Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In clarifying recent comments on this board
> concerning the Great Pyramid, please consider the
> following.
>
> 1. Scott Creighton's
> book, "The Great Pyramid Hoax" headlines that
> there is a conspiracy to conceal the true history
> of Egypt. Is there?
>
> Apparently Col. Vyse forged a cartouche of Khufu
> in Campbell's Chamber to make it appear that Khufu
> was the builder of the pyramid as no other
> evidence was, or still is, available to verify
> authenticity. Vyse's motive for his alleged
> actions were to achieve some sort of recognition
> and fame in Antiquarian circles.
>
> Let's, for the sake of argument, accept this to be
> true.
>
> At that time, Vyse knew little or nothing of
> Khufu. Or cartouches. How does a wish for some
> peer accolades equate to a conspiracy to conceal
> the true history of Egypt? Did Vyse know of this
> "true history" beforehand?

As noted passim, if Vyse had had the knowledge it would take to pull this off, that knowledge alone would have gained him all the peer accolades he could wish for, without his taking the crazy risk of engaging in forgery.

Again, on the theory which tries to get round the need for such knowledge, the “proposed secret cache” would in itself have been a major discovery, most likely (for reasons I have outlined elsewhere) in a large and otherwise unknown piece of Old Kingdom architecture—which again would have brought him all the recognition and fame he could wish for, risk-free.

No credible motivation has been suggested for Vyse to have done what the forgery theory has him doing (and Creighton, this goes double for bringing Archbishop Ussher into it).

> 2. In attempting to
> prove this conspiracy, the author publicizes the
> following:
>
> "Examines recent chemical analysis of the marks
> and high-definition photos to reveal errors and
> other anomalies within the forged Khufu
> cartouche"

>
> There is no chemical analysis of the cartouche nor
> any high definition photos of it in the book.
>
>
> 3. A poster with the
> handle "Lonely Angel" posted the following on 25
> January.
>
> "Now that the Vyse "evidence" has been
> thoroughly debunked - with no link to Khufu now -
> and the dating of the GP blown wide open, I guess
> the door is open for many more of these
> theories."

>
> Again, accepting the Vyse markings to be
> forgeries, how does their addition to the chamber
> change the date of construction of the pyramid?
> With no markings as evidence, it could be earlier,
> later or the same.
>
>
> 4. On 4 February,
> Lonely Angel posted the following:
>
> "I said Robert Bauval now accepted Scott's HOAX
> claims. You demanded proof that he said it. I
> provided said proof."

>
> He cited a radio show titled Paranormal UK Radio
> [paranormalukradio.podbean.com].
>
> I have listened to this broadcast and Robert
> Bauval did say that he agreed with Scott Creighton
> as to fake graffiti. But does that give rise to
> having "the dating of the GP blown wide open"?

To labour the obvious, this appeal to the opinion of Robert Bauval is merely an attempt to bamboozle those for whom his opinion has authority—so mere appeal to authority, an informal fallacy.

Reading this again, I’m struck by the melodrama of “demanded proof”. What did I really do? I asked two (2) questions and I made a related observation:

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1075032,1178661

‘In what words exactly did Robert “acknowledge” this? Where may we read or hear them?’

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1075032,1178683

‘Yet neither of you has quoted this acknowledgement, or told us where we may read or hear it for ourselves.’

This was enough to prompt action.

The poster formerly known as “Alcibiades” answered my second question, so the second part of my observation (correct when I made it) no longer applies. As for my first question (and the first part of my observation), as far as I know, no one other than me has transcribed the key remark:

“I’ve just had a long talk with, er (cough) . . . Scott Creighton . . . At first I was very sceptical, but he, he convinced me. I had a long, long talk, just before I, you came online . . .”

It seems we may be assured on this basis that Robert was convinced by sound arguments and has held the same opinion ever since.

> 5. Robert Bauval states
> on his website the following:
>
> "In my book The Orion Mystery published in
> 1994, Plate 15a shows precisely the same stellar
> alignment used by Kate Spence, with Ancient
> Egyptian stellar-deities superimposed.
>
> This alignment and others were used by me to date
> the Great Pyramid to c.2450 BC, plus or minus 25
> years, thus within a range of 2430 BC to 2470 BC.
>
> It is generally agreed that a plus or minus
> tolerance of 20 arc seconds should be taken into
> account for naked-eye observations of stars, hence
> the need for a ±25 years deviation."

>
> It would appear not. Bauval's calculations agree
> with mainstream opinion.
>
>
> 6. If Scott Creighton
> is relying on Robert Bauval to corroborate the
> central premise of "Hoax", ie somehow there is
> "a conspiracy to conceal the true history of
> Egypt"
, his hopes are in vain.

Yes.

> 7. Lonely Angel's
> opinion of the work of Scott Creighton, and his
> overblown viewpoints are not universally shared.
> Hard evidence is required.

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Pyramid Hoax Observations 2565 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 03:51
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 372 Racho 05-Feb-19 03:55
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 351 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 04:16
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 404 DUNE 05-Feb-19 08:22
Who was Thoth? serious question... 326 Racho 05-Feb-19 16:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 339 LonelyAngel 05-Feb-19 20:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 339 cladking 05-Feb-19 20:29
Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 290 Racho 05-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 292 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:01
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 316 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:02
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 234 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:52
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 255 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:01
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 267 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:23
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 294 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 263 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:46
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 201 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:26
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 226 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 02:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 206 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 200 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:48
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 194 cladking 06-Feb-19 14:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 220 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 14:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 240 Lee McGiffen 08-Feb-19 10:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 229 cladking 08-Feb-19 15:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 217 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 15:29
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 190 cladking 08-Feb-19 16:42
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 312 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 226 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:10
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 226 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 231 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:25
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 242 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:36
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 173 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 18:35
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 170 cladking 08-Feb-19 17:19
Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 216 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 20:17
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 252 cladking 08-Feb-19 21:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 200 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 22:14
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 173 cladking 08-Feb-19 22:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 177 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 205 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 22:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 239 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 187 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 06:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 193 cladking 09-Feb-19 15:28
gunpowder 172 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:08
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 189 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 21:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 165 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 192 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:41
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 186 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 190 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 177 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 22:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 168 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 182 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:47
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 175 cladking 10-Feb-19 01:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 181 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 161 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:26
Research methodology 153 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:06
Happy news on the Furphy front 185 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 214 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 219 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 18:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 168 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 188 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 20:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 176 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:21
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 161 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 263 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 13:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 183 Warwick 11-Feb-19 18:02
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 203 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 19:03
The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 198 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:05
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 195 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:25
Elbonian methodology 162 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 206 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:38
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 171 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:46
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 182 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 166 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:52
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 207 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 173 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:08
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 190 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:19
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 177 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 174 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:28
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 171 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:33
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 194 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:36
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 174 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:47
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 198 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:48
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 180 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:55
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 188 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 20:04
Scott wipes the floor with them again 187 LonelyAngel 11-Feb-19 21:03
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 237 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 21:31
Get the hell out of dodge and go write another book... 197 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:04
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 197 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 22:08
Aye - facts are chiels that winna ding. 178 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:15
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 192 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 165 cladking 11-Feb-19 23:09
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 187 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 23:35
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 163 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 11:07
Oooooh Scott... 201 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 11:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 202 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:06
Re: Oooooh Scott... 206 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 14:40
Re: Oooooh Scott... 186 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Oooooh Scott... 182 Corpuscles 13-Feb-19 22:01
Re: Oooooh Scott... 185 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:11
Re: Oooooh Scott... 173 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 179 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:45
Re: Oooooh Scott... 190 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:24
Re: Oooooh Scott... 181 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 19:33
Re: Oooooh Scott... 178 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:02
Re: Oooooh Scott... 145 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:55
Re: Oooooh Scott... 164 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:59
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 187 Warwick 11-Feb-19 22:20
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 202 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:45
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 228 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 15:12
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 188 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:21
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 192 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 16:44
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 151 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:18
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 174 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:31
Angel wishes to wallow in the past 191 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:58
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 183 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 17:58
A Perfect example of Obfuscation 172 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:00
The Charlatan and the Truckler 204 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:25
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 213 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-19 23:15
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 202 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 01:28
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 293 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 11:26
excerpt from the New Age Dictionary 183 Warwick 14-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 173 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 155 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 21:07
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 199 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 21:34
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 159 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 15:52
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 181 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 22:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 180 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 23:02
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 217 Morten 15-Feb-19 12:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 204 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 14:19
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 222 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 16:21
Vyse's Journal and the Mason's Marks 171 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:23
His podcast lies 206 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 20:00
Re: His podcast lies 153 Warwick 17-Feb-19 16:44
Re: His podcast lies 175 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 16:54
Re: His podcast lies 170 Warwick 17-Feb-19 18:06
Re: His podcast lies 162 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 20:07
Re: His podcast lies 162 Warwick 17-Feb-19 20:28
Re: His podcast lies 163 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 21:30
Re: His podcast lies 173 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 22:00
Re: His podcast lies 160 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:57
Re: His podcast lies 224 Warwick 18-Feb-19 16:47
Re: His podcast lies 159 Warwick 17-Feb-19 22:07
Re: His podcast lies 176 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 21:46
Re: His podcast lies 142 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:47
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 192 sfbey 14-Feb-19 16:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 186 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 17:40
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 172 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:10
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 176 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 18:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 153 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 171 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 19:09
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 159 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:35
curious minds want to know 171 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:56
Re: curious minds want to know 194 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: curious minds want to know 163 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:13
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 165 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 165 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 168 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 17:42
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 155 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 186 Corpuscles 16-Feb-19 01:02
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 191 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:14
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 174 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 182 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:04
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 187 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:20
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 198 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 19:17
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 184 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:22
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 179 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:59
It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 172 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:17
Re: It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 210 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 21:16
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 181 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 20:12
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 167 Warwick 10-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 179 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 20:49
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 170 Warwick 10-Feb-19 21:15
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 203 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 23:40
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 172 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 11:00
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 259 Corpuscles 12-Feb-19 01:03
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 174 Merrell 12-Feb-19 09:44
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 260 Martin Stower 12-Feb-19 12:00
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 189 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 22:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 195 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:45
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 234 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 163 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 23:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 196 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 174 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:24
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 172 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:30
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 195 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:34
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 168 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:39
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 194 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:22
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 179 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 175 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:28
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 165 Barbelo 09-Feb-19 23:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 198 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 179 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:58
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 174 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:20
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 201 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 163 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:35
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 188 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 189 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 01:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 190 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:16
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 193 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 01:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 202 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 205 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 238 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:29
Intro for new tv show 180 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:31
Re: Intro for new tv show 185 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 10:39
Re: Intro for new tv show 163 Warwick 09-Feb-19 19:58
Re: Intro for new tv show 183 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Intro for new tv show 162 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:15
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 222 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:13
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 194 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:19
The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 246 Barbelo 06-Feb-19 04:16
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 209 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:57
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 179 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 17:53
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 168 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:29
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 168 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:31
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 182 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:48
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 157 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:54
A Soft Cock 188 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:29
Keep it Civil 182 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 09:57
Re: Keep it Civil 198 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 10:48
Re: Keep it Civil 193 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 11:38
Re: A Soft Cock 168 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:28
Re: A Soft Cock 236 Barbelo 15-Feb-19 20:31
Re: A Soft Cock 159 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:10
Re: A Soft Cock 210 Barbelo 16-Feb-19 20:44
Re: A Soft Cock 177 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 11:45
Re: A Soft Cock 170 Corpuscles 20-Feb-19 20:19
Re: A Soft Cock 171 Warwick 21-Feb-19 18:01
Re: A Soft Cock 156 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 18:37
Re: A Soft Cock 171 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 18:49
Re: A Soft Cock 163 Warwick 21-Feb-19 19:42
Re: A Soft Cock 161 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:16
Re: A Soft Cock 168 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 20:30
Re: A Soft Cock 168 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:33
Completely Flaccid 187 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 05:59
Re: Completely Flaccid 171 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 12:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 141 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 12:53
Re: Completely Flaccid 187 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 175 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Completely Flaccid 170 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 191 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 14:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 167 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 19:06
Re: Completely Flaccid 174 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 19:17
Re: Completely Flaccid 193 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 22:44
Re: Completely Flaccid 161 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 11:16
Re: Completely Flaccid 172 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:40
Re: Completely Flaccid 196 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 02:35
simply put 151 Warwick 24-Feb-19 16:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 162 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 10:49
Re: Completely Flaccid 168 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 170 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 17:47
Re: Completely Flaccid 164 LonelyAngel 24-Feb-19 15:39
Re: Completely Flaccid 160 Corpuscles 24-Feb-19 15:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 158 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:42
Re: Completely Flaccid 165 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 19:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 154 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 20:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 151 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 21:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 182 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 22:07
factoid 165 Warwick 24-Feb-19 17:03
Re: factoid 160 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:31
Re: factoid 180 Warwick 26-Feb-19 19:39
Re: factoid 161 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 10:09
Re: factoid 198 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 11:00
Re: factoid 149 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 13:35
Re: factoid 206 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 14:33
Re: factoid 179 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:24
Re: factoid 171 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 16:52
Re: factoid 158 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:55
Re: factoid 170 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:11
Re: factoid 177 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 17:18
Re: factoid 191 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:42
Re: factoid 149 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:49
Re: factoid 155 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 13:12
Re: factoid 177 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 13:21
Re: factoid 194 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 15:19
Re: factoid 160 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:11
Dusty? 164 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:05
Re: Dusty? 153 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:52
Re: Dusty? 171 Warwick 28-Feb-19 17:56
Re: Dusty? 195 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 17:59
Re: Dusty? 173 Warwick 28-Feb-19 18:36
Re: Dusty? 175 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 12:05
Re: Dusty? 169 Warwick 01-Mar-19 18:14
Re: Dusty? 157 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 21:57
Re: Dusty? 157 Warwick 01-Mar-19 22:11
Re: Dusty? 167 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 12:58
unbelievable 171 Warwick 02-Mar-19 15:27
Mod Caution > Warwick Off-Topic Posts 160 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:57
I apologise 173 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 16:59
Re: I apologise 232 Warwick 02-Mar-19 17:48
Mod Caution > LonelyAngel Off-Topic Posts 165 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:54
Re: A Soft Cock 189 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 12:09
Re: A Soft Cock 177 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 12:44
Re: A Soft Cock 211 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 13:11
Re: A Soft Cock 171 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 16:02
Re: A Soft Cock 168 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:12
Re: A Soft Cock 164 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 15:53
Re: A Soft Cock 146 Warwick 19-Feb-19 17:37
Re: A Soft Cock 177 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:06
Re: A Soft Cock 165 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:16
Re: A Soft Cock 167 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:23
Re: A Soft Cock 174 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:28
Re: A Soft Cock 196 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:31
Re: A Soft Cock 201 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:40
Re: A Soft Cock 222 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 22:11
Re: A Soft Cock 186 LonelyAngel 20-Feb-19 12:52
Re: A Soft Cock 172 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 18:14
Re: A Soft Cock 149 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:22
Re: A Soft Cock 148 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 234 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 00:46
Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 232 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 06:14
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 225 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:50
I am not surprised at all 196 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 15:41
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 226 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 16:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 255 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 18:10
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 191 cladking 06-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 186 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:00
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 191 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 207 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:51
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 218 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:49
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 191 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 15:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 196 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:10
Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 201 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:07
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 230 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 22:31
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 257 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:12
More .. 202 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 23:00
Re: More .. 201 sfbey 07-Feb-19 23:13
Re: More .. 190 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 23:33
Re: More .. 228 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:01
Re: More .. 206 sfbey 08-Feb-19 02:42
Re: More .. 192 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 00:26
Re: More .. 183 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:26
Re: More .. 195 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 02:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 219 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 23:03
Why is it so IMPORTANT? 224 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 01:45
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 195 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:52
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 206 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:48
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 230 cladking 07-Feb-19 14:30
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 253 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 18:08
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 230 cladking 07-Feb-19 22:27
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 280 Warwick 08-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 223 JuhaS 13-Feb-19 22:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.