Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Hugh and I are currently writing a book to be called 'From Stonehenge to Giza'

At the root of the calculations is Hugh's megalithic yard which is Real Pi x root 4/3 = 10000th of Petrie's 3023 feet G1 base.

The link from Stonehenge is falling off a log simple.


Thom gives 330 meg yard circumference at the Aubrey the first phase of SH circa 3200 BCE.


My suggestion is that they did not design SH against the foot but against 11.88 inches or 0.99 of a foot.


So the number of units used is 330 x 2.7207 x 100/99 at SH = 906.9 units


All that is required at the GP is x 40 to get Petrie's analysis.


906.9 x 40 = 36276 taking us into Dune's last calculation to hit 3.1416.


Now when 'The Eclipse' was written Dune's work was not on my compass, but Jim's very much was.


This is my 3.1416 base 100 Pi calculation supporting the intro to the Eclipse, 3.1416 is base 100, 22/7 is base 99 and 1632/26 is base 102.


3.1416 is obviously the focal point as base 100 and is such a pragmatic version of Pi.


Dune has G2 designed against 3.1416 and it make me wonder if G2 is not the most significant pyramid of the three because of its position. I really have not studied it and the book will be about G1.


It strikes me that Dune's work and mine at SH find 3.1416 as the focal point of Pi as engineered by the designers. Not a coincidence.


The GP is a Pi calculation device as is SH. The difference is The diameter is fixed at Giza but variable at SH with a fixed circumference.


Thom Pi at the GP appears at 36266.666inches base perimeter the radius being 11155.555r inches and this is 10400 UOIO's.


the radius is 52000 UOIO's x 7 = 364000 or 1000 years.

This is the run in to my book 'The Eclipse' and SH is designed against 364 x 8 = 2912 = 560 x 52. with a 10 day addition every 8 years.


[drive.google.com]

this link shows how the 3 versions of Pi at SH work together and how the various systems are part of one overarching system and Jim's numbers are base 110. 3.1416 is the base 100 system.


Note that the base 100 Welsh system is also base 32 and that the Roman system is base 96. This analysis fits the Giza design and Thom's base 102 system comes out as 36266.666r at Giza. There are no loose ends in these calculations and the Scottish system is well researched but now I am more inclined to the Welsh system being base 96 and the base 100 system remaining a secret.


So no Egyptian analysis here at all but all of it links to Dune's outputs.


And when Egyptian Pi x Babylonian Pi = 9.87654321 and the square root of this is a very passable version of pi the question to ask is were they building Pi squared into their designs and the answer the evidence suggests is emphatically yes.


1760 / (22/7x22/7) = 178.1818182 / 100 x 99 =176.4

176.4
88.2
44.1
14.7 147 is a very well known number in sport
2.1
0.3

It is very deliberate once the system is understood.


Manu said to Jim


'A right triangle whose legs are one to two has a base of square root of five. This is geometry Jim. It existed before the pyramid. So did e-1 and square root of five.

1.718 ft/rc x 30/33 Ind/Imp x (2.236+2+2) = ?

You are looking at all these relationships in a one-sided way making one-sided conclusions when all this could just be incidental to the geometry at play. No knowledge of π is proven by your rectangle and and Indus foot conversion. This is the same systemic oversight you commit in all of your theorems.
I am pointing out the obvious and Jacob did so long before me.
'


The point Manu constantly overlooks is the deliberate manipulation of these universal constants using Thom's system linked to the imperial system.


Root 5 used by the designers of Carnac using the figures of Howard Crowhurst comes out as 19008/8500


8500 is 3.125 Babylonian Pi x 2.72 the megalithic yard x 1000, Thom's system


19008 is 10.8 x 1760 the imperial system

When this version of root 5 is divided into 816 Thom's base number the result is 364.9262939 x 360 x 1000 / 5280 is exactly 24883.20 the canon of ancient measure.

Saying

'
You are looking at all these relationships in a one-sided way making one-sided conclusions when all this could just be incidental to the geometry at play.'

just demonstrates that the evidence has not been followed through and you most certainly have not looked at Hugh's workings because Hugh asks the question - could it all just be incidental to the geometry and concludes it is not.



Edited 7 time(s). Last edit at 08-Dec-18 13:28 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 3077 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 397 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 409 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 401 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 238 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 184 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 187 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 181 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 181 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 180 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 222 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 197 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 191 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 181 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 182 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 186 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 204 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 185 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 204 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 204 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 174 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 178 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 193 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 190 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 188 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 203 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 187 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 165 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 187 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 196 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 184 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 191 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 182 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 153 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 151 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 171 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 152 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 157 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 149 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 150 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 183 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 161 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 157 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 159 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Earth depicted in the sky 225 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 168 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 195 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 159 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 212 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 160 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 168 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 193 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 201 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 155 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 167 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 165 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 147 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 185 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 165 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 175 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 169 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 162 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 156 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 155 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 162 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 155 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 194 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 364 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 339 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 259 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 180 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 172 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 175 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 179 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 168 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 179 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 195 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 179 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 160 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 161 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 185 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 164 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 173 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 154 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 160 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 156 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 162 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 155 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 182 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 147 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 150 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 141 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 161 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 162 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 184 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 166 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 153 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 166 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 146 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 143 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 196 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 181 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 178 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 194 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 161 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 163 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 168 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 159 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 190 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 181 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 184 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 183 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 170 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 186 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 161 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 145 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 161 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 167 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 175 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 168 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 158 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 180 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 215 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 192 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 166 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 157 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 163 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 159 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 174 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 180 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 168 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 170 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 189 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 179 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 179 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 168 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 191 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 153 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 144 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 150 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 174 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 186 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 163 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 183 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 191 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 176 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 218 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 198 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 217 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53
Link to 277.777r at the GP 133 DavidK 25-Feb-19 19:37
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 140 DavidK 04-Mar-19 21:42
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP and 1111.1111r 78 DavidK 22-Mar-19 20:58
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 92 rodz111 23-Mar-19 02:27
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 105 DavidK 23-Mar-19 14:44
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 85 rodz111 24-Mar-19 09:28
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 105 Thanos5150 23-Mar-19 15:03
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 98 rodz111 24-Mar-19 01:56
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 101 Thanos5150 24-Mar-19 03:32
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 83 rodz111 24-Mar-19 06:14
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 95 DavidK 24-Mar-19 13:35
closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 77 DavidK 24-Mar-19 16:33
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 78 rodz111 24-Mar-19 20:00
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 90 DavidK 25-Mar-19 08:18
Stanton Drew 79 molder 27-Mar-19 22:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 77 DavidK 28-Mar-19 07:37
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 67 molder 29-Mar-19 10:33
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 75 DUNE 29-Mar-19 11:16
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 94 DavidK 29-Mar-19 13:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 104 molder 29-Mar-19 20:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.