Martin Stower Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Origyptian Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> Doctor Femano,
>
> I am not about to respond in detail to your
> reeking pack of lies about what I’ve said.
> Anyone wishing to know what I’ve said need only
> read my posts and not your lying
> editorial.
>
> I will confine my remarks to the following:
>
> The topic of the discussion was set by this post,
> root node of the tree in which your pack of lies
> appears:
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,11
> 31277,1131654#msg-1131654]http://grahamhancock.com
> /phorum/read.php?1,1131277,1131654#msg-1131654[/ur
> l]
>
> You have persistently and culpably misrepresented
> the topic, or changed it to suit yourself,
> imputing the result to me, in the face of my
> bringing this post to your attention. Clearly you
> imagine that your carelessness, ineptitude and
> convenient “forgetfulness” constitute a
> licence to post falsehoods.
>
> Anyone wishing to know what a weasel you are need
> only look at this post and your response to it:
>
> [url=http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,11
> 31277,1132037#msg-1132037]http://grahamhancock.com
> /phorum/read.php?1,1131277,1132037#msg-1132037[/ur
> l]
>
> Anyone wishing to know what an odious dogmatist
> you are need only look at your muck above.
> You’re losing it, Femano. What we’re seeing
> is your galloping cognitive dissonance, as your
> pat little ideology is challenged.
>
> M.

How can it be a reeking pack of lies when I backed up my statements with posts that are there for all to read? What I call my opinion and interpretation you call lies. No big surprise there.

The fact that you don't want to respond to my points certainly doesn't invalidate them, it simply shows your predictable predilection to deflect and insult when you encounter disagreement.