Thank you for your reply.
> My post goes into motive and your post goes into
> Assuming the motive was not to come home
> empty-handed and instead come home with the
> solution to a mystery...
I was addressing motive also. As wacko, as the whole 'Hoax' fantasy proposition is from start to end.
> What you are saying is use the minimum necessary
> effort to accomplish the fraud, right?
Absolutely. I would have thought SC if he hoped to achieve any credibility would have addressed such issues. But alas, I see he did not respond even to your simple question.
> We have multiple marks in the chambers. Scott’s
> mission is to expose all those which tie Khufu to
> G1 as fraud because if even one survives his
> prosecution, the overall thesis falls.
> So this is a discrepancy I also see...the
> reasonable modus of the alleged fraudster and the
> mission of his prosecutor.
> Furthermore, we have Khufu and Khnum-Khuf side by
> side at Wadi Maghara, Wadi El Jarf and Khufu
> Akhet. The probability that these are two separate
> rulers from two separate eras held against the
> probability that they refer to one and the same
> person given the religious shift during that time,
> given that Khufu had a double golden Horus title,
> and given that this is the time immediately before
> the dynasty when King’s established two more
> titular names, prenomen/throne and Son of Re,
> weighs little in my opinion.
> Also, I have published proof that Hemiunu embedded
> the design of Khufu Akhet in his mastaba which
> further pins that pyramid to a king he served.
> Also, there were five gangs at work two of which
> used the nfr and the was symbol. They worked on
> Hemiunu’s mastaba and on Khufu Akhet. This
> symbols were painted over other marks. Scott has
> not ruled out the possibility that the numerals
> could have been added at a different time than
> these crew marks.
> At this point, Scott has generated enough
> suspicion to warrant a definitive falsification of
> his theory. In other words, the next logical step
> is to probe the partially hidden Khufu cartouche
> in Campbell’s chamber. If the cartouche extends
> past the seam behind the granite wall, the hoax
> theory is falsified. Then, the most likely
> explanation for the observations made by Scott
> pertaining to the other cartouche is that it was
> painted in situ at the time of laying the chamber
> and not at the quarry.
I disagree. I do not think he has generated any significant suspicion other than perhaps Col. H Vyse might have been dealt lightly by the court in completely dismissing and exonerating him on the vote 'purchase'/ manipulation/influence case(?).
Of all regular posters here at GHMB I suspect you are the most likely active researcher to gain permit to inspect the RC's. For all their bleating about "science", none of SC or his "expert", "independent researchers" are ever likely to want to ever inspect the real hard evidence. Fakes! & phoneys the lot of them ;-)
However you imho completely hit the point in this comment later:
Is it plausible to think that all are fakes? What was the motive of the alleged fraud and what was necessary and sufficient to perpetrate it (see Corpuscle's post)? To come home to England with a trophy in hand by plastering the chambers all over with red symbols they didn't even know? This makes no sense even for a guy who blasts himself into ancient monuments.
The only effort SC and colleagues come up with to explain the inexplainable knowledge these so called forgers had about writing in 4th D hieroglyphic/hieratic symbols was a vague guess they must have found a secret document that contained details of the phyles. LOL! but doesn't even address how the feck???? they could read this...... would be priceless (then and now)....., arguably more important than the cartouches themselves, document.?
Then have the confidence to perpetrate fraud , albeit with according to Operations at least 8 independent visitors during the 1837 Feb to July period inspecting works, including the Arbuthnot's (although it seems her ladyships ample ass did not make it through Davidsons tunnel or perhaps even inside G1)?
Then go on to fool the entire professional archaeological world (contemporaries and later), and all other fringe CT new , fresh thinking comers, for over two centuries until Z Sitchin has a fantasy about aliens (the latest craze) and then SC buys that hook, line, and sinker and tries to embellish it by what he tragically calls "evidence" LOL!
M Stower has every aspect of Creighton's and colleagues fantasy, completely, many times over , DEBUNKED! ;-)
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10-Jun-18 08:17 by Corpuscles.