Manu: No, the impression I get after looking at all this is still they are probably authentic...all of them.
I have no problem with that. You are perfectly entitled to your opinion. All that I shall say, however, is not to draw conclusions until you have considered ALL the evidence I have hitherto published. Which I do not think that you have.
I do not, for many, many reasons share your view. There are many serious questions concerning these painted marks, particularly the various names of the king, and they need to be properly addressed. I do not expect to convince everyone--that is impossible. However, in saying that, the evidence I have presented thus far has certainly changed the mind of your colleague, Robert Bauval:
See here @ about 56 mins, 30s.
BTW - I did enjoy reading your joint paper with Schoch & Bauval on the ancient name of the Sphinx. I should add, I disagree with it. But hey--you won't convince everyone.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 09-Jun-18 16:05 by Scott Creighton.