Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Thanks Jacob

You need to read my book 'Stonehenge the Eclipse' to see where I am coming from and I don't think you have read it. Once the project was completed the next stop was always going to be the GP because of Hugh's work. My driver has and always will be promoting the work of Alexander Thom because his work is on a completely different level and the treatment meted out to him by academia was absolutely shocking.

[www.amazon.co.uk]

The sekhed is obviously a superior unit than Pi within the design of the GP and I learned this from you. It works three dimensionally. So why would they focus on 22/7, they used 256/81 and 22/7 is naturally built into the design of the GP by using the sekhed.


Using 256/81 shows that they used the diameter to relate to the circle so they would have known 22/7. What happens at Stonehenge is that the Aubrey circle works as a Pi manipulation device centred on two versions of Pi 1760/560 and 1632/520. Real pi lies in between but they used 31416/10000.

1760/560 leads to the GP but it is 1760/280 per your analysis. This is why the base will always be divisible by 1760 to produce the cubit in inches, because the GP is designed in feet and inches as Hugh has demonstrated.


This version of Pi (Thom Pi) can be varied without changing the Pi number. It can be 5440 / 1733.333r or 1632/520 keeping the Pi relationship intact. There is a reason for this. The nodal cycle of the Moon is 6800 days or 5440 / 0.8.


Eclipse danger periods occur every 173.333r days so 3 periods every 520 days. The designers of the monuments were very interested in the Eclipse, this is common knowledge.


When this investigation started it was necessary to set a framework out to direct the focus and is my first book and it only looks at Stonehenge. I knew nothing about it or how to predict eclipses but I do now.


This is what the book laid out and it was written with virtually a zero knowledge base. The guy who reviewed it said it was not clear to him what the book was trying to do. He obviously did not read chapter two 'Searching for Clues'

'For clarity, proposals that will be followed up in this book are outlined here, based on a review of Professor Thom's findings.

The first is that they used the foot and the mile as well as the megalithic yard, this is covered in chapter three.

The second is that they developed a set of divine numbers based on their understanding of the natural universe and the mathematical studies they worked on and that these numbers were used to plan an build the monuments to embed spirituality into the designs. This is covered in chapter four.


The third is that they used a simple four season calendar of 91 days per season to provide constant comparable years. This is covered in chapter five.


The fourth is that they developed the modern time system by experimentation at the Greater Cursus and Woodhenge. This is covered in chapter seven.

These proposals are as a result of reviewing Professor Thom's findings.The assumptions are that they were capable of doing all these things as outlined by the professor's work.'


I am still doing this and the initial assumptions have proved to be, in the main, proven at Stonehenge. When I wrote the book it had not been possible to link the imperial system to the one Thom had discovered but just after publishing the relationship surfaced and led to an investigation of the primes within the designs. I had them as 1-13 in the book but had missed the base prime of Thom's system number 17.


Your assumptions of what I am trying to do at the GP are way off beam. my objective is to demonstrate that it is designed against the megalithic yard and that the megalithic yard is expressed via the cubit which was used instead of the megalithic yard. Most probably the reasons for using the cubit outweigh using the megalithic yard just as using the sekhed outweighs the use of 22/7.


It is not possible to do any of the above without using fractional mathematics.


The findings at Stonehenge drive the investigation on this website.


The key is that the cubit x 1.584 = the megalithic yard if 1760 cubits are in the GP base. The GP height is 280 cubits.


1760 and 280 are imperial bases, no question.


You have shown that 1760 is not fixed, different cubits can give a higher figure, eg 20.25 inches and Michell did the same, but the cubits being looked at in the investigation always have 1760 in the base.

So for example working down from the top of the pyramid 20.25 gives a base of 35640 inches and height of 5670 inches. So we are a distance from the base, 101.1818181818r inches to be precise. Jim can explain the importance of these numbers and they are lunar based.

Also working down from the top of the pyramid 20.00 inches gives a base of 35200 inches and height of 5670 inches. So we are a distance from the base, 171.1818181818r inches to be precise. Jim can explain the importance of these numbers as well and they are lunar based.

171.1818181818r - 101.1818181818 = 70 for a reason

'As I see it you, like most, are so wrapped up attempting to prove their use of pi to even investigate let alone comprehend the level of significance of the 5 1/2 seked held by the Ancient Egyptians. '


Not so, well off the mark.


5.5 sekhed is 14/11 x 11/2 = 7 please see above, everyone knows how may days there are in a week.


Do you know what an MOD is? megalithic one day unit and it is 1/7 making 22/7 represent 22 days.

I am following your rules Jacob but coming from a very different angle and I really value what you have achieved and if you publish I will be first in the queue.

the circle builders in the UK were into pi and that is what Thom tells us. This version of Thom pi as 5440 / 1733.333r is my discovery that unlocks the Aubrey circle it is base 17 divided by base 13 and imperial pi is base 11 divided by base 7 the two units are designed exactly the same way and this is a fact.


A 91 day season was suggested in the first book. Eventually it surfaced within the Aubrey design.


1760/560 x 5440/ 1733.333r x 91 = 897.6 Thom's Aubrey circumference. The complexity is quite something, it is an eclipse prediction system based on Pi. the 28 and 26 day lunar cycles are being monitored against 6600 days and 6800 days the nodal cycle.


1.32 x 6800 = 897.60

1.36 x 6600 = 897.60


Dual systems where 1760/560 x 5440/1733.333r represents one solar day. It is astonishing.

3.142857143 x 3.138461538 = 9.863736264 x 91 = 897.60


And at the GP pi squared = 9.87654321.


cheers

dave



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 28-Nov-18 11:49 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 3705 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 547 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 553 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 572 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 392 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 305 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 333 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 309 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 304 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 302 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 362 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 322 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 320 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 323 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 306 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 319 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 366 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 330 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 335 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 325 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 335 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 331 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 328 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 328 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 318 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 366 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 355 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 325 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 342 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 369 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 294 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 320 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 328 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 264 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 293 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 278 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 287 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 297 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 271 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 268 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 361 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 275 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 271 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 279 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Re: 23040 83 DavidK 24-Dec-19 00:52
Re: 23040 85 Sirfiroth 26-Dec-19 14:30
Re: 23040 55 DavidK 27-Dec-19 19:05
Re: 23040 132 Sirfiroth 27-Dec-19 21:04
Earth depicted in the sky 375 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 279 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 352 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 288 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 396 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 268 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 307 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 314 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 321 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 263 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 300 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 302 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 271 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 386 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 286 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 299 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 284 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 283 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 274 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 308 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 282 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 289 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 71 thinkitover 24-Dec-19 16:07
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 326 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 54 DavidK 27-Dec-19 19:17
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 517 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 468 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 401 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 284 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 305 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 362 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 316 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 293 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 318 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 353 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 319 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 270 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 288 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 372 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 294 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 314 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 267 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 272 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 272 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 269 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 286 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 323 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 274 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 282 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 258 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 282 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 266 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 326 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 285 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 255 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 276 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 257 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 262 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 347 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 321 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 302 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 351 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 288 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 285 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 333 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 291 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 360 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 314 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 325 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 333 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 316 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 345 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 273 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 236 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 276 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 276 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 311 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 300 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 309 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 314 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 402 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 340 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 292 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 270 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 270 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 283 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 297 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 305 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 328 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 296 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 325 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 335 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 308 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 279 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 340 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 269 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 263 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 261 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 300 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 342 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 287 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 313 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 357 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 290 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 368 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 356 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 357 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53
Link to 277.777r at the GP 316 DavidK 25-Feb-19 19:37
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 276 DavidK 04-Mar-19 21:42
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP and 1111.1111r 238 DavidK 22-Mar-19 20:58
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 247 rodz111 23-Mar-19 02:27
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 235 DavidK 23-Mar-19 14:44
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 208 rodz111 24-Mar-19 09:28
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 239 Thanos5150 23-Mar-19 15:03
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 235 rodz111 24-Mar-19 01:56
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 246 Thanos5150 24-Mar-19 03:32
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 183 rodz111 24-Mar-19 06:14
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 206 DavidK 24-Mar-19 13:35
closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 179 DavidK 24-Mar-19 16:33
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 172 rodz111 24-Mar-19 20:00
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 185 DavidK 25-Mar-19 08:18
Stanton Drew 229 molder 27-Mar-19 22:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 233 DavidK 28-Mar-19 07:37
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 208 molder 29-Mar-19 10:33
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 199 DUNE 29-Mar-19 11:16
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 213 DavidK 29-Mar-19 13:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 245 molder 29-Mar-19 20:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.