Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).
Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, Greg - you're quite right. It should be
> 22-25. Thanks for spotting.
>
> What's also interesting here is that this al Jarf
> document is held by mainstream as being
> contemporary with the Great Pyramid's construction
> (not getting into that dispute) - but the
> orthography of a number of the signs on the al
> Jarf papyri is quite different to similar signs
> found in the GP itself. Also the orientation of
> the hieratic script.
>
> SC
All very interesting. The difference in orthography etc between the papyrus and the quarry marks may in be because the papyrus is a detailed log book and lists for record keeping where the quarry marks and work gang graffiti are quick live notations and production oriented.
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, Greg - you're quite right. It should be
> 22-25. Thanks for spotting.
>
> What's also interesting here is that this al Jarf
> document is held by mainstream as being
> contemporary with the Great Pyramid's construction
> (not getting into that dispute) - but the
> orthography of a number of the signs on the al
> Jarf papyri is quite different to similar signs
> found in the GP itself. Also the orientation of
> the hieratic script.
>
> SC
All very interesting. The difference in orthography etc between the papyrus and the quarry marks may in be because the papyrus is a detailed log book and lists for record keeping where the quarry marks and work gang graffiti are quick live notations and production oriented.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.