By calling attention to the referees' saying that all but one criticism was valid, the Wiki writer calls attention to the one that was declared invalid. This does looks like an indirect attempt to redeem Krupp's argument, with much-required vagueness.
"The validity of this match has been called into question by Hancock's critics, as noted in the text"
What a shit line. Anything can be questioned, and should. Under such scrutiny however, "Hancock's critics" had their asses handed right back to them on this point via the referees' answer.
Like I said, "low rent."
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11-Jan-19 17:23 by Poster Boy.