Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
Quote

Hans: How was Goyon and Ginsells builders
> mark explained away?
>
> SC: Can you explain exactly how these marks found
> outside G1 actually prove (beyond
> reasonable doubt)
that the painted marks allegedly
> discovered inside G1 must therefore be
> authentic? How exactly does that work? Or are we
> just assuming that because some of the signs (what
> was it Hermione said) - ah yes - are "comparable
> with" each other then they must all be
> authentic? Really? How so?
>
> SC

Quote
Scott Creighton
then they must all be authentic? Really? How so?

I note you appear to be having great difficulty with the concept. Based on repeated similar questions to poster Merrell, now to Hanslune, and apparently someone called Hermione.

I would be surprised if you do not still have your infamous cited "Art Expert" Jon Snape's email address. Perhaps you could drop him a line and enquire as to how older art works are authenticated or falsified (where there is question of the original artist responsible)? I don't expect you to believe me (I do not have a degree or Masters in Art), but essentially the essence is that;... known (beyond reasonable doubt) authentic artworks are compared to the subject in question.

Similarly in Classical Philology, where authentication and dating of written language is concerned then the whole available body of such language is studied to determine patterns , development over time, etc. I feel sure you ought know this already as you have already presented your amateur views on the orientation of hieratic numerals with or without Ra or day symbol.

You are on record very recently of suggesting that some of the "marks" in the Relieving Chambers ("Vyse Chambers")of G1 are "probably" genuine.

Quote
Scott Creighton February 04, 2019 01:01PM
SC: I discussed this in a long, private conversation with Robert in August 2017, so after the youtube link you gave. For the avoidance of doubt, it's my view, and always has been, that there are some marks in these 'Vyse Chambers' that I believe are probably genuine and others that are probably not so. We just have to figure out which is which.

I also note you questions include the word prove or proof. It ought not be lost to any sensible unbiased reader that this is merely weasling words and attempt to place the burden of proof on others to authenticate, when you have completely failed in your challenge to "marks" (hieroglyphics) authenticity to prove anything.

As noted in the OP of this thread the claims of hard evidence on the back cover are not included in the book. Complete absolute , printed in ink, fraud.

Most your so called "evidence" in 'Hoax' is focused on the cartouche of Khufu in Campbells Chamber.
Some discussion or conjecture is made on the other cartouches.

In order that your underlying motive, to discredit the accepted age of G1 or mislead others to assume such, then Vyse and team would have had to forge all of them.

As Merrell provided to you recently, before your harping dummy spit repeated questions:

Quote

Seven blocks of masonry with the king’s Horus name, Medjedu (Hr-mDdw)
Ten blocks of masonry with the king’s full name, Khnum-Khuf (Xnmw-xwf)
Two blocks of masonry with the king’s abbreviated name, Khufu (xwfw)
In fact, the spatial arrangement of the graffiti allows us to determine which crews were responsible for specific parts of the relieving chambers as they were being built (ibid: 127). These phyles left us no doubt the great monument they were building was for their king, Khufu. [ancientneareast.org]

Now you know for certain that Vyse and team had no such capacity to forge such in 1837. Nor any reason to highlight the confusion or dispute , the at the time dispute, as to the identity of Khnum - Khuf. Nor the yet to be absolutely confirmed Horus name.
So you therefore to further weasel and delude others you borrow Alan Alford's idea of a secret cache of documents from which they copied such forgeries, without much attention drawn to such inanity, nor explanation of how Vyse and team were able to read and understand such fictitious document anyway and/or a motive go to so much effort and RISK when in their very hands you claim they held an invaluable document describing a major construction project for King Khufu which has never been seen outside of your and Alfords imagination!

So you italicise "all" If any one of those cartouches are genuine then the motive for Vyse disappears as if he could forge them he could read whether they were appropriate inclusions or not and would have no reason to risk discovery. In the last 180 years there has only been a few loons who have gone to print even challenging it. Neither of them experts in Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics.

You have painted yourself into a corner, and now your only weaselling way out is to allude to a challenge of the authenticity collective extant body of 4thDynasty writings , including boat pits, Goyen, etc etc.

You demand proof, but have given none yourself.

What have you got to say ?

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Pyramid Hoax Observations 2422 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 03:51
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 304 Racho 05-Feb-19 03:55
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 275 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 04:16
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 319 DUNE 05-Feb-19 08:22
Who was Thoth? serious question... 274 Racho 05-Feb-19 16:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 265 LonelyAngel 05-Feb-19 20:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 265 cladking 05-Feb-19 20:29
Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 222 Racho 05-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 228 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:01
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 231 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:02
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 167 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:52
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 194 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:01
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 206 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:23
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 213 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 187 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:46
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 148 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:26
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 159 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 02:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 154 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 140 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:48
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 142 cladking 06-Feb-19 14:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 147 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 14:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 171 Lee McGiffen 08-Feb-19 10:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 155 cladking 08-Feb-19 15:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 161 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 15:29
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 128 cladking 08-Feb-19 16:42
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 222 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 162 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:10
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 161 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 164 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:25
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 169 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:36
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 124 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 18:35
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 125 cladking 08-Feb-19 17:19
Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 152 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 20:17
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 187 cladking 08-Feb-19 21:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 139 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 22:14
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 125 cladking 08-Feb-19 22:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 124 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 141 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 22:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 188 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 135 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 06:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 135 cladking 09-Feb-19 15:28
gunpowder 122 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:08
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 119 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 21:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 107 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 130 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:41
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 110 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 139 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 125 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 22:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 104 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 129 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:47
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 125 cladking 10-Feb-19 01:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 123 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 111 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:26
Research methodology 115 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:06
Happy news on the Furphy front 123 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 157 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 147 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 18:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 123 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 137 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 20:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 126 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:21
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 109 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 177 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 13:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 128 Warwick 11-Feb-19 18:02
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 138 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 19:03
The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 122 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:05
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 119 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:25
Elbonian methodology 109 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 166 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:38
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 115 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:46
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 127 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 119 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:52
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 140 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 120 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:08
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 132 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:19
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 117 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 128 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:28
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 118 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:33
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 139 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:36
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 120 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:47
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 140 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:48
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 117 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:55
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 130 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 20:04
Scott wipes the floor with them again 134 LonelyAngel 11-Feb-19 21:03
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 167 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 21:31
Get the hell out of dodge and go write another book... 136 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:04
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 140 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 22:08
Aye - facts are chiels that winna ding. 125 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:15
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 137 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 124 cladking 11-Feb-19 23:09
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 133 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 23:35
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 123 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 11:07
Oooooh Scott... 141 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 11:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 131 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:06
Re: Oooooh Scott... 137 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 14:40
Re: Oooooh Scott... 132 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Oooooh Scott... 116 Corpuscles 13-Feb-19 22:01
Re: Oooooh Scott... 123 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:11
Re: Oooooh Scott... 118 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 121 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:45
Re: Oooooh Scott... 131 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:24
Re: Oooooh Scott... 116 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 19:33
Re: Oooooh Scott... 109 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:02
Re: Oooooh Scott... 97 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:55
Re: Oooooh Scott... 110 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:59
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 137 Warwick 11-Feb-19 22:20
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 137 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:45
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 163 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 15:12
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 120 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:21
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 130 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 16:44
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 111 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:18
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 114 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:31
Angel wishes to wallow in the past 121 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:58
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 126 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 17:58
A Perfect example of Obfuscation 123 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:00
The Charlatan and the Truckler 149 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:25
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 161 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-19 23:15
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 156 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 01:28
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 218 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 11:26
excerpt from the New Age Dictionary 119 Warwick 14-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 119 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 116 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 21:07
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 130 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 21:34
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 111 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 15:52
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 119 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 22:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 129 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 23:02
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 138 Morten 15-Feb-19 12:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 143 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 14:19
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 137 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 16:21
Vyse's Journal and the Mason's Marks 114 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:23
His podcast lies 139 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 20:00
Re: His podcast lies 103 Warwick 17-Feb-19 16:44
Re: His podcast lies 113 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 16:54
Re: His podcast lies 114 Warwick 17-Feb-19 18:06
Re: His podcast lies 107 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 20:07
Re: His podcast lies 110 Warwick 17-Feb-19 20:28
Re: His podcast lies 105 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 21:30
Re: His podcast lies 121 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 22:00
Re: His podcast lies 121 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:57
Re: His podcast lies 157 Warwick 18-Feb-19 16:47
Re: His podcast lies 108 Warwick 17-Feb-19 22:07
Re: His podcast lies 132 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 21:46
Re: His podcast lies 104 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:47
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 133 sfbey 14-Feb-19 16:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 120 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 17:40
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 118 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:10
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 118 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 18:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 104 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 121 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 19:09
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 109 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:35
curious minds want to know 115 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:56
Re: curious minds want to know 133 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: curious minds want to know 103 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:13
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 122 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 113 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 108 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 17:42
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 112 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 133 Corpuscles 16-Feb-19 01:02
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 122 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:14
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 124 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 127 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:04
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 117 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:20
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 131 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 19:17
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 130 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:22
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 126 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:59
It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 125 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:17
Re: It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 149 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 21:16
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 124 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 20:12
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 116 Warwick 10-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 120 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 20:49
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 119 Warwick 10-Feb-19 21:15
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 145 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 23:40
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 130 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 11:00
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 190 Corpuscles 12-Feb-19 01:03
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 122 Merrell 12-Feb-19 09:44
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 191 Martin Stower 12-Feb-19 12:00
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 139 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 22:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 124 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:45
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 163 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 113 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 23:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 138 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 131 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:24
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 121 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:30
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 138 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:34
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 124 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:39
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 136 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:22
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 133 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 120 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:28
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 107 Barbelo 09-Feb-19 23:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 134 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 119 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:58
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 127 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:20
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 136 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 122 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:35
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 120 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 128 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 01:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 128 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:16
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 138 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 01:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 143 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 114 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 170 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:29
Intro for new tv show 126 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:31
Re: Intro for new tv show 124 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 10:39
Re: Intro for new tv show 109 Warwick 09-Feb-19 19:58
Re: Intro for new tv show 121 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Intro for new tv show 107 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:15
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 158 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:13
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 140 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:19
The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 173 Barbelo 06-Feb-19 04:16
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 151 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:57
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 123 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 17:53
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 112 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:29
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 120 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:31
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 123 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:48
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 109 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:54
A Soft Cock 138 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:29
Keep it Civil 138 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 09:57
Re: Keep it Civil 139 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 10:48
Re: Keep it Civil 147 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 11:38
Re: A Soft Cock 110 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:28
Re: A Soft Cock 153 Barbelo 15-Feb-19 20:31
Re: A Soft Cock 106 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:10
Re: A Soft Cock 144 Barbelo 16-Feb-19 20:44
Re: A Soft Cock 119 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 11:45
Re: A Soft Cock 121 Corpuscles 20-Feb-19 20:19
Re: A Soft Cock 111 Warwick 21-Feb-19 18:01
Re: A Soft Cock 100 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 18:37
Re: A Soft Cock 117 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 18:49
Re: A Soft Cock 99 Warwick 21-Feb-19 19:42
Re: A Soft Cock 104 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:16
Re: A Soft Cock 104 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 20:30
Re: A Soft Cock 107 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:33
Completely Flaccid 132 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 05:59
Re: Completely Flaccid 111 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 12:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 100 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 12:53
Re: Completely Flaccid 120 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 110 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Completely Flaccid 115 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 112 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 14:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 113 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 19:06
Re: Completely Flaccid 113 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 19:17
Re: Completely Flaccid 141 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 22:44
Re: Completely Flaccid 102 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 11:16
Re: Completely Flaccid 116 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:40
Re: Completely Flaccid 126 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 02:35
simply put 102 Warwick 24-Feb-19 16:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 111 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 10:49
Re: Completely Flaccid 102 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 119 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 17:47
Re: Completely Flaccid 108 LonelyAngel 24-Feb-19 15:39
Re: Completely Flaccid 108 Corpuscles 24-Feb-19 15:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 104 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:42
Re: Completely Flaccid 109 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 19:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 103 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 20:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 102 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 21:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 120 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 22:07
factoid 119 Warwick 24-Feb-19 17:03
Re: factoid 109 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:31
Re: factoid 109 Warwick 26-Feb-19 19:39
Re: factoid 106 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 10:09
Re: factoid 130 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 11:00
Re: factoid 99 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 13:35
Re: factoid 132 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 14:33
Re: factoid 104 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:24
Re: factoid 107 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 16:52
Re: factoid 104 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:55
Re: factoid 114 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:11
Re: factoid 113 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 17:18
Re: factoid 128 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:42
Re: factoid 91 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:49
Re: factoid 99 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 13:12
Re: factoid 112 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 13:21
Re: factoid 107 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 15:19
Re: factoid 103 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:11
Dusty? 102 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:05
Re: Dusty? 112 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:52
Re: Dusty? 103 Warwick 28-Feb-19 17:56
Re: Dusty? 120 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 17:59
Re: Dusty? 118 Warwick 28-Feb-19 18:36
Re: Dusty? 114 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 12:05
Re: Dusty? 110 Warwick 01-Mar-19 18:14
Re: Dusty? 107 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 21:57
Re: Dusty? 106 Warwick 01-Mar-19 22:11
Re: Dusty? 109 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 12:58
unbelievable 111 Warwick 02-Mar-19 15:27
Mod Caution > Warwick Off-Topic Posts 112 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:57
I apologise 100 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 16:59
Re: I apologise 172 Warwick 02-Mar-19 17:48
Mod Caution > LonelyAngel Off-Topic Posts 108 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:54
Re: A Soft Cock 129 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 12:09
Re: A Soft Cock 116 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 12:44
Re: A Soft Cock 144 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 13:11
Re: A Soft Cock 110 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 16:02
Re: A Soft Cock 118 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:12
Re: A Soft Cock 108 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 15:53
Re: A Soft Cock 98 Warwick 19-Feb-19 17:37
Re: A Soft Cock 113 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:06
Re: A Soft Cock 105 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:16
Re: A Soft Cock 101 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:23
Re: A Soft Cock 109 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:28
Re: A Soft Cock 115 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:31
Re: A Soft Cock 120 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:40
Re: A Soft Cock 143 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 22:11
Re: A Soft Cock 123 LonelyAngel 20-Feb-19 12:52
Re: A Soft Cock 107 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 18:14
Re: A Soft Cock 99 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:22
Re: A Soft Cock 101 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 172 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 00:46
Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 166 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 06:14
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 160 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:50
I am not surprised at all 147 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 15:41
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 166 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 16:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 173 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 18:10
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 144 cladking 06-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 137 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:00
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 131 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 145 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:51
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 145 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:49
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 125 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 15:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 137 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:10
Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 138 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:07
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 170 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 22:31
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 177 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:12
More .. 132 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 23:00
Re: More .. 122 sfbey 07-Feb-19 23:13
Re: More .. 142 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 23:33
Re: More .. 157 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:01
Re: More .. 146 sfbey 08-Feb-19 02:42
Re: More .. 136 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 00:26
Re: More .. 131 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:26
Re: More .. 129 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 02:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 148 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 23:03
Why is it so IMPORTANT? 161 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 01:45
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 146 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:52
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 157 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:48
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 159 cladking 07-Feb-19 14:30
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 191 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 18:08
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 178 cladking 07-Feb-19 22:27
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 215 Warwick 08-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 174 JuhaS 13-Feb-19 22:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.