Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Poster Boy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As I thought
>
> You knew you couldn't back up your ridiculous
> statement on RD, so you'll try diversion... Again.
>
>
> Then you try to say that you got pissy in reaction
> to my replies. Wrong again, Phil. You started
> getting condescending and didn't expect to get
> push back.
>
> It's all there. I was polite. You started
> getting rude. I pushed back, but only after I had
> been polite to your pompous ass repeatedly and you
> started to portray me as your inferior and then an
> evangelical whatever.
>
> As for the rest of this diatribe, I suggest that
> you read my position statement again. This
> immature blathering of yours is nothing I'm
> interested in continuing.
>
> Next time, take care to think of whom you
> condescend to in the future, bub.

[Note: I don’t expect anyone to actually read this. I just want it here as an easy access record. Sorry, but this kind of dual-logic discourse fascinates me.]

OK, so after repeated requests, you still have no explanation for slandering me buy putting disparaging remarks in my mouth, you have no evidence of a blinking Sun, no eyewitness account of anyone in the audience seeing a blinking Sun, no information about the veracity of the videographer whose work you seem so eager to embrace, and you’ve given no acknowledgement that the videos may be misrepresenting what actually happened that day.

Let’s continue your line of thought. In your earlier post you claim to have gone through the history of “pissiness" in this discussion. At one point you make the statements:

    From there you got increasingly pissy, Phil.

    Origyptian "Pulsing can simply be a finger passing over the light sensor on the camera."

    "What is it about any of those videos that seem even remotely authentic to you?"

That strikes you as increasingly pissy? I simply described a possible way to logically achieve the same effect without invoking a ‘miracle' and asked you what you found so compelling about those couple of videos on YouTube.

And this:

    Cleary, Phil, once again, I stated that I was not insisting I was looking at a miracle, and you became increasingly careless. You clearly knew nothing about Fatima or Church policy, you brought up Guadeloupe, which is irrelevant to these events which are public. Your summary judgement of the salient issues was glib and superficial. Then, you got increasingly annoyed that I was calling you out on your replies. Finally, I tried to work with you. Sent you a PM. Rather than reply, you took a run at me on the board.

“Careless” is not “pissy”. Guadalupe is a lot more relevant than your story about the guru, neither of which reported a blinking Sun. And what intrigued me is not that you claimed to have "called me out" (you did no such thing), but rather how relentless you were about not acknowledging that the videos were likely tampered with, that there are no eyewitness reports of a blinking Sun, and how many times you tried to twist the discussion into making me look like the bad guy, going so far as to fabricate comments from me that claimed you and the audience were hallucinating on drugs. I made no such comments.

You publicly reproduced the exact entire text of your Private Message to me. You still haven’t acknowledged that doing so is a violation of the GHMB CoC. I’m not “prosecuting” you for that, because it’s not my rule to enforce, it’s Graham Hancock’s rule that you violated and that had to agree to when you signed up here. But not a reason to get pissy.

Let's take a deeper look at your summary in the above quote. You claimed I got “increasingly pissy” but you neglected to post a link to any of those comments. Meanwhile, you made a reference to the:

    …actual solar ‘miracle’ as the written testimonials so explicitly attest.

You have hinted repeatedly about eyewitness reports and testimonials, and I asked you respectfully, several times, if you could reproduce any of those “explicit” testimonials, and you have neglected to produce any, even as you continue to insist they exist. Not a reason to get pissy?

Also in that same post:

    As I said at the outset, Phil, I'm open to all possibilities. Try reading that a few times, it might actually sink in.

I considered that to be rude and unwarranted, especially since I said nothing up to that point that was “pissy”. I only asked you what you found to compelling in those videos. But still not a reason to get pissy, right?

Up next:

    "It is all so very easy to apply denialist thinking to the arcane past.”

What gave you the urge to mention "denialist"? Are you calling me a denialist because I’m questioning the veracity of a couple of videos published by complete strangers that show something that’s never been mentioned before, not even by those who attended those events?! Still not a reason to get pissy?

What have I said in the past week that sounded “pissy” to you? I remained quite civil during most of our discourse, while you repeatedly deflected, misrepresented, and flat out lied about what was said here.

You replied to me with this post 3 days ago:

    You would just say that it is all part of the hoax. Anybody can come up with a conspiracy theory. Sounds like you really believe that here…

So now you think you can read my mind, and you accuse me of suggesting a conspiracy theory? And yet I still have not gotten “pissy” back at you.

How about this one in your same post after I described the experiment I did to alter the exposure of a video frame to mimic the blinking Sun effect:

    Let us all be VERY CLEAR, Origyptian. You did NOT mimic the video and you have NOT come close to meeting my direct challenge. Here's one from 2010, apparently. Another for you to produce evidence to compare to.

So I should feel obligated to "meet" your "direct challenge"? That’s as presumptuous as it is arrogant, considering you haven’t lifted a finger to provide any evidence at all that the Sun actually was indeed blinking at those events. I’m not trying to prove anything to you, I'm only questioning the veracity of those YouTube videos. But rather than countering with your own evidence, you have no qualms about issuing me a direct challenge, this time about yet another video? But I still didn't get pissy with you. And actually, in the next post I sent to you, the only thing remotely resembling a terse comment from me up to that point was:

    Yes, it was very easy to mimic the effect within a few seconds. You seem to be in total denial about this and I'm wondering why, unless you're simply one of the faithful who wants it to be true.

Hardly an example of “increasingly pissy”. In fact, I have no problem with the faithful and the belief in such things. Christians want there to be a Heaven, they want to be admitted there, they believe God is in control of everything and that when calamity strikes, it's an example of God working in “mysterious ways”. That’s not a disparaging remark, these are well known, common characteristics of the faith. Nothing to be shy, embarrassed, or defensive about. The faithful simply want to believe. And I have no problem with that..as long as they don’t require me to believe the same thing (and I’m saying that as a general principle and not as a statement of whether I do or do not subscribe to a similar faith).

Your reply to me (Jan 7, 7:21PM) includes:

    The testimonials are what the testimonals are, sir. There are many of them and you will see the people looking in the direction of the sun.

Yet another reference to alleged testimonials, none of which you’ve willing or able to cite up to that point.

And this:

    I think it is more likely that the space between the sun and the crowds was somehow distorted, which caused the effects. Shall we rule that out, Origyptian, in the name of iron boats not being able to float?

You see nothing pissy about that comment? OK, how about this one:

    Your whole argument is predicated on people pretending they are moved by solar anomalies, and that they go home and manipulate footage. It ENTIRELY ignores supporting testimonials. Like I said, anybody can concoct a conspiracy theory.

Let’s dissect that one: You wrongly accuse me of claiming the audience was pretending to be moved by what they saw, you wrongly accuse me of claiming “they” go home and manipulate footage (at least one, possibly two, but certainly not the group of honest faithful!), you reference those alleged testimonials again and yet don’t provide any citations to any of them, and then end it with an assertion that I’m accusing someone of a conspiracy theory. How can your summary of my “whole argument” be completely wrong? Not to mention that you claimed that I accused you and the hundreds in that audience to be hallucinating on drugs (I most certainly did not). MIght that be cause to get pissy?

    ...the group reactions and the testimonials that some sort of solar anomalies occrred

Yet another reference to these mysterious testimonials, but now the miracle has been waffled back to “some sort of solar anomalies”? What’s going on here, Poster Boy?

And in reply to my previous post (which was still respectful), you come back with:

    Origyptian:The fact is, the "Dancing" descriptor far more accurately refers to the morphing shape of the Sun's glare as the clouds pass by and not to any blinking of the Sun.

    Poster Boy: This is BS. It really indicates to me how superficial your treatment of this discussion, and smug. I did address your concern about the subdued crowd when I followed up with the India post. Do your own research, there are plenty of testimonials out there.

Now, what on earth got you so pissy about my comment? All I did was repeat what some of those testimonials about the dancing Sun said. Basically, as it is massaged by the passing wafts of clouds, the glare of the Sun changed shape and assumes what some believe looked like an image of the Virgin Mary. That’s simple and non-disparaging. It’s what I read was the reason that they had gathered there in the first place. Some web sites actually superimpose an illustration of Mary over the Sun to demonstrate the contours that resemble her. What do you think is BS about that? What’s superficial about it? I did my own research to glean that characterization, which, by the way, completely supports the crowd reaction we see in those videos.

But where are all those testimonials about a blinking Sun? My own research hasn’t turned up any yet, and neither has yours, apparently. And yet you go on:

    You are so mired in your prespective being the only one that can be right, you can't fathom anything else.

And yet you haven’t lifted a finger to provide any evidence or narrative or belief about the “anything else” that you think it could actually be. All I did was challenge the veracity of those blinking Sun videos. You keep taking issue with that and relentlessly defend the blinking Sun on those videos. I have no idea why you are embracing those blinking Sun videos since you don’t seem to have seen it with your own eyes, you don’t know anything about the videographers, you don’t know how those videos were made, you can’t explain why there’s only 1 video per event (over 2 events) showing the blinking Sun even though there were “hundreds” of people who came specifically expecting to see a miracle. Why wouldn’t you expect most of them to pull out their cells to record the event? And yet you claim that I'm the one being arrogant here?

And later in that same post:

    Later on in my jhournal I write that I was there for forty-five minutes, studying the situation and the people's reactions. Few looked up at the 'stars' for more than a couple of minutes. Most reverted to a normal emotional state quite quickly.

And so you wrote in your journal how long you were there, that you were “studying the situation”, and that you studied the people’s reaction. But you never state what you actually saw! I don’t recall you ever saying what you saw. And I’m curious why that is. And finally, you comment here:

    No, I won't continue this discussion with you because your rushes to judgement are just that. No, because I think your treatment of this discussion is judgemental, pedantic and frankly predictably boring. I certainly won't make the time to answer questions for you that you could come up with with a little effort on your own part.

Your own comments sound pretty pissy to me, and yet I’d not yet slung a single insulting, disparaging, or pissy comment at you up to that point. You claim I'm the one that's rushing to judgement even though I went through the diligence to first prove to myself how easy it was to mimic the blinking sun using free and rudimentary post-processing software while you are so quick to embrace those videos despite the lack of any credibility of the videographer(s), your lack of diligence to understand digital post-processing, and your resistance to even post a citation of any eyewitness report that you seem to think corroborates what's shown on those videos.

Actually, the first time I gave you any attitude seems to be Jan 8, 3:58AM:

    Poster Boy: You have said it was easy to manipulate the light sensor. You made the claim. You probably didn't expect to be called out on that…

    Origyptian: That takes nerve, my friend. I don't play that kind of game. You, on the other hand have no qualms whatsoever about completely embracing videos generated and posted by complete strangers, and yet you apparently feel no compulsion to inquire with those individuals as to the true nature of their videos, and yet you claim I am required to prove those videos are a hoax?...even when I clearly showed that a normal (darker) frame from the video can almost perfectly mimic the saturated (brighter) "blinked on" image, you still claim it's not good enough because I didn't run that same effect on multiple frames in the same video? That hardly makes any sense at all, not to mention the catastrophic double standard of your position.

Different logical belief systems in confrontation.
I think it's a fascinating discourse.

______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?



Edited 11 time(s). Last edit at 09-Jan-18 21:13 by Origyptian.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Intelligent Design and Human Origins 2553 MichaelG 29-Dec-17 18:35
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 484 PhiPIandI 29-Dec-17 20:51
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 296 MichaelG 04-Jan-18 16:49
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 299 rodz111 21-Jan-18 15:52
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 367 jjeremybenthem 29-Dec-17 21:25
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 271 MichaelG 08-Jan-18 18:45
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 399 Aine 29-Dec-17 23:49
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 300 M. J. Thomas 30-Dec-17 11:12
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 345 Susan Doris 30-Dec-17 13:10
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 311 Aine 30-Dec-17 14:47
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 267 Susan Doris 30-Dec-17 17:41
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 274 Aine 30-Dec-17 17:57
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 302 Sirfiroth 30-Dec-17 18:18
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 266 Susan Doris 30-Dec-17 18:44
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 286 M. J. Thomas 30-Dec-17 20:52
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 295 Sirfiroth 30-Dec-17 21:54
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 229 Susan Doris 30-Dec-17 22:54
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 253 Sirfiroth 30-Dec-17 23:35
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 334 Susan Doris 31-Dec-17 05:44
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 204 gulsbo 10-Jan-18 19:44
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 227 cladking 30-Dec-17 19:11
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 279 Vanya 30-Dec-17 14:04
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 228 MichaelG 08-Jan-18 18:46
Ongoing multidisciplinary studies across academia . . . 336 Reagent 30-Dec-17 02:49
Re: Ongoing multidisciplinary studies across academia . . . 191 MichaelG 08-Jan-18 19:52
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 320 Thunderbird 30-Dec-17 04:16
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 271 Susan Doris 30-Dec-17 13:16
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 277 Thunderbird 31-Dec-17 18:49
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 231 MichaelG 09-Jan-18 21:06
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 173 Origyptian 09-Jan-18 21:32
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 354 Vanya 30-Dec-17 14:25
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 254 Aine 30-Dec-17 14:48
Not necessarily Christian 253 drrayeye 30-Dec-17 22:26
Re: Not necessarily Christian 251 Vanya 31-Dec-17 09:06
Re: Not necessarily Christian 195 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 03:48
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 245 Origyptian 31-Dec-17 16:59
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 219 brett z 31-Dec-17 17:16
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 212 Origyptian 31-Dec-17 17:37
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 218 brett z 31-Dec-17 23:22
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 209 Origyptian 01-Jan-18 07:53
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 202 brett z 01-Jan-18 19:17
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 198 Origyptian 01-Jan-18 22:07
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 178 brett z 01-Jan-18 22:21
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 207 Aine 31-Dec-17 17:46
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 242 Origyptian 31-Dec-17 18:06
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 220 Aine 31-Dec-17 19:23
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 241 Aine 31-Dec-17 19:31
What about Multiverse ? 241 Vanya 01-Jan-18 12:19
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 221 MichaelG 09-Jan-18 21:32
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 196 gulsbo 10-Jan-18 20:05
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 157 cladking 10-Jan-18 20:43
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 191 Origyptian 10-Jan-18 22:13
Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 286 drrayeye 30-Dec-17 22:11
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 217 brett z 30-Dec-17 23:04
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 243 drrayeye 31-Dec-17 08:47
, Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 257 Susan Doris 31-Dec-17 09:38
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design 222 DUNE 31-Dec-17 10:29
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 221 drrayeye 31-Dec-17 12:57
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 265 Susan Doris 31-Dec-17 13:37
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 233 drrayeye 31-Dec-17 14:13
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 227 Susan Doris 31-Dec-17 14:27
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 232 drrayeye 31-Dec-17 14:53
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 248 Susan Doris 31-Dec-17 15:56
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 217 Origyptian 31-Dec-17 17:15
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 211 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 02:06
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 159 Origyptian 01-Jan-18 08:05
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 213 Thanos5150 01-Jan-18 01:59
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 201 brett z 01-Jan-18 02:08
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 246 Susan Doris 01-Jan-18 06:11
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 206 Origyptian 01-Jan-18 07:59
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 208 Susan Doris 01-Jan-18 10:32
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 189 Origyptian 01-Jan-18 17:25
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 256 Susan Doris 01-Jan-18 18:29
driving force 207 brett z 01-Jan-18 18:57
Re: driving force 199 Poster Boy 01-Jan-18 18:59
Re: driving force 205 brett z 01-Jan-18 19:01
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 199 Aine 02-Jan-18 00:54
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 189 brett z 02-Jan-18 03:31
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 231 Origyptian 02-Jan-18 05:15
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 280 Aine 02-Jan-18 18:06
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 292 Origyptian 02-Jan-18 21:09
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 213 Aine 02-Jan-18 22:55
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 248 Origyptian 03-Jan-18 14:19
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 246 Susan Doris 03-Jan-18 15:05
entropy 209 brett z 03-Jan-18 15:45
Re: entropy 205 Susan Doris 03-Jan-18 16:22
Re: entropy 206 Origyptian 03-Jan-18 19:56
Re: entropy 255 brett z 03-Jan-18 21:15
Re: entropy 198 Aham 04-Jan-18 05:07
Re: entropy 233 brett z 04-Jan-18 05:52
Re: entropy 191 Aine 04-Jan-18 12:07
Re: entropy 188 Origyptian 05-Jan-18 16:59
Re: entropy 221 brett z 05-Jan-18 17:13
Re: entropy 194 Origyptian 05-Jan-18 18:17
Re: entropy 198 brett z 05-Jan-18 18:21
Re: entropy 180 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 18:08
Re: entropy 217 Origyptian 05-Jan-18 16:13
snow crystals and life 233 brett z 05-Jan-18 20:52
Re: snow crystals and life 188 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 21:18
Re: snow crystals and life 189 brett z 06-Jan-18 22:08
Re: entropy 237 Origyptian 05-Jan-18 15:34
Information 190 drrayeye 05-Jan-18 17:46
Re: Information 178 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 18:36
Re: Information 191 cladking 06-Jan-18 19:35
Re: Information 213 drrayeye 06-Jan-18 20:14
Re: entropy 200 cladking 05-Jan-18 20:16
Re: entropy 180 Eddie Larry 05-Jan-18 20:32
Re: entropy 232 cladking 05-Jan-18 21:53
Re: entropy 200 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 20:47
Re: entropy 191 cladking 06-Jan-18 21:57
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 228 Origyptian 03-Jan-18 19:45
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 159 Aine 03-Jan-18 19:49
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 143 Origyptian 03-Jan-18 23:26
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 182 drrayeye 04-Jan-18 03:03
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 222 Susan Doris 04-Jan-18 06:19
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 218 Origyptian 05-Jan-18 17:07
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 206 Susan Doris 05-Jan-18 19:06
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 184 cladking 05-Jan-18 19:33
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 174 Aine 03-Jan-18 16:16
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 155 Origyptian 03-Jan-18 21:26
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 166 Susan Doris 04-Jan-18 06:27
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 171 Aine 04-Jan-18 12:21
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 193 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 16:55
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 191 brett z 06-Jan-18 17:21
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 167 cladking 06-Jan-18 20:06
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 224 Thunderbird 06-Jan-18 17:47
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 178 Origyptian 07-Jan-18 17:05
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 187 Thunderbird 08-Jan-18 05:59
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 208 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 16:13
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 171 cladking 08-Jan-18 17:17
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 222 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 17:31
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 181 cladking 08-Jan-18 18:26
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 231 Thunderbird 09-Jan-18 16:55
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 227 cladking 09-Jan-18 20:56
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 189 Thunderbird 10-Jan-18 06:59
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 215 Susan Doris 10-Jan-18 07:40
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 228 Audrey 10-Jan-18 18:03
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 205 Origyptian 10-Jan-18 18:57
Re: Masonic History 192 Thunderbird 10-Jan-18 21:03
Re: Masonic History 198 Origyptian 10-Jan-18 22:21
Re: Masonic History 211 Susan Doris 11-Jan-18 06:35
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 194 Susan Doris 10-Jan-18 19:22
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 133 cladking 10-Jan-18 21:00
Re: The speed of Thought : ) 175 Thunderbird 10-Jan-18 21:31
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 278 Susan Doris 11-Jan-18 06:42
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 181 cladking 10-Jan-18 20:20
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 218 Origyptian 10-Jan-18 21:53
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 175 cladking 11-Jan-18 01:25
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 195 Origyptian 11-Jan-18 06:04
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 283 cladking 11-Jan-18 15:39
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 199 Audrey 11-Jan-18 02:26
Re: UBW/nt 178 Thunderbird 11-Jan-18 03:25
Re: Cosmic Parallels ... 225 cladking 10-Jan-18 14:52
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 177 Poster Boy 03-Jan-18 16:30
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 172 Origyptian 03-Jan-18 23:00
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 181 Thunderbird 02-Jan-18 21:18
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 173 Origyptian 02-Jan-18 21:30
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 235 Aine 02-Jan-18 22:59
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 203 Vanya 03-Jan-18 16:49
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 214 Aine 03-Jan-18 17:01
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 188 Vanya 03-Jan-18 19:18
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 235 Thanos5150 02-Jan-18 03:14
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 195 Audrey 02-Jan-18 06:05
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 178 Thanos5150 02-Jan-18 06:21
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 298 Origyptian 02-Jan-18 13:05
Re: Directed Panspermia 222 Thunderbird 04-Jan-18 03:11
Re: Directed Panspermia 193 Aine 04-Jan-18 12:27
Re: Directed Panspermia 170 Origyptian 05-Jan-18 19:58
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 276 cladking 31-Dec-17 15:19
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 174 Poster Boy 01-Jan-18 17:37
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 177 cladking 02-Jan-18 03:38
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 165 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 03:58
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 153 cladking 02-Jan-18 04:18
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 147 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 04:33
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 142 cladking 02-Jan-18 04:49
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 162 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 05:00
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 177 Origyptian 31-Dec-17 17:10
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 147 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 02:19
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 195 Aine 01-Jan-18 02:49
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 217 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 02:56
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 252 Aine 01-Jan-18 03:49
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 177 Origyptian 01-Jan-18 08:09
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 168 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 09:37
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 202 Origyptian 01-Jan-18 17:17
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 194 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 17:28
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 184 Poster Boy 01-Jan-18 17:41
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 171 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 20:17
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 157 Susan Doris 01-Jan-18 17:57
It's impossible 167 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 21:58
Re: It's impossible 180 Origyptian 01-Jan-18 22:22
Re: It's impossible 216 Audrey 01-Jan-18 22:40
Re: It's impossible 167 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 23:32
Re: It's impossible 191 Aine 02-Jan-18 00:42
Re: It's impossible 199 Eddie Larry 01-Jan-18 23:02
Re: It's impossible 178 brett z 01-Jan-18 23:57
Re: It's impossible 181 Eddie Larry 02-Jan-18 00:15
anthropic principle 246 brett z 02-Jan-18 00:21
Re: anthropic principle 193 Eddie Larry 02-Jan-18 04:44
Re: anthropic principle 209 brett z 02-Jan-18 12:16
What Primates Teach Us About Being Human 264 Vanya 02-Jan-18 16:19
Re: What Primates Teach Us About Being Human 170 Susan Doris 02-Jan-18 16:59
Re: What Primates Teach Us About Being Human 187 Vanya 02-Jan-18 17:14
Re: It's impossible 190 Aine 02-Jan-18 00:46
Re: It's impossible 199 Eddie Larry 02-Jan-18 15:40
Re: It's impossible 190 Susan Doris 02-Jan-18 16:47
Re: It's impossible 180 drrayeye 02-Jan-18 17:44
Re: It's impossible 191 Aine 02-Jan-18 17:50
Re: It's impossible 135 Eddie Larry 02-Jan-18 18:04
Re: It's impossible 198 Aine 02-Jan-18 18:07
Re: It's impossible 177 Eddie Larry 02-Jan-18 23:20
Re: It's impossible 141 Aine 03-Jan-18 00:23
Re: It's impossible 141 cladking 02-Jan-18 19:05
Re: It's impossible 150 Eddie Larry 02-Jan-18 23:30
Re: It's impossible 188 Aine 03-Jan-18 00:25
Re: It's impossible 246 Eddie Larry 03-Jan-18 10:12
Re: It's impossible 174 Aine 03-Jan-18 16:36
Re: It's impossible 221 cladking 03-Jan-18 15:28
Re: It's impossible 164 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 04:57
Re: It's impossible 138 Susan Doris 02-Jan-18 06:39
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 224 Audrey 01-Jan-18 21:00
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 233 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 21:21
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 166 Audrey 01-Jan-18 22:38
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 217 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 23:26
Re: Bioplasma 166 Thunderbird 04-Jan-18 03:30
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 233 Susan Doris 01-Jan-18 10:40
Laugh or cry? 238 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 13:00
Re: Laugh or cry? 263 Susan Doris 01-Jan-18 14:21
About time for you to learn about atheism 187 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 17:20
Re: About time for you to learn about atheism 194 Susan Doris 01-Jan-18 18:03
Re: About time for you to learn about atheism 235 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 20:21
Re: About time for you to learn about atheism 230 Susan Doris 02-Jan-18 06:52
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 221 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 20:19
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 217 Susan Doris 02-Jan-18 06:54
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 195 Jon Ellison 02-Jan-18 08:23
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 212 Susan Doris 02-Jan-18 08:29
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 184 Jon Ellison 02-Jan-18 09:18
Re: , Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 207 Susan Doris 02-Jan-18 11:20
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 251 eyeofhorus33 31-Dec-17 15:39
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 282 eli stills 31-Dec-17 16:56
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 254 cladking 31-Dec-17 17:59
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 253 Susan Doris 31-Dec-17 18:23
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 216 cladking 31-Dec-17 19:49
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 244 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 20:56
But I lack the pictures! n/t 248 cladking 31-Dec-17 21:25
My interpretation 219 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 02:35
Re: My interpretation 235 Aine 01-Jan-18 02:46
not to me 250 drrayeye 01-Jan-18 02:54
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 211 Poster Boy 01-Jan-18 04:15
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 246 Thanos5150 01-Jan-18 05:38
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 187 Susan Doris 01-Jan-18 06:06
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 152 Poster Boy 01-Jan-18 06:21
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 172 Thanos5150 01-Jan-18 23:12
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 184 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 00:19
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 185 eli stills 01-Jan-18 18:24
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 153 Poster Boy 01-Jan-18 18:55
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 183 eli stills 01-Jan-18 20:34
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 153 Poster Boy 01-Jan-18 20:54
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 196 Thanos5150 02-Jan-18 01:26
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 203 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 02:37
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 262 Thanos5150 02-Jan-18 05:44
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 169 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 05:50
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 182 Thanos5150 02-Jan-18 06:11
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 193 eli stills 02-Jan-18 16:21
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 178 Eddie Larry 02-Jan-18 16:32
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 183 Origyptian 02-Jan-18 16:53
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 178 Eddie Larry 02-Jan-18 18:06
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 252 Thanos5150 02-Jan-18 21:42
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 164 eli stills 03-Jan-18 02:47
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 195 Thanos5150 03-Jan-18 23:07
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 181 eli stills 04-Jan-18 02:11
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 147 Origyptian 04-Jan-18 15:43
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 175 Poster Boy 03-Jan-18 06:01
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 216 Origyptian 03-Jan-18 19:06
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 224 Poster Boy 03-Jan-18 19:17
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 189 Origyptian 03-Jan-18 23:22
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 162 Poster Boy 03-Jan-18 23:25
Kerala 2016 181 Poster Boy 03-Jan-18 21:43
Re: Kerala 2016 168 Origyptian 03-Jan-18 23:38
Re: Kerala 2016 189 Poster Boy 04-Jan-18 00:16
and Back to Nigeria 2017 166 Poster Boy 04-Jan-18 05:43
Re: and Back to Nigeria 2017 218 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 16:16
Medjugorje - May 2010 169 Poster Boy 06-Jan-18 19:25
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 207 Origyptian 07-Jan-18 17:56
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 180 Poster Boy 07-Jan-18 19:21
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 176 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 03:58
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 138 Poster Boy 08-Jan-18 04:42
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 151 Origyptian 07-Jan-18 18:49
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 140 Poster Boy 07-Jan-18 19:25
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 168 Origyptian 07-Jan-18 20:51
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 158 Eddie Larry 07-Jan-18 20:59
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 171 Poster Boy 07-Jan-18 21:18
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 196 Origyptian 07-Jan-18 21:42
See ya, Phil 188 Poster Boy 07-Jan-18 22:31
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 188 Eddie Larry 08-Jan-18 06:20
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 157 Poster Boy 07-Jan-18 21:15
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 176 Jon Ellison 07-Jan-18 21:32
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 131 Poster Boy 07-Jan-18 21:42
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 156 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 14:15
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 158 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 03:02
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 167 Poster Boy 08-Jan-18 03:46
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 193 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 14:42
Re: Medjugorje - May 2010 180 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 14:57
Proselytizing: Not 223 Poster Boy 09-Jan-18 01:26
Re: Proselytizing: Not 219 Origyptian 09-Jan-18 04:08
Re: Proselytizing: Not 231 Poster Boy 09-Jan-18 05:05
Re: Proselytizing: Not 196 Origyptian 09-Jan-18 14:05
Re: Proselytizing: Not 236 Susan Doris 09-Jan-18 14:41
13-Year Inquiry 148 Poster Boy 07-Jan-18 03:00
Re: 13-Year Inquiry 163 Origyptian 07-Jan-18 19:00
Re: 13-Year Inquiry 133 Poster Boy 07-Jan-18 19:20
Exodus, Hebrews Yahweh etc 228 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 20:02
Re: Exodus, Hebrews Yahweh etc 202 Thanos5150 03-Jan-18 21:43
Re: Exodus, Hebrews Yahweh etc 181 Eddie Larry 03-Jan-18 22:28
Re: Exodus, Hebrews Yahweh etc 165 Thanos5150 03-Jan-18 22:51
Re: Exodus, Hebrews Yahweh etc 194 Poster Boy 04-Jan-18 00:03
Re: Exodus, Hebrews Yahweh etc 194 Thanos5150 04-Jan-18 00:58
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 173 eli stills 02-Jan-18 03:01
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 187 Thanos5150 02-Jan-18 06:07
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 204 eli stills 02-Jan-18 16:38
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 195 Eddie Larry 02-Jan-18 16:46
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 210 Thunderbird 01-Jan-18 20:24
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 197 Poster Boy 01-Jan-18 20:47
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 240 Aine 02-Jan-18 00:37
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 212 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 00:57
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 235 Aine 02-Jan-18 01:02
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 189 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 01:21
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 242 eli stills 02-Jan-18 17:19
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 209 Aine 02-Jan-18 17:37
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 211 eyeofhorus33 02-Jan-18 18:00
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 191 eli stills 02-Jan-18 19:28
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 248 eli stills 01-Jan-18 20:54
Re: Intelligent Design is a form of atheism 156 MichaelG 09-Jan-18 21:46
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 267 Poster Boy 01-Jan-18 03:02
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 257 Susan Doris 01-Jan-18 06:23
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 229 Poster Boy 01-Jan-18 06:45
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 231 eli stills 01-Jan-18 18:43
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 245 Poster Boy 01-Jan-18 19:02
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 236 MichaelG 02-Jan-18 17:18
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 256 Aine 02-Jan-18 17:44
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 179 cladking 02-Jan-18 19:28
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 248 Aine 02-Jan-18 19:33
Genes Drive "Evolution". 233 cladking 03-Jan-18 15:43
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 144 Aine 03-Jan-18 16:26
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 197 cladking 03-Jan-18 17:38
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 240 Susan Doris 03-Jan-18 17:47
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 184 cladking 03-Jan-18 20:40
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 218 Susan Doris 04-Jan-18 07:48
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 188 cladking 03-Jan-18 17:51
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 215 Aine 03-Jan-18 17:56
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 174 cladking 03-Jan-18 18:10
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 211 Aine 03-Jan-18 18:27
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 232 Eddie Larry 03-Jan-18 18:47
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 185 Aine 03-Jan-18 19:55
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 171 cladking 03-Jan-18 20:52
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 189 Eddie Larry 03-Jan-18 21:12
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 207 Aine 03-Jan-18 23:30
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 191 cladking 04-Jan-18 00:46
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 177 Archaic 04-Jan-18 02:10
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 169 cladking 04-Jan-18 03:37
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 205 Aine 04-Jan-18 12:10
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 216 Thanos5150 04-Jan-18 15:37
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 216 Aine 04-Jan-18 15:40
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 215 Thanos5150 04-Jan-18 16:07
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 208 cladking 04-Jan-18 16:14
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 196 cladking 04-Jan-18 16:35
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 163 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 17:35
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 196 cladking 06-Jan-18 18:37
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 170 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 12:47
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 174 Susan Doris 08-Jan-18 13:28
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 139 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 16:45
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 198 Susan Doris 08-Jan-18 16:53
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 171 cladking 08-Jan-18 19:48
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 167 cladking 08-Jan-18 14:59
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 212 cladking 04-Jan-18 15:39
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 192 Vanya 04-Jan-18 16:10
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 199 cladking 04-Jan-18 17:14
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 248 Vanya 04-Jan-18 18:05
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 267 drrayeye 04-Jan-18 18:11
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 206 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 17:41
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 195 Vanya 06-Jan-18 19:51
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 172 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 05:29
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 178 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 17:22
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 195 cladking 06-Jan-18 17:46
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 116 Origyptian 07-Jan-18 16:36
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 173 cladking 07-Jan-18 18:27
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 175 Audrey 07-Jan-18 02:52
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 144 Origyptian 07-Jan-18 16:25
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 140 Audrey 08-Jan-18 02:51
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 173 Thunderbird 10-Jan-18 21:57
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 125 Susan Doris 03-Jan-18 18:00
Re: Genes Drive "Evolution". 181 cladking 03-Jan-18 21:03
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 227 Susan Doris 02-Jan-18 19:06
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 204 MichaelG 04-Jan-18 16:41
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 211 Susan Doris 04-Jan-18 18:38
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 226 cladking 04-Jan-18 18:54
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 202 cladking 02-Jan-18 19:22
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 188 MichaelG 04-Jan-18 16:45
Design makes sense 203 drrayeye 02-Jan-18 19:49
Re: Design makes sense 248 Aine 02-Jan-18 19:59
Re: Design makes sense 186 brett z 02-Jan-18 20:03
Re: Design makes sense 187 Aine 02-Jan-18 20:05
Re: Design makes sense 180 drrayeye 02-Jan-18 20:31
Re: Design makes sense 214 Aine 03-Jan-18 01:14
Re: Design makes sense 185 Susan Doris 03-Jan-18 06:05
Plans and the structure of behavior 270 drrayeye 03-Jan-18 09:09
Re: Plans and the structure of behavior 188 Susan Doris 03-Jan-18 09:46
Re: Plans and the structure of behavior 213 drrayeye 03-Jan-18 19:26
Re: Plans and the structure of behavior 210 Susan Doris 04-Jan-18 06:46
Re: Plans and the structure of behavior 142 drrayeye 04-Jan-18 12:38
Re: Plans and the structure of behavior 178 Susan Doris 04-Jan-18 14:40
Executive Subroutines 179 drrayeye 04-Jan-18 16:09
Re: Executive Subroutines 180 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 01:14
Re: Executive Subroutines 199 cladking 06-Jan-18 01:51
Re: Executive Subroutines 183 Audrey 06-Jan-18 06:34
Re: Executive Subroutines 170 Susan Doris 06-Jan-18 08:38
Re: Executive Subroutines 166 cladking 06-Jan-18 15:23
Re: Executive Subroutines 178 Audrey 07-Jan-18 02:25
Re: Executive Subroutines 162 cladking 07-Jan-18 02:51
Re: Executive Subroutines 156 Audrey 07-Jan-18 04:04
Re: Executive Subroutines 173 cladking 07-Jan-18 04:53
Re: Executive Subroutines 194 Audrey 08-Jan-18 03:03
Re: Executive Subroutines 146 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 16:42
Re: Executive Subroutines 137 Susan Doris 06-Jan-18 05:45
Intelligent atheists and ID: Your reading list is long 166 drrayeye 06-Jan-18 06:28
Re: Intelligent atheists and ID: Your reading list is long 194 Susan Doris 06-Jan-18 08:36
Not a great start 185 drrayeye 06-Jan-18 10:32
Re: Not a great start 248 Susan Doris 06-Jan-18 12:10
Re: Intelligent atheists and ID: Your reading list is long 178 cladking 06-Jan-18 15:45
Re: Executive Subroutines 186 Audrey 06-Jan-18 06:32
Re: Executive Subroutines 235 Susan Doris 06-Jan-18 09:33
Re: Executive Subroutines 172 cladking 06-Jan-18 15:56
Re: Executive Subroutines 174 Audrey 07-Jan-18 02:15
Re: Executive Subroutines 254 Susan Doris 07-Jan-18 07:57
Re: Executive Subroutines 119 cladking 07-Jan-18 14:29
Re: Executive Subroutines 216 Susan Doris 07-Jan-18 14:45
Re: Executive Subroutines 148 cladking 07-Jan-18 16:36
Re: Executive Subroutines 193 Susan Doris 07-Jan-18 17:54
Re: Executive Subroutines 152 cladking 07-Jan-18 19:31
Re: Executive Subroutines 163 cladking 07-Jan-18 19:52
Re: Executive Subroutines 183 cladking 07-Jan-18 20:15
Re: Executive Subroutines 191 Susan Doris 07-Jan-18 23:32
Re: Executive Subroutines 229 cladking 08-Jan-18 00:57
Re: Executive Subroutines 224 Susan Doris 08-Jan-18 06:11
Re: Executive Subroutines 229 cladking 21-Jan-18 02:04
Re: Executive Subroutines 178 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 13:17
Re: Executive Subroutines 216 Susan Doris 08-Jan-18 13:39
Re: Executive Subroutines 191 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 16:57
Re: Executive Subroutines 142 cladking 08-Jan-18 17:05
Re: Executive Subroutines 213 Susan Doris 08-Jan-18 17:33
Re: Executive Subroutines 165 cladking 06-Jan-18 15:38
Re: Executive Subroutines 171 Eddie Larry 06-Jan-18 15:52
Re: Plans and the structure of behavior 189 Aine 03-Jan-18 16:30
Re: Plans and the structure of behavior 197 drrayeye 03-Jan-18 19:31
Re: Plans and the structure of behavior 230 Aine 03-Jan-18 19:47
If you really want to know 174 drrayeye 04-Jan-18 04:04
Re: If you really want to know 185 Susan Doris 04-Jan-18 06:51
Re: If you really want to know 170 Aine 04-Jan-18 12:07
Re: Design makes sense 252 Susan Doris 03-Jan-18 00:15
Re: Design makes sense 189 cladking 03-Jan-18 16:30
Re: Design makes sense 213 drrayeye 03-Jan-18 19:34
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 234 Vanya 02-Jan-18 20:13
Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 213 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 20:38
Re: Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 226 Aine 02-Jan-18 23:01
Re: Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 201 Poster Boy 02-Jan-18 23:39
Re: Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 199 Aine 03-Jan-18 00:21
Re: Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 202 Poster Boy 03-Jan-18 01:24
IF .... THEN .... - Random, Mutation, Evolution 298 Vanya 03-Jan-18 16:38
Re: IF .... THEN .... - Random, Mutation, Evolution 172 Aine 03-Jan-18 17:03
Re: IF .... THEN .... - Random, Mutation, Evolution 251 Poster Boy 03-Jan-18 17:43
Re: IF .... THEN .... - Random, Mutation, Evolution 199 Vanya 03-Jan-18 19:31
Re: IF .... THEN .... - Random, Mutation, Evolution 199 Vanya 04-Jan-18 13:13
Re: IF .... THEN .... - Random, Mutation, Evolution 163 Poster Boy 04-Jan-18 20:22
Re: IF .... THEN .... - Random, Mutation, Evolution 247 Vanya 05-Jan-18 09:15
Re: IF .... THEN .... - Random, Mutation, Evolution 177 Poster Boy 05-Jan-18 20:06
Re: IF .... THEN .... - Random, Mutation, Evolution 288 Vanya 06-Jan-18 14:17
Re: IF .... THEN .... - Random, Mutation, Evolution 152 Poster Boy 06-Jan-18 19:29
Re: Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 198 Aine 03-Jan-18 16:38
Re: Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 207 Origyptian 03-Jan-18 14:27
Re: Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 224 Aine 03-Jan-18 16:29
Re: Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 158 Origyptian 03-Jan-18 22:04
Re: Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 219 cloister 03-Jan-18 22:14
Re: Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 238 cladking 03-Jan-18 17:13
Re: Random mutations and evolution... Intelligent Design and Human Origins 250 Poster Boy 03-Jan-18 17:50
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 140 MichaelG 09-Jan-18 21:49
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 220 gulsbo 06-Jan-18 19:39
Re: Intelligent Design and...Implementation? 159 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 04:48
Re: Intelligent Design and...Implementation? 215 gulsbo 08-Jan-18 20:45
Re: Intelligent Design and...Implementation? 183 Origyptian 08-Jan-18 21:44
Re: Intelligent Design and...Implementation? 236 gulsbo 10-Jan-18 18:43
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 182 MichaelG 09-Jan-18 21:53
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 218 cladking 09-Jan-18 22:21
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 192 gulsbo 10-Jan-18 19:13
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 129 cladking 10-Jan-18 20:33
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 168 Origyptian 10-Jan-18 22:00
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 203 cladking 11-Jan-18 01:54
Re: Intelligent Design and Human Origins 185 cladking 08-Jan-18 20:20
2 points 221 Warwick 10-Jan-18 18:33
Mebbe it was designed by committee n/t 239 cladking 10-Jan-18 20:47
Re: Mebbe it was designed by committee n/t 175 Warwick 10-Jan-18 20:58
Re: Mebbe it was designed by committee 202 cladking 10-Jan-18 21:11
Re: Mebbe it was designed by committee 179 MichaelG 17-Jan-18 18:26
Re: Mebbe it was designed by committee 173 cladking 17-Jan-18 18:42
Re: Mebbe it was designed by committee 186 Audrey 17-Jan-18 23:39
Re: Mebbe it was designed by committee 260 Warwick 17-Jan-18 23:52


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.