re: Intro for new tv show 139 Warwick 09-Feb-19 19:58
Re: Intro for new tv show 158 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Intro for new tv show 138 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:15
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 198 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:13
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 166 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:19
The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 218 Barbelo 06-Feb-19 04:16
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 180 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:57
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 151 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 17:53
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 140 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:29
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 145 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:31
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 154 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:48
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 132 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:54
A Soft Cock 165 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:29
Keep it Civil 169 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 09:57
Re: Keep it Civil 170 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 10:48
Re: Keep it Civil 176 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 11:38
Re: A Soft Cock 139 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:28
Re: A Soft Cock 208 Barbelo 15-Feb-19 20:31
Re: A Soft Cock 134 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:10
Re: A Soft Cock 182 Barbelo 16-Feb-19 20:44
Re: A Soft Cock 149 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 11:45
Re: A Soft Cock 147 Corpuscles 20-Feb-19 20:19
Re: A Soft Cock 142 Warwick 21-Feb-19 18:01
Re: A Soft Cock 128 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 18:37
Re: A Soft Cock 144 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 18:49
Re: A Soft Cock 136 Warwick 21-Feb-19 19:42
Re: A Soft Cock 139 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:16
Re: A Soft Cock 137 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 20:30
Re: A Soft Cock 141 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:33
Completely Flaccid 162 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 05:59
Re: Completely Flaccid 142 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 12:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 125 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 12:53
Re: Completely Flaccid 159 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 149 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Completely Flaccid 147 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 160 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 14:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 140 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 19:06
Re: Completely Flaccid 152 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 19:17
Re: Completely Flaccid 167 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 22:44
Re: Completely Flaccid 132 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 11:16
Re: Completely Flaccid 148 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:40
Re: Completely Flaccid 164 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 02:35
simply put 128 Warwick 24-Feb-19 16:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 140 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 10:49
Re: Completely Flaccid 136 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 145 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 17:47
Re: Completely Flaccid 136 LonelyAngel 24-Feb-19 15:39
Re: Completely Flaccid 137 Corpuscles 24-Feb-19 15:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 134 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:42
Re: Completely Flaccid 138 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 19:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 129 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 20:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 127 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 21:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 157 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 22:07
factoid 153 Warwick 24-Feb-19 17:03
Re: factoid 135 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:31
Re: factoid 148 Warwick 26-Feb-19 19:39
Re: factoid 136 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 10:09
Re: factoid 173 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 11:00
Re: factoid 126 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 13:35
Re: factoid 174 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 14:33
Re: factoid 143 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:24
Re: factoid 146 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 16:52
Re: factoid 134 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:55
Re: factoid 143 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:11
Re: factoid 146 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 17:18
Re: factoid 163 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:42
Re: factoid 123 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:49
Re: factoid 130 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 13:12
Re: factoid 152 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 13:21
Re: factoid 164 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 15:19
Re: factoid 138 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:11
Dusty? 139 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:05
Re: Dusty? 142 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:52
Re: Dusty? 143 Warwick 28-Feb-19 17:56
Re: Dusty? 167 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 17:59
Re: Dusty? 149 Warwick 28-Feb-19 18:36
Re: Dusty? 148 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 12:05
Re: Dusty? 132 Warwick 01-Mar-19 18:14
Re: Dusty? 136 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 21:57
Re: Dusty? 131 Warwick 01-Mar-19 22:11
Re: Dusty? 138 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 12:58
unbelievable 142 Warwick 02-Mar-19 15:27
Mod Caution > Warwick Off-Topic Posts 138 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:57
I apologise 149 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 16:59
Re: I apologise 203 Warwick 02-Mar-19 17:48
Mod Caution > LonelyAngel Off-Topic Posts 143 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:54
Re: A Soft Cock 163 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 12:09
Re: A Soft Cock 152 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 12:44
Re: A Soft Cock 177 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 13:11
Re: A Soft Cock 157 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 16:02
Re: A Soft Cock 140 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:12
Re: A Soft Cock 131 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 15:53
Re: A Soft Cock 122 Warwick 19-Feb-19 17:37
Re: A Soft Cock 151 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:06
Re: A Soft Cock 138 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:16
Re: A Soft Cock 137 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:23
Re: A Soft Cock 148 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:28
Re: A Soft Cock 168 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:31
Re: A Soft Cock 170 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:40
Re: A Soft Cock 189 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 22:11
Re: A Soft Cock 157 LonelyAngel 20-Feb-19 12:52
Re: A Soft Cock 146 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 18:14
Re: A Soft Cock 124 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:22
Re: A Soft Cock 125 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 210 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 00:46
Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 200 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 06:14
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 196 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:50
I am not surprised at all 171 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 15:41
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 198 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 16:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 229 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 18:10
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 168 cladking 06-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 169 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:00
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 166 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 180 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:51
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 188 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:49
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 160 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 15:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 171 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:10
Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 174 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:07
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 219 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 22:31
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 234 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:12
More .. 175 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 23:00
Re: More .. 163 sfbey 07-Feb-19 23:13
Re: More .. 177 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 23:33
Re: More .. 194 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:01
Re: More .. 179 sfbey 08-Feb-19 02:42
Re: More .. 167 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 00:26
Re: More .. 158 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:26
Re: More .. 163 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 02:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 190 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 23:03
Why is it so IMPORTANT? 195 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 01:45
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 169 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:52
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 183 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:48
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 198 cladking 07-Feb-19 14:30
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 227 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 18:08
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 207 cladking 07-Feb-19 22:27
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 254 Warwick 08-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 200 JuhaS 13-Feb-19 22:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.