Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Stephen

you say ' It's one thing for someone like John Neal to cite the ratio of an Assyrian Ft. to an Imperial Ft. as 21/20, and another thing entirely to explain why and how this came about. ----- It can't be done through simple linear measurement analysis. One thing I do know, is that what we call the Imperial Metric system, and Megalithic Metric systems, are co-joined at the Vesica hip, in this evolutionary prerecorded history process.'

copy that.

i nave come into this late in life but with a plan. I watched a documentary by Mike Parker Pearson on Stonehenge and the genetics of cattle found at SH from other areas of the UK. It was a quite brilliant amalysis but the final conclusions were jaw droppingly unrelated to the findings with the flimsiest of evidence so i did some research. I stumbled upon a book called 'civilisation one' by Knight and Butler and this led me to Thom's first book. After i had read the introduction i knew immediately that 'something was rotten in the State of Denmark'

I went away for a couple of months to a warm comfortable place and analysed Thom's outputs and summarised them in my first book. It was immediately clear that he had discovered a system of measurement and that the megalithic yard was just a component.I decided the best place to have the book reviwed was the megalithic portal and paid to have a run of copies published professionally. The book lays out an audit programme to be followed that at the time of publication i belived would enable 'the megalithic code' to be cracked in particular the relationship between the imperial system and Thom's system.

The plan was to publicly record this process on the megalithic portal website as on line working papers and findings and this is now complete. In the process three more books. 'The Answer', 'Proving the Megalithic Yard' and 'The Eclipse'. All very public and at times quite fraught because i had backed myself that i could do it.

In my naivety I had no idea of the depth of the rift between Thom and the archaeology profession or that the portal was populated by very many archaeologists so it was never going to be a match made in heaven.

Anway i quickly linked the imperial and Thom's system using the ratio 33 to 34. This is a proof. If you use a unit of 33/34 imperial feet in the imperial system you get Thom's system. Thom's work has been systematically rubbished by academia using pseudo scentific evidence carrying no weight whatsoever. Thom was right.

It is ironic to be saying this on Graham Hancock's website as his work is supposedly pseudo scientific. The methods used to trash Thom are now turned on GH and he is accused of using methods already employed against Thom. It is catch 22.

Once the 99 to 102 relationship between the imperial and Thom is understood, and how the length of the unit is crtical to producing the system, the obvious base to look at is 100 as this is one step above the imperial and the 'universally sacred' base discovered by Thom. This is done in my last book.

Pi appears to go with the bases

99 is 1760/560
100 is 31416/10000
102 is 1632/520

Once it is realised that a unit of 99/102 imperial feet divided into the imperial system produces Thom's system the base 100 system can be reproduced.

This is 5280/99 x 100 = 5333.33333r the eclipse system (Universally sacred)

It is also 1320 x 100/99 = 1333.3333 base unit 1.3333 this is 4/3 or inverted 3/4.

It appears that we have been looking at the imperial system with our eyes wide shut.

In the last book the suggestion is that our ancestors so delighted and revelled in these numbers they hid the imperial system's sacred unit on top of a non sacred base 99 system. They are still laughing at us.

The imperial foot is base 100 as 100 x 0.12 and the unit that works with the imperial system is 9 x 10 x 11 x 12 = 11880 / 1000 or 11.88 inches or 0.99 of a foot.This is 99 x 0.12.

5280 / 0.99 = 5333.333r the eclipse prediction system, a naturally ocurring system.

Thom's unit is 102 x 0.12 = 1.02 feet.

5440 / 1.02 = 5333.333r the eclipse system.

All systems converge on base 100. The Welsh (Druidic), the Scottish (Pictish), and the English imperial [using the correct sacred unit on the wrong base system].

'Proving the megalithic yard' is a vital stepping stone to confirming that the imperial system is ancient.

Here is the eclipse times table.

1.333333333
2.666666667
4
5.333333333
6.666666667
8
9.333333333
10.66666667
12
13.33333333
14.66666667
16
17.33333333
18.66666667
20
21.33333333
22.66666667
24
25.33333333
26.66666667
28
29.33333333 x 12 = 352 x 15 = 5280

They did not use decimals probably.

The base unit is 4/3 and the inversion 3/4.

This unit as root 4/3 and root 3/4 explains Hugh Franklin's anaysis of the GP.

At SH they did not use square roots they used Pi squared as

1760/560 x 1632/520 x 91 = 89760 imperial feet the Aubrey circumference in units of 0.12 of an imperial foot.

This is one season of 91 days so x 4 to get the 364 day Asimov year and x 8 to get the 10 day reset period using 365.25 day years.

Happy New Year to all the people i have agreed with and crossed swords with on this journey so far, still a long way to go.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 31-Dec-17 10:51 by DavidK.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Let there be Phos :) 2285 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 03:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 226 magisterchessmutt 16-Dec-17 14:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 273 drew 17-Dec-17 02:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) 174 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 14:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 224 Sirfiroth 17-Dec-17 21:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 202 magisterchessmutt 17-Dec-17 22:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 270 Horatech 18-Dec-17 06:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 183 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 14:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 234 Horatech 18-Dec-17 23:27
Re: Let there be Phos :) 218 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 02:49
Re: Let there be Phos :) 211 molder 19-Dec-17 05:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 192 Horatech 19-Dec-17 06:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 213 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 06:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 198 molder 19-Dec-17 07:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 264 magisterchessmutt 19-Dec-17 11:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 199 Sirfiroth 19-Dec-17 19:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 233 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 03:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) 177 Sirfiroth 20-Dec-17 16:03
Re: Let there be Phos :) 205 magisterchessmutt 21-Dec-17 06:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 183 molder 19-Dec-17 22:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 198 magisterchessmutt 20-Dec-17 02:08
Re: Let there be Phos :) 208 molder 20-Dec-17 20:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 216 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 02:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) 185 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 04:23
Re: Let there be Phos :) 210 mmstud 22-Dec-17 08:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 239 magisterchessmutt 22-Dec-17 10:44
Re: Let there be Phos :) 203 mmstud 22-Dec-17 12:26
Re: Let there be Phos :) 272 magisterchessmutt 23-Dec-17 00:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 271 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 15:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) 268 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 04:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 213 drew 18-Dec-17 00:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) 207 magisterchessmutt 18-Dec-17 02:11
Re: Let there be Phos :) 296 mmstud 22-Dec-17 14:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 281 molder 22-Dec-17 21:21
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 285 molder 23-Dec-17 22:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 233 magisterchessmutt 24-Dec-17 01:55
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 237 magisterchessmutt 26-Dec-17 14:53
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 193 molder 26-Dec-17 21:51
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 189 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 03:36
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 176 molder 27-Dec-17 05:02
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 242 magisterchessmutt 27-Dec-17 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 196 rodz111 29-Dec-17 22:44
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 174 Sirfiroth 28-Dec-17 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 208 DavidK 28-Dec-17 19:33
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 210 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 02:42
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 265 Sirfiroth 29-Dec-17 14:27
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 205 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:05
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 218 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:37
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 258 DavidK 29-Dec-17 01:52
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 322 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 03:04
Re: Let there be Phos :)Doubling a cube 181 molder 31-Dec-17 22:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) 258 cladking 28-Dec-17 20:36
Re: Let there be Phos :) 220 magisterchessmutt 29-Dec-17 01:47
Re: Let there be Phos :) 199 cladking 29-Dec-17 02:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 213 cladking 29-Dec-17 23:02
Re: Let there be Phos :) 289 DavidK 29-Dec-17 10:51
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Target Practice 212 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 03:24
Re: Let there be Phos :) 237 DavidK 29-Dec-17 15:22
Re: Let there be Phos :) 238 magisterchessmutt 30-Dec-17 04:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 276 DavidK 30-Dec-17 15:56
Re: Let there be Phos :) 190 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 05:32
Re: Let there be Phos :) 261 DavidK 31-Dec-17 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 214 magisterchessmutt 31-Dec-17 12:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 243 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 11:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 223 DavidK 01-Jan-18 11:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 207 magisterchessmutt 01-Jan-18 13:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 207 DavidK 01-Jan-18 13:39
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 216 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 04:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 240 DavidK 02-Jan-18 09:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 194 magisterchessmutt 02-Jan-18 12:30
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 280 DavidK 02-Jan-18 13:20
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 208 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 03:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 168 molder 03-Jan-18 06:00
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 175 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 07:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) Lunar Reflections 274 molder 03-Jan-18 08:47
Re:A Canonical alternative 205 cloister 03-Jan-18 10:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 179 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 11:16
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 182 molder 03-Jan-18 11:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 174 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 12:18
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 190 molder 03-Jan-18 12:34
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 181 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 13:19
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 190 cloister 03-Jan-18 15:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 179 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 16:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 260 cloister 05-Jan-18 17:23
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 175 Origyptian 06-Jan-18 18:14
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 192 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:45
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 240 cloister 08-Jan-18 11:25
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 216 DavidK 03-Jan-18 15:37
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 176 magisterchessmutt 03-Jan-18 17:31
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 237 DavidK 03-Jan-18 18:54
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 183 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 03:04
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 254 DavidK 04-Jan-18 09:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 128 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 11:20
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 188 DavidK 04-Jan-18 11:55
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 269 magisterchessmutt 04-Jan-18 12:13
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 208 Sirfiroth 07-Jan-18 00:00
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 221 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 00:46
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 179 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 07:41
Re: Re:A Canonical alternative 233 cloister 07-Jan-18 09:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 191 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 16:12
Re: Let there be Phos :) 235 DavidK 07-Jan-18 18:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 199 magisterchessmutt 07-Jan-18 22:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 233 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:09
Re: Let there be Phos :) 208 DavidK 07-Jan-18 23:53
Re: Let there be Phos :) 204 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 03:37
Re: Let there be Phos :) 196 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 04:05
Re: Let there be Phos :) 216 DavidK 08-Jan-18 08:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 183 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 10:28
Re: Let there be Phos :) 226 DavidK 08-Jan-18 10:59
Re: Let there be Phos :) 160 DavidK 08-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 183 magisterchessmutt 08-Jan-18 12:35
Re: Let there be Phos :) 193 DavidK 08-Jan-18 17:45
Re: Let there be Phos :) 167 DavidK 08-Jan-18 19:43
Re: Let there be Phos :) 234 magisterchessmutt 09-Jan-18 03:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 188 DavidK 09-Jan-18 18:21
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 199 molder 10-Jan-18 13:33
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 164 molder 10-Jan-18 13:57
Re: Let there be Phos :) The Scottish mile 168 DavidK 10-Jan-18 15:07
Re: Let there be Phos :) 145 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:38
Re: Let there be Phos :) 178 DavidK 10-Jan-18 16:46
Re: Let there be Phos :) 203 DavidK 10-Jan-18 21:18
Re: Let there be Phos :) 172 molder 11-Jan-18 21:54
Re: Let there be Phos :) 186 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 10:29
Re: Let there be Phos :) 180 DavidK 12-Jan-18 11:17
Re: Let there be Phos :) 150 DavidK 12-Jan-18 10:40
Re: Let there be Phos :) 153 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:01
Re: Let there be Phos :) 195 DavidK 12-Jan-18 13:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 154 DavidK 12-Jan-18 12:06
Re: Let there be Phos :) 175 magisterchessmutt 12-Jan-18 12:25
Re: Let there be Phos :) 218 DavidK 12-Jan-18 14:16
Re: Let there be Phos :) 182 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 11:34
Re: Let there be Phos :) 158 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:04
Re: Let there be Phos :) 179 magisterchessmutt 13-Jan-18 12:31
Re: Let there be Phos :) 262 DavidK 13-Jan-18 12:47
Let there be Phos at the GP 262 DavidK 17-Jan-18 15:13
Re: Let there be Phos :) 188 DavidK 22-Mar-18 22:50
Re: Let there be Phos :) 225 magisterchessmutt 27-Mar-18 21:19
Re: Let there be Phos :) 226 DavidK 07-Apr-18 20:01


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.