Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
The sekhed as 14/11 defines the design of the GP as a three dimensional unit of measure.

The GP base is designed against a circle of radius 220 cubits and the skehed defines the height as 280 cubits against a radius of 220 cubits of the inscribed circle within the GP base.

This relationship 280/220 can be restated as n/(n-1) by subtracting 220 from 280 to give 60

280 / 60 = 4.666r

220 / 60 = 3.666r

The sekhed is 4.666r/3.666r.

The sequence can be continued

280 plus 60 = 340 and this is Thom's megalithic system

340 / 60 = 5.666r Thom base 17

280 / 60 = 4.666r base 7 the sekhed numerator

220 / 60 = 3.666r base 11 the sekhed denominator

the next unit is 400 / 60 = 6.666r and this is the base 100 system using 396.

the system is sexagesimal so Babylonian in nature.

Because 3.666r is built into the ratio as the denominator and this is 10 barleycorns the eclipse is represented in the ratio as 40 barleycorns being 18.666r/14.666r.

So 14.666r will always be found in the design of the GP

Using decimal maths the Sekhed is 14/11 = 1.27272727r and again this translates using n/(n-1) as 1.26 x 100/99 and the base 100 system in this case is the sekhed.

126
63
21
7 zo a base 7 system x 100/99.

The eclipse unit translates using 10/9 as 13.2 x 10/9 and also as 14.52 x 100/99.

Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 19-Jun-18 20:27 by DavidK.

Subject Views Written By Posted
Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 786 DavidK 10-Jun-18 09:11
The n/(n-1) ancient systems 120 DavidK 11-Jun-18 06:24
the ancients are laughing at us 139 DavidK 11-Jun-18 06:57
Stonehenge using 561/560 135 DavidK 12-Jun-18 06:25
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 138 magisterchessmutt 16-Jun-18 06:26
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 117 DavidK 17-Jun-18 06:27
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 146 Manu 17-Jun-18 17:04
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 119 DavidK 18-Jun-18 12:34
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 108 rodz111 18-Jun-18 19:02
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 104 Manu 18-Jun-18 19:56
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 122 DavidK 18-Jun-18 22:13
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 115 Manu 19-Jun-18 03:19
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 113 DavidK 19-Jun-18 05:38
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 97 Manu 19-Jun-18 07:04
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 106 DavidK 19-Jun-18 10:42
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 135 Manu 19-Jun-18 18:11
Re: Stonehenge using 561/560 196 DavidK 20-Jun-18 19:12
Understanding “n/n-1” 124 Dr. Troglodyte 11-Jun-18 16:50
Re: Understanding “n/n-1” 132 DavidK 11-Jun-18 18:35
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 280 rodz111 12-Jun-18 19:48
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 115 DavidK 13-Jun-18 07:08
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 125 DavidK 13-Jun-18 07:30
GP perimeter using n/(n-1) 132 DavidK 13-Jun-18 13:38
The sekhed using n/(n-1) 145 DavidK 13-Jun-18 09:14
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 132 Sirfiroth 19-Jun-18 00:17
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 110 DavidK 19-Jun-18 20:17
Re: Understanding Michell's Canon and Thom using n/(n-1) 111 Sirfiroth 20-Jun-18 03:12

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.