Now you say that my ideas are close to your ideas, and that I should rewrite OMR using AE formats.
What I have in OMR and what it shows, none have done before besides the architect of the pyramid's info. Sure, I use obvious info that is available so that I can say 'Hey...this is what someone else has said...and this is what I say...and this is where I'm going.'
I wrote OMR so anyone might be able to follow it.
All my ideas are written so anyone might be able to follow them.
Bloody original stuff too, a lot of them are...
...should I point you to the post about a different kind of magnetism - based upon the internal workings of a Black Hole - that I made 3 years before MIT made a simplified version and declared to the world they had found a 3rd kind of magnetism?
Yeah...rewrite OMR just so you can say 'I knew that!'
You know what?
"Sorry Andrew, but I did not create the problem, just pointing it out. Would you rather not know? I guess these sorts of truths always catch us off guard and create unforeseen problems for those unprepared to hear it? "
"Yea, I was reading one of Rods post and got several ideas worth perusing. He also confirmed by a different method 25/9 is an integral part of the Ancient Egyptian system. (25/9 = 2 7/9 = 2.77777777...) with the inverse being 9/25 = .36 "
And you asked someone to leave because they were talking about their ideas...in their book...but it's okay to get your ideas from someone else...
...or is that truth something you would rather no-one know?
I had a lot of fun playing in this board...have done so since I first joined in 2003. ANd you and so many others were great in aiding me to understand the basics so I could allow my mind to formulate something original.
It was the platform from which to unleash my own spin on existence...
...and it was wonderful.
I wish you all the best, Jacob. Develop something no-one else has ever conceived of. And grow into someone respected and whom has time for the little man...every man...even yourself.