Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Stephen

you say ' It's one thing for someone like John Neal to cite the ratio of an Assyrian Ft. to an Imperial Ft. as 21/20, and another thing entirely to explain why and how this came about. ----- It can't be done through simple linear measurement analysis. One thing I do know, is that what we call the Imperial Metric system, and Megalithic Metric systems, are co-joined at the Vesica hip, in this evolutionary prerecorded history process.'

copy that.

i nave come into this late in life but with a plan. I watched a documentary by Mike Parker Pearson on Stonehenge and the genetics of cattle found at SH from other areas of the UK. It was a quite brilliant amalysis but the final conclusions were jaw droppingly unrelated to the findings with the flimsiest of evidence so i did some research. I stumbled upon a book called 'civilisation one' by Knight and Butler and this led me to Thom's first book. After i had read the introduction i knew immediately that 'something was rotten in the State of Denmark'

I went away for a couple of months to a warm comfortable place and analysed Thom's outputs and summarised them in my first book. It was immediately clear that he had discovered a system of measurement and that the megalithic yard was just a component.I decided the best place to have the book reviwed was the megalithic portal and paid to have a run of copies published professionally. The book lays out an audit programme to be followed that at the time of publication i belived would enable 'the megalithic code' to be cracked in particular the relationship between the imperial system and Thom's system.

The plan was to publicly record this process on the megalithic portal website as on line working papers and findings and this is now complete. In the process three more books. 'The Answer', 'Proving the Megalithic Yard' and 'The Eclipse'. All very public and at times quite fraught because i had backed myself that i could do it.

In my naivety I had no idea of the depth of the rift between Thom and the archaeology profession or that the portal was populated by very many archaeologists so it was never going to be a match made in heaven.

Anway i quickly linked the imperial and Thom's system using the ratio 33 to 34. This is a proof. If you use a unit of 33/34 imperial feet in the imperial system you get Thom's system. Thom's work has been systematically rubbished by academia using pseudo scentific evidence carrying no weight whatsoever. Thom was right.

It is ironic to be saying this on Graham Hancock's website as his work is supposedly pseudo scientific. The methods used to trash Thom are now turned on GH and he is accused of using methods already employed against Thom. It is catch 22.

Once the 99 to 102 relationship between the imperial and Thom is understood, and how the length of the unit is crtical to producing the system, the obvious base to look at is 100 as this is one step above the imperial and the 'universally sacred' base discovered by Thom. This is done in my last book.

Pi appears to go with the bases

99 is 1760/560
100 is 31416/10000
102 is 1632/520

Once it is realised that a unit of 99/102 imperial feet divided into the imperial system produces Thom's system the base 100 system can be reproduced.

This is 5280/99 x 100 = 5333.33333r the eclipse system (Universally sacred)

It is also 1320 x 100/99 = 1333.3333 base unit 1.3333 this is 4/3 or inverted 3/4.

It appears that we have been looking at the imperial system with our eyes wide shut.

In the last book the suggestion is that our ancestors so delighted and revelled in these numbers they hid the imperial system's sacred unit on top of a non sacred base 99 system. They are still laughing at us.

The imperial foot is base 100 as 100 x 0.12 and the unit that works with the imperial system is 9 x 10 x 11 x 12 = 11880 / 1000 or 11.88 inches or 0.99 of a foot.This is 99 x 0.12.

5280 / 0.99 = 5333.333r the eclipse prediction system, a naturally ocurring system.

Thom's unit is 102 x 0.12 = 1.02 feet.

5440 / 1.02 = 5333.333r the eclipse system.

All systems converge on base 100. The Welsh (Druidic), the Scottish (Pictish), and the English imperial [using the correct sacred unit on the wrong base system].

'Proving the megalithic yard' is a vital stepping stone to confirming that the imperial system is ancient.

Here is the eclipse times table.

1.333333333
2.666666667
4
5.333333333
6.666666667
8
9.333333333
10.66666667
12
13.33333333
14.66666667
16
17.33333333
18.66666667
20
21.33333333
22.66666667
24
25.33333333
26.66666667
28
29.33333333 x 12 = 352 x 15 = 5280

They did not use decimals probably.

The base unit is 4/3 and the inversion 3/4.

This unit as root 4/3 and root 3/4 explains Hugh Franklin's anaysis of the GP.

At SH they did not use square roots they used Pi squared as

1760/560 x 1632/520 x 91 = 89760 imperial feet the Aubrey circumference in units of 0.12 of an imperial foot.

This is one season of 91 days so x 4 to get the 364 day Asimov year and x 8 to get the 10 day reset period using 365.25 day years.

Happy New Year to all the people i have agreed with and crossed swords with on this journey so far, still a long way to go.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 31-Dec-17 10:51 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Let there be Phos :) 2361 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 03:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 263 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 14:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 308 drew 17-Dec-17 02:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) 192 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 14:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 280 Sirfiroth 17-Dec-17 21:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 222 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 22:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 302 Horatech 18-Dec-17 06:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 206 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 14:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 288 Horatech 18-Dec-17 23:27
Re: Let there be Phos :) 238 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 02:49
Re: Let there be Phos :) 228 molder 19-Dec-17 05:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 227 Horatech 19-Dec-17 06:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 229 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 06:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 220 molder 19-Dec-17 07:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 293 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 11:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 219 Sirfiroth 19-Dec-17 19:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 270 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 03:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 196 Sirfiroth 20-Dec-17 16:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 224 magisterchessmutt 21-Dec-17 06:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 200 molder 19-Dec-17 22:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 213 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 02:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 224 molder 20-Dec-17 20:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 250 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 02:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) 205 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 04:23
Re: Let there be Phos :) 230 mmstud 22-Dec-17 08:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 256 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 10:44
Re: Let there be Phos :) 218 mmstud 22-Dec-17 12:26
Re: Let there be Phos :) 303 magisterchessmutt 23-Dec-17 00:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 297 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 15:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) 297 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 04:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 241 drew 18-Dec-17 00:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) 225 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 02:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 321 mmstud 22-Dec-17 14:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 302 molder 22-Dec-17 21:21
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 322 molder 23-Dec-17 22:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 251 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 01:55
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 267 magisterchessmutt 26-Dec-17 14:53
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 211 molder 26-Dec-17 21:51
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 225 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 03:36
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 195 molder 27-Dec-17 05:02
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 259 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 235 rodz111 29-Dec-17 22:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 189 Sirfiroth 28-Dec-17 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 248 DavidK 28-Dec-17 19:33
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 239 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 02:42
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 301 Sirfiroth 29-Dec-17 14:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 249 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:05
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 248 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:37
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 297 DavidK 29-Dec-17 01:52
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 365 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 03:04
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 196 molder 31-Dec-17 22:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 286 cladking 28-Dec-17 20:36
Re: Let there be Phos :) 242 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 239 cladking 29-Dec-17 02:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 243 cladking 29-Dec-17 23:02
Re: Let there be Phos :) 332 DavidK 29-Dec-17 10:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Target Practice 242 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 03:24
Re: Let there be Phos :) 283 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 277 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 04:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 320 DavidK 30-Dec-17 15:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 220 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 05:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 304 DavidK 31-Dec-17 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 256 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 12:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 280 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 266 DavidK 01-Jan-18 11:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 251 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 13:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 262 DavidK 01-Jan-18 13:39
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 244 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 04:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 278 DavidK 02-Jan-18 09:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 219 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 12:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 322 DavidK 02-Jan-18 13:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 225 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 03:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 183 molder 03-Jan-18 06:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 190 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 07:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 315 molder 03-Jan-18 08:47
Re:A Canonical alternative 231 cloister 03-Jan-18 10:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 203 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 11:16
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 199 molder 03-Jan-18 11:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 190 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 12:18
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 208 molder 03-Jan-18 12:34
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 198 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 13:19
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 212 cloister 03-Jan-18 15:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 200 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 16:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 290 cloister 05-Jan-18 17:23
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 206 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 18:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 212 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:45
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 264 cloister 08-Jan-18 11:25
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 246 DavidK 03-Jan-18 15:37
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 215 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 17:31
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 264 DavidK 03-Jan-18 18:54
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 202 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 03:04
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 308 DavidK 04-Jan-18 09:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 151 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 11:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 203 DavidK 04-Jan-18 11:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 298 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 12:13
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 227 Sirfiroth 07-Jan-18 00:00
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 255 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 00:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 202 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 07:41
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 256 cloister 07-Jan-18 09:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 217 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 16:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 259 DavidK 07-Jan-18 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 237 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 22:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 271 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:09
Re: Let there be Phos :) 239 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:53
Re: Let there be Phos :) 225 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 03:37
Re: Let there be Phos :) 231 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:05
Re: Let there be Phos :) 240 DavidK 08-Jan-18 08:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 202 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 248 DavidK 08-Jan-18 10:59
Re: Let there be Phos :) 189 DavidK 08-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 208 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 12:35
Re: Let there be Phos :) 209 DavidK 08-Jan-18 17:45
Re: Let there be Phos :) 198 DavidK 08-Jan-18 19:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 277 magisterchessmutt 09-Jan-18 03:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 222 DavidK 09-Jan-18 18:21
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 244 molder 10-Jan-18 13:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 192 molder 10-Jan-18 13:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 189 DavidK 10-Jan-18 15:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 171 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 194 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 228 DavidK 10-Jan-18 21:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) 201 molder 11-Jan-18 21:54
Re: Let there be Phos :) 215 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 10:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 191 DavidK 12-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 167 DavidK 12-Jan-18 10:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) 173 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:01
Re: Let there be Phos :) 208 DavidK 12-Jan-18 13:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 172 DavidK 12-Jan-18 12:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 196 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 249 DavidK 12-Jan-18 14:16
Re: Let there be Phos :) 201 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 11:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) 172 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) 207 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 12:31
Re: Let there be Phos :) 288 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:47
Let there be Phos at the GP 297 DavidK 17-Jan-18 15:13
Re: Let there be Phos :) 232 DavidK 22-Mar-18 22:50
Re: Let there be Phos :) 266 magisterchessmutt 27-Mar-18 21:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 263 DavidK 07-Apr-18 20:01


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.