Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Manu

'Likewise the pyramid angle can easily be explained with astronomy available to the ancient Egyptians. The 1.27 differential comes from the two observable orbits ratio 365.25/27.5 / 365.25/35. Sideral period of the Moon and the half period of Sirius' annual vidual absence at Memphis. This half period is enshrined in mummification...35 days drying 35 wrapping. It is embedded in seven small step pyramids made before Giza 1.
Ok, it could still be wrong but you have to prove that it is and your proposal doesn't do that. '

I can accept this to a point because I have 365.25/27.5 at Stonehenge as 13149/1000 x 100/99 and also that a proof and an accepted proof are completely different. We are claiming the same basic system is used at SH and Giza and now that the fixed relationship between the unit is becoming clear the proof is becoming easier to establish though acceptance is ridiculously difficult to obtain. So we have to keep chipping away and when acceptance comes it will be from the ones doing the study because they are the only ones making the judgements. This is why your comments are so valuable.


Based on Hugh's work I can say that the cubit and the megalithic yard work as variable units within a fixed relationship and the system is being examined here not the GP or SH. The proof is outside the structures themselves. It is a unified system of measurements that covers geometry, astronomy and geodesy. To a point Michell's canon of Ancient measure appears to be it but it goes beyond the canon. Michell has the Solar day and the circumference of the Earth established but the astronomical counts eluded him, if he was looking for them. I don't know if he was.


It is the fixed relationships between the different units that can be tested and confirmed aainst exixting theories and this work is in its infancy because the relationships are only just coming to light.


I will give you the most important one for now so you can have a look at it.

It brings the megalithic yard into play within the Giza design because it aligns the variable cubit and variable meg yard because Hugh's work has uncovered the relationship and I can show how it works.


These are Hugh's units


The HFMY root 3/4 x real Pi = 2.720699046 derived geometrically a naturally occurring unit in feet


The HFC root 4/3 x real Pi /0.176 = 20.61135641 inches or 1.717613034 feet


We are using cubits, imperial feet and megalithic yards, real pi and real root 4/3 and 3/4 it is a very heady brew Hugh has put together.


What Hugh had not realised, and it took a lot of work to finally confirm it, is that the relationship between the cubit and the meg yard is a fixed one and the two units themselves are variables.

2.720699046 / 1.717613034 = 1.584 exactly and /12 = 0.132.


If you look at the structure of the two units the logic within the design is very apparent.

What has been worked out is that the modern figures being used for Pi and the roots were not necessarily know to the designers but very close approximations certainly were. This was a big stumbling point.


Because this fixed relationship is known it can be applied at Stonehenge to convert the design into cubits by multiplying the meg yards by 1.584.


330 x 1.584 = 528.This is in cubits and is the same design as the GP except that the GP is 1760 cubits


In cubits SH x 3.33333r is the Giza base regardless of the length of the cubit or the meg yard.

The proof is very simple, the unit of translation is 0.99.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 24-Nov-18 11:03 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 3537 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 491 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 493 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 510 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 337 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 259 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 276 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 258 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 249 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 257 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 300 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 270 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 270 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 273 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 250 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 272 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 306 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 274 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 286 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 280 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 276 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 276 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 281 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 274 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 269 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 309 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 306 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 278 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 286 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 320 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 252 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 270 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 276 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 224 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 236 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 236 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 229 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 238 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 225 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 225 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 299 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 232 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 228 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 240 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Re: 23040 51 DavidK 24-Dec-19 00:52
Re: 23040 48 Sirfiroth 26-Dec-19 14:30
Re: 23040 22 DavidK 27-Dec-19 19:05
Re: 23040 42 Sirfiroth 27-Dec-19 21:04
Earth depicted in the sky 325 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 241 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 291 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 238 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 326 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 227 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 265 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 275 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 279 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 219 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 239 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 245 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 227 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 317 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 239 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 257 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 236 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 239 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 228 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 253 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 233 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 250 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 37 thinkitover 24-Dec-19 16:07
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 278 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 22 DavidK 27-Dec-19 19:17
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 460 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 418 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 350 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 243 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 265 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 272 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 269 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 247 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 273 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 303 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 267 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 230 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 250 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 288 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 241 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 259 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 222 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 231 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 229 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 229 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 234 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 276 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 218 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 226 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 215 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 241 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 225 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 273 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 240 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 220 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 232 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 215 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 222 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 292 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 270 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 255 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 296 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 244 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 240 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 283 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 246 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 297 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 262 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 273 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 264 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 264 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 280 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 226 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 198 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 237 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 234 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 256 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 247 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 250 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 266 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 347 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 291 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 253 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 228 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 232 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 245 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 255 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 252 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 263 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 246 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 276 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 279 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 259 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 237 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 287 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 227 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 213 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 220 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 253 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 294 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 236 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 265 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 306 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 254 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 301 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 306 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 307 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53
Link to 277.777r at the GP 237 DavidK 25-Feb-19 19:37
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 226 DavidK 04-Mar-19 21:42
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP and 1111.1111r 176 DavidK 22-Mar-19 20:58
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 181 rodz111 23-Mar-19 02:27
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 184 DavidK 23-Mar-19 14:44
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 161 rodz111 24-Mar-19 09:28
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 193 Thanos5150 23-Mar-19 15:03
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 192 rodz111 24-Mar-19 01:56
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 179 Thanos5150 24-Mar-19 03:32
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 140 rodz111 24-Mar-19 06:14
Re: Link to 277.777r at the GP 166 DavidK 24-Mar-19 13:35
closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 141 DavidK 24-Mar-19 16:33
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 134 rodz111 24-Mar-19 20:00
Re: closed or open mind- how to get kicked off a closed mind websire 144 DavidK 25-Mar-19 08:18
Stanton Drew 174 molder 27-Mar-19 22:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 170 DavidK 28-Mar-19 07:37
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 152 molder 29-Mar-19 10:33
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 158 DUNE 29-Mar-19 11:16
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 170 DavidK 29-Mar-19 13:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 201 molder 29-Mar-19 20:48


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.