Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi All

did Thom say those things , well I am not going to reference them but yes he did, I think he knew that he had been stitched up because his findings were just too radical for archaeologists to accept. He ended up being laughed at and ridiculed. He took it all with great dignity.


For me proving the megalithic yard became an obsessive challenge.

[www.amazon.com]

the proof has now been pared down to something very simple.


Thom discovered a system of measurement

10 megalithic inches 8.16 imperial inches

40 in a yard of 32.64 inches

1000 in 10 rods of 816 inches

divide this by 34 and multiply by 33 and get the parallel imperial system

100th of the imperial chain is 8.16 x 33/34 = 7.92 inches

40 x 7.92 = 316.8 imperial inches the root unit of Michell's canon of ancient measure


100 x 7.92 = 792 inches the imperial chain which can be pegged out as a circle with 100 links and a diameter of 21 imperial feet. The sacred base 100 circle as Thom suggested. This is the Aubrey circle when a unit of 2 of Thom's rods is the base unit being 13.6 imperial feet. 66 units / 21 is the Aubrey.


So Thom's chain is 816 inches and is 1000 megalithic inches so the two systems are replicas of each other


Cloister can slag me off to his heart's content but this is the evidence he continually ignores, like a horse wearing blinkers.

Dune has it using the 2.72 inch unit.

36278 / 2.72 = 13337.5 but the megalithic yard is variable and Dune's version is 2.7207 /36276 x 36278 = 2.72085

36278 / 2.72085 = 13333.333r a constant within the design of the GP.

36276 / 2.7207 = 13333.333r This is Hugh's version and the solution is understanding what the 0.0007 of one imperial foot represents. This is what Hugh and I are writhing about.

This is what happens if inches are used


36278 / (2.72085 x 12 = 32.6502) = 1111.111r the UOIO a constant within the design of the GP.


Why is this 0.0007 of a foot so important?


Because when used at Avebury it unlocks Thom's analysis of 521 rods of 68 imperial feet because the unit that actually needs to be used is 521 x 2.7207 x 2.5 = 3543.71175

The rest can been discovered using the modern NASA website because the above number represents 10 lunar years because Avebury is a Temple to the Eclipse.


354.71175 / 120 = 29.53093125 this is the exact length of the mean Lunation period on the NASA website when 0.53093125 is converted to hours and minutes.


They knew the mean lunation period because the lunar month varies with time, it is just unbelievable but Thom's analysis does not lie and it is supported by Jim Wakefield's paper 'From the Rollrights to Stonehenge'.


The version of Pi being used when Hugh's actual megalithic yard is used is 3.14159 Pi accurate to 5 sig figs.


The calculation is 3543.713053 / 94 x 12 = 1128.( Jim's number 94)


Thom was scrupulous with his measurement of 521 megalithic rods, why when 520 would have been so much more logical?


You can take a horse to water but you can't make it drink.


This is what Robin Heath wrote in his fantastic little book 'Sun, Moon and Earth'

'Islamic and Jewish calendar traditions recognise that it takes 33 Solar years to complete 34 Lunar years'


33 imperial base the Sun

34 Thom's base the Moon.


Audio Robin!!

cheers

Dave



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 13-Dec-18 10:56 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 2195 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 253 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 276 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 250 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 95 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 63 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 60 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 62 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 65 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 64 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 86 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 67 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 65 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 47 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 64 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 61 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 70 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 58 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 67 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 65 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 58 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 55 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 60 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 61 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 57 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 72 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 66 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 48 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 61 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 74 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 68 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 64 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 71 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 47 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 41 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 57 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 47 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 49 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 44 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 50 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 52 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 45 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 46 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 54 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Earth depicted in the sky 104 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 52 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 69 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 47 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 92 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 42 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 47 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 71 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 80 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 52 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 50 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 57 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 44 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 50 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 50 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 54 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 51 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 51 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 46 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 45 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 46 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 41 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 74 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 246 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 200 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 123 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 63 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 60 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 59 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 58 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 51 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 59 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 71 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 58 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 46 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 53 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 58 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 56 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 50 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 48 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 48 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 49 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 52 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 44 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 54 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 47 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 43 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 39 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 52 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 47 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 63 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 46 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 48 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 54 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 38 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 37 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 71 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 61 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 60 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 67 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 49 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 49 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 56 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 45 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 57 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 71 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 63 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 59 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 55 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 57 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 49 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 37 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 49 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 49 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 56 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 51 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 48 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 55 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 88 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 60 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 49 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 44 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 46 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 45 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 64 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 58 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 45 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 45 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 65 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 59 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 54 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 57 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 63 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 42 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 43 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 52 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 56 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 66 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 46 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 54 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 58 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 62 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 83 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 67 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 82 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.