Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hugh and I are currently writing a book to be called 'From Stonehenge to Giza'

At the root of the calculations is Hugh's megalithic yard which is Real Pi x root 4/3 = 10000th of Petrie's 3023 feet G1 base.

The link from Stonehenge is falling off a log simple.


Thom gives 330 meg yard circumference at the Aubrey the first phase of SH circa 3200 BCE.


My suggestion is that they did not design SH against the foot but against 11.88 inches or 0.99 of a foot.


So the number of units used is 330 x 2.7207 x 100/99 at SH = 906.9 units


All that is required at the GP is x 40 to get Petrie's analysis.


906.9 x 40 = 36276 taking us into Dune's last calculation to hit 3.1416.


Now when 'The Eclipse' was written Dune's work was not on my compass, but Jim's very much was.


This is my 3.1416 base 100 Pi calculation supporting the intro to the Eclipse, 3.1416 is base 100, 22/7 is base 99 and 1632/26 is base 102.


3.1416 is obviously the focal point as base 100 and is such a pragmatic version of Pi.


Dune has G2 designed against 3.1416 and it make me wonder if G2 is not the most significant pyramid of the three because of its position. I really have not studied it and the book will be about G1.


It strikes me that Dune's work and mine at SH find 3.1416 as the focal point of Pi as engineered by the designers. Not a coincidence.


The GP is a Pi calculation device as is SH. The difference is The diameter is fixed at Giza but variable at SH with a fixed circumference.


Thom Pi at the GP appears at 36266.666inches base perimeter the radius being 11155.555r inches and this is 10400 UOIO's.


the radius is 52000 UOIO's x 7 = 364000 or 1000 years.

This is the run in to my book 'The Eclipse' and SH is designed against 364 x 8 = 2912 = 560 x 52. with a 10 day addition every 8 years.


[drive.google.com]

this link shows how the 3 versions of Pi at SH work together and how the various systems are part of one overarching system and Jim's numbers are base 110. 3.1416 is the base 100 system.


Note that the base 100 Welsh system is also base 32 and that the Roman system is base 96. This analysis fits the Giza design and Thom's base 102 system comes out as 36266.666r at Giza. There are no loose ends in these calculations and the Scottish system is well researched but now I am more inclined to the Welsh system being base 96 and the base 100 system remaining a secret.


So no Egyptian analysis here at all but all of it links to Dune's outputs.


And when Egyptian Pi x Babylonian Pi = 9.87654321 and the square root of this is a very passable version of pi the question to ask is were they building Pi squared into their designs and the answer the evidence suggests is emphatically yes.


1760 / (22/7x22/7) = 178.1818182 / 100 x 99 =176.4

176.4
88.2
44.1
14.7 147 is a very well known number in sport
2.1
0.3

It is very deliberate once the system is understood.


Manu said to Jim


'A right triangle whose legs are one to two has a base of square root of five. This is geometry Jim. It existed before the pyramid. So did e-1 and square root of five.

1.718 ft/rc x 30/33 Ind/Imp x (2.236+2+2) = ?

You are looking at all these relationships in a one-sided way making one-sided conclusions when all this could just be incidental to the geometry at play. No knowledge of π is proven by your rectangle and and Indus foot conversion. This is the same systemic oversight you commit in all of your theorems.
I am pointing out the obvious and Jacob did so long before me.
'


The point Manu constantly overlooks is the deliberate manipulation of these universal constants using Thom's system linked to the imperial system.


Root 5 used by the designers of Carnac using the figures of Howard Crowhurst comes out as 19008/8500


8500 is 3.125 Babylonian Pi x 2.72 the megalithic yard x 1000, Thom's system


19008 is 10.8 x 1760 the imperial system

When this version of root 5 is divided into 816 Thom's base number the result is 364.9262939 x 360 x 1000 / 5280 is exactly 24883.20 the canon of ancient measure.

Saying

'
You are looking at all these relationships in a one-sided way making one-sided conclusions when all this could just be incidental to the geometry at play.'

just demonstrates that the evidence has not been followed through and you most certainly have not looked at Hugh's workings because Hugh asks the question - could it all just be incidental to the geometry and concludes it is not.



Edited 7 time(s). Last edit at 08-Dec-18 13:28 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 3173 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 421 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 434 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 428 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 265 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 203 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 217 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 203 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 203 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 201 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 246 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 220 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 218 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 210 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 201 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 214 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 238 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 210 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 226 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 227 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 200 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 204 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 218 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 215 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 212 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 229 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 216 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 193 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 221 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 234 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 204 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 219 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 207 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 178 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 175 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 192 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 175 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 181 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 170 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 180 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 212 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 181 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 176 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 183 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Earth depicted in the sky 253 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 195 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 231 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 187 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 235 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 180 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 191 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 222 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 222 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 175 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 189 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 189 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 173 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 222 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 187 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 196 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 189 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 184 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 181 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 180 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 182 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 185 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 225 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 394 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 364 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 284 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 204 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 191 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 210 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 208 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 196 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 207 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 221 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 211 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 183 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 191 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 210 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 192 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 196 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 176 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 187 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 185 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 184 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 185 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 207 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 167 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 175 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 168 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 186 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 181 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 209 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 190 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 176 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 187 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 172 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 169 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 225 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 210 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 207 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 230 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 182 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 185 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 203 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 190 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 220 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 205 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 211 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 204 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 195 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 214 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 180 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 164 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 187 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 188 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 201 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 191 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 183 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 208 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 249 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 223 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 189 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 178 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 186 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 180 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 202 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 203 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 193 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 196 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 216 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 205 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 210 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 189 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 218 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 179 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 166 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 170 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 200 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 216 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 183 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 212 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 218 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 196 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 244 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 226 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 247 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53
Link to 277.777r at the GP 159 DavidK 25-Feb-19 19:37
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 165 DavidK 04-Mar-19 21:42
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP and 1111.1111r 105 DavidK 22-Mar-19 20:58
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 116 rodz111 23-Mar-19 02:27
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 133 DavidK 23-Mar-19 14:44
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 105 rodz111 24-Mar-19 09:28
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 135 Thanos5150 23-Mar-19 15:03
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 130 rodz111 24-Mar-19 01:56
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 125 Thanos5150 24-Mar-19 03:32
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 100 rodz111 24-Mar-19 06:14
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 120 DavidK 24-Mar-19 13:35
closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 94 DavidK 24-Mar-19 16:33
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 97 rodz111 24-Mar-19 20:00
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 109 DavidK 25-Mar-19 08:18
Stanton Drew 110 molder 27-Mar-19 22:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 100 DavidK 28-Mar-19 07:37
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 86 molder 29-Mar-19 10:33
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 96 DUNE 29-Mar-19 11:16
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 113 DavidK 29-Mar-19 13:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 132 molder 29-Mar-19 20:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.