Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
SC: Precisely. Whatever way any such properly conducted scientific results go, there will be folks on either side of this particular divide ready to denounce those results. Fact is - I have received communication from Egyptologists and archaeologists who, having read HOAX (and my subsequent articles), believe I have presented sufficient questions around these painted marks and are of the opinion that the marks now need to be scientifically tested (using non-destructive means if possible).
I can't promise anything, of course, but there are currently small moves afoot. Not sure if it will gain traction but watch this space. Can't say any more than that.
SC
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08-Feb-19 17:09 by Scott Creighton.
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Quote
CK: Just because we all ignore evidence that doesn't agree is no reason to fail to gather the evidence.
SC: Precisely. Whatever way any such properly conducted scientific results go, there will be folks on either side of this particular divide ready to denounce those results. Fact is - I have received communication from Egyptologists and archaeologists who, having read HOAX (and my subsequent articles), believe I have presented sufficient questions around these painted marks and are of the opinion that the marks now need to be scientifically tested (using non-destructive means if possible).
I can't promise anything, of course, but there are currently small moves afoot. Not sure if it will gain traction but watch this space. Can't say any more than that.
SC
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08-Feb-19 17:09 by Scott Creighton.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.