Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hugh and I are currently writing a book to be called 'From Stonehenge to Giza'

At the root of the calculations is Hugh's megalithic yard which is Real Pi x root 4/3 = 10000th of Petrie's 3023 feet G1 base.

The link from Stonehenge is falling off a log simple.


Thom gives 330 meg yard circumference at the Aubrey the first phase of SH circa 3200 BCE.


My suggestion is that they did not design SH against the foot but against 11.88 inches or 0.99 of a foot.


So the number of units used is 330 x 2.7207 x 100/99 at SH = 906.9 units


All that is required at the GP is x 40 to get Petrie's analysis.


906.9 x 40 = 36276 taking us into Dune's last calculation to hit 3.1416.


Now when 'The Eclipse' was written Dune's work was not on my compass, but Jim's very much was.


This is my 3.1416 base 100 Pi calculation supporting the intro to the Eclipse, 3.1416 is base 100, 22/7 is base 99 and 1632/26 is base 102.


3.1416 is obviously the focal point as base 100 and is such a pragmatic version of Pi.


Dune has G2 designed against 3.1416 and it make me wonder if G2 is not the most significant pyramid of the three because of its position. I really have not studied it and the book will be about G1.


It strikes me that Dune's work and mine at SH find 3.1416 as the focal point of Pi as engineered by the designers. Not a coincidence.


The GP is a Pi calculation device as is SH. The difference is The diameter is fixed at Giza but variable at SH with a fixed circumference.


Thom Pi at the GP appears at 36266.666inches base perimeter the radius being 11155.555r inches and this is 10400 UOIO's.


the radius is 52000 UOIO's x 7 = 364000 or 1000 years.

This is the run in to my book 'The Eclipse' and SH is designed against 364 x 8 = 2912 = 560 x 52. with a 10 day addition every 8 years.


[drive.google.com]

this link shows how the 3 versions of Pi at SH work together and how the various systems are part of one overarching system and Jim's numbers are base 110. 3.1416 is the base 100 system.


Note that the base 100 Welsh system is also base 32 and that the Roman system is base 96. This analysis fits the Giza design and Thom's base 102 system comes out as 36266.666r at Giza. There are no loose ends in these calculations and the Scottish system is well researched but now I am more inclined to the Welsh system being base 96 and the base 100 system remaining a secret.


So no Egyptian analysis here at all but all of it links to Dune's outputs.


And when Egyptian Pi x Babylonian Pi = 9.87654321 and the square root of this is a very passable version of pi the question to ask is were they building Pi squared into their designs and the answer the evidence suggests is emphatically yes.


1760 / (22/7x22/7) = 178.1818182 / 100 x 99 =176.4

176.4
88.2
44.1
14.7 147 is a very well known number in sport
2.1
0.3

It is very deliberate once the system is understood.


Manu said to Jim


'A right triangle whose legs are one to two has a base of square root of five. This is geometry Jim. It existed before the pyramid. So did e-1 and square root of five.

1.718 ft/rc x 30/33 Ind/Imp x (2.236+2+2) = ?

You are looking at all these relationships in a one-sided way making one-sided conclusions when all this could just be incidental to the geometry at play. No knowledge of π is proven by your rectangle and and Indus foot conversion. This is the same systemic oversight you commit in all of your theorems.
I am pointing out the obvious and Jacob did so long before me.
'


The point Manu constantly overlooks is the deliberate manipulation of these universal constants using Thom's system linked to the imperial system.


Root 5 used by the designers of Carnac using the figures of Howard Crowhurst comes out as 19008/8500


8500 is 3.125 Babylonian Pi x 2.72 the megalithic yard x 1000, Thom's system


19008 is 10.8 x 1760 the imperial system

When this version of root 5 is divided into 816 Thom's base number the result is 364.9262939 x 360 x 1000 / 5280 is exactly 24883.20 the canon of ancient measure.

Saying

'
You are looking at all these relationships in a one-sided way making one-sided conclusions when all this could just be incidental to the geometry at play.'

just demonstrates that the evidence has not been followed through and you most certainly have not looked at Hugh's workings because Hugh asks the question - could it all just be incidental to the geometry and concludes it is not.



Edited 7 time(s). Last edit at 08-Dec-18 13:28 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 3272 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 448 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 460 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 469 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 299 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 226 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 242 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 219 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 220 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 225 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 271 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 239 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 245 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 239 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 220 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 249 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 264 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 240 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 251 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 257 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 246 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 237 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 243 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 244 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 237 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 270 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 270 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 243 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 253 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 284 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 216 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 236 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 236 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 191 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 200 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 205 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 191 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 200 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 193 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 196 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 262 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 197 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 193 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 199 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Earth depicted in the sky 291 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 211 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 261 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 210 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 279 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 199 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 233 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 241 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 241 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 188 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 203 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 210 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 192 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 271 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 209 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 226 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 205 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 206 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 197 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 217 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 199 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 205 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 244 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 425 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 388 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 313 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 223 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 229 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 237 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 236 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 217 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 240 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 268 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 236 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 201 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 214 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 240 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 207 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 225 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 191 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 200 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 200 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 201 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 202 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 238 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 186 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 197 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 185 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 211 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 196 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 232 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 208 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 190 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 204 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 185 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 190 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 260 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 237 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 223 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 257 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 213 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 208 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 248 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 218 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 260 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 230 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 240 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 229 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 222 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 246 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 195 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 180 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 207 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 207 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 223 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 211 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 212 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 234 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 296 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 255 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 221 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 197 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 201 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 213 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 222 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 224 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 222 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 225 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 242 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 240 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 233 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 209 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 251 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 197 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 182 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 190 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 222 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 262 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 216 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 241 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 269 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 222 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 268 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 272 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 272 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53
Link to 277.777r at the GP 192 DavidK 25-Feb-19 19:37
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 191 DavidK 04-Mar-19 21:42
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP and 1111.1111r 137 DavidK 22-Mar-19 20:58
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 144 rodz111 23-Mar-19 02:27
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 162 DavidK 23-Mar-19 14:44
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 132 rodz111 24-Mar-19 09:28
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 166 Thanos5150 23-Mar-19 15:03
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 158 rodz111 24-Mar-19 01:56
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 146 Thanos5150 24-Mar-19 03:32
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 110 rodz111 24-Mar-19 06:14
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 137 DavidK 24-Mar-19 13:35
closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 105 DavidK 24-Mar-19 16:33
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 114 rodz111 24-Mar-19 20:00
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 123 DavidK 25-Mar-19 08:18
Stanton Drew 143 molder 27-Mar-19 22:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 135 DavidK 28-Mar-19 07:37
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 107 molder 29-Mar-19 10:33
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 123 DUNE 29-Mar-19 11:16
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 131 DavidK 29-Mar-19 13:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 161 molder 29-Mar-19 20:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.