I subsequently came across the Fig. maps in your Giza Doomsday Clock article, where the center of the circle is indicated as being North of the middle point of G2's base (as such neither conforming to the correlating position of star Alnilam, located East of the pyramid's centered placement).
You hypothetically relocate Khafre's pyramid, in order to match the pyramid & star, which reconciles the structure with so-called Lehner-Goedicke line. To determine this diagonal, with two 'parallels' on either side, the two sets of queens/subsidiary pyramids were essential as a pre-curser. Their accurate placement, no doubt, would have demanded some undisclosed intricacies.
You claim the Belt asterism could have been reproduced by method of employing the "inter-quarter lines" to determine the square base placement of each of the 3 great pyramids. G2 however, you argue, was re-positioned from "the underlying design template" for some reason, which you suggest was to "create a specific timeline" - one that connects to the backside of the Sphinx. The last Fig. in this thread demonstrates such and the inserted circle is suggestive of its radius having an origin that corresponds with the apex of G2 (in situ, the actual location where it stands today).
The underlined however, conflict one another...
Incidentally, max.& min. culmination of Orion occurred 14.210 BC & 1.250 BC respectively.
Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 29-Jun-19 06:56 by hendrik dirker.