> Yes--when the evidence goes against you then it is
> dismissed as "folklore". No doubt had this
> Coptic-Egyptian tradition stated these pyramids
> were conceived as tombs then you would have no
> problem using such texts to bolster your own
> argument. The FACT remains, these Coptic-Egyptian
> texts tell us these pyramids were constructed as
> 'recovery vaults' or 'arks'.
Your BS and deception and ignorance seems to have no bounds. Your attention to detail comprehension of fact even worse.
You haven't read the Arabic texts you call the Coptic- Egyptian tradition texts. You cant!
These you claim as "evidence" repetitively in your rant here!
But from exactly the same source as you quote. Page 329 to help you and Lousie fumble and bumble around in your investigation.
I have re-typed a little of it for others benefit. ( I do not have a digital copy, but mine matches your quotations exactly)
The very same documents you quote attributed to the very same author (Al Masoudi) in particular the Arabic document known as "Golden Meadows" British Museum item xxx9576 says:
The author says " the pyramids (my insert*) were built of squared stones of unequal size, and they were the tombs of the kings, and when one of these monarchs died , his body was placed in a sarcophagus of stone , called in Egypt and Syria "Al Harm" and a pyramid was built over it." ... (It goes on to describe the entrance many other details etc.
Insert* : No mention at all about seeds, nor 16 pyramids, but at least the pyramids we would loosely refer to here as G1, G2, Medium, Bent and Red.
Cherry picking deceit or just sloppy ignorance passed off as "research"?
You're bluff and blunder .... you like some things it says, and ignore others. Or if the quote above is your honest ignorant belief, then you don't or cant even read your sources !
You are the Hoax and the fraud!
I do not necessarily agree that they were all tombs either! However BS! and deception and bluff and double standards say more about you and your lack of integrity and decency to forum members and community at large! Beware folks a Con-man!
Folks to add insult to injury his source is wait for it:
4. Colonel H. Vyse, Operations Carried On At The Pyramids of Gizeh in 1837, Vol 2 (Cambridge University Press, 2014) p. 319-330.
5. ibid. p. 322.
For those who want to read the whole extract themselves , I found a google copy:
The same bloke he recently in libellous posthumous defamation claimed was a deceitful hoaxing liar! In his latest flop failed book!
You said "what the Coptic-Egyptian tradition informs us and is what the evidence points to." and "evidence" LOL!
Bye for now ....
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 07-Jan-18 17:41 by Corpuscles.