Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> SC: And much of our ancient history is based on
> second/third hand accounts i.e. hearsay. The
> writings of Manetho, for example, are largely lost
> to us with only fragments of his work passed on by
> the likes of Josephus, Eusebius etc. So we have
> second/third hand accounts of ancient history. Are
> you saying we dismiss it all because it is
> essentially hearsay?
>
> No, we don't do that. What we do is try and find
> evidence to support those second/third hand
> accounts of Manetho's writings in order to
> corroborate and validate as much of it as we
> possibly can.
>
> And that is what I have done in HOAX. I have
> looked in detail at the Walter Allen logbook
> account, seeking clues elsewhere in that text that
> might help us to determine whether it has
> presented a true historical account (or not).
> Allen's logbook account is no longer, imo, merely
> 'hearsay' as it is validated by other statements
> within the account and corroborated by other
> evidence elsewhere.
>
> SC
The body of evidence that leads to the conclusion that G1 was built by Khufu is monumental. It takes years for any one person to absorb even part of it. Manetho is just one of the 100's of template overlays ( as you very well know but don't mind not sharing with your readers). as are the various marks found above the KC. I could go on but it's far easier to read the 1000's of posts we and your puppets have exchanged over the years.
The search engine here is an OPEN BOOK.
Warwick
-------------------------------------------------------
>
>Quote
WLN: hearsay is hearsay.
> SC: And much of our ancient history is based on
> second/third hand accounts i.e. hearsay. The
> writings of Manetho, for example, are largely lost
> to us with only fragments of his work passed on by
> the likes of Josephus, Eusebius etc. So we have
> second/third hand accounts of ancient history. Are
> you saying we dismiss it all because it is
> essentially hearsay?
>
> No, we don't do that. What we do is try and find
> evidence to support those second/third hand
> accounts of Manetho's writings in order to
> corroborate and validate as much of it as we
> possibly can.
>
> And that is what I have done in HOAX. I have
> looked in detail at the Walter Allen logbook
> account, seeking clues elsewhere in that text that
> might help us to determine whether it has
> presented a true historical account (or not).
> Allen's logbook account is no longer, imo, merely
> 'hearsay' as it is validated by other statements
> within the account and corroborated by other
> evidence elsewhere.
>
> SC
The body of evidence that leads to the conclusion that G1 was built by Khufu is monumental. It takes years for any one person to absorb even part of it. Manetho is just one of the 100's of template overlays ( as you very well know but don't mind not sharing with your readers). as are the various marks found above the KC. I could go on but it's far easier to read the 1000's of posts we and your puppets have exchanged over the years.
The search engine here is an OPEN BOOK.
Warwick
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.