> Corpuscles Wrote:
> > Axiom 1: That the complete vocabulary of the
> > Great Pyramid builders is contained in the
> > texts and /or perhaps including the extant
> > discovered, Old Kingdom texts.
> These are rituals read to the crowds at the kings'
> ascension ceremonies. If you understood the
> language you'd know this. If you actually read my
> posts you'd have seen that I've many times cited
> the actual words which when taken literally are
> necessarily interpreted to mean that they are
> rituals. You're too busy looking for keywords to
> attack rather than looking for the meaning or
> If I cite them here you'll just blow them off yet
> again. But these words include no words of belief
> or cognition EXACTLY as is the point of this very
> Rather than address the actual point you lecture
> about reality according to Corpuscles.
> > Axiom 2. That the pyramid texts are a treatise
> > concerning building the great pyramid.
> I've made no such assumptions. They are mere
> But they are rituals that take place on and around
> the great pyramids and as such contain numerous
> clues as to their purpose and how dead kings and
> living stones ascended upon them.
> You have your mind made up about reality and about
> what I'm going to say long before you ever read my
> > Axiom 3. That the true meaning of such texts
> > only be determined by one individual currently
> > alive and requires extreme delusional
> > imagination.
> At this time I'm the only individual who has
> modelled Ancient Language so it can be understood
> by this specific stinky footed bumpkin.
> It will be easier to understand when it is
> translated to fit author intent. At this time
> Mercer's translation is by far the best English
Where in all of ancient Egypt is the word "ritual" attested?
What is the glyph spelling (Gardiner ref's please) of such word?
Does/did it mean anything like the modern English meaning? ie A religious ceremony, therefore intrinsically superstitious?
I join Hanslune in asking what glyphs spell 81'3" as well. You do realise you made that up? Yes?????
Your memory is sadly shockingly bad, but I will remind you that you conceded that it was merely approximately one sixth the supposed height of G1!
Yet you are attempting to interpret writing in disparate 5th and 6th Dynasty inferior pyramids and tombs which specifically mention the relevant kings name (in hieroglyphs) it is always "N" to you.
> > You are the original stinky footed bumpkin?
> > Then suggest you wash/bathe your feet warm or
> > water , dry and anoint with perfumed tinea
> > powder!
> No. The original stinky footed bumpkins were the
> slow witted people circa 3200 BC who couldn't keep
> up with ancient science. In their defense the
> primary failure wasn't so much stupidity or
> illiteracy so much as the inability to remember
> enough names. I'm sure this language was tough
> for the slow but it was also tough for those with
> weak memories. The inability to command language
> was likely a common problem for 40,000 years.
> Today almost anyone can talk because nothing
> really has to make any sense at all. Who'd even
> notice? For the ancients bad grammar would result
> in an inability to even understand or follow
A few of us DO notice that you do not make any sense, ever!.
Edit: This includes every internet forum reader ever to read your rubbish. You have failed in millions of words over a period of a decade to convince a single one person to accept your gobbledygook or BS!
Contemplate that for a moment … NONE …!!!!
You previously seemed to accept near or approximate orthodox time dating for G1?
If "they" were already confused by circa 3200BC how could they have understood this metaphysical science to later build G1?
As I said, you are more irrational that a lobotomised rock!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08-Oct-18 05:29 by Corpuscles.