Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanks Jacob

You need to read my book 'Stonehenge the Eclipse' to see where I am coming from and I don't think you have read it. Once the project was completed the next stop was always going to be the GP because of Hugh's work. My driver has and always will be promoting the work of Alexander Thom because his work is on a completely different level and the treatment meted out to him by academia was absolutely shocking.

[www.amazon.co.uk]

The sekhed is obviously a superior unit than Pi within the design of the GP and I learned this from you. It works three dimensionally. So why would they focus on 22/7, they used 256/81 and 22/7 is naturally built into the design of the GP by using the sekhed.


Using 256/81 shows that they used the diameter to relate to the circle so they would have known 22/7. What happens at Stonehenge is that the Aubrey circle works as a Pi manipulation device centred on two versions of Pi 1760/560 and 1632/520. Real pi lies in between but they used 31416/10000.

1760/560 leads to the GP but it is 1760/280 per your analysis. This is why the base will always be divisible by 1760 to produce the cubit in inches, because the GP is designed in feet and inches as Hugh has demonstrated.


This version of Pi (Thom Pi) can be varied without changing the Pi number. It can be 5440 / 1733.333r or 1632/520 keeping the Pi relationship intact. There is a reason for this. The nodal cycle of the Moon is 6800 days or 5440 / 0.8.


Eclipse danger periods occur every 173.333r days so 3 periods every 520 days. The designers of the monuments were very interested in the Eclipse, this is common knowledge.


When this investigation started it was necessary to set a framework out to direct the focus and is my first book and it only looks at Stonehenge. I knew nothing about it or how to predict eclipses but I do now.


This is what the book laid out and it was written with virtually a zero knowledge base. The guy who reviewed it said it was not clear to him what the book was trying to do. He obviously did not read chapter two 'Searching for Clues'

'For clarity, proposals that will be followed up in this book are outlined here, based on a review of Professor Thom's findings.

The first is that they used the foot and the mile as well as the megalithic yard, this is covered in chapter three.

The second is that they developed a set of divine numbers based on their understanding of the natural universe and the mathematical studies they worked on and that these numbers were used to plan an build the monuments to embed spirituality into the designs. This is covered in chapter four.


The third is that they used a simple four season calendar of 91 days per season to provide constant comparable years. This is covered in chapter five.


The fourth is that they developed the modern time system by experimentation at the Greater Cursus and Woodhenge. This is covered in chapter seven.

These proposals are as a result of reviewing Professor Thom's findings.The assumptions are that they were capable of doing all these things as outlined by the professor's work.'


I am still doing this and the initial assumptions have proved to be, in the main, proven at Stonehenge. When I wrote the book it had not been possible to link the imperial system to the one Thom had discovered but just after publishing the relationship surfaced and led to an investigation of the primes within the designs. I had them as 1-13 in the book but had missed the base prime of Thom's system number 17.


Your assumptions of what I am trying to do at the GP are way off beam. my objective is to demonstrate that it is designed against the megalithic yard and that the megalithic yard is expressed via the cubit which was used instead of the megalithic yard. Most probably the reasons for using the cubit outweigh using the megalithic yard just as using the sekhed outweighs the use of 22/7.


It is not possible to do any of the above without using fractional mathematics.


The findings at Stonehenge drive the investigation on this website.


The key is that the cubit x 1.584 = the megalithic yard if 1760 cubits are in the GP base. The GP height is 280 cubits.


1760 and 280 are imperial bases, no question.


You have shown that 1760 is not fixed, different cubits can give a higher figure, eg 20.25 inches and Michell did the same, but the cubits being looked at in the investigation always have 1760 in the base.

So for example working down from the top of the pyramid 20.25 gives a base of 35640 inches and height of 5670 inches. So we are a distance from the base, 101.1818181818r inches to be precise. Jim can explain the importance of these numbers and they are lunar based.

Also working down from the top of the pyramid 20.00 inches gives a base of 35200 inches and height of 5670 inches. So we are a distance from the base, 171.1818181818r inches to be precise. Jim can explain the importance of these numbers as well and they are lunar based.

171.1818181818r - 101.1818181818 = 70 for a reason

'As I see it you, like most, are so wrapped up attempting to prove their use of pi to even investigate let alone comprehend the level of significance of the 5 1/2 seked held by the Ancient Egyptians. '


Not so, well off the mark.


5.5 sekhed is 14/11 x 11/2 = 7 please see above, everyone knows how may days there are in a week.


Do you know what an MOD is? megalithic one day unit and it is 1/7 making 22/7 represent 22 days.

I am following your rules Jacob but coming from a very different angle and I really value what you have achieved and if you publish I will be first in the queue.

the circle builders in the UK were into pi and that is what Thom tells us. This version of Thom pi as 5440 / 1733.333r is my discovery that unlocks the Aubrey circle it is base 17 divided by base 13 and imperial pi is base 11 divided by base 7 the two units are designed exactly the same way and this is a fact.


A 91 day season was suggested in the first book. Eventually it surfaced within the Aubrey design.


1760/560 x 5440/ 1733.333r x 91 = 897.6 Thom's Aubrey circumference. The complexity is quite something, it is an eclipse prediction system based on Pi. the 28 and 26 day lunar cycles are being monitored against 6600 days and 6800 days the nodal cycle.


1.32 x 6800 = 897.60

1.36 x 6600 = 897.60


Dual systems where 1760/560 x 5440/1733.333r represents one solar day. It is astonishing.

3.142857143 x 3.138461538 = 9.863736264 x 91 = 897.60


And at the GP pi squared = 9.87654321.


cheers

dave



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 28-Nov-18 11:49 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 2698 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 321 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 336 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 319 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 163 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 122 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 118 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 118 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 121 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 122 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 147 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 130 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 123 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 111 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 116 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 115 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 125 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 112 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 132 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 127 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 117 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 111 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 120 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 121 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 111 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 133 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 120 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 102 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 116 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 128 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 118 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 122 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 118 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 92 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 92 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 106 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 95 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 94 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 87 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 95 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 114 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 92 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 97 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 103 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Earth depicted in the sky 161 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 102 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 128 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 98 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 140 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 95 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 99 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 129 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 133 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 97 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 103 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 105 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 91 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 100 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 100 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 106 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 105 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 97 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 94 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 93 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 98 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 93 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 129 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 294 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 260 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 184 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 115 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 111 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 107 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 115 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 104 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 113 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 128 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 114 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 97 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 100 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 115 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 101 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 103 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 94 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 97 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 96 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 99 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 94 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 112 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 95 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 90 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 83 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 102 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 97 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 120 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 94 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 92 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 103 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 86 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 84 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 122 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 117 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 119 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 121 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 101 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 97 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 106 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 92 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 117 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 119 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 114 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 114 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 107 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 115 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 97 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 86 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 99 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 103 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 112 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 105 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 97 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 107 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 144 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 121 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 104 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 96 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 101 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 98 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 112 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 116 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 100 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 103 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 123 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 108 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 110 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 109 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 121 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 91 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 89 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 94 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 108 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 117 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 100 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 111 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 118 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 112 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 145 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 124 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 148 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53
Link to 277.777r at the GP 58 DavidK 25-Feb-19 19:37
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 70 DavidK 04-Mar-19 21:42
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP and 1111.1111r 15 DavidK 22-Mar-19 20:58
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 22 rodz111 23-Mar-19 02:27
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 37 DavidK 23-Mar-19 14:44
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 16 rodz111 24-Mar-19 09:28
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 29 Thanos5150 23-Mar-19 15:03
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 19 rodz111 24-Mar-19 01:56
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 26 Thanos5150 24-Mar-19 03:32
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 25 rodz111 24-Mar-19 06:14
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 39 DavidK 24-Mar-19 13:35
closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 19 DavidK 24-Mar-19 16:33
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 21 rodz111 24-Mar-19 20:00
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 26 DavidK 25-Mar-19 08:18


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.