Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hi All

did Thom say those things , well I am not going to reference them but yes he did, I think he knew that he had been stitched up because his findings were just too radical for archaeologists to accept. He ended up being laughed at and ridiculed. He took it all with great dignity.


For me proving the megalithic yard became an obsessive challenge.

[www.amazon.com]

the proof has now been pared down to something very simple.


Thom discovered a system of measurement

10 megalithic inches 8.16 imperial inches

40 in a yard of 32.64 inches

1000 in 10 rods of 816 inches

divide this by 34 and multiply by 33 and get the parallel imperial system

100th of the imperial chain is 8.16 x 33/34 = 7.92 inches

40 x 7.92 = 316.8 imperial inches the root unit of Michell's canon of ancient measure


100 x 7.92 = 792 inches the imperial chain which can be pegged out as a circle with 100 links and a diameter of 21 imperial feet. The sacred base 100 circle as Thom suggested. This is the Aubrey circle when a unit of 2 of Thom's rods is the base unit being 13.6 imperial feet. 66 units / 21 is the Aubrey.


So Thom's chain is 816 inches and is 1000 megalithic inches so the two systems are replicas of each other


Cloister can slag me off to his heart's content but this is the evidence he continually ignores, like a horse wearing blinkers.

Dune has it using the 2.72 inch unit.

36278 / 2.72 = 13337.5 but the megalithic yard is variable and Dune's version is 2.7207 /36276 x 36278 = 2.72085

36278 / 2.72085 = 13333.333r a constant within the design of the GP.

36276 / 2.7207 = 13333.333r This is Hugh's version and the solution is understanding what the 0.0007 of one imperial foot represents. This is what Hugh and I are writhing about.

This is what happens if inches are used


36278 / (2.72085 x 12 = 32.6502) = 1111.111r the UOIO a constant within the design of the GP.


Why is this 0.0007 of a foot so important?


Because when used at Avebury it unlocks Thom's analysis of 521 rods of 68 imperial feet because the unit that actually needs to be used is 521 x 2.7207 x 2.5 = 3543.71175

The rest can been discovered using the modern NASA website because the above number represents 10 lunar years because Avebury is a Temple to the Eclipse.


354.71175 / 120 = 29.53093125 this is the exact length of the mean Lunation period on the NASA website when 0.53093125 is converted to hours and minutes.


They knew the mean lunation period because the lunar month varies with time, it is just unbelievable but Thom's analysis does not lie and it is supported by Jim Wakefield's paper 'From the Rollrights to Stonehenge'.


The version of Pi being used when Hugh's actual megalithic yard is used is 3.14159 Pi accurate to 5 sig figs.


The calculation is 3543.713053 / 94 x 12 = 1128.( Jim's number 94)


Thom was scrupulous with his measurement of 521 megalithic rods, why when 520 would have been so much more logical?


You can take a horse to water but you can't make it drink.


This is what Robin Heath wrote in his fantastic little book 'Sun, Moon and Earth'

'Islamic and Jewish calendar traditions recognise that it takes 33 Solar years to complete 34 Lunar years'


33 imperial base the Sun

34 Thom's base the Moon.


Audio Robin!!

cheers

Dave



Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 13-Dec-18 10:56 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 2551 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 312 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 330 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 315 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 159 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 116 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 109 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 112 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 118 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 117 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 142 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 124 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 117 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 104 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 113 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 112 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 121 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 110 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 128 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 125 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 110 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 107 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 116 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 116 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 108 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 130 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 116 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 101 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 112 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 124 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 116 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 117 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 114 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 89 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 88 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 104 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 92 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 91 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 86 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 91 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 106 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 89 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 95 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 99 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Earth depicted in the sky 156 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 100 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 125 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 95 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 139 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 91 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 96 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 125 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 130 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 94 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 100 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 102 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 87 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 96 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 97 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 104 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 102 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 95 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 91 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 91 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 92 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 90 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 128 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 292 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 257 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 180 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 112 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 107 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 104 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 108 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 99 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 108 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 124 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 109 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 95 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 95 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 109 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 99 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 99 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 90 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 95 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 93 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 97 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 92 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 107 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 92 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 88 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 80 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 100 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 94 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 117 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 91 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 89 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 100 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 83 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 83 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 119 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 113 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 103 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 118 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 96 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 95 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 102 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 88 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 115 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 117 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 112 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 111 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 103 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 112 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 93 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 83 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 96 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 98 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 107 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 102 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 93 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 106 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 141 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 117 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 100 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 94 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 97 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 94 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 110 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 114 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 98 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 100 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 120 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 105 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 108 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 104 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 117 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 89 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 88 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 91 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 106 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 113 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 99 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 107 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 115 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 108 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 142 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 119 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 144 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53
Link to 277.777r at the GP 51 DavidK 25-Feb-19 19:37
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 59 DavidK 04-Mar-19 21:42


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.