Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Martin Stower Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Scott Creighton Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > > SC: Genuine marks are almost certainly those
> that
> > > Vyse writes about in his private journal,
> > > (discovered upon his second visit) on the
> east
> > > wall of Wellington's Chamber
. . .
> >
> > You mean the ones
> you told your podcast dupes Vyse
> > wrote weren’t there?
> >
> > Almost certainly.
> >
> > > EDIT TO ADD: And, as I have oft stated - if
> just
> > > ONE mark in those chambers is found to have
> been
> > > fraudulently placed then it automatically
> calls
> > > everything therein into question
> (excepting
> > > those already accepted as genuine from other
> > > evidence e.g. Vyse's private journal). . . .
> >
> > Reminder:
> >
> > “For the avoidance of doubt, it's my view,
> and
> > always has been [sic], that there are some
> marks
> > in these 'Vyse Chambers' that I believe are
> > probably genuine and others that are probably
> not
> > so. We just have to figure out which is
> which.”
> >
> > To which we now find added:
> >
> > “. . . (excepting those already accepted as
> > genuine from other evidence e.g. Vyse's private
> > journal) . . .”
> >
> > Hypocrisy turned up to 11.
> >
> > M.
>
> The clearest example is this one:
>
> http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1097177,1097443
>
> “. . . Now when you go to look at
> his private journal, as I did, I managed to track
> his private journal, his handwritten notes,
> they’re located in a small archive library, in
> the North of London. I found these and I was
> reading through them—I managed to find the first
> chamber that Colonel Vyse entered was
> Wellington’s Chamber. This is the first chamber
> that he managed to blast his way into, with
> gunpowder. Now when he, visited this chamber on
> two occasions, on the second occasion, he writes,
> in his, private notes, that, there was nothing in
> the chamber that looked like hieroglyphics. Now
> when Vyse uses the term ‘hieroglyphics’ he’s
> talking about these quarry marks (Right), and
> these are the marks that the gangs would paint,
> their gang name or crew name, onto their block
> that they cut—they took pride in these, so they
> made sure that their gang name was stamped on
> these blocks or painted, onto these blocks. So
> Vyse tells us that there’s nothing, in, this
> chamber—Wellington’s Chamber—that looked
> like that—and then, three years later, we find
> that his published account, of the very same
> night, Richard, the very same night—remember
> this guy’s want to find a cartouche. He writes
> in his published book, ‘On this night we found
> the quarry marks.’ (In Wellington’s Chamber.)
> In Wellington’s Chamber. (The same chamber that
> he said he found nothing in earlier.) Yes. In his
> private notes, his private thoughts, of his time
> at Giza—so we know that’s authentic, that’s
> his real thoughts—he found nothing—and then in
> his published book he says he found the quarry
> marks—and then when you go and look to see,
> well, what quarry marks had he found, he got, one
> of his assistants to basically copy, the quarry
> marks that were allegedly painted in these
> chambers. I mean you go and look at the quarry
> marks from Wellington’s Chamber, what do you
> find? A cartouche—and that’s the very thing
> Vyse wanted to find, and the remarkable thing is
> in his private notes there’s not a single
> mention of him finding a cartouche, and that was
> the very thing he wanted to find. (Right, so that
> . . .) There’s no ‘eureka’ moment, nothing,
> completely silent, and yet he found a cartouche
> allegedly. (Very suspicious, very
> suspicious.)”

>
> M.

Hmmm, what are we to make of such?

So between 25th January 2019 the date of SC rather exuberant declaration on "Beyond Reality" show were he declares Vyses private journal says there wasn't any marks in Wellington's Chamber (with hearty chortles ) and now , after being challenged reminded he believes some graffiti /glyphs are probably genuine (apparently always has?), that he chooses the very ones, which for years he has gained trash radio mileage out of declaring they must have been faked?

Does this mean he has changed his mind and learnt something?
Or
Does it mean there are at least two made up stories, one for more knowledgeable folk on GHMB and a different story for the naïve listeners of some wacko CT podcast? ( Oh! and LonelyAngel)

Why choose Wellington's as the "genuine" is it because they are the least legible and least damming to his
HOAX? Or just now scrambling to find some answer as to what he thinks is genuine?

"Operations" is rather clear that on March 30th 1837 Vyse went into Wellington twice and he makes clear it was only in the evening after Mr Perring and Mr Mash had arrived did they find or confirm they were hieroglyphics. Seems to me Vyse knew so little about the subject that Perring was the more knowledgeable on hieroglyphics?

Somewhere in Operations Vyse does state that something to the effect that... it would be good to find a cartouche to date the pyramid …..but his and all the growing teams interest seems far more emphatically interested in other projects seemingly with the aim of finding a tomb or burial place rather than a cartouche: eg The air shaft clearance, Campbells Tomb, The removable of debris to find the entrance. The hieroglyphs found on backing blocks on South side, barely rate a mention or description.

Again clearly all 7 Horus name renderings must be genuine. No one then (1837) could have forged them!
Why fake 10 Khnum Khuf cartouches if the 'grand dastardly plan' was to place the more identifiable least controversial - Khufu cartouche?


Hilariously, Creighton suggests to his listeners they should look here for more information.!!!
(If you do, the I recommend search for contributions by contributor and expert and scholar "Martin Stower" on the subject!)

Edit to help LA find something to snipe at!!!!


Edit 2: I also find the earlier SC rant interesting with regard to the inference of "three years after".

Does SC realise that between 30th March and by the 17th April 1837 that Perring's drawings had ben made and sent on 20th March 1837 to Mr Hamilton at the British Museum. Also (without counting precisely) it seems at least a dozen dignitaries had examined the marks in the month of April 1837. There is no relevance to the comment that the book was written 3 yrs later as clearly he was relying on the journal notes themselves in writing the book....


" the very same night, Richard", ... LOL!!!



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 17-Feb-19 21:04 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Pyramid Hoax Observations 2420 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 03:51
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 302 Racho 05-Feb-19 03:55
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 274 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 04:16
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 318 DUNE 05-Feb-19 08:22
Who was Thoth? serious question... 272 Racho 05-Feb-19 16:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 262 LonelyAngel 05-Feb-19 20:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 265 cladking 05-Feb-19 20:29
Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 221 Racho 05-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 227 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:01
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 230 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:02
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 167 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:52
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 193 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:01
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 204 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:23
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 212 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 185 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:46
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 148 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:26
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 158 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 02:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 154 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 140 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:48
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 141 cladking 06-Feb-19 14:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 147 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 14:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 170 Lee McGiffen 08-Feb-19 10:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 155 cladking 08-Feb-19 15:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 160 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 15:29
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 127 cladking 08-Feb-19 16:42
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 221 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 162 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:10
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 160 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 163 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:25
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 169 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:36
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 123 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 18:35
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 125 cladking 08-Feb-19 17:19
Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 152 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 20:17
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 184 cladking 08-Feb-19 21:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 138 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 22:14
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 125 cladking 08-Feb-19 22:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 124 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 141 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 22:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 187 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 134 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 06:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 134 cladking 09-Feb-19 15:28
gunpowder 122 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:08
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 119 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 21:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 106 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 129 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:41
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 110 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 139 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 125 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 22:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 104 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 129 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:47
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 124 cladking 10-Feb-19 01:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 123 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 111 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:26
Research methodology 115 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:06
Happy news on the Furphy front 122 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 157 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 147 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 18:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 123 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 137 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 20:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 126 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:21
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 108 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 176 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 13:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 127 Warwick 11-Feb-19 18:02
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 138 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 19:03
The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 122 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:05
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 118 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:25
Elbonian methodology 109 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 166 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:38
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 115 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:46
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 127 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 118 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:52
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 140 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 120 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:08
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 132 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:19
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 117 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 127 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:28
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 118 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:33
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 139 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:36
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 120 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:47
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 140 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:48
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 117 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:55
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 130 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 20:04
Scott wipes the floor with them again 134 LonelyAngel 11-Feb-19 21:03
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 167 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 21:31
Get the hell out of dodge and go write another book... 135 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:04
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 140 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 22:08
Aye - facts are chiels that winna ding. 125 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:15
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 137 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 124 cladking 11-Feb-19 23:09
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 133 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 23:35
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 123 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 11:07
Oooooh Scott... 141 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 11:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 131 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:06
Re: Oooooh Scott... 137 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 14:40
Re: Oooooh Scott... 131 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Oooooh Scott... 115 Corpuscles 13-Feb-19 22:01
Re: Oooooh Scott... 123 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:11
Re: Oooooh Scott... 118 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 120 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:45
Re: Oooooh Scott... 129 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:24
Re: Oooooh Scott... 115 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 19:33
Re: Oooooh Scott... 109 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:02
Re: Oooooh Scott... 96 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:55
Re: Oooooh Scott... 109 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:59
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 137 Warwick 11-Feb-19 22:20
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 136 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:45
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 163 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 15:12
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 119 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:21
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 130 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 16:44
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 111 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:18
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 114 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:31
Angel wishes to wallow in the past 121 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:58
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 125 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 17:58
A Perfect example of Obfuscation 122 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:00
The Charlatan and the Truckler 149 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:25
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 160 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-19 23:15
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 155 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 01:28
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 217 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 11:26
excerpt from the New Age Dictionary 119 Warwick 14-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 119 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 116 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 21:07
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 129 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 21:34
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 111 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 15:52
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 119 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 22:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 128 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 23:02
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 136 Morten 15-Feb-19 12:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 142 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 14:19
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 137 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 16:21
Vyse's Journal and the Mason's Marks 114 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:23
His podcast lies 138 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 20:00
Re: His podcast lies 103 Warwick 17-Feb-19 16:44
Re: His podcast lies 113 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 16:54
Re: His podcast lies 113 Warwick 17-Feb-19 18:06
Re: His podcast lies 106 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 20:07
Re: His podcast lies 109 Warwick 17-Feb-19 20:28
Re: His podcast lies 105 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 21:30
Re: His podcast lies 121 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 22:00
Re: His podcast lies 121 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:57
Re: His podcast lies 156 Warwick 18-Feb-19 16:47
Re: His podcast lies 108 Warwick 17-Feb-19 22:07
Re: His podcast lies 131 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 21:46
Re: His podcast lies 104 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:47
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 133 sfbey 14-Feb-19 16:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 120 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 17:40
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 117 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:10
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 117 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 18:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 103 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 121 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 19:09
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 109 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:35
curious minds want to know 115 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:56
Re: curious minds want to know 132 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: curious minds want to know 102 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:13
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 122 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 113 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 108 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 17:42
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 112 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 133 Corpuscles 16-Feb-19 01:02
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 121 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:14
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 123 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 126 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:04
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 117 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:20
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 129 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 19:17
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 130 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:22
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 126 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:59
It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 125 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:17
Re: It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 149 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 21:16
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 124 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 20:12
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 115 Warwick 10-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 120 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 20:49
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 119 Warwick 10-Feb-19 21:15
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 145 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 23:40
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 129 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 11:00
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 189 Corpuscles 12-Feb-19 01:03
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 122 Merrell 12-Feb-19 09:44
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 190 Martin Stower 12-Feb-19 12:00
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 139 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 22:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 124 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:45
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 163 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 112 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 23:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 137 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 131 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:24
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 121 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:30
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 138 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:34
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 124 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:39
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 136 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:22
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 133 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 120 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:28
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 107 Barbelo 09-Feb-19 23:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 134 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 119 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:58
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 127 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:20
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 136 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 122 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:35
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 120 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 128 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 01:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 128 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:16
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 137 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 01:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 143 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 114 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 168 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:29
Intro for new tv show 125 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:31
Re: Intro for new tv show 123 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 10:39
Re: Intro for new tv show 109 Warwick 09-Feb-19 19:58
Re: Intro for new tv show 121 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Intro for new tv show 106 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:15
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 157 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:13
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 139 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:19
The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 173 Barbelo 06-Feb-19 04:16
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 151 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:57
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 123 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 17:53
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 111 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:29
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 120 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:31
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 123 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:48
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 109 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:54
A Soft Cock 137 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:29
Keep it Civil 138 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 09:57
Re: Keep it Civil 139 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 10:48
Re: Keep it Civil 147 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 11:38
Re: A Soft Cock 110 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:28
Re: A Soft Cock 152 Barbelo 15-Feb-19 20:31
Re: A Soft Cock 106 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:10
Re: A Soft Cock 144 Barbelo 16-Feb-19 20:44
Re: A Soft Cock 119 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 11:45
Re: A Soft Cock 121 Corpuscles 20-Feb-19 20:19
Re: A Soft Cock 111 Warwick 21-Feb-19 18:01
Re: A Soft Cock 100 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 18:37
Re: A Soft Cock 117 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 18:49
Re: A Soft Cock 99 Warwick 21-Feb-19 19:42
Re: A Soft Cock 104 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:16
Re: A Soft Cock 104 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 20:30
Re: A Soft Cock 106 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:33
Completely Flaccid 131 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 05:59
Re: Completely Flaccid 110 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 12:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 100 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 12:53
Re: Completely Flaccid 120 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 109 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Completely Flaccid 112 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 111 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 14:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 112 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 19:06
Re: Completely Flaccid 113 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 19:17
Re: Completely Flaccid 141 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 22:44
Re: Completely Flaccid 102 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 11:16
Re: Completely Flaccid 116 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:40
Re: Completely Flaccid 125 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 02:35
simply put 102 Warwick 24-Feb-19 16:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 111 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 10:49
Re: Completely Flaccid 102 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 118 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 17:47
Re: Completely Flaccid 108 LonelyAngel 24-Feb-19 15:39
Re: Completely Flaccid 108 Corpuscles 24-Feb-19 15:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 104 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:42
Re: Completely Flaccid 109 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 19:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 102 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 20:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 101 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 21:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 120 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 22:07
factoid 118 Warwick 24-Feb-19 17:03
Re: factoid 107 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:31
Re: factoid 109 Warwick 26-Feb-19 19:39
Re: factoid 106 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 10:09
Re: factoid 130 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 11:00
Re: factoid 99 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 13:35
Re: factoid 130 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 14:33
Re: factoid 104 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:24
Re: factoid 106 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 16:52
Re: factoid 104 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:55
Re: factoid 114 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:11
Re: factoid 112 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 17:18
Re: factoid 128 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:42
Re: factoid 91 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:49
Re: factoid 99 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 13:12
Re: factoid 111 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 13:21
Re: factoid 107 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 15:19
Re: factoid 103 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:11
Dusty? 100 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:05
Re: Dusty? 112 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:52
Re: Dusty? 103 Warwick 28-Feb-19 17:56
Re: Dusty? 120 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 17:59
Re: Dusty? 117 Warwick 28-Feb-19 18:36
Re: Dusty? 114 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 12:05
Re: Dusty? 110 Warwick 01-Mar-19 18:14
Re: Dusty? 107 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 21:57
Re: Dusty? 106 Warwick 01-Mar-19 22:11
Re: Dusty? 108 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 12:58
unbelievable 110 Warwick 02-Mar-19 15:27
Mod Caution > Warwick Off-Topic Posts 112 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:57
I apologise 100 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 16:59
Re: I apologise 170 Warwick 02-Mar-19 17:48
Mod Caution > LonelyAngel Off-Topic Posts 108 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:54
Re: A Soft Cock 128 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 12:09
Re: A Soft Cock 116 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 12:44
Re: A Soft Cock 144 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 13:11
Re: A Soft Cock 110 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 16:02
Re: A Soft Cock 118 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:12
Re: A Soft Cock 108 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 15:53
Re: A Soft Cock 97 Warwick 19-Feb-19 17:37
Re: A Soft Cock 113 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:06
Re: A Soft Cock 105 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:16
Re: A Soft Cock 100 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:23
Re: A Soft Cock 107 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:28
Re: A Soft Cock 115 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:31
Re: A Soft Cock 120 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:40
Re: A Soft Cock 143 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 22:11
Re: A Soft Cock 122 LonelyAngel 20-Feb-19 12:52
Re: A Soft Cock 107 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 18:14
Re: A Soft Cock 99 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:22
Re: A Soft Cock 101 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 170 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 00:46
Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 166 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 06:14
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 160 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:50
I am not surprised at all 146 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 15:41
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 166 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 16:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 173 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 18:10
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 144 cladking 06-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 137 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:00
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 130 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 145 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:51
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 145 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:49
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 125 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 15:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 137 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:10
Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 137 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:07
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 170 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 22:31
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 177 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:12
More .. 132 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 23:00
Re: More .. 121 sfbey 07-Feb-19 23:13
Re: More .. 141 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 23:33
Re: More .. 157 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:01
Re: More .. 145 sfbey 08-Feb-19 02:42
Re: More .. 135 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 00:26
Re: More .. 131 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:26
Re: More .. 128 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 02:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 147 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 23:03
Why is it so IMPORTANT? 161 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 01:45
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 146 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:52
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 156 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:48
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 157 cladking 07-Feb-19 14:30
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 191 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 18:08
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 178 cladking 07-Feb-19 22:27
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 214 Warwick 08-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 173 JuhaS 13-Feb-19 22:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.