Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Stephen

you say ' It's one thing for someone like John Neal to cite the ratio of an Assyrian Ft. to an Imperial Ft. as 21/20, and another thing entirely to explain why and how this came about. ----- It can't be done through simple linear measurement analysis. One thing I do know, is that what we call the Imperial Metric system, and Megalithic Metric systems, are co-joined at the Vesica hip, in this evolutionary prerecorded history process.'

copy that.

i nave come into this late in life but with a plan. I watched a documentary by Mike Parker Pearson on Stonehenge and the genetics of cattle found at SH from other areas of the UK. It was a quite brilliant amalysis but the final conclusions were jaw droppingly unrelated to the findings with the flimsiest of evidence so i did some research. I stumbled upon a book called 'civilisation one' by Knight and Butler and this led me to Thom's first book. After i had read the introduction i knew immediately that 'something was rotten in the State of Denmark'

I went away for a couple of months to a warm comfortable place and analysed Thom's outputs and summarised them in my first book. It was immediately clear that he had discovered a system of measurement and that the megalithic yard was just a component.I decided the best place to have the book reviwed was the megalithic portal and paid to have a run of copies published professionally. The book lays out an audit programme to be followed that at the time of publication i belived would enable 'the megalithic code' to be cracked in particular the relationship between the imperial system and Thom's system.

The plan was to publicly record this process on the megalithic portal website as on line working papers and findings and this is now complete. In the process three more books. 'The Answer', 'Proving the Megalithic Yard' and 'The Eclipse'. All very public and at times quite fraught because i had backed myself that i could do it.

In my naivety I had no idea of the depth of the rift between Thom and the archaeology profession or that the portal was populated by very many archaeologists so it was never going to be a match made in heaven.

Anway i quickly linked the imperial and Thom's system using the ratio 33 to 34. This is a proof. If you use a unit of 33/34 imperial feet in the imperial system you get Thom's system. Thom's work has been systematically rubbished by academia using pseudo scentific evidence carrying no weight whatsoever. Thom was right.

It is ironic to be saying this on Graham Hancock's website as his work is supposedly pseudo scientific. The methods used to trash Thom are now turned on GH and he is accused of using methods already employed against Thom. It is catch 22.

Once the 99 to 102 relationship between the imperial and Thom is understood, and how the length of the unit is crtical to producing the system, the obvious base to look at is 100 as this is one step above the imperial and the 'universally sacred' base discovered by Thom. This is done in my last book.

Pi appears to go with the bases

99 is 1760/560
100 is 31416/10000
102 is 1632/520

Once it is realised that a unit of 99/102 imperial feet divided into the imperial system produces Thom's system the base 100 system can be reproduced.

This is 5280/99 x 100 = 5333.33333r the eclipse system (Universally sacred)

It is also 1320 x 100/99 = 1333.3333 base unit 1.3333 this is 4/3 or inverted 3/4.

It appears that we have been looking at the imperial system with our eyes wide shut.

In the last book the suggestion is that our ancestors so delighted and revelled in these numbers they hid the imperial system's sacred unit on top of a non sacred base 99 system. They are still laughing at us.

The imperial foot is base 100 as 100 x 0.12 and the unit that works with the imperial system is 9 x 10 x 11 x 12 = 11880 / 1000 or 11.88 inches or 0.99 of a foot.This is 99 x 0.12.

5280 / 0.99 = 5333.333r the eclipse prediction system, a naturally ocurring system.

Thom's unit is 102 x 0.12 = 1.02 feet.

5440 / 1.02 = 5333.333r the eclipse system.

All systems converge on base 100. The Welsh (Druidic), the Scottish (Pictish), and the English imperial [using the correct sacred unit on the wrong base system].

'Proving the megalithic yard' is a vital stepping stone to confirming that the imperial system is ancient.

Here is the eclipse times table.

1.333333333
2.666666667
4
5.333333333
6.666666667
8
9.333333333
10.66666667
12
13.33333333
14.66666667
16
17.33333333
18.66666667
20
21.33333333
22.66666667
24
25.33333333
26.66666667
28
29.33333333 x 12 = 352 x 15 = 5280

They did not use decimals probably.

The base unit is 4/3 and the inversion 3/4.

This unit as root 4/3 and root 3/4 explains Hugh Franklin's anaysis of the GP.

At SH they did not use square roots they used Pi squared as

1760/560 x 1632/520 x 91 = 89760 imperial feet the Aubrey circumference in units of 0.12 of an imperial foot.

This is one season of 91 days so x 4 to get the 364 day Asimov year and x 8 to get the 10 day reset period using 365.25 day years.

Happy New Year to all the people i have agreed with and crossed swords with on this journey so far, still a long way to go.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 31-Dec-17 10:51 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Let there be Phos :) 2535 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 03:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 360 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 14:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 401 drew 17-Dec-17 02:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) 269 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 14:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 366 Sirfiroth 17-Dec-17 21:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 307 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 22:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 373 Horatech 18-Dec-17 06:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 276 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 14:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 387 Horatech 18-Dec-17 23:27
Re: Let there be Phos :) 322 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 02:49
Re: Let there be Phos :) 291 molder 19-Dec-17 05:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 304 Horatech 19-Dec-17 06:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 297 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 06:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 303 molder 19-Dec-17 07:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 377 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 11:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 295 Sirfiroth 19-Dec-17 19:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 353 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 03:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 269 Sirfiroth 20-Dec-17 16:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 295 magisterchessmutt 21-Dec-17 06:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 262 molder 19-Dec-17 22:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 295 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 02:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 287 molder 20-Dec-17 20:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 318 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 02:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) 286 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 04:23
Re: Let there be Phos :) 298 mmstud 22-Dec-17 08:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 315 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 10:44
Re: Let there be Phos :) 289 mmstud 22-Dec-17 12:26
Re: Let there be Phos :) 386 magisterchessmutt 23-Dec-17 00:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 411 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 15:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) 378 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 04:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 309 drew 18-Dec-17 00:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) 321 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 02:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 410 mmstud 22-Dec-17 14:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 383 molder 22-Dec-17 21:21
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 436 molder 23-Dec-17 22:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 345 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 01:55
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 359 magisterchessmutt 26-Dec-17 14:53
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 287 molder 26-Dec-17 21:51
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 299 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 03:36
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 282 molder 27-Dec-17 05:02
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 335 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 316 rodz111 29-Dec-17 22:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 255 Sirfiroth 28-Dec-17 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 339 DavidK 28-Dec-17 19:33
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 351 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 02:42
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 388 Sirfiroth 29-Dec-17 14:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 326 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:05
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 340 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:37
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 397 DavidK 29-Dec-17 01:52
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 457 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 03:04
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 264 molder 31-Dec-17 22:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 393 cladking 28-Dec-17 20:36
Re: Let there be Phos :) 337 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 326 cladking 29-Dec-17 02:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 306 cladking 29-Dec-17 23:02
Re: Let there be Phos :) 435 DavidK 29-Dec-17 10:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Target Practice 335 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 03:24
Re: Let there be Phos :) 377 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 337 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 04:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 403 DavidK 30-Dec-17 15:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 294 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 05:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 403 DavidK 31-Dec-17 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 335 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 12:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 356 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 363 DavidK 01-Jan-18 11:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 338 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 13:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 338 DavidK 01-Jan-18 13:39
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 330 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 04:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 370 DavidK 02-Jan-18 09:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 296 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 12:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 406 DavidK 02-Jan-18 13:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 294 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 03:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 256 molder 03-Jan-18 06:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 251 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 07:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 399 molder 03-Jan-18 08:47
Re:A Canonical alternative 331 cloister 03-Jan-18 10:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 266 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 11:16
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 269 molder 03-Jan-18 11:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 254 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 12:18
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 294 molder 03-Jan-18 12:34
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 265 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 13:19
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 287 cloister 03-Jan-18 15:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 271 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 16:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 373 cloister 05-Jan-18 17:23
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 277 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 18:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 269 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:45
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 339 cloister 08-Jan-18 11:25
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 314 DavidK 03-Jan-18 15:37
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 289 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 17:31
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 335 DavidK 03-Jan-18 18:54
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 281 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 03:04
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 400 DavidK 04-Jan-18 09:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 233 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 11:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 284 DavidK 04-Jan-18 11:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 406 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 12:13
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 296 Sirfiroth 07-Jan-18 00:00
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 329 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 00:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 274 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 07:41
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 337 cloister 07-Jan-18 09:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 305 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 16:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 360 DavidK 07-Jan-18 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 340 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 22:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 346 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:09
Re: Let there be Phos :) 334 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:53
Re: Let there be Phos :) 298 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 03:37
Re: Let there be Phos :) 300 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:05
Re: Let there be Phos :) 302 DavidK 08-Jan-18 08:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 281 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 308 DavidK 08-Jan-18 10:59
Re: Let there be Phos :) 255 DavidK 08-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 276 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 12:35
Re: Let there be Phos :) 280 DavidK 08-Jan-18 17:45
Re: Let there be Phos :) 283 DavidK 08-Jan-18 19:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 365 magisterchessmutt 09-Jan-18 03:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 300 DavidK 09-Jan-18 18:21
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 307 molder 10-Jan-18 13:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 269 molder 10-Jan-18 13:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 266 DavidK 10-Jan-18 15:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 226 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 266 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 312 DavidK 10-Jan-18 21:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) 277 molder 11-Jan-18 21:54
Re: Let there be Phos :) 275 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 10:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 244 DavidK 12-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 236 DavidK 12-Jan-18 10:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) 254 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:01
Re: Let there be Phos :) 268 DavidK 12-Jan-18 13:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 245 DavidK 12-Jan-18 12:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 266 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 313 DavidK 12-Jan-18 14:16
Re: Let there be Phos :) 275 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 11:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) 233 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) 283 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 12:31
Re: Let there be Phos :) 370 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:47
Let there be Phos at the GP 438 DavidK 17-Jan-18 15:13
Re: Let there be Phos :) 306 DavidK 22-Mar-18 22:50
Re: Let there be Phos :) 348 magisterchessmutt 27-Mar-18 21:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 338 DavidK 07-Apr-18 20:01


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.