Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Manu

'Likewise the pyramid angle can easily be explained with astronomy available to the ancient Egyptians. The 1.27 differential comes from the two observable orbits ratio 365.25/27.5 / 365.25/35. Sideral period of the Moon and the half period of Sirius' annual vidual absence at Memphis. This half period is enshrined in mummification...35 days drying 35 wrapping. It is embedded in seven small step pyramids made before Giza 1.
Ok, it could still be wrong but you have to prove that it is and your proposal doesn't do that. '

I can accept this to a point because I have 365.25/27.5 at Stonehenge as 13149/1000 x 100/99 and also that a proof and an accepted proof are completely different. We are claiming the same basic system is used at SH and Giza and now that the fixed relationship between the unit is becoming clear the proof is becoming easier to establish though acceptance is ridiculously difficult to obtain. So we have to keep chipping away and when acceptance comes it will be from the ones doing the study because they are the only ones making the judgements. This is why your comments are so valuable.


Based on Hugh's work I can say that the cubit and the megalithic yard work as variable units within a fixed relationship and the system is being examined here not the GP or SH. The proof is outside the structures themselves. It is a unified system of measurements that covers geometry, astronomy and geodesy. To a point Michell's canon of Ancient measure appears to be it but it goes beyond the canon. Michell has the Solar day and the circumference of the Earth established but the astronomical counts eluded him, if he was looking for them. I don't know if he was.


It is the fixed relationships between the different units that can be tested and confirmed aainst exixting theories and this work is in its infancy because the relationships are only just coming to light.


I will give you the most important one for now so you can have a look at it.

It brings the megalithic yard into play within the Giza design because it aligns the variable cubit and variable meg yard because Hugh's work has uncovered the relationship and I can show how it works.


These are Hugh's units


The HFMY root 3/4 x real Pi = 2.720699046 derived geometrically a naturally occurring unit in feet


The HFC root 4/3 x real Pi /0.176 = 20.61135641 inches or 1.717613034 feet


We are using cubits, imperial feet and megalithic yards, real pi and real root 4/3 and 3/4 it is a very heady brew Hugh has put together.


What Hugh had not realised, and it took a lot of work to finally confirm it, is that the relationship between the cubit and the meg yard is a fixed one and the two units themselves are variables.

2.720699046 / 1.717613034 = 1.584 exactly and /12 = 0.132.


If you look at the structure of the two units the logic within the design is very apparent.

What has been worked out is that the modern figures being used for Pi and the roots were not necessarily know to the designers but very close approximations certainly were. This was a big stumbling point.


Because this fixed relationship is known it can be applied at Stonehenge to convert the design into cubits by multiplying the meg yards by 1.584.


330 x 1.584 = 528.This is in cubits and is the same design as the GP except that the GP is 1760 cubits


In cubits SH x 3.33333r is the Giza base regardless of the length of the cubit or the meg yard.

The proof is very simple, the unit of translation is 0.99.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 24-Nov-18 11:03 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 2182 DavidK 11-Jan-18 10:02
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 247 molder 11-Jan-18 11:09
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 272 DavidK 11-Jan-18 12:03
Jim Wakefield's Egyptian Pi. 244 DavidK 01-Feb-18 23:58
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 91 DavidK 14-Nov-18 08:34
23040 61 DavidK 22-Nov-18 21:54
Re: 23040 57 molder 22-Nov-18 22:45
Re: 23040 59 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:38
Re: 23040 61 molder 23-Nov-18 02:43
Re: 23040 59 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 13:36
Re: 23040 83 Manu 23-Nov-18 18:46
Re: 23040 64 molder 23-Nov-18 22:44
Re: 23040 62 Manu 23-Nov-18 23:10
Re: 23040 44 DavidK 24-Nov-18 00:11
Re: 23040 62 molder 24-Nov-18 01:30
Re: 23040 58 molder 24-Nov-18 03:14
Re: 23040 68 Manu 24-Nov-18 04:47
Re: 23040 54 DavidK 24-Nov-18 10:02
Re: 23040 64 molder 24-Nov-18 11:04
Re: 23040 60 Manu 24-Nov-18 15:01
Re: 23040 56 Sirfiroth 24-Nov-18 17:16
Re: 23040 52 Manu 24-Nov-18 19:45
Re: 23040 54 DavidK 24-Nov-18 21:08
Re: 23040 56 Manu 24-Nov-18 22:13
Re: 23040 51 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:36
Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 68 hendrik dirker 27-Nov-18 12:10
some thoughts 63 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:56
an anecdote 45 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 10:42
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 58 Sirfiroth 29-Nov-18 22:03
Re: Earth combined in sphere & octahedron 71 hendrik dirker 30-Nov-18 07:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 63 molder 24-Nov-18 23:37
Re: More than one value for pi used 59 Manu 25-Nov-18 18:56
Re: More than one value for pi used 68 DavidK 25-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 44 Manu 26-Nov-18 14:33
Re: More than one value for pi used 39 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:08
Re: More than one value for pi used 52 Manu 27-Nov-18 11:15
Re: More than one value for pi used 45 molder 27-Nov-18 22:41
Re: More than one value for pi used 46 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:12
Re: More than one value for pi used 40 DavidK 27-Nov-18 23:35
Re: More than one value for pi used 45 Manu 27-Nov-18 23:50
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 49 M. J. Thomas 28-Nov-18 11:28
Re: Holes in Grand Gallery ramps 42 molder 01-Dec-18 12:55
Re: More than one value for pi used 44 molder 26-Nov-18 11:47
Re: More than one value for pi used 51 Manu 26-Nov-18 12:11
Earth depicted in the sky 99 hendrik dirker 24-Nov-18 17:28
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 49 molder 24-Nov-18 23:21
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 66 DavidK 25-Nov-18 08:35
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 45 DavidK 26-Nov-18 11:31
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 83 hendrik dirker 26-Nov-18 17:23
Re: Earth depicted in the sky 21600 flagged 40 DavidK 27-Nov-18 10:42
I dunno 44 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 16:22
Re: 23040 67 Sirfiroth 23-Nov-18 00:41
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 74 DavidK 23-Nov-18 09:53
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 48 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 14:06
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 45 DavidK 26-Nov-18 15:24
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 54 Sirfiroth 26-Nov-18 21:13
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 42 DavidK 27-Nov-18 09:16
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 47 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 01:10
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 47 DavidK 28-Nov-18 11:39
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 49 Manu 28-Nov-18 14:25
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 48 DavidK 28-Nov-18 16:14
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 49 Manu 28-Nov-18 17:20
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 43 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 00:52
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 41 Manu 30-Nov-18 02:12
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 43 Sirfiroth 28-Nov-18 17:04
Re: 23040 and writing real Pi 39 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:02
Really loving Jim's 23040 and root 5 71 DavidK 23-Nov-18 16:29
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 243 DavidK 19-Mar-18 09:43
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 196 DavidK 08-May-18 10:31
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 119 DavidK 12-Nov-18 17:14
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 60 DavidK 28-Nov-18 20:25
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 57 hendrik dirker 29-Nov-18 17:12
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 56 DavidK 30-Nov-18 15:28
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 50 Sirfiroth 30-Nov-18 16:52
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 48 molder 30-Nov-18 22:22
Re: The Work of Hugh Franklin at the GP and Stonehenge 55 DavidK 30-Nov-18 22:45
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge 68 hendrik dirker 01-Dec-18 08:13
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 54 DavidK 01-Dec-18 10:49
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 44 molder 01-Dec-18 12:28
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 51 Sirfiroth 01-Dec-18 14:25
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 55 rodz111 01-Dec-18 18:36
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 54 DavidK 01-Dec-18 20:53
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 46 Sirfiroth 02-Dec-18 20:09
Re: eclipse & Stonehenge and Pi 46 DavidK 02-Dec-18 22:55
Really that dense? 44 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 02:29
Re: Really that dense? 46 rodz111 03-Dec-18 03:40
Re: Really that dense? 50 Sirfiroth 03-Dec-18 14:37
Re: Really that dense? 41 rodz111 04-Dec-18 03:43
Re: Really that dense? 50 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 05:06
Re: Really that dense? 44 DavidK 04-Dec-18 10:13
Re: Really that dense? 40 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 15:01
Re: Really that dense? 36 DavidK 04-Dec-18 16:17
Re: Really that dense? 49 molder 04-Dec-18 10:27
Re: Really that dense? 43 DavidK 04-Dec-18 13:06
Re: Really that dense? 58 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 16:42
Re: Really that dense? 42 rodz111 04-Dec-18 21:38
Re: Really that dense? 44 Sirfiroth 04-Dec-18 23:38
Re: Really that dense? 51 DavidK 05-Dec-18 00:06
Re: Really that dense? 35 rodz111 05-Dec-18 16:32
Re: Really that dense? 35 rodz111 09-Dec-18 04:17
Re: Really that dense? 67 DavidK 03-Dec-18 09:19
Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 54 molder 05-Dec-18 21:40
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 57 DavidK 05-Dec-18 23:01
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 63 cloister 05-Dec-18 23:38
uhmm... every day? 46 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 06:42
Re: uhmmm... every day? 47 cloister 06-Dec-18 08:37
Re: uhmmm... every day? 53 hendrik dirker 06-Dec-18 09:06
Re: uhmmm... every day? 41 cloister 06-Dec-18 11:25
Re: Re:Egyptian value for pi in GP 51 DavidK 06-Dec-18 10:04
Quite Simply! 66 Sirfiroth 06-Dec-18 13:55
Re: Quite Simply! 61 DUNE 07-Dec-18 11:24
Great Assumption! 54 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 14:44
Re: Great Assumption! 51 DUNE 07-Dec-18 16:49
Re: Great Assumption! 52 Sirfiroth 07-Dec-18 17:52
Re: Great Assumption! 47 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 02:28
Re: Great Assumption! 34 DUNE 08-Dec-18 09:05
Re: Great Assumption! 45 Thanos5150 08-Dec-18 15:57
Re: Great Assumption! 46 DUNE 08-Dec-18 17:51
Re: Quite Simply! 53 DavidK 07-Dec-18 14:57
Re: Quite Simply! 47 DavidK 07-Dec-18 20:27
Re: Quite Simply! 44 DUNE 07-Dec-18 22:26
Re: Quite Simply! 52 DavidK 07-Dec-18 22:37
a load of numbers under scrtutiny 81 hendrik dirker 12-Dec-18 13:30
Papyrus of Pffft.... 56 cloister 12-Dec-18 16:01
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 47 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 12:16
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 41 cloister 14-Dec-18 14:52
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 44 Dr. Troglodyte 14-Dec-18 15:30
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 42 hendrik dirker 15-Dec-18 06:50
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 61 DavidK 15-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Papyrus of Pffft.... 55 cloister 15-Dec-18 21:27
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 42 rodz111 15-Dec-18 08:54
Re: Papyrus of Pffft or the pre-Columbian cultures 42 molder 18-Dec-18 22:18
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 61 DavidK 12-Dec-18 20:16
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 57 DUNE 12-Dec-18 21:51
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 49 cloister 12-Dec-18 22:59
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 54 gjb 13-Dec-18 01:53
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 60 DavidK 13-Dec-18 10:35
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 39 cloister 13-Dec-18 12:22
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 40 DavidK 13-Dec-18 12:39
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 50 cloister 13-Dec-18 13:04
Re: a load of numbers under scrtutiny 53 gjb 13-Dec-18 12:54
440 & 280 62 hendrik dirker 13-Dec-18 06:51
Re: 440 & 280 42 hendrik dirker 21-Dec-18 11:51
Re:-Stop the World for a word... 50 rodz111 13-Dec-18 19:57
Re: Re:-Stop the World for a word... 54 hendrik dirker 14-Dec-18 06:04
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 60 molder 08-Dec-18 05:10
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 78 DavidK 08-Dec-18 09:15
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 64 DUNE 08-Dec-18 15:31
Re: Re:Babylonian value for pi in GP 79 DavidK 09-Dec-18 09:53


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.