Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yes, Greg - you're quite right. It should be
> 22-25. Thanks for spotting.
>
> What's also interesting here is that this al Jarf
> document is held by mainstream as being
> contemporary with the Great Pyramid's construction
> (not getting into that dispute) - but the
> orthography of a number of the signs on the al
> Jarf papyri is quite different to similar signs
> found in the GP itself. Also the orientation of
> the hieratic script.
>
> SC

All very interesting. The difference in orthography etc between the papyrus and the quarry marks may in be because the papyrus is a detailed log book and lists for record keeping where the quarry marks and work gang graffiti are quick live notations and production oriented.