Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In clarifying recent comments on this board
> concerning the Great Pyramid, please consider the
> following.
>
> 1. Scott Creighton's
> book, "The Great Pyramid Hoax" headlines that
> there is a conspiracy to conceal the true history
> of Egypt. Is there?
>
> Apparently Col. Vyse forged a cartouche of Khufu
> in Campbell's Chamber to make it appear that Khufu
> was the builder of the pyramid as no other
> evidence was, or still is, available to verify
> authenticity. Vyse's motive for his alleged
> actions were to achieve some sort of recognition
> and fame in Antiquarian circles.
>
> Let's, for the sake of argument, accept this to be
> true.
>
> At that time, Vyse knew little or nothing of
> Khufu. Or cartouches. How does a wish for some
> peer accolades equate to a conspiracy to conceal
> the true history of Egypt? Did Vyse know of this
> "true history" beforehand?

As noted passim, if Vyse had had the knowledge it would take to pull this off, that knowledge alone would have gained him all the peer accolades he could wish for, without his taking the crazy risk of engaging in forgery.

Again, on the theory which tries to get round the need for such knowledge, the “proposed secret cache” would in itself have been a major discovery, most likely (for reasons I have outlined elsewhere) in a large and otherwise unknown piece of Old Kingdom architecture—which again would have brought him all the recognition and fame he could wish for, risk-free.

No credible motivation has been suggested for Vyse to have done what the forgery theory has him doing (and Creighton, this goes double for bringing Archbishop Ussher into it).

> 2. In attempting to
> prove this conspiracy, the author publicizes the
> following:
>
> "Examines recent chemical analysis of the marks
> and high-definition photos to reveal errors and
> other anomalies within the forged Khufu
> cartouche"

>
> There is no chemical analysis of the cartouche nor
> any high definition photos of it in the book.
>
>
> 3. A poster with the
> handle "Lonely Angel" posted the following on 25
> January.
>
> "Now that the Vyse "evidence" has been
> thoroughly debunked - with no link to Khufu now -
> and the dating of the GP blown wide open, I guess
> the door is open for many more of these
> theories."

>
> Again, accepting the Vyse markings to be
> forgeries, how does their addition to the chamber
> change the date of construction of the pyramid?
> With no markings as evidence, it could be earlier,
> later or the same.
>
>
> 4. On 4 February,
> Lonely Angel posted the following:
>
> "I said Robert Bauval now accepted Scott's HOAX
> claims. You demanded proof that he said it. I
> provided said proof."

>
> He cited a radio show titled Paranormal UK Radio
> [paranormalukradio.podbean.com].
>
> I have listened to this broadcast and Robert
> Bauval did say that he agreed with Scott Creighton
> as to fake graffiti. But does that give rise to
> having "the dating of the GP blown wide open"?

To labour the obvious, this appeal to the opinion of Robert Bauval is merely an attempt to bamboozle those for whom his opinion has authority—so mere appeal to authority, an informal fallacy.

Reading this again, I’m struck by the melodrama of “demanded proof”. What did I really do? I asked two (2) questions and I made a related observation:

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1075032,1178661

‘In what words exactly did Robert “acknowledge” this? Where may we read or hear them?’

http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,1075032,1178683

‘Yet neither of you has quoted this acknowledgement, or told us where we may read or hear it for ourselves.’

This was enough to prompt action.

The poster formerly known as “Alcibiades” answered my second question, so the second part of my observation (correct when I made it) no longer applies. As for my first question (and the first part of my observation), as far as I know, no one other than me has transcribed the key remark:

“I’ve just had a long talk with, er (cough) . . . Scott Creighton . . . At first I was very sceptical, but he, he convinced me. I had a long, long talk, just before I, you came online . . .”

It seems we may be assured on this basis that Robert was convinced by sound arguments and has held the same opinion ever since.

> 5. Robert Bauval states
> on his website the following:
>
> "In my book The Orion Mystery published in
> 1994, Plate 15a shows precisely the same stellar
> alignment used by Kate Spence, with Ancient
> Egyptian stellar-deities superimposed.
>
> This alignment and others were used by me to date
> the Great Pyramid to c.2450 BC, plus or minus 25
> years, thus within a range of 2430 BC to 2470 BC.
>
> It is generally agreed that a plus or minus
> tolerance of 20 arc seconds should be taken into
> account for naked-eye observations of stars, hence
> the need for a ±25 years deviation."

>
> It would appear not. Bauval's calculations agree
> with mainstream opinion.
>
>
> 6. If Scott Creighton
> is relying on Robert Bauval to corroborate the
> central premise of "Hoax", ie somehow there is
> "a conspiracy to conceal the true history of
> Egypt"
, his hopes are in vain.

Yes.

> 7. Lonely Angel's
> opinion of the work of Scott Creighton, and his
> overblown viewpoints are not universally shared.
> Hard evidence is required.

M.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Pyramid Hoax Observations 2822 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 03:51
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 493 Racho 05-Feb-19 03:55
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 480 Barbelo 05-Feb-19 04:16
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 546 DUNE 05-Feb-19 08:22
Who was Thoth? serious question... 447 Racho 05-Feb-19 16:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 483 LonelyAngel 05-Feb-19 20:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 461 cladking 05-Feb-19 20:29
Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 414 Racho 05-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 425 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:01
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 459 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:02
Re: Does wike reflect consensus...reality? 339 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:52
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 379 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:01
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 387 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:23
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 408 cladking 06-Feb-19 01:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 395 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 01:46
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 311 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:26
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 340 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 02:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 312 cladking 06-Feb-19 04:17
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 315 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:48
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 309 cladking 06-Feb-19 14:08
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 332 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 14:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 360 Lee McGiffen 08-Feb-19 10:20
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 348 cladking 08-Feb-19 15:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 322 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 15:29
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 312 cladking 08-Feb-19 16:42
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 447 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:03
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 397 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:10
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 342 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:12
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 381 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 17:25
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 362 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 17:36
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 299 eyeofhorus33 08-Feb-19 18:35
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 303 cladking 08-Feb-19 17:19
Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 324 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 20:17
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 369 cladking 08-Feb-19 21:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 323 Barbelo 08-Feb-19 22:14
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 285 cladking 08-Feb-19 22:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 304 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 335 Scott Creighton 08-Feb-19 22:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 347 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 302 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 06:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 309 cladking 09-Feb-19 15:28
gunpowder 303 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:08
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 326 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 21:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 296 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:26
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 310 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:41
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 317 cladking 09-Feb-19 21:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 300 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 299 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 22:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 274 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:25
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 300 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:47
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 301 cladking 10-Feb-19 01:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 294 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 279 cladking 09-Feb-19 23:26
Research methodology 259 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:06
Happy news on the Furphy front 326 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 343 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 356 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 18:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 287 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 302 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 20:36
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 303 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 21:21
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 269 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 379 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 13:32
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 303 Warwick 11-Feb-19 18:02
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 339 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 19:03
The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 306 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:05
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 300 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:25
Elbonian methodology 294 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 357 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:38
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 282 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:46
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 292 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:50
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 276 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:52
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 325 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 309 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:08
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 302 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:19
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 287 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 287 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:28
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 293 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:33
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 308 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:36
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 292 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:47
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 363 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:48
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 288 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:55
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 313 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 20:04
Scott wipes the floor with them again 318 LonelyAngel 11-Feb-19 21:03
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 370 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 21:31
Get the hell out of dodge and go write another book... 314 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:04
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 330 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 22:08
Aye - facts are chiels that winna ding. 289 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 22:15
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 316 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 278 cladking 11-Feb-19 23:09
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 308 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 23:35
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 283 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 11:07
Oooooh Scott... 319 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 11:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 313 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:06
Re: Oooooh Scott... 323 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 14:40
Re: Oooooh Scott... 301 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 20:47
Re: Oooooh Scott... 291 Corpuscles 13-Feb-19 22:01
Re: Oooooh Scott... 295 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:11
Re: Oooooh Scott... 304 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:35
Re: Oooooh Scott... 287 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:45
Re: Oooooh Scott... 298 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:24
Re: Oooooh Scott... 286 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 19:33
Re: Oooooh Scott... 290 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:02
Re: Oooooh Scott... 251 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:55
Re: Oooooh Scott... 272 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:59
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 298 Warwick 11-Feb-19 22:20
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 317 LonelyAngel 13-Feb-19 14:45
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 350 Martin Stower 13-Feb-19 15:12
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 314 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:21
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 310 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 16:44
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 267 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:18
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 276 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:31
Angel wishes to wallow in the past 299 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:58
Re: Scott wipes the floor with them again 317 WonderWho 13-Feb-19 17:58
A Perfect example of Obfuscation 275 Warwick 13-Feb-19 17:00
The Charlatan and the Truckler 306 Barbelo 13-Feb-19 20:25
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 320 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-19 23:15
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 309 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 01:28
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 415 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 11:26
excerpt from the New Age Dictionary 295 Warwick 14-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 278 Barbelo 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 282 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 21:07
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 306 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 21:34
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 266 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 15:52
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 310 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 22:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 293 Corpuscles 14-Feb-19 23:02
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 369 Morten 15-Feb-19 12:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 306 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 14:19
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 360 Martin Stower 15-Feb-19 16:21
Vyse's Journal and the Mason's Marks 280 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:23
His podcast lies 371 Martin Stower 16-Feb-19 20:00
Re: His podcast lies 275 Warwick 17-Feb-19 16:44
Re: His podcast lies 274 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 16:54
Re: His podcast lies 289 Warwick 17-Feb-19 18:06
Re: His podcast lies 274 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 20:07
Re: His podcast lies 276 Warwick 17-Feb-19 20:28
Re: His podcast lies 265 Corpuscles 17-Feb-19 21:30
Re: His podcast lies 282 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 22:00
Re: His podcast lies 264 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:57
Re: His podcast lies 348 Warwick 18-Feb-19 16:47
Re: His podcast lies 265 Warwick 17-Feb-19 22:07
Re: His podcast lies 312 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 21:46
Re: His podcast lies 251 Corpuscles 18-Feb-19 03:47
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 326 sfbey 14-Feb-19 16:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 305 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 17:40
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 285 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:10
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 289 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 18:37
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 253 Warwick 14-Feb-19 18:58
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 275 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 19:09
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 267 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:35
curious minds want to know 287 Warwick 14-Feb-19 19:56
Re: curious minds want to know 312 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-19 21:03
Re: curious minds want to know 274 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:13
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 285 Martin Stower 14-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 278 Warwick 15-Feb-19 17:30
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 285 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-19 17:42
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 258 Warwick 15-Feb-19 18:01
Re: The Charlatan and the Truckler 316 Corpuscles 16-Feb-19 01:02
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 292 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:14
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 274 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:23
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 291 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:04
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 306 Warwick 10-Feb-19 19:20
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 346 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 19:17
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 300 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 19:22
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 296 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 19:59
It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 286 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:17
Re: It Is Not Evidence - It's False & Misleading 324 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 21:16
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 317 R Avry Wilson 10-Feb-19 20:12
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 272 Warwick 10-Feb-19 20:39
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 293 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 20:49
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 280 Warwick 10-Feb-19 21:15
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 340 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 23:40
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 277 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 11:00
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 385 Corpuscles 12-Feb-19 01:03
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 282 Merrell 12-Feb-19 09:44
Re: The Key Sentence for Corpuscles 380 Martin Stower 12-Feb-19 12:00
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 298 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 22:18
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 308 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 22:45
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 348 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 22:51
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 255 Corpuscles 09-Feb-19 23:05
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 313 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 274 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:24
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 270 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:30
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 300 Scott Creighton 09-Feb-19 23:34
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 285 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:39
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 312 Warwick 10-Feb-19 15:22
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 307 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:06
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 302 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:28
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 271 Barbelo 09-Feb-19 23:33
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 320 Jon Ellison 09-Feb-19 23:43
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 282 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:58
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 284 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:20
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 314 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:29
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 261 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 00:35
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 292 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 00:57
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 297 Jon Ellison 10-Feb-19 01:07
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 313 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:16
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 295 Corpuscles 10-Feb-19 01:27
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 311 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Are These The Words Of A Pseudologist? 323 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 23:19
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 356 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 23:29
Intro for new tv show 296 Warwick 09-Feb-19 03:31
Re: Intro for new tv show 284 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 10:39
Re: Intro for new tv show 266 Warwick 09-Feb-19 19:58
Re: Intro for new tv show 289 Martin Stower 09-Feb-19 20:12
Re: Intro for new tv show 264 Warwick 09-Feb-19 20:15
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 330 Corpuscles 05-Feb-19 21:13
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 299 Warwick 05-Feb-19 21:19
The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 380 Barbelo 06-Feb-19 04:16
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 313 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:57
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 313 Scott Creighton 10-Feb-19 17:53
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 271 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:29
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 283 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:31
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 292 Martin Stower 10-Feb-19 18:48
Re: The Evidence Would Put Paid To The Hoax : Who Wants That? 259 Warwick 10-Feb-19 18:54
A Soft Cock 299 Barbelo 10-Feb-19 20:29
Keep it Civil 283 Scott Creighton 11-Feb-19 09:57
Re: Keep it Civil 307 Martin Stower 11-Feb-19 10:48
Re: Keep it Civil 296 Barbelo 11-Feb-19 11:38
Re: A Soft Cock 273 LonelyAngel 15-Feb-19 15:28
Re: A Soft Cock 350 Barbelo 15-Feb-19 20:31
Re: A Soft Cock 270 LonelyAngel 16-Feb-19 18:10
Re: A Soft Cock 316 Barbelo 16-Feb-19 20:44
Re: A Soft Cock 276 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 11:45
Re: A Soft Cock 277 Corpuscles 20-Feb-19 20:19
Re: A Soft Cock 273 Warwick 21-Feb-19 18:01
Re: A Soft Cock 272 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 18:37
Re: A Soft Cock 271 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 18:49
Re: A Soft Cock 275 Warwick 21-Feb-19 19:42
Re: A Soft Cock 266 LonelyAngel 21-Feb-19 20:16
Re: A Soft Cock 279 Martin Stower 21-Feb-19 20:30
Re: A Soft Cock 277 Warwick 21-Feb-19 20:33
Completely Flaccid 287 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 05:59
Re: Completely Flaccid 285 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 12:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 262 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 12:53
Re: Completely Flaccid 339 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 290 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 13:27
Re: Completely Flaccid 283 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 13:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 312 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 14:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 270 Corpuscles 22-Feb-19 19:06
Re: Completely Flaccid 275 LonelyAngel 22-Feb-19 19:17
Re: Completely Flaccid 315 Martin Stower 22-Feb-19 22:44
Re: Completely Flaccid 268 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 11:16
Re: Completely Flaccid 276 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:40
Re: Completely Flaccid 312 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 02:35
simply put 257 Warwick 24-Feb-19 16:48
Re: Completely Flaccid 272 LonelyAngel 23-Feb-19 10:49
Re: Completely Flaccid 299 Martin Stower 23-Feb-19 12:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 282 Corpuscles 23-Feb-19 17:47
Re: Completely Flaccid 278 LonelyAngel 24-Feb-19 15:39
Re: Completely Flaccid 268 Corpuscles 24-Feb-19 15:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 264 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:42
Re: Completely Flaccid 272 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 19:03
Re: Completely Flaccid 263 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 20:54
Re: Completely Flaccid 254 Scott Creighton 26-Feb-19 21:11
Re: Completely Flaccid 304 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 22:07
factoid 302 Warwick 24-Feb-19 17:03
Re: factoid 268 LonelyAngel 26-Feb-19 18:31
Re: factoid 301 Warwick 26-Feb-19 19:39
Re: factoid 277 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 10:09
Re: factoid 300 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 11:00
Re: factoid 259 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 13:35
Re: factoid 314 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 14:33
Re: factoid 298 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:24
Re: factoid 280 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 16:52
Re: factoid 266 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 16:55
Re: factoid 272 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:11
Re: factoid 298 LonelyAngel 27-Feb-19 17:18
Re: factoid 301 Martin Stower 27-Feb-19 17:42
Re: factoid 257 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:49
Re: factoid 263 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 13:12
Re: factoid 289 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 13:21
Re: factoid 297 Martin Stower 28-Feb-19 15:19
Re: factoid 285 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:11
Dusty? 261 Warwick 27-Feb-19 20:05
Re: Dusty? 252 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 09:52
Re: Dusty? 284 Warwick 28-Feb-19 17:56
Re: Dusty? 337 LonelyAngel 28-Feb-19 17:59
Re: Dusty? 288 Warwick 28-Feb-19 18:36
Re: Dusty? 294 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 12:05
Re: Dusty? 286 Warwick 01-Mar-19 18:14
Re: Dusty? 273 LonelyAngel 01-Mar-19 21:57
Re: Dusty? 269 Warwick 01-Mar-19 22:11
Re: Dusty? 277 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 12:58
unbelievable 280 Warwick 02-Mar-19 15:27
Mod Caution > Warwick Off-Topic Posts 276 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:57
I apologise 303 LonelyAngel 02-Mar-19 16:59
Re: I apologise 352 Warwick 02-Mar-19 17:48
Mod Caution > LonelyAngel Off-Topic Posts 297 Dr. Troglodyte 02-Mar-19 15:54
Re: A Soft Cock 300 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 12:09
Re: A Soft Cock 292 LonelyAngel 17-Feb-19 12:44
Re: A Soft Cock 333 Martin Stower 17-Feb-19 13:11
Re: A Soft Cock 289 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 16:02
Re: A Soft Cock 277 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:12
Re: A Soft Cock 274 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 15:53
Re: A Soft Cock 246 Warwick 19-Feb-19 17:37
Re: A Soft Cock 316 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:06
Re: A Soft Cock 285 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:16
Re: A Soft Cock 279 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:23
Re: A Soft Cock 287 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:28
Re: A Soft Cock 308 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 18:31
Re: A Soft Cock 300 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:40
Re: A Soft Cock 342 Martin Stower 19-Feb-19 22:11
Re: A Soft Cock 317 LonelyAngel 20-Feb-19 12:52
Re: A Soft Cock 324 LonelyAngel 19-Feb-19 18:14
Re: A Soft Cock 249 Warwick 19-Feb-19 18:22
Re: A Soft Cock 247 Warwick 17-Feb-19 17:05
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 345 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 00:46
Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 359 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 06:14
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 353 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 08:50
I am not surprised at all 303 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 15:41
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 398 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 16:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 464 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 18:10
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 291 cladking 06-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 295 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:00
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 293 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:55
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 338 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:51
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 323 Warwick 07-Feb-19 08:49
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 314 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 15:24
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 304 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:10
Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 332 Hanslune 06-Feb-19 20:07
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 463 Scott Creighton 06-Feb-19 22:31
Re: Scott why DID you forget about those builders marks? 403 Martin Stower 06-Feb-19 23:12
More .. 322 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 23:00
Re: More .. 349 sfbey 07-Feb-19 23:13
Re: More .. 318 Martin Stower 07-Feb-19 23:33
Re: More .. 334 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:01
Re: More .. 349 sfbey 08-Feb-19 02:42
Re: More .. 320 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 00:26
Re: More .. 300 Corpuscles 08-Feb-19 01:26
Re: More .. 305 Martin Stower 08-Feb-19 02:39
Re: Goyon and Ginsells builders mark 329 Corpuscles 06-Feb-19 23:03
Why is it so IMPORTANT? 348 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 01:45
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 299 cladking 07-Feb-19 01:52
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 336 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 04:48
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 345 cladking 07-Feb-19 14:30
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 367 Corpuscles 07-Feb-19 18:08
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 345 cladking 07-Feb-19 22:27
Re: Why is it so IMPORTANT? 384 Warwick 08-Feb-19 19:24
Re: Pyramid Hoax Observations 347 JuhaS 13-Feb-19 22:03


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.