Welcome! » Log In » Register

The Dearth of Hypotheses.

January 05, 2018 03:46PM
Would you prefer that like Hawass he dispute the void exists at all and then add that it doesn't exist until he says it exists? How about the guy in charge who simply says that there are no plans to explore any of these further? Or Lehner who says the best way to see the pyramid (and by extrapolation to see the void) is to stand with your back to the pyramid?

So Scott Creighton is speculating much as Egyptology itself does. They simply assumed ancient people were bumpkins who built tombs during peak growing season with no crop in the ground and invented Egyptology. There are only three primary differences between the speculations. Scott Creighton doesn't have two centuries of et als who agree with him, Scott Creighton's speculation isn't layer after layer of speculation, and most importantly Scott Creighton's hypothesis doesn't paint the builders as superstitious and moribund.

Egyptology has taken positions against science and reason and show no signs of abandoning them. One must wonder if it's because they are so insular or because they're afraid they're wrong, or they're afraid of the pyramid itself. They are unanimous in saying we shouldn't look at the pyramid because there's nothing there. They are in strict agreement that the only thing there is a manifestation of ramps and changeless superstitious bumpkins who needed a nice home for their dead kings dying to get in (and one at a time please).


There is a void there. There is necessarily a chamber but its exact shape and orientation is unknown because it hasn't been seen from multiple perspectives yet. It doesn't matter whether Hawass believes in it or not because there exists evidence which always trumps belief and opinion. It doesn't matter if Lehner looks over his shoulder or not and it doesn't matter if they never summon the courage to study it. There exists a chamber and it's unknown if any passages connect to it or not. This is by definition because of the nature of the means to discover and map this chamber. It can not image small voids like a passage because it lacks sufficient resolution at this specific stage of the technology. It might never be sufficient without infinitely long exposure to see much detail (I'm sure there are many at Giza who wouldn't mind waiting forever to get the results).

I have a few guesses as to what this is for but I'm waiting for a proper perspective of it to venture them or to form an hypothesis. How very very very ironic that the best perspective of the void would be right from the thermal anomaly on the east side 161' south of the NE corner which would not only cast light on the shape and orientation of the anomaly but would also show the passage leading to the Mafdet Lynx right behind the anomaly. It would be able to clearly show this passage because it is so close. Muons would whip right through here showing the first several feet of the passage and proving it connects the path on the outside. I won't mention my favorite speculation as to the function of the new void at this time as I'll have to make major revisions in my theory. Scott Creighton's idea doesn't need a specific shape to plant ancestors but mine does require a specific shape.

People need to start looking right through Egyptological opinion. This is easy enough to do. Every time an Egyptologist says something is "religious" or "magical" just stop listening. These are not explanations, they are evasions. If they were really magically religious they could point to exactly what gave them this idea and there would be consensus. Every time an Egyptologist disputes something said by scientists just stop listening. It doesn't matter why Hawass says there is no void, he is merely wrong.

I like reading speculations about the ancients and their accomplishments because I can get all kinds of new ideas and new perspectives from them. The only speculations I don't care about are those that start out with painting ancient people as stumble footed bumpkins or highly ignorant of their own environment. Scott Creighton's are some of my favorite.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.
» Reply » Quote
Subject Author Views Posted

Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Scott Creighton 1619 January 05, 2018 09:42AM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Martin Stower 526 January 05, 2018 01:44PM

» The Dearth of Hypotheses.

cladking 417 January 05, 2018 03:46PM

Re: The Dearth of Hypotheses.

Martin Stower 373 January 05, 2018 03:49PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

gulsbo 351 January 06, 2018 09:24PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

mmstud 352 January 05, 2018 05:16PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

eyeofhorus33 306 January 05, 2018 07:41PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

mmstud 337 January 05, 2018 09:27PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Spiros 366 January 06, 2018 07:06AM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Scott Creighton 344 January 06, 2018 10:30AM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Martin Stower 349 January 06, 2018 11:06AM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Spiros 355 January 06, 2018 11:25AM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Barbelo 338 January 06, 2018 08:11PM

Thanks, Scott

drrayeye 355 January 07, 2018 06:23AM

ditto n/t

cladking 355 January 07, 2018 03:52PM

Thank you, Dr Ray & CK - N/T

Scott Creighton 369 January 08, 2018 10:30AM

Yes! Ditto Scott, thank you.

andy_mac_27 493 January 15, 2018 06:27PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Open mind 342 January 07, 2018 09:22AM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Spiros 320 January 07, 2018 01:09PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Open mind 295 January 07, 2018 03:35PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

cladking 329 January 07, 2018 04:01PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Scott Creighton 304 January 12, 2018 05:33PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Spiros 316 January 12, 2018 07:16PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Scott Creighton 312 January 26, 2018 03:53PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Morten 360 January 27, 2018 01:49AM

A flashback

Morten 314 January 27, 2018 04:11AM

Re: A flashback

sfbey 268 January 27, 2018 06:24PM

Re: A flashback

Morten 353 January 27, 2018 06:53PM

Re: Hall of the Ancestors (GHMB Article)

Scott Creighton 306 January 27, 2018 01:12PM



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login