You ignore the in-your-face evidence and focus on something which doesn't mean a thing. Look at the margin of error Petrie reports on those inch figures. Super-confirmation bias and super filter setting on blissful ignore. WTF is wrong with you? ;)
Your 3.6525 figure has a true range of
23.32±0.73 in + 20.51±0.40 in = 42.7 - 44.96 inch....3.558 - 3.747 foot.
In other words there isn't likely one pair of holes, side-by-side, or across, which adds up to 3.6525 feet.
And this is only a one cubit feature. In the extremely implausible event the designer wanted to highlight the foot via insinuation implicating the solar year and not the glaringly obvious cubit using seven megalithic palm partitions adding up to a cubit, would this Indian or Stonehenge designer not be able to mark out ONE DAMN cubit accurately enough to make it obvious beyond a shadow of a doubt what metric he employed?
lol. Jim, I assume you were drunk when you wrote this post.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 27-Nov-18 23:31 by Manu.