Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Explain how scientific it is to allow an Unas example as the make-or-break test.
Let's say the result supports Scott.
Does that unequivocally confirm his theory? Make it fact?
I've seen enough ambiguity in the writing style to conclude the line of reasoning that employs it does nothing in support.
Sans 45-year-old video testament, archaeology waxes the proclivity of relative solutions. QED.
In this case, what is more likely?
Let's say the result supports Scott.
Does that unequivocally confirm his theory? Make it fact?
I've seen enough ambiguity in the writing style to conclude the line of reasoning that employs it does nothing in support.
Sans 45-year-old video testament, archaeology waxes the proclivity of relative solutions. QED.
In this case, what is more likely?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.