I can't promise anything, of course, but there are currently small moves afoot. Not sure if it will gain traction but watch this space. Can't say any more than that.
Why would you want any testing?
(1) If the paint is reconciled to Dynasty 4, there is no hoax and current chronology prevails. Creighton goes down in flames.
(2) If the paint is reconciled to any date other than + - 25 from 1837, Vyse is vindicated. Creighton goes down in flames.
(3) If the paint is reconciled to 1837 or thereabouts, it is a recent addition, but how does this validate your central premise that there is a conspiracy to conceal the true history of Egypt?
It changes nothing with respect to the date of construction of the Great Pyramid.
Isn't this all simply another furphy? Nothing is afoot. Nothing will gain traction. There is no need to watch this, or any other, space.
I wouldn't be surprised if you and your publisher aren't sued for deceptive conduct for engaging in false and misleading advertising with respect to the non existent chemical analysis and high definition photos you claimed were in your book.
Isn't that a hoax?
Is that why you now provide the disclaimer, "I can't promise anything, of course."
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09-Feb-19 11:51 by Barbelo.