Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
Quote

RW: Because what is written there is not
> the number 20. This was already explained to
> you.
>
> Miatello, a specialist in AE mathematics, thinks
> it's hieratic '20' - J.P. Allen and Hawass have
> offered some support to his notion. But you know
> better because you're more knowledgeable than all
> those folks, aren't you?

Let's review:

Quote

R Avry Wilson Wrote: January 27, 2018 10:39PM
-------------------------------------------------------
> sfbey Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Scott, Can you find Miatello's "20" glyph
> anywhere
> > else? Inscription, book, list etc etc etc?
>
> Best I can find in a quick search is
> Miatello citing the Cairo fragment and pBerlin. The link is to the only paper he has on this specific set of glyphs. No discussion or reasoning.
>
> Here is a net image of hieratic numbers.
>
> In the online news releases (which all lead back
> to Italian compatriot and archaeological
> journalist Rossela Lorenzi's report -
> [web.archive.org]) have
> brief notes from James Allen giving a tentative
> thumbs up. However, what this means is that
> Miatello's conclusions are far from confirmed. The
> '20' glyph could easily be Gardiner W25, and with
> the '1' really being M17 we could just as readily
> conclude it is 'ini' - to 'fetch'/'bring' a
> quantity of 100 (IF the '100' glyph is still
> '100', of course).
>
> Two things at play: The conclusion of being
> numbers at all is very much inconclusive. Two,
> that suggesting a contemporary employment of
> glyphs not resonating is supposed to mean Merer's
> text is dated wrong is preposterous.

Am I'm not the only one. Allen and Hawass did not give a 100% endorsement to Miatello, and if you care to do some internet research you'll find other arguments against Miatello. Notice that I use good reasoning to explain why the markings may not be '20'. (This 'reasoning' will come into play later in your post.) Lastly, pay SPECIAL attention to where I wrote: "The link is to the only paper {Miatello} has on this specific set of glyphs. No discussion or reasoning." In other words, looks like he ran it past some colleagues with the sole purpose of doing a press release, i.e. not a paper submitted to a relative peer reviewed journal. This doesn't sound like someone who is convinced of their own argument, and especially odd from a 'specialist' .... oh wait ... a 'self-proclaimed' specialist -> at academia.edu he lists as 'Independent Researcher, Egyptology, Department Member'. Department member? Of what? Miatello has published in a number of relative journals, so why not on this?


Quote

RW: Besides, you seem to think having an
> opinion makes the opinion true by virtue of it
> having been expressed.
>
> There's opinion and there's 'reasoned opinion'. I
> choose the latter.

Et voila. It is you who thinks your opinion is reasonable. It isn't. It's a cockamamie notion of forgery you've invented because you feel obligated to expand the already faulty cartouche forgery.


Quote

RW:Your opinion has been weighed and
> measured and found wanting.
>
> That's what it's all about. Problem for you
> though, and the thing you simply cannot
> countenance,

(Ah, but I have ...)

> is there are many who actually agree
> with my opinion and disagree with yours.

The only people who agree with you are ... who? ... disciples who don't understand the subject matter? AGAIN, take your theory to forums other than alternative MBs, then get back to me when you have their support.


> That YOU
> and the other hardcore Egypt fundamentalists here
> disagree is only to be expected - par for the
> course, so to speak.

I am certainly not a 'hardcore Egypt fundamentalist'. Neither 'hardcore' nor 'fundamentalist'. There are plenty of actions I vehemently disagree with. Try a little more finesse with your brush strokes, eh? Anyways, yes, disagreement is expected, but not because of any 'hardcore fundamentalism', rather some pretty basic objections.


> A signed affidavit from Vyse
> that he forged these markings would not convince
> you of Vyse's guilt and would instead have you
> finding some way to negate such a proof.

Strawman alert.


> You
> simply will NEVER accept these painted markings
> are fraudlent under ANY circumstances. I get that
> - I won't ever convince everyone.

Much to your chagrin. I have very good reason not to accept them as fraudulent. But listen carefully: IF a genuine document comes out written in Vyse's own hand where he explicitly states a plan to commit (or that he did commit) a forgery in these chambers, then I would accept it. Why? Because I accept genuine truths. HOWEVER, in light of other context, the evidence says Khufu built the GP, and WITHOUT the signed confession from Vyse I tend to accept the current theory.


> But I don't suspect that is the real issue here -
> I actually think the issue for you is that anyone
> should at all have the slightest temerity to even
> challenge your worldview; in your view you KNOW
> the truth and that we are all just listen to what
> we're told by you and those like you, shut up and
> just eat our cereal. You know - fascist-style.

Spare me the soap-boxing, Scott. You are free to challenge whatever you wish. The problem is not that a worldview (which you have no idea of what mine is - please stick to the specific subject) is being challenged, it is the value of the challenge.

> Well, as I've oft said before - hell will freeze
> over first. Oh and welcome to the real world.

Indeed it would before we go back to a free-for-all mindset of the Dark Ages and beyond. Anyhoo, if you wish to continue deflecting to a discussion of the virtues and failings of society, please find another venue.

Quote

RW: I could also point out the orientation
> of the numerals to the signs may not be relative
> at all, ie not written at the same time. One guy
> marks nefer, another comes along later and writes
> a number. This creates doubt in knowing the truth
> (barring 4500 year old video) of how they were
> written, and such doubt sinks any opinion you
> might have showing any sign of validity.
>
> In case it's escaped your attention, I presented a
> scenario to explain these anomalous orientations
> of these numbers.

Of course you did. Congratulations. The scenario is bogus, predicated on the already faulty cartouche forgery claim. It is as desperate a claim as it is wrong.

> The one thing these marks have
> in abundance is DOUBT. The problem for
> mainstreamers is that there SHOULDN'T be ANY
> doubt. But, however much you pretend to yourself
> there is no doubt, there IS doubt about these
> marks. And those doubts aren't going to go away
> any time soon.


It is you who creates the doubt in the context of forgery, not anybody else. Sure, there is doubt about a timeline when they were put on the block during construction (eg: writing Nefer preceded the numerals), or maybe even which way the writer was standing. But there is no doubt they are viable numerals written by workers who helped build the pyramid for Khufu. :)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 2301 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 11:16
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 379 Barbelo 13-Feb-18 11:29
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 354 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 11:56
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 387 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-18 12:55
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 371 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 17:09
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 347 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 17:41
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 320 M. J. Thomas 13-Feb-18 17:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 306 M. J. Thomas 13-Feb-18 17:53
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 320 M. J. Thomas 13-Feb-18 17:58
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 294 R Avry Wilson 13-Feb-18 18:16
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 299 M. J. Thomas 13-Feb-18 21:04
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 319 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-18 21:22
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 310 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 22:37
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 310 R Avry Wilson 13-Feb-18 23:44
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 298 Merrell 14-Feb-18 08:31
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 278 R Avry Wilson 14-Feb-18 17:52
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 229 Martin Stower 18-Jul-18 14:26
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 286 R Avry Wilson 13-Feb-18 21:23
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 280 M. J. Thomas 14-Feb-18 01:53
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 270 sfbey 14-Feb-18 02:52
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 280 R Avry Wilson 14-Feb-18 03:12
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 268 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 10:39
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 282 M. J. Thomas 14-Feb-18 11:16
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 256 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 22:34
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 278 M. J. Thomas 13-Feb-18 17:57
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 316 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 18:20
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 332 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-18 19:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 304 Morten 13-Feb-18 22:01
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 282 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 22:31
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 271 Morten 13-Feb-18 22:38
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 324 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 22:24
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 283 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 12:28
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 299 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 14:50
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 259 cladking 14-Feb-18 15:31
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 298 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 16:05
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 248 cladking 14-Feb-18 16:36
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 257 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 16:40
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 280 Origyptian 14-Feb-18 16:46
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 269 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 16:58
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 256 Origyptian 14-Feb-18 17:11
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 270 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 17:15
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 275 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 17:29
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 295 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 17:38
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 245 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 18:11
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 242 Morten 14-Feb-18 18:13
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 309 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 18:41
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 295 Morten 14-Feb-18 18:57
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 227 Martin Stower 16-Jun-18 09:07
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 265 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 17:24
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 255 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 17:33
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 255 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 18:09
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 264 R Avry Wilson 14-Feb-18 18:17
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 266 Morten 14-Feb-18 16:07
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 261 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 16:35
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 261 Morten 14-Feb-18 18:01
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 271 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 18:51
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 257 Origyptian 14-Feb-18 19:02
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 259 R Avry Wilson 14-Feb-18 19:02
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 257 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 19:13
Agree. n/t 240 Morten 14-Feb-18 19:03
Re: Agree. n/t 254 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 19:47
Linen list 255 Morten 14-Feb-18 20:08
Re: Linen list 266 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 22:43
Re: Linen list 243 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 22:59
Re: Linen list 247 Morten 14-Feb-18 23:09
Re: Linen list 250 Morten 15-Feb-18 10:54
Re: Linen list 287 Origyptian 15-Feb-18 15:08
Re: Linen list 226 Morten 15-Feb-18 19:15
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 287 Manu 07-Apr-18 02:46
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 302 Scott Creighton 07-Apr-18 15:32
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 299 Manu 07-Apr-18 19:26
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 317 Martin Stower 03-May-18 21:57
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 284 Corpuscles 13-Feb-18 21:37
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 299 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 22:54
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 259 Corpuscles 13-Feb-18 23:55
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 268 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 00:19
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 277 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 00:47
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 288 Corpuscles 14-Feb-18 01:01
I Know Someone Who May Be Able To Help 274 Barbelo 14-Feb-18 04:07
Re: I Know Someone Who May Be Able To Help 284 Corpuscles 14-Feb-18 06:31
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 272 eyeofhorus33 14-Feb-18 18:53
This book might help ? 273 sfbey 14-Feb-18 18:20
Re: This book might help ? 275 Morten 14-Feb-18 18:36
Re: This book might help ? 256 sfbey 14-Feb-18 18:47
Re: This book might help ? 272 Warwick 14-Feb-18 19:16
Re: This book might help ? 257 sfbey 14-Feb-18 20:14
Re: This book might help ? 255 Warwick 14-Feb-18 20:40
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 331 Morten 14-Feb-18 23:46
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 272 sfbey 15-Feb-18 02:29
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 287 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 10:01
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 258 Morten 15-Feb-18 10:47
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 264 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 11:12
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 254 Morten 15-Feb-18 12:11
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 280 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 12:28
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 268 Morten 15-Feb-18 12:59
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 247 Morten 15-Feb-18 17:09
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 286 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 17:23
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 248 Morten 15-Feb-18 17:39
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 255 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 17:58
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 254 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 18:29
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 246 Morten 15-Feb-18 18:53
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 257 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 18:27
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 242 Morten 15-Feb-18 18:46
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 282 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 18:04
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 261 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 18:17
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 227 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 18:23
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 350 Martin Stower 18-Feb-18 23:33
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 253 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 11:33
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 250 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 18:13
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 237 Warwick 15-Feb-18 18:32
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 259 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 20:20
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 278 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 18:40
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 281 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 20:08
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 315 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 20:26
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 278 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 15:21
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 264 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 16:24
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 266 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 16:32
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 264 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 16:36
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 251 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 16:41
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 255 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 16:46
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 278 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 17:16
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 241 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 17:27
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 223 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 18:17
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 269 eyeofhorus33 15-Feb-18 18:25
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 230 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 18:52
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 261 eyeofhorus33 15-Feb-18 19:03
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 328 eyeofhorus33 15-Feb-18 19:01
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 255 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 19:15
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 258 eyeofhorus33 15-Feb-18 19:36
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 256 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 19:38
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 264 sfbey 15-Feb-18 19:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 264 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 20:25
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 270 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 20:30
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 261 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 20:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 263 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:06
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 258 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 20:38
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 262 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 20:56
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 240 Morten 15-Feb-18 21:09
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 269 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:19
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 236 Morten 15-Feb-18 21:32
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 241 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:34
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 248 Morten 15-Feb-18 21:42
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 246 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:53
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 235 Morten 15-Feb-18 21:58
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 251 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 22:06
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 268 sfbey 16-Feb-18 00:03
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 296 Morten 16-Feb-18 06:47
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 255 Scott Creighton 16-Feb-18 11:05
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 270 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 11:21
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 256 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 240 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:47
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 251 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:34
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 247 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:17
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 210 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:24
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 214 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:39
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 239 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 267 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:59
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 317 Scott Creighton 27-Feb-18 11:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 310 Martin Stower 27-Feb-18 14:33
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 285 Scott Creighton 27-Feb-18 15:26
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 279 Martin Stower 27-Feb-18 16:05
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 271 Scott Creighton 27-Feb-18 16:12
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 274 Martin Stower 27-Feb-18 16:25
Curiouser and curiouser 322 Warwick 27-Feb-18 18:01
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 248 Corpuscles 15-Feb-18 21:47
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 263 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 22:13
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 238 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 20:26
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 255 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 20:39
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 265 Spiros 16-Feb-18 09:32
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 239 Spiros 16-Feb-18 11:38
Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 299 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 14:19
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 263 Morten 16-Feb-18 14:52
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 237 Morten 16-Feb-18 14:55
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 247 sfbey 16-Feb-18 14:59
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 278 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 15:13
Thank you n/t 329 Morten 16-Feb-18 15:53
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 266 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 15:00
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 244 Morten 16-Feb-18 15:25
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 253 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 15:29
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 249 sfbey 16-Feb-18 15:05
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 256 sfbey 16-Feb-18 15:12
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 267 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 15:18
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 249 Morten 16-Feb-18 15:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.