> Isn't this all simply another furphy? Nothing is
> afoot. Nothing will gain traction. There is no
> need to watch this, or any other, space.
Exactly this is just more deflection and deceit.
Creighton has not, will not, and cannot address any of the criticisms in your OP nor any others added since.
So he picks up a feeble mind like CK comment , pretends he himself is interested in a thorough analysis (even actual science) and tries to pretend ( actually re- contend) that his utter fabricated BS! still has some merit and is worth investigating further. Then appeals to anonymous authority (like "experts" does that sound familiar?) .. and btw stay tuned it will be long and slow, but might happen one day, no promises, no details ( but still 'look at me' -SC) !
As if he has any value or credibility left.
There is, no non destructive techniques! Real Egyptologists and Archaeologists know that.
There has to be sufficient organic paint binder present (if ever there) and relatively contamination free.
Creighton and associated CT cronies would be the last persons the Egyptian authorities would allow to mutilate the RC's.
Some interesting articles on the extreme difficulty of dating ochre based painting
First one a very new technique (doesn't or cannot apply to RC's)
Second one older techniques describing difficulty, (again not suitable for RC's)
It has been done, but with extreme difficulty.
Anyway as you know or point out extensive RCD has been carried out on G1 mortar but Creighton doesn't believe the dating!!! He regularly suggests it is 10,000 years or more older. So why would he believe any attempted paint dating?
Furphy. All just more Creighton Bull Sh!t
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09-Feb-19 07:44 by Corpuscles.