Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Scott Creighton Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
Quote

RW: Because what is written there is not
> the number 20. This was already explained to
> you.
>
> Miatello, a specialist in AE mathematics, thinks
> it's hieratic '20' - J.P. Allen and Hawass have
> offered some support to his notion. But you know
> better because you're more knowledgeable than all
> those folks, aren't you?

Let's review:

Quote

R Avry Wilson Wrote: January 27, 2018 10:39PM
-------------------------------------------------------
> sfbey Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Scott, Can you find Miatello's "20" glyph
> anywhere
> > else? Inscription, book, list etc etc etc?
>
> Best I can find in a quick search is
> Miatello citing the Cairo fragment and pBerlin. The link is to the only paper he has on this specific set of glyphs. No discussion or reasoning.
>
> Here is a net image of hieratic numbers.
>
> In the online news releases (which all lead back
> to Italian compatriot and archaeological
> journalist Rossela Lorenzi's report -
> [web.archive.org]) have
> brief notes from James Allen giving a tentative
> thumbs up. However, what this means is that
> Miatello's conclusions are far from confirmed. The
> '20' glyph could easily be Gardiner W25, and with
> the '1' really being M17 we could just as readily
> conclude it is 'ini' - to 'fetch'/'bring' a
> quantity of 100 (IF the '100' glyph is still
> '100', of course).
>
> Two things at play: The conclusion of being
> numbers at all is very much inconclusive. Two,
> that suggesting a contemporary employment of
> glyphs not resonating is supposed to mean Merer's
> text is dated wrong is preposterous.

Am I'm not the only one. Allen and Hawass did not give a 100% endorsement to Miatello, and if you care to do some internet research you'll find other arguments against Miatello. Notice that I use good reasoning to explain why the markings may not be '20'. (This 'reasoning' will come into play later in your post.) Lastly, pay SPECIAL attention to where I wrote: "The link is to the only paper {Miatello} has on this specific set of glyphs. No discussion or reasoning." In other words, looks like he ran it past some colleagues with the sole purpose of doing a press release, i.e. not a paper submitted to a relative peer reviewed journal. This doesn't sound like someone who is convinced of their own argument, and especially odd from a 'specialist' .... oh wait ... a 'self-proclaimed' specialist -> at academia.edu he lists as 'Independent Researcher, Egyptology, Department Member'. Department member? Of what? Miatello has published in a number of relative journals, so why not on this?


Quote

RW: Besides, you seem to think having an
> opinion makes the opinion true by virtue of it
> having been expressed.
>
> There's opinion and there's 'reasoned opinion'. I
> choose the latter.

Et voila. It is you who thinks your opinion is reasonable. It isn't. It's a cockamamie notion of forgery you've invented because you feel obligated to expand the already faulty cartouche forgery.


Quote

RW:Your opinion has been weighed and
> measured and found wanting.
>
> That's what it's all about. Problem for you
> though, and the thing you simply cannot
> countenance,

(Ah, but I have ...)

> is there are many who actually agree
> with my opinion and disagree with yours.

The only people who agree with you are ... who? ... disciples who don't understand the subject matter? AGAIN, take your theory to forums other than alternative MBs, then get back to me when you have their support.


> That YOU
> and the other hardcore Egypt fundamentalists here
> disagree is only to be expected - par for the
> course, so to speak.

I am certainly not a 'hardcore Egypt fundamentalist'. Neither 'hardcore' nor 'fundamentalist'. There are plenty of actions I vehemently disagree with. Try a little more finesse with your brush strokes, eh? Anyways, yes, disagreement is expected, but not because of any 'hardcore fundamentalism', rather some pretty basic objections.


> A signed affidavit from Vyse
> that he forged these markings would not convince
> you of Vyse's guilt and would instead have you
> finding some way to negate such a proof.

Strawman alert.


> You
> simply will NEVER accept these painted markings
> are fraudlent under ANY circumstances. I get that
> - I won't ever convince everyone.

Much to your chagrin. I have very good reason not to accept them as fraudulent. But listen carefully: IF a genuine document comes out written in Vyse's own hand where he explicitly states a plan to commit (or that he did commit) a forgery in these chambers, then I would accept it. Why? Because I accept genuine truths. HOWEVER, in light of other context, the evidence says Khufu built the GP, and WITHOUT the signed confession from Vyse I tend to accept the current theory.


> But I don't suspect that is the real issue here -
> I actually think the issue for you is that anyone
> should at all have the slightest temerity to even
> challenge your worldview; in your view you KNOW
> the truth and that we are all just listen to what
> we're told by you and those like you, shut up and
> just eat our cereal. You know - fascist-style.

Spare me the soap-boxing, Scott. You are free to challenge whatever you wish. The problem is not that a worldview (which you have no idea of what mine is - please stick to the specific subject) is being challenged, it is the value of the challenge.

> Well, as I've oft said before - hell will freeze
> over first. Oh and welcome to the real world.

Indeed it would before we go back to a free-for-all mindset of the Dark Ages and beyond. Anyhoo, if you wish to continue deflecting to a discussion of the virtues and failings of society, please find another venue.

Quote

RW: I could also point out the orientation
> of the numerals to the signs may not be relative
> at all, ie not written at the same time. One guy
> marks nefer, another comes along later and writes
> a number. This creates doubt in knowing the truth
> (barring 4500 year old video) of how they were
> written, and such doubt sinks any opinion you
> might have showing any sign of validity.
>
> In case it's escaped your attention, I presented a
> scenario to explain these anomalous orientations
> of these numbers.

Of course you did. Congratulations. The scenario is bogus, predicated on the already faulty cartouche forgery claim. It is as desperate a claim as it is wrong.

> The one thing these marks have
> in abundance is DOUBT. The problem for
> mainstreamers is that there SHOULDN'T be ANY
> doubt. But, however much you pretend to yourself
> there is no doubt, there IS doubt about these
> marks. And those doubts aren't going to go away
> any time soon.


It is you who creates the doubt in the context of forgery, not anybody else. Sure, there is doubt about a timeline when they were put on the block during construction (eg: writing Nefer preceded the numerals), or maybe even which way the writer was standing. But there is no doubt they are viable numerals written by workers who helped build the pyramid for Khufu. :)

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 2458 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 11:16
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 446 Barbelo 13-Feb-18 11:29
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 417 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 11:56
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 440 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-18 12:55
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 426 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 17:09
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 416 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 17:41
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 376 M. J. Thomas 13-Feb-18 17:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 365 M. J. Thomas 13-Feb-18 17:53
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 373 M. J. Thomas 13-Feb-18 17:58
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 361 R Avry Wilson 13-Feb-18 18:16
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 353 M. J. Thomas 13-Feb-18 21:04
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 373 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-18 21:22
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 366 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 22:37
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 372 R Avry Wilson 13-Feb-18 23:44
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 359 Merrell 14-Feb-18 08:31
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 334 R Avry Wilson 14-Feb-18 17:52
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 292 Martin Stower 18-Jul-18 14:26
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 337 R Avry Wilson 13-Feb-18 21:23
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 336 M. J. Thomas 14-Feb-18 01:53
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 323 sfbey 14-Feb-18 02:52
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 334 R Avry Wilson 14-Feb-18 03:12
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 321 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 10:39
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 345 M. J. Thomas 14-Feb-18 11:16
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 309 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 22:34
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 351 M. J. Thomas 13-Feb-18 17:57
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 380 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 18:20
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 381 Scott Creighton 13-Feb-18 19:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 358 Morten 13-Feb-18 22:01
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 338 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 22:31
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 320 Morten 13-Feb-18 22:38
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 389 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 22:24
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 334 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 12:28
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 386 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 14:50
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 307 cladking 14-Feb-18 15:31
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 380 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 16:05
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 304 cladking 14-Feb-18 16:36
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 323 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 16:40
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 338 Origyptian 14-Feb-18 16:46
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 320 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 16:58
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 326 Origyptian 14-Feb-18 17:11
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 320 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 17:15
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 329 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 17:29
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 355 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 17:38
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 300 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 18:11
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 296 Morten 14-Feb-18 18:13
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 373 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 18:41
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 365 Morten 14-Feb-18 18:57
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 281 Martin Stower 16-Jun-18 09:07
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 343 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 17:24
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 311 Scott Creighton 14-Feb-18 17:33
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 316 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 18:09
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 318 R Avry Wilson 14-Feb-18 18:17
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 325 Morten 14-Feb-18 16:07
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 323 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 16:35
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 317 Morten 14-Feb-18 18:01
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 322 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 18:51
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 308 Origyptian 14-Feb-18 19:02
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 319 R Avry Wilson 14-Feb-18 19:02
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 327 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 19:13
Agree. n/t 304 Morten 14-Feb-18 19:03
Re: Agree. n/t 305 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 19:47
Linen list 310 Morten 14-Feb-18 20:08
Re: Linen list 323 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 22:43
Re: Linen list 303 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 22:59
Re: Linen list 318 Morten 14-Feb-18 23:09
Re: Linen list 309 Morten 15-Feb-18 10:54
Re: Linen list 347 Origyptian 15-Feb-18 15:08
Re: Linen list 287 Morten 15-Feb-18 19:15
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 340 Manu 07-Apr-18 02:46
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 369 Scott Creighton 07-Apr-18 15:32
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 370 Manu 07-Apr-18 19:26
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 407 Martin Stower 03-May-18 21:57
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 339 Corpuscles 13-Feb-18 21:37
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 353 Martin Stower 13-Feb-18 22:54
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 313 Corpuscles 13-Feb-18 23:55
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 323 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 00:19
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 346 Martin Stower 14-Feb-18 00:47
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 346 Corpuscles 14-Feb-18 01:01
I Know Someone Who May Be Able To Help 329 Barbelo 14-Feb-18 04:07
Re: I Know Someone Who May Be Able To Help 343 Corpuscles 14-Feb-18 06:31
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 324 eyeofhorus33 14-Feb-18 18:53
This book might help ? 324 sfbey 14-Feb-18 18:20
Re: This book might help ? 328 Morten 14-Feb-18 18:36
Re: This book might help ? 317 sfbey 14-Feb-18 18:47
Re: This book might help ? 324 Warwick 14-Feb-18 19:16
Re: This book might help ? 308 sfbey 14-Feb-18 20:14
Re: This book might help ? 305 Warwick 14-Feb-18 20:40
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 392 Morten 14-Feb-18 23:46
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 332 sfbey 15-Feb-18 02:29
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 344 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 10:01
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 322 Morten 15-Feb-18 10:47
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 320 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 11:12
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 313 Morten 15-Feb-18 12:11
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 335 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 12:28
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 342 Morten 15-Feb-18 12:59
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 296 Morten 15-Feb-18 17:09
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 339 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 17:23
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 303 Morten 15-Feb-18 17:39
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 308 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 17:58
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 308 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 18:29
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 302 Morten 15-Feb-18 18:53
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 314 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 18:27
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 310 Morten 15-Feb-18 18:46
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 343 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 18:04
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 320 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 18:17
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 279 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 18:23
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 413 Martin Stower 18-Feb-18 23:33
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 308 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 11:33
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 303 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 18:13
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 291 Warwick 15-Feb-18 18:32
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 312 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 20:20
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 330 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 18:40
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 340 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 20:08
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 375 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 20:26
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 336 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 15:21
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 322 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 16:24
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 322 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 16:32
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 325 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 16:36
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 306 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 16:41
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 312 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 16:46
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 342 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 17:16
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 300 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 17:27
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 289 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 18:17
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 325 eyeofhorus33 15-Feb-18 18:25
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 301 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 18:52
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 312 eyeofhorus33 15-Feb-18 19:03
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 394 eyeofhorus33 15-Feb-18 19:01
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 313 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 19:15
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 314 eyeofhorus33 15-Feb-18 19:36
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 307 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 19:38
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 324 sfbey 15-Feb-18 19:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 318 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 20:25
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 326 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 20:30
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 314 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 20:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 321 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:06
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 331 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 20:38
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 318 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 20:56
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 303 Morten 15-Feb-18 21:09
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 322 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:19
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 293 Morten 15-Feb-18 21:32
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 323 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:34
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 304 Morten 15-Feb-18 21:42
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 302 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:53
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 312 Morten 15-Feb-18 21:58
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 313 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 22:06
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 322 sfbey 16-Feb-18 00:03
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 360 Morten 16-Feb-18 06:47
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 316 Scott Creighton 16-Feb-18 11:05
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 324 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 11:21
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 308 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 291 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:47
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 312 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:34
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 298 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:17
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 261 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:24
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 263 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:39
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 290 Scott Creighton 15-Feb-18 21:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 324 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 21:59
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 376 Scott Creighton 27-Feb-18 11:45
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 384 Martin Stower 27-Feb-18 14:33
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 345 Scott Creighton 27-Feb-18 15:26
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 331 Martin Stower 27-Feb-18 16:05
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 323 Scott Creighton 27-Feb-18 16:12
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 325 Martin Stower 27-Feb-18 16:25
Curiouser and curiouser 378 Warwick 27-Feb-18 18:01
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 298 Corpuscles 15-Feb-18 21:47
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 326 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 22:13
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 292 R Avry Wilson 15-Feb-18 20:26
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 304 Martin Stower 15-Feb-18 20:39
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 316 Spiros 16-Feb-18 09:32
Re: Rotated (or horizontal) numerals in Campbell’s Chamber 294 Spiros 16-Feb-18 11:38
Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 364 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 14:19
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 325 Morten 16-Feb-18 14:52
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 293 Morten 16-Feb-18 14:55
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 302 sfbey 16-Feb-18 14:59
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 335 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 15:13
Thank you n/t 394 Morten 16-Feb-18 15:53
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 323 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 15:00
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 298 Morten 16-Feb-18 15:25
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 303 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 15:29
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 303 sfbey 16-Feb-18 15:05
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 314 sfbey 16-Feb-18 15:12
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 319 Martin Stower 16-Feb-18 15:18
Re: Items of interest in Gliddon 1847 301 Morten 16-Feb-18 15:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.