Morten Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Morten Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> > Do you have examples of sideways digits up to 9
> (that are not dates)?
>
>
> No?
>
> Is it fair to say then that any sideways
> digits (that are not dates) - over or below 9 -
> outside Campbell´s chamber would confirm the
> digits we discuss?
>
> Morten

I think most people tend to draw their conclusions from evidence that DOES exist and, as such, can inform the debate as opposed to that which is non-existant and which can't inform the debate.

At least, that's how most sensible folks would operate. If you can find an old kingdom hieratic 'n' sign (that is NOT a date) anywhere outside the Vyse Chambers, I will gladly accept the argument. I have said that a number of times before. Just one sideways 'n' that is NOT a date and I'll accept the argument. I can't say fairer than that.

BTW - in the Vyse Chambers we observe the value '20' written as 'uu' (presumably two upside-down 'n' - or, according to you, sideways). The orientation is immaterial to this particular question which is: why do we find at virtually the very same height of the GP in the small cavity chamber at the end of the Queens' Chamber southern shaft, the number '20' written using what is believed to be a completely different hieratic sign i.e. not 'nn'? And why isn't it written sideways?

SC



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 15-Feb-18 17:25 by Scott Creighton.