Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In clarifying recent comments on this board
> concerning the Great Pyramid, please consider the
> following.
>
> 1. Scott Creighton's
> book, "The Great Pyramid Hoax" headlines that
> there is a conspiracy to conceal the true history
> of Egypt. Is there?
>
> Apparently Col. Vyse forged a cartouche of Khufu
> in Campbell's Chamber to make it appear that Khufu
> was the builder of the pyramid as no other
> evidence was, or still is, available to verify
> authenticity. Vyse's motive for his alleged
> actions were to achieve some sort of recognition
> and fame in Antiquarian circles.
>
> Let's, for the sake of argument, accept this to be
> true.
>
> At that time, Vyse knew little or nothing of
> Khufu. Or cartouches. How does a wish for some
> peer accolades equate to a conspiracy to conceal
> the true history of Egypt? Did Vyse know of this
> "true history" beforehand?

As noted passim, if Vyse had had the knowledge it would take to pull this off, that knowledge alone would have gained him all the peer accolades he could wish for, without his taking the crazy risk of engaging in forgery.

Again, on the theory which tries to get round the need for such knowledge, the “proposed secret cache” would in itself have been a major discovery, most likely (for reasons I have outlined elsewhere) in a large and otherwise unknown piece of Old Kingdom architecture—which again would have brought him all the recognition and fame he could wish for, risk-free.

No credible motivation has been suggested for Vyse to have done what the forgery theory has him doing (and Creighton, this goes double for bringing Archbishop Ussher into it).

> 2. In attempting to
> prove this conspiracy, the author publicizes the
> following:
>
> "Examines recent chemical analysis of the marks
> and high-definition photos to reveal errors and
> other anomalies within the forged Khufu
> cartouche"

>
> There is no chemical analysis of the cartouche nor
> any high definition photos of it in the book.
>
>
> 3. A poster with the
> handle "Lonely Angel" posted the following on 25
> January.
>
> "Now that the Vyse "evidence" has been
> thoroughly debunked - with no link to Khufu now -
> and the dating of the GP blown wide open, I guess
> the door is open for many more of these
> theories."

>
> Again, accepting the Vyse markings to be
> forgeries, how does their addition to the chamber
> change the date of construction of the pyramid?
> With no markings as evidence, it could be earlier,
> later or the same.
>
>
> 4. On 4 February,
> Lonely Angel posted the following:
>
> "I said Robert Bauval now accepted Scott's HOAX
> claims. You demanded proof that he said it. I
> provided said proof."

>
> He cited a radio show titled Paranormal UK Radio
> [paranormalukradio.podbean.com].
>
> I have listened to this broadcast and Robert
> Bauval did say that he agreed with Scott Creighton
> as to fake graffiti. But does that give rise to
> having "the dating of the GP blown wide open"?

To labour the obvious, this appeal to the opinion of Robert Bauval is merely an attempt to bamboozle those for whom his opinion has authority—so mere appeal to authority, an informal fallacy.

Reading this again, I’m struck by the melodrama of “demanded proof”. What did I really do? I asked two (2) questions and I made a related observation:

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1075032,1178661

‘In what words exactly did Robert “acknowledge” this? Where may we read or hear them?’

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1075032,1178683

‘Yet neither of you has quoted this acknowledgement, or told us where we may read or hear it for ourselves.’

This was enough to prompt action.

The poster formerly known as “Alcibiades” answered my second question, so the second part of my observation (correct when I made it) no longer applies. As for my first question (and the first part of my observation), as far as I know, no one other than me has transcribed the key remark:

“I’ve just had a long talk with, er (cough) . . . Scott Creighton . . . At first I was very sceptical, but he, he convinced me. I had a long, long talk, just before I, you came online . . .”

It seems we may be assured on this basis that Robert was convinced by sound arguments and has held the same opinion ever since.

> 5. Robert Bauval states
> on his website the following:
>
> "In my book The Orion Mystery published in
> 1994, Plate 15a shows precisely the same stellar
> alignment used by Kate Spence, with Ancient
> Egyptian stellar-deities superimposed.
>
> This alignment and others were used by me to date
> the Great Pyramid to c.2450 BC, plus or minus 25
> years, thus within a range of 2430 BC to 2470 BC.
>
> It is generally agreed that a plus or minus
> tolerance of 20 arc seconds should be taken into
> account for naked-eye observations of stars, hence
> the need for a ±25 years deviation."

>
> It would appear not. Bauval's calculations agree
> with mainstream opinion.
>
>
> 6. If Scott Creighton
> is relying on Robert Bauval to corroborate the
> central premise of "Hoax", ie somehow there is
> "a conspiracy to conceal the true history of
> Egypt"
, his hopes are in vain.

Yes.

> 7. Lonely Angel's
> opinion of the work of Scott Creighton, and his
> overblown viewpoints are not universally shared.
> Hard evidence is required.

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Pyramid Hoax Observations 2659 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 03:51
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 405 Racho 05-Feb-19 03:55
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 393 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 04:16
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 444 DUNE 05-Feb-19 08:22
Who was Thoth? serious question... 363 Racho 05-Feb-19 16:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 385 LonelyAngel 05-Feb-19 20:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 380 cladking 05-Feb-19 20:29
Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 324 Racho 05-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 328 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:01
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 355 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:02
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 263 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:52
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 287 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:01
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 299 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:23
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 329 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 297 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:46
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 230 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:26
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 256 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 02:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 233 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 229 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:48
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 224 cladking 06-Feb-19 14:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 248 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 14:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 272 Lee McGiffen 08-Feb-19 10:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 262 cladking 08-Feb-19 15:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 244 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 15:29
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 231 cladking 08-Feb-19 16:42
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 354 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 277 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:10
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 260 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 277 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:25
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 279 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:36
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 204 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 18:35
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 216 cladking 08-Feb-19 17:19
Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 245 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 20:17
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 288 cladking 08-Feb-19 21:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 232 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 22:14
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 199 cladking 08-Feb-19 22:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 206 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 249 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 22:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 266 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 217 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 06:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 221 cladking 09-Feb-19 15:28
gunpowder 202 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:08
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 219 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 21:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 203 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 223 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:41
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 218 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 221 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 204 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 22:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 196 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 216 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:47
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 205 cladking 10-Feb-19 01:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 210 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 195 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:26
Research methodology 181 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:06
Happy news on the Furphy front 223 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 246 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 257 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 18:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 209 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 219 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 20:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 207 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:21
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 189 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 302 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 13:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 213 Warwick 11-Feb-19 18:02
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 234 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 19:03
The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 228 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:05
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 223 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:25
Elbonian methodology 198 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 252 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:38
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 204 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:46
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 211 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 197 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:52
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 241 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 222 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:08
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 219 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:19
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 205 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 201 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:28
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 202 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:33
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 220 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:36
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 209 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:47
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 230 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:48
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 207 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:55
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 218 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 20:04
Scott wipes the floor with them again 220 LonelyAngel 11-Feb-19 21:03
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 274 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 21:31
Get the hell out of dodge and go write another book... 236 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:04
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 231 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 22:08
Aye - facts are chiels that winna ding. 205 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:15
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 221 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 196 cladking 11-Feb-19 23:09
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 228 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 23:35
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 192 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 11:07
Oooooh Scott... 234 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 11:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 231 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:06
Re: Oooooh Scott... 236 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 14:40
Re: Oooooh Scott... 220 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Oooooh Scott... 207 Corpuscles 13-Feb-19 22:01
Re: Oooooh Scott... 213 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:11
Re: Oooooh Scott... 204 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 210 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:45
Re: Oooooh Scott... 221 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:24
Re: Oooooh Scott... 208 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 19:33
Re: Oooooh Scott... 208 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:02
Re: Oooooh Scott... 174 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:55
Re: Oooooh Scott... 195 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:59
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 221 Warwick 11-Feb-19 22:20
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 242 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:45
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 258 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 15:12
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 220 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:21
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 227 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 16:44
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 182 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:18
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 200 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:31
Angel wishes to wallow in the past 223 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:58
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 214 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 17:58
A Perfect example of Obfuscation 201 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:00
The Charlatan and the Truckler 226 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:25
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 244 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-19 23:15
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 223 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 01:28
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 325 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 11:26
excerpt from the New Age Dictionary 212 Warwick 14-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 205 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 202 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 21:07
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 228 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 21:34
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 184 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 15:52
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 226 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 22:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 207 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 23:02
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 261 Morten 15-Feb-19 12:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 233 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 14:19
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 272 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 16:21
Vyse's Journal and the Mason's Marks 199 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:23
His podcast lies 254 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 20:00
Re: His podcast lies 183 Warwick 17-Feb-19 16:44
Re: His podcast lies 202 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 16:54
Re: His podcast lies 202 Warwick 17-Feb-19 18:06
Re: His podcast lies 195 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 20:07
Re: His podcast lies 190 Warwick 17-Feb-19 20:28
Re: His podcast lies 190 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 21:30
Re: His podcast lies 201 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 22:00
Re: His podcast lies 190 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:57
Re: His podcast lies 261 Warwick 18-Feb-19 16:47
Re: His podcast lies 185 Warwick 17-Feb-19 22:07
Re: His podcast lies 220 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 21:46
Re: His podcast lies 170 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:47
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 225 sfbey 14-Feb-19 16:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 217 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 17:40
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 202 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:10
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 213 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 18:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 179 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 201 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 19:09
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 188 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:35
curious minds want to know 205 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:56
Re: curious minds want to know 227 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: curious minds want to know 191 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:13
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 195 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 202 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 199 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 17:42
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 184 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 217 Corpuscles 16-Feb-19 01:02
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 221 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:14
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 199 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 210 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:04
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 217 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:20
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 235 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 19:17
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 216 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:22
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 211 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:59
It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 197 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:17
Re: It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 244 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 21:16
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 216 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 20:12
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 194 Warwick 10-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 209 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 20:49
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 198 Warwick 10-Feb-19 21:15
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 240 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 23:40
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 195 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 11:00
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 292 Corpuscles 12-Feb-19 01:03
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 200 Merrell 12-Feb-19 09:44
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 299 Martin Stower 12-Feb-19 12:00
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 215 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 22:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 223 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:45
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 268 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 190 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 23:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 237 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 201 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:24
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 200 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:30
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 222 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:34
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 200 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:39
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 223 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:22
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 209 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 222 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:28
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 193 Barbelo 09-Feb-19 23:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 230 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 208 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:58
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 202 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:20
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 238 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 188 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:35
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 216 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 221 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 01:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 230 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:16
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 220 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 01:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 229 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 236 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 265 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:29
Intro for new tv show 218 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:31
Re: Intro for new tv show 212 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 10:39
Re: Intro for new tv show 190 Warwick 09-Feb-19 19:58
Re: Intro for new tv show 209 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Intro for new tv show 189 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:15
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 256 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:13
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 228 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:19
The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 285 Barbelo 06-Feb-19 04:16
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 240 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:57
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 217 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 17:53
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 198 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:29
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 201 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:31
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 212 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:48
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 185 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:54
A Soft Cock 213 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:29
Keep it Civil 207 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 09:57
Re: Keep it Civil 226 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 10:48
Re: Keep it Civil 221 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 11:38
Re: A Soft Cock 196 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:28
Re: A Soft Cock 265 Barbelo 15-Feb-19 20:31
Re: A Soft Cock 186 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:10
Re: A Soft Cock 238 Barbelo 16-Feb-19 20:44
Re: A Soft Cock 205 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 11:45
Re: A Soft Cock 197 Corpuscles 20-Feb-19 20:19
Re: A Soft Cock 198 Warwick 21-Feb-19 18:01
Re: A Soft Cock 195 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 18:37
Re: A Soft Cock 199 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 18:49
Re: A Soft Cock 190 Warwick 21-Feb-19 19:42
Re: A Soft Cock 189 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:16
Re: A Soft Cock 195 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 20:30
Re: A Soft Cock 197 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:33
Completely Flaccid 211 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 05:59
Re: Completely Flaccid 204 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 12:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 171 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 12:53
Re: Completely Flaccid 235 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 208 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Completely Flaccid 203 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 224 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 14:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 194 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 19:06
Re: Completely Flaccid 200 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 19:17
Re: Completely Flaccid 220 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 22:44
Re: Completely Flaccid 189 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 11:16
Re: Completely Flaccid 203 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:40
Re: Completely Flaccid 228 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 02:35
simply put 178 Warwick 24-Feb-19 16:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 193 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 10:49
Re: Completely Flaccid 206 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 202 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 17:47
Re: Completely Flaccid 195 LonelyAngel 24-Feb-19 15:39
Re: Completely Flaccid 190 Corpuscles 24-Feb-19 15:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 187 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:42
Re: Completely Flaccid 194 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 19:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 187 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 20:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 177 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 21:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 215 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 22:07
factoid 198 Warwick 24-Feb-19 17:03
Re: factoid 189 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:31
Re: factoid 218 Warwick 26-Feb-19 19:39
Re: factoid 189 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 10:09
Re: factoid 229 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 11:00
Re: factoid 179 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 13:35
Re: factoid 239 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 14:33
Re: factoid 209 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:24
Re: factoid 202 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 16:52
Re: factoid 190 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:55
Re: factoid 198 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:11
Re: factoid 213 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 17:18
Re: factoid 221 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:42
Re: factoid 180 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:49
Re: factoid 181 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 13:12
Re: factoid 208 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 13:21
Re: factoid 225 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 15:19
Re: factoid 208 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:11
Dusty? 191 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:05
Re: Dusty? 181 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:52
Re: Dusty? 200 Warwick 28-Feb-19 17:56
Re: Dusty? 224 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 17:59
Re: Dusty? 214 Warwick 28-Feb-19 18:36
Re: Dusty? 203 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 12:05
Re: Dusty? 204 Warwick 01-Mar-19 18:14
Re: Dusty? 188 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 21:57
Re: Dusty? 187 Warwick 01-Mar-19 22:11
Re: Dusty? 195 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 12:58
unbelievable 202 Warwick 02-Mar-19 15:27
Mod Caution > Warwick Off-Topic Posts 190 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:57
I apologise 205 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 16:59
Re: I apologise 271 Warwick 02-Mar-19 17:48
Mod Caution > LonelyAngel Off-Topic Posts 193 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:54
Re: A Soft Cock 217 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 12:09
Re: A Soft Cock 206 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 12:44
Re: A Soft Cock 240 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 13:11
Re: A Soft Cock 205 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 16:02
Re: A Soft Cock 196 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:12
Re: A Soft Cock 196 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 15:53
Re: A Soft Cock 174 Warwick 19-Feb-19 17:37
Re: A Soft Cock 211 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:06
Re: A Soft Cock 199 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:16
Re: A Soft Cock 198 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:23
Re: A Soft Cock 209 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:28
Re: A Soft Cock 232 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:31
Re: A Soft Cock 230 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:40
Re: A Soft Cock 266 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 22:11
Re: A Soft Cock 237 LonelyAngel 20-Feb-19 12:52
Re: A Soft Cock 210 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 18:14
Re: A Soft Cock 178 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:22
Re: A Soft Cock 176 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 266 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 00:46
Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 270 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 06:14
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 275 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:50
I am not surprised at all 227 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 15:41
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 278 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 16:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 338 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 18:10
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 220 cladking 06-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 218 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:00
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 220 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 243 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:51
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 247 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:49
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 235 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 15:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 229 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:10
Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 231 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:07
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 301 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 22:31
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 318 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:12
More .. 231 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 23:00
Re: More .. 243 sfbey 07-Feb-19 23:13
Re: More .. 227 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 23:33
Re: More .. 258 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:01
Re: More .. 242 sfbey 08-Feb-19 02:42
Re: More .. 229 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 00:26
Re: More .. 210 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:26
Re: More .. 229 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 02:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 247 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 23:03
Why is it so IMPORTANT? 268 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 01:45
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 221 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:52
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 243 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:48
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 271 cladking 07-Feb-19 14:30
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 281 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 18:08
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 270 cladking 07-Feb-19 22:27
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 309 Warwick 08-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 268 JuhaS 13-Feb-19 22:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.