Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it "makes no difference to you" then why all
> the huffing and puffing? Why don't you just adhere
> to Racho's advice and don't respond to posts which
> get you all hot and bothered?

Interesting sexual connotation you use there. Might it be a way of belittling the poster? Especially a woman poster? Warning..... chauvinistic remarks are not good for your health.
If I want yours or Racho's or Ori's advice, I'll ask for it. Don't worry about what I respond to.
FYI, am not hot and bothered. Neither sexually nor in anger. But if you want to make it sexual, good luck with that.

> Unlike yourself who appears quite content to not
> only immerse herself in sub-standard rubbish but
> also takes considerable time to defend it, there
> are others who prefer a higher standard of proof.

And your higher standards of proof for the natural formation of giant spheres is ...??
Am waiting for that "educational context" that presents the same volume of material as in the video.
You hinted that you had come across such. Or was that just a way to trash a video that does you no harm?

> Considering his ongoing crusade for such lofty
> levels I would have thought that Dr. Femano would
> also appreciate work of a higher quality.

I wouldn't worry about Ori. You should worry about your claim of "educational context".

> But really your attack post is just another thinly
> veiled defense of Dr Femano and the crackpot
> label. From what I can gather this isn't the first
> time you have selflessly done so.

Not defending Ori at all, what the hell does he have to do with it? You are reading too many corpuscles.
Am defending Vlad, or are you not astute enough to pick that up. You really need to get over the Ori obsession.

> Wacko or crackpot?
>
> Matters little to me as well.

Then why use it? It must matter to you, since you use it to covertly insult someone.

> Do you also think that the seagulls at Niagara
> Falls are UFOs?

Have no idea what you're talking about. I've never heard of the Niagara Falls seagulls. What do they have to do with giant stone spheres anyways? Or was that just an unnecessary way of insulting someone?

Evidently you have no desire to discuss giant stone spheres or unusual stone work of any kind. Your objective is ...??

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1557 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 314 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 385 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 345 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 425 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 258 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 276 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 178 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 199 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 203 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 168 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 255 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 359 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 192 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 253 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 233 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 266 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 144 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 188 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 214 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 116 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 141 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 169 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 143 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 225 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 174 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 180 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 219 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 239 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 235 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 260 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 272 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 202 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 233 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 303 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 149 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 244 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 287 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 213 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 313 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 217 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 187 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 179 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 286 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 222 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 283 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 241 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 209 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 192 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 254 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 167 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 255 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 254 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 277 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 231 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 240 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 263 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 181 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 249 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 279 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 336 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 359 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 292 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 264 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 276 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 253 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 294 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 265 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 233 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 260 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.