Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
My approach relies on the work of others I have not got time to do it myself and why change a winning ticket. I see Jacob's work as something reliance can be placed on because he is using Egyptian maths. Also I can follow his logic and he is using 44/7 and this is used at he UK sites as discovered by Thom.


I also think your approach and mine align based on what you have published and I have read. The systems are astro - geo - mathematical.

'Quote
From the Pyramids of Ægypt accurately measured by Mr. John Greaves, I collect the length of the antient Cubit of Memphis in this manner. The side of the first Pyramid was 693 English feet. It is very probable, that at first the measure of it was determined by some round number of Ægyptian Cubits. Ibn Abd Alhokm, quoted by Mr. Greaves, tells us, that the measure of each side was an 100 Royal Cubits of the antient times. But it is probable, that the Ægyptians learn'd, from the Orgyiæ of the Greeks, their measure of four Cubits of Memphis, and gave it the name of the Royal Cubit. Thus the side of the Pyramid will be 400 <409> simple Cubits, or four Arouræ; and the Cubit of Memphis will be equal to 17321000 of the English Foot.,

This is intriguing and the canon can be applied to the values.


It does not seem like the GP is being described but nevertheless


The cubit indicated is 693/400 feet and this is 1.7325 imperial feet 20.79 inches and is instantly recognisable.


20.79 x 17.6 = 365.904 solar days x 100/99 = 369.6 solar days, 365.904 gives 24948 miles 52 less than 25000.(Thom Pi is 1632/520)


369.6 x 360 x 1000 = 25200 imperial miles.


Once the system is understood interpretation of the cubit length produces meaningful information.


What Thom and SH has taught me is that the imperial system is a chameleon.


5280/99 x 100 = 5333.333r the sacred eclipse system


5280/99 x 102 = 5440 or 2000 megalithic units the nodal cycle is 5440/4 x 5 =6800 days..


This is how they hid systems inside each other. Thom's fits into the imperial using a unit of 33/34 imperial feet and the base 100 system uses a unit of 0.99 feet.

The GP is defined by 100 inches or 8.333r imperial feet as one solar day

3023 feet is 362.76 solar days Franklin
3024 feet is 362.88 solar days Michell


1 foot is 0.12 solar days

8.333r feet is 1 solar day.


It is very simple and works as cubit in inches x 17.6 = solar days.


20 x 17.6 = 352


20.8333r x 17.6 = 366.666r
x 24/25 = 352.


Using the Roman foot changes 366.66r to 352.
This is fundamental to understanding what they were doing. The systems are three dimensional using the sekhed 14/11 which is a manifestation of the imperial system as is 44/7 and 44/3 and 10/9.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 19-Jun-18 05:39 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 744 DavidK 10-Jun-18 09:11
The n/(n-1) ancient systems 111 DavidK 11-Jun-18 06:24
the ancients are laughing at us 129 DavidK 11-Jun-18 06:57
Stonehenge using 561/560 126 DavidK 12-Jun-18 06:25
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 122 magisterchessmutt 16-Jun-18 06:26
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 111 DavidK 17-Jun-18 06:27
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 134 Manu 17-Jun-18 17:04
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 109 DavidK 18-Jun-18 12:34
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 102 rodz111 18-Jun-18 19:02
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 96 Manu 18-Jun-18 19:56
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 99 DavidK 18-Jun-18 22:13
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 105 Manu 19-Jun-18 03:19
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 106 DavidK 19-Jun-18 05:38
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 89 Manu 19-Jun-18 07:04
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 98 DavidK 19-Jun-18 10:42
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 125 Manu 19-Jun-18 18:11
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 176 DavidK 20-Jun-18 19:12
Understanding “n/n-1” 118 Dr. Troglodyte 11-Jun-18 16:50
Re: Understanding “n/n-1” 119 DavidK 11-Jun-18 18:35
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 260 rodz111 12-Jun-18 19:48
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 102 DavidK 13-Jun-18 07:08
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 112 DavidK 13-Jun-18 07:30
GP perimeter using n/(n-1) 118 DavidK 13-Jun-18 13:38
The sekhed using n/(n-1) 138 DavidK 13-Jun-18 09:14
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 122 Sirfiroth 19-Jun-18 00:17
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 96 DavidK 19-Jun-18 20:17
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 99 Sirfiroth 20-Jun-18 03:12


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.