Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi Lee,

As demonstrated by problem #10 of the Moscow Mathematical Papyrus , in their own indomitable way, show a circle area x 2 equals the surface area of a hemisphere, therefore a circle area x 4 equals the surface are of a hemisphere.
Problem 50 formula applied to the 4 1/2 diameter of MMP 10 (4 1/2 x 8/9)^2 = 16 sq area of a circle
Problem 10 states 9 x 8/9 x 8/9 x 4 1/2 = 32 which equals twice the circle area.
The fact is in any circle with a circumscribed square the ratio between the square and circle area or the circumference and perimeter is the 5 1/2 seked rise run of 14/11 as found in G1 and Meydum pyramids. In G1 and Meydum where the perimeter and circumference are equal, but the square and circle areas of the two constructs still maintain a 14/11 ratio to one another.
i.e. 440^2 = 193600 area square cubits, perimeter 1760 cubits (440 x4)
193600 x 14/11 = 2464000 area circle sq cubits, circumference 1760 cubits, radius 280 cubits.
Circle circumference x 1/2 the radius = circle area.



What ever we can do with pi they could do with the 5 1/2 seked yielding pi like results in the form of 22/7. Reiterating and as stated many times before, there is no mention of pi anywhere in the Ancient Egyptian archives, but we do find multiple references to the 5 1/2 seked, and the square and circle. The problem is, everyone seems to be intent on proving the Ancient Egyptians used pi while ignoring their demonstrated use of the the 5 1/2 seked.

Jacob

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Area and the Rhind Papyrus 961 gjb 09-Jan-19 05:13
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 206 engbren 09-Jan-19 06:03
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 191 gjb 09-Jan-19 06:10
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 168 engbren 09-Jan-19 06:30
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 198 DavidK 09-Jan-19 10:06
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 168 gjb 09-Jan-19 13:32
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 175 Sirfiroth 09-Jan-19 15:04
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 155 DavidK 09-Jan-19 20:02
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 154 Sirfiroth 09-Jan-19 21:06
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 197 engbren 10-Jan-19 02:02
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 172 Sirfiroth 10-Jan-19 04:15
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 198 engbren 10-Jan-19 05:53
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 171 engbren 15-Jan-19 04:50
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 184 Lee McGiffen 10-Jan-19 10:56
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 225 Scott Creighton 10-Jan-19 12:33
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 216 Martin Stower 12-Jan-19 18:23
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 138 Warwick 14-Jan-19 21:04
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 175 DavidK 10-Jan-19 13:57
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 218 Scott Creighton 10-Jan-19 14:16
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 202 DavidK 10-Jan-19 17:10
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 276 Sirfiroth 10-Jan-19 17:58
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 184 engbren 16-Jan-19 10:24
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 191 gjb 18-Jan-19 23:28
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 186 DavidK 19-Jan-19 00:28
Re: Area and the Rhind Papyrus 203 engbren 06-Feb-19 12:56


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.