Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hugh and I are currently writing a book to be called 'From Stonehenge to Giza'

At the root of the calculations is Hugh's megalithic yard which is Real Pi x root 4/3 = 10000th of Petrie's 3023 feet G1 base.

The link from Stonehenge is falling off a log simple.


Thom gives 330 meg yard circumference at the Aubrey the first phase of SH circa 3200 BCE.


My suggestion is that they did not design SH against the foot but against 11.88 inches or 0.99 of a foot.


So the number of units used is 330 x 2.7207 x 100/99 at SH = 906.9 units


All that is required at the GP is x 40 to get Petrie's analysis.


906.9 x 40 = 36276 taking us into Dune's last calculation to hit 3.1416.


Now when 'The Eclipse' was written Dune's work was not on my compass, but Jim's very much was.


This is my 3.1416 base 100 Pi calculation supporting the intro to the Eclipse, 3.1416 is base 100, 22/7 is base 99 and 1632/26 is base 102.


3.1416 is obviously the focal point as base 100 and is such a pragmatic version of Pi.


Dune has G2 designed against 3.1416 and it make me wonder if G2 is not the most significant pyramid of the three because of its position. I really have not studied it and the book will be about G1.


It strikes me that Dune's work and mine at SH find 3.1416 as the focal point of Pi as engineered by the designers. Not a coincidence.


The GP is a Pi calculation device as is SH. The difference is The diameter is fixed at Giza but variable at SH with a fixed circumference.


Thom Pi at the GP appears at 36266.666inches base perimeter the radius being 11155.555r inches and this is 10400 UOIO's.


the radius is 52000 UOIO's x 7 = 364000 or 1000 years.

This is the run in to my book 'The Eclipse' and SH is designed against 364 x 8 = 2912 = 560 x 52. with a 10 day addition every 8 years.


[drive.google.com]

this link shows how the 3 versions of Pi at SH work together and how the various systems are part of one overarching system and Jim's numbers are base 110. 3.1416 is the base 100 system.


Note that the base 100 Welsh system is also base 32 and that the Roman system is base 96. This analysis fits the Giza design and Thom's base 102 system comes out as 36266.666r at Giza. There are no loose ends in these calculations and the Scottish system is well researched but now I am more inclined to the Welsh system being base 96 and the base 100 system remaining a secret.


So no Egyptian analysis here at all but all of it links to Dune's outputs.


And when Egyptian Pi x Babylonian Pi = 9.87654321 and the square root of this is a very passable version of pi the question to ask is were they building Pi squared into their designs and the answer the evidence suggests is emphatically yes.


1760 / (22/7x22/7) = 178.1818182 / 100 x 99 =176.4

176.4
88.2
44.1
14.7 147 is a very well known number in sport
2.1
0.3

It is very deliberate once the system is understood.


Manu said to Jim


'A right triangle whose legs are one to two has a base of square root of five. This is geometry Jim. It existed before the pyramid. So did e-1 and square root of five.

1.718 ft/rc x 30/33 Ind/Imp x (2.236+2+2) = ?

You are looking at all these relationships in a one-sided way making one-sided conclusions when all this could just be incidental to the geometry at play. No knowledge of π is proven by your rectangle and and Indus foot conversion. This is the same systemic oversight you commit in all of your theorems.
I am pointing out the obvious and Jacob did so long before me.
'


The point Manu constantly overlooks is the deliberate manipulation of these universal constants using Thom's system linked to the imperial system.


Root 5 used by the designers of Carnac using the figures of Howard Crowhurst comes out as 19008/8500


8500 is 3.125 Babylonian Pi x 2.72 the megalithic yard x 1000, Thom's system


19008 is 10.8 x 1760 the imperial system

When this version of root 5 is divided into 816 Thom's base number the result is 364.9262939 x 360 x 1000 / 5280 is exactly 24883.20 the canon of ancient measure.

Saying

'
You are looking at all these relationships in a one-sided way making one-sided conclusions when all this could just be incidental to the geometry at play.'

just demonstrates that the evidence has not been followed through and you most certainly have not looked at Hugh's workings because Hugh asks the question - could it all just be incidental to the geometry and concludes it is not.



Edited 7 time(s). Last edit at 08-Dec-18 13:28 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 3240 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 436 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 450 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 460 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 287 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 217 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 233 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 214 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 216 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 209 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 260 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 233 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 232 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 225 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 212 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 240 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 252 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 224 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 240 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 239 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 224 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 221 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 232 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 229 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 223 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 251 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 244 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 218 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 237 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 263 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 212 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 230 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 225 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 186 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 186 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 200 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 184 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 190 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 182 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 189 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 239 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 188 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 185 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 192 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Earth depicted in the sky 272 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 205 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 247 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 197 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 257 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 191 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 213 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 232 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 235 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 184 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 196 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 202 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 184 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 248 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 198 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 210 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 198 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 196 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 188 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 194 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 189 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 200 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 236 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 408 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 377 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 301 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 218 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 212 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 226 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 226 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 208 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 229 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 247 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 224 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 194 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 207 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 226 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 200 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 216 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 186 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 194 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 194 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 193 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 195 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 224 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 179 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 185 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 178 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 195 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 190 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 223 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 199 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 185 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 196 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 179 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 182 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 242 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 223 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 215 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 242 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 197 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 197 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 228 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 199 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 238 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 220 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 228 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 216 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 211 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 235 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 188 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 174 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 198 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 199 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 213 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 205 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 198 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 223 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 272 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 241 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 206 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 191 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 197 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 195 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 215 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 214 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 210 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 212 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 233 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 229 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 224 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 201 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 234 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 190 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 175 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 181 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 214 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 244 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 200 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 225 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 236 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 204 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 257 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 262 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 260 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53
Link to 277.777r at the GP 175 DavidK 25-Feb-19 19:37
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 181 DavidK 04-Mar-19 21:42
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP and 1111.1111r 122 DavidK 22-Mar-19 20:58
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 127 rodz111 23-Mar-19 02:27
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 152 DavidK 23-Mar-19 14:44
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 117 rodz111 24-Mar-19 09:28
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 150 Thanos5150 23-Mar-19 15:03
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 149 rodz111 24-Mar-19 01:56
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 138 Thanos5150 24-Mar-19 03:32
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 107 rodz111 24-Mar-19 06:14
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 130 DavidK 24-Mar-19 13:35
closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 102 DavidK 24-Mar-19 16:33
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 108 rodz111 24-Mar-19 20:00
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 117 DavidK 25-Mar-19 08:18
Stanton Drew 133 molder 27-Mar-19 22:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 116 DavidK 28-Mar-19 07:37
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 101 molder 29-Mar-19 10:33
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 111 DUNE 29-Mar-19 11:16
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 123 DavidK 29-Mar-19 13:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 150 molder 29-Mar-19 20:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.