Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hugh and I are currently writing a book to be called 'From Stonehenge to Giza'

At the root of the calculations is Hugh's megalithic yard which is Real Pi x root 4/3 = 10000th of Petrie's 3023 feet G1 base.

The link from Stonehenge is falling off a log simple.


Thom gives 330 meg yard circumference at the Aubrey the first phase of SH circa 3200 BCE.


My suggestion is that they did not design SH against the foot but against 11.88 inches or 0.99 of a foot.


So the number of units used is 330 x 2.7207 x 100/99 at SH = 906.9 units


All that is required at the GP is x 40 to get Petrie's analysis.


906.9 x 40 = 36276 taking us into Dune's last calculation to hit 3.1416.


Now when 'The Eclipse' was written Dune's work was not on my compass, but Jim's very much was.


This is my 3.1416 base 100 Pi calculation supporting the intro to the Eclipse, 3.1416 is base 100, 22/7 is base 99 and 1632/26 is base 102.


3.1416 is obviously the focal point as base 100 and is such a pragmatic version of Pi.


Dune has G2 designed against 3.1416 and it make me wonder if G2 is not the most significant pyramid of the three because of its position. I really have not studied it and the book will be about G1.


It strikes me that Dune's work and mine at SH find 3.1416 as the focal point of Pi as engineered by the designers. Not a coincidence.


The GP is a Pi calculation device as is SH. The difference is The diameter is fixed at Giza but variable at SH with a fixed circumference.


Thom Pi at the GP appears at 36266.666inches base perimeter the radius being 11155.555r inches and this is 10400 UOIO's.


the radius is 52000 UOIO's x 7 = 364000 or 1000 years.

This is the run in to my book 'The Eclipse' and SH is designed against 364 x 8 = 2912 = 560 x 52. with a 10 day addition every 8 years.


[drive.google.com]

this link shows how the 3 versions of Pi at SH work together and how the various systems are part of one overarching system and Jim's numbers are base 110. 3.1416 is the base 100 system.


Note that the base 100 Welsh system is also base 32 and that the Roman system is base 96. This analysis fits the Giza design and Thom's base 102 system comes out as 36266.666r at Giza. There are no loose ends in these calculations and the Scottish system is well researched but now I am more inclined to the Welsh system being base 96 and the base 100 system remaining a secret.


So no Egyptian analysis here at all but all of it links to Dune's outputs.


And when Egyptian Pi x Babylonian Pi = 9.87654321 and the square root of this is a very passable version of pi the question to ask is were they building Pi squared into their designs and the answer the evidence suggests is emphatically yes.


1760 / (22/7x22/7) = 178.1818182 / 100 x 99 =176.4

176.4
88.2
44.1
14.7 147 is a very well known number in sport
2.1
0.3

It is very deliberate once the system is understood.


Manu said to Jim


'A right triangle whose legs are one to two has a base of square root of five. This is geometry Jim. It existed before the pyramid. So did e-1 and square root of five.

1.718 ft/rc x 30/33 Ind/Imp x (2.236+2+2) = ?

You are looking at all these relationships in a one-sided way making one-sided conclusions when all this could just be incidental to the geometry at play. No knowledge of π is proven by your rectangle and and Indus foot conversion. This is the same systemic oversight you commit in all of your theorems.
I am pointing out the obvious and Jacob did so long before me.
'


The point Manu constantly overlooks is the deliberate manipulation of these universal constants using Thom's system linked to the imperial system.


Root 5 used by the designers of Carnac using the figures of Howard Crowhurst comes out as 19008/8500


8500 is 3.125 Babylonian Pi x 2.72 the megalithic yard x 1000, Thom's system


19008 is 10.8 x 1760 the imperial system

When this version of root 5 is divided into 816 Thom's base number the result is 364.9262939 x 360 x 1000 / 5280 is exactly 24883.20 the canon of ancient measure.

Saying

'
You are looking at all these relationships in a one-sided way making one-sided conclusions when all this could just be incidental to the geometry at play.'

just demonstrates that the evidence has not been followed through and you most certainly have not looked at Hugh's workings because Hugh asks the question - could it all just be incidental to the geometry and concludes it is not.



Edited 7 time(s). Last edit at 08-Dec-18 13:28 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 2188 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 252 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 275 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 248 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 94 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 62 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 58 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 61 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 63 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 62 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 84 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 65 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 64 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 46 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 63 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 59 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 69 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 57 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 65 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 62 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 57 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 54 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 59 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 59 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 55 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 70 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 65 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 47 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 60 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 73 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 67 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 63 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 69 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 46 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 40 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 56 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 46 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 48 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 42 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 47 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 51 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 43 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 45 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 53 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Earth depicted in the sky 103 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 51 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 68 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 46 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 84 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 41 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 46 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 70 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 76 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 49 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 47 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 55 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 43 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 49 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 48 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 52 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 50 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 50 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 44 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 42 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 45 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 40 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 73 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 245 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 198 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 121 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 62 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 58 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 58 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 54 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 49 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 56 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 70 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 56 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 45 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 52 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 57 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 55 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 47 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 47 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 46 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 48 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 51 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 43 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 52 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 45 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 42 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 37 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 50 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 45 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 62 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 44 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 46 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 53 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 37 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 36 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 69 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 59 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 58 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 66 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 48 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 48 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 54 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 43 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 53 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 68 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 62 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 56 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 53 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 55 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 48 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 36 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 48 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 48 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 55 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 48 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 46 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 54 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 83 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 57 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 48 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 43 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 45 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 44 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 63 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 56 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 44 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 44 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 63 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 58 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 52 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 56 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 62 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 41 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 42 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 51 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 55 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 65 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 44 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 52 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 56 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 61 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 81 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 66 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 81 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.