Mysteries :
The Official GrahamHancock.com forums

For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board).

Okay...so the seked makes an angle of 51.843 degrees. Cutting off the 3 to fit with math sums doesn't do anything for the seked of 5 1/2 as an interaction of 14 and 11. You have 51.84, so you would have to explain what 51.84 relates to as it doesn't relate to the seked of 5 1/2.

I think we all know that having a seked of 5 1/2 relating to a circle as Jacob has pointed out means the circle isn't a proper circle. Now you are making it even more improper.

In the past, I have pointed out (1/5 x 360) - (1/7 x 360) = 20.5714285...a nice figure for the RC in the chambers, which expresses a complete diagonal in the upper chamber of 10 x (1/7 x 360).

You start off your math with the square root of 72 (1/5 x 360) which is all well and good, but then you hit 7 x 1260 as a figure to divide by, which is just 360 x 3 1/2...then 1250, then 1249 5/7 with a jump-back of 1/8 x 9 and marry that to 1234 2/7.

Then what the heck 30,38194444444452, 364,5833333333342 and 4410 mean is anyone's guess.

Rod, we can all play with numbers and I can take you on wonderful journey playing 192837465 and all kinds of multiplications and divisions and even add in some stuff like 4 x 65 / 99 x 3.71 but it doesn't mean anything. It is just the fun that can be had with numbers.

So, while I might have been a little frivolous with my comment, it just means that - even with what you produced that I am responding to - such as 51.84 has nothing to do with pi and therefore looks quite out of place in a discussion about pi. 51.84 is a number...so are the rest of your divisors...just numbers. You might have been as well off using 51.83, 51.85 22.96 or even a goat and two cows, as all of those don't have anything to do with pi let alone a seked of 5 1/2. If you want to express 51.84 as the number instead of 51.843, then you destroy even Jacob's work, and that just doesn't make sense as 51.84 doesn't relate to anything...you see?

Jacob's topic is about pi, or values of pi that are recognized according to a precedent...not shaving one number off something...you might as well shave numbers off all kinds of things like you were doing in another topic about the beams above the upper chamber and 46,656 which had some kind of exploration into all kinds of numbers that had no sense to them except being a wonderful exploration into numbers that were everything but 46,656 and applications to that.

So...well...do you have anything to offer for pi or the actual seked of 5 1/2? If so, add it in. If not, well, I'd like to talk about a goat and 2 cows. Do you have any?

I think we all know that having a seked of 5 1/2 relating to a circle as Jacob has pointed out means the circle isn't a proper circle. Now you are making it even more improper.

In the past, I have pointed out (1/5 x 360) - (1/7 x 360) = 20.5714285...a nice figure for the RC in the chambers, which expresses a complete diagonal in the upper chamber of 10 x (1/7 x 360).

You start off your math with the square root of 72 (1/5 x 360) which is all well and good, but then you hit 7 x 1260 as a figure to divide by, which is just 360 x 3 1/2...then 1250, then 1249 5/7 with a jump-back of 1/8 x 9 and marry that to 1234 2/7.

Then what the heck 30,38194444444452, 364,5833333333342 and 4410 mean is anyone's guess.

Rod, we can all play with numbers and I can take you on wonderful journey playing 192837465 and all kinds of multiplications and divisions and even add in some stuff like 4 x 65 / 99 x 3.71 but it doesn't mean anything. It is just the fun that can be had with numbers.

So, while I might have been a little frivolous with my comment, it just means that - even with what you produced that I am responding to - such as 51.84 has nothing to do with pi and therefore looks quite out of place in a discussion about pi. 51.84 is a number...so are the rest of your divisors...just numbers. You might have been as well off using 51.83, 51.85 22.96 or even a goat and two cows, as all of those don't have anything to do with pi let alone a seked of 5 1/2. If you want to express 51.84 as the number instead of 51.843, then you destroy even Jacob's work, and that just doesn't make sense as 51.84 doesn't relate to anything...you see?

Jacob's topic is about pi, or values of pi that are recognized according to a precedent...not shaving one number off something...you might as well shave numbers off all kinds of things like you were doing in another topic about the beams above the upper chamber and 46,656 which had some kind of exploration into all kinds of numbers that had no sense to them except being a wonderful exploration into numbers that were everything but 46,656 and applications to that.

So...well...do you have anything to offer for pi or the actual seked of 5 1/2? If so, add it in. If not, well, I'd like to talk about a goat and 2 cows. Do you have any?

A Slave of Chains trumps a King of Clubs every time

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.