> Scholar Twit Femano wrote:
> > But go ahead and
> > conveniently ignore all those other
> 31277,1133064#msg-1133064]contradictions and
> > Then perhaps you can explain how he can depart
> > from Tura and head to Akhet-Khufu on one day,
> > then on the very next day, depart from Tura on
> > way to Akhet-Khufu again.
> Because he just didn't write it down.
So you're using what wasn't written down in the log as evidence of the log's veracity??????????
That's even better than your feedback loop in the algorithm. Lol
> Know what else is not recorded? What side he
> parted his hair on. Also, when did he eat, drink?
> My dear lord, he must have never eaten nor drank
> because it's not in there. Nothing about the
> peoples' specific duties loading stone. What ought
> we conclude? AHHA! Merer worked alone and
> levitated it on board. What about his age? Was he
> 12, 85, what? Ooo, the seriuos implications of it
> all. Was rhe craft he used a canoe or a 150ft
> freighter? This could seriously challenge the
> stone carry capacity: a bag of pebbles or 100 ton
> raw chunk to be cut up at the worksite?
Never seen any of that in any ships log of a ships movements..
I wonder why??
Is it because it's a ships log of a ships evolutions?
> I could do this 'ommission' thing all week. No
> need though, as this sort of track invented by you
> is utterly ridiculous, as anyone can plainly see.
> A 'Doctor' I wouldn't dare accept a diagnosis
> from; an art expert I wouldn't dare have calculate
> the re-entry of a kite; a barking 'hieroglyph'
> expert kept far away from teaching children 'the
> dog ran down the road'; a 'translator' who
> translates translations of translations who should
> be wearing a Dr Hector mask on an Egyptian tour; a
> Scottish priest who should disband his flock
> before a suicide pact delivers them to eternal
> grace in the Akhet.
> Did I [i]omit[/i] anything?
Possibly not but they did..
> Probably ... but maybe a timely algorithmic chart
> can figue it out. May Ra bless us with such
That's a good idea.