We know Creighton is lying: his fingers are touching the keys. - Martin Stower
This from the man who deliberately sought to give a false impression of an important historical document, namely a page from Vyse' private journal dated 16th June, 1837.
Just over 8 years ago I raised a question about this page in Vyse's journal here on this very forum. My question related to the large cartouche on the bottom of this page - you can see it in the image below:
[dead link]http://doernenburg.alien.de/alternativ/pyramide/grafik/VyseJournal_lrg.jpg[dead link]
Above image link can be found at:
The image above was created by Martin Stower which he gave to Frank Doernenburg to publish on his web site. It shows just the bottom-left section of the page from Vyse's private journal of 16th June. My question concerned a low quality version of the above image which had originally been posted on Frank D's site which made the 3 lines in the disc of the bottom cartouche look more like a solar disc. I wondered, if there truly were 3 lines in this cartouche within the actual chamber (as we see in all the photos of this cartouche), why then would Vyse not have drawn the three lines clearly and properly in this cartouche at the bottom of this page? It was a reasonable question.
Eventually Frank D responded by placing a link to a higher resolution copy of the image which showed that there were indeed 3 lines in the disc. My question was thus answered.
So, the point here is that I was questioning the lines in the disc of the bottom Khufu cartouche on the small section of that page from Vyse's private journal. At that time, from what Stower had presented, it seemed very obvious that this was clear proof that Vyse had indeed discovered this "cartouche in Campbell's Chamber" - it was right there on that section of the page in his own handwriting. For me that settled the question. From what Stower had given to Dornenburg, it seemed there was little point in questioning the validity of Vyse's claim.
Until, that is, I went and saw the FULL PAGE from Vyse's private journal for myself; until I saw the part of the page Stower had deliberately and consciously WITHHELD because he most assuredly knew the implications of releasing it. On the part of the page Stower had withheld was a SECOND full Khufu cartouche which Vyse ALSO stated was "in Campbell's Chamber" except in this version there were NO LINES AT ALL in the cartouche disc!! A clear contradiction in Vyse's own hand and one that immediately raised a whole lot of awkward questions; questions that Stower would undounbtedly NOT want anyone to be asking.
Given the debate I had previously been having with Stower about a genuine (but unrelated) query about the marks in the disc in the image above which was eventually answered with a higher res image, one might wonder why it never occurred to Stower to mention the OTHER cartouche on that page where there REALLY WAS a major contradiction? Here we were discussing a problem with a disc in Khufu's cartouche not having the proper markings in it and Stower never once cracked a light about the OTHER contradictory Khufu cartocuhe on that very same page that he had WITHHELD from public view.
Mr Stower - I will keep this simple. In your actions (described above) you deliberately sought to withhold important and pertinent historical information, the effect of which served only to distort the actual truth. You did so even during a discussion when it most assuredly would have crossed your mind that then was a good and relevant time to AT LEAST make mention of the other, contradictory cartouche on that page. I do not say you had to publish the rest of that page showing the other cartouche but simply a note in that thread 8 years ago to alert readers that there was another Khufu cartouche from Campbell's Chamber on that page and that it presented a Khufu cartouche with NO LINES in the disc - i.e. that there existed a contradiction. You LIED by ommission, Martin Stower. You had the perfect opportunity to make that information known and you said NOTHING. You deliberately withheld that information to allow this false narrative to continue only because it suited your own selfish, narrow agenda and to hell with the truth.
YOU are the LIAR here, Martin Stower. A truly despicable liar. And don't EVER forget that.
EDIT: To update dead link using wayback machine.
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 05-Jun-18 08:48 by Scott Creighton.