Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it "makes no difference to you" then why all
> the huffing and puffing? Why don't you just adhere
> to Racho's advice and don't respond to posts which
> get you all hot and bothered?

Interesting sexual connotation you use there. Might it be a way of belittling the poster? Especially a woman poster? Warning..... chauvinistic remarks are not good for your health.
If I want yours or Racho's or Ori's advice, I'll ask for it. Don't worry about what I respond to.
FYI, am not hot and bothered. Neither sexually nor in anger. But if you want to make it sexual, good luck with that.

> Unlike yourself who appears quite content to not
> only immerse herself in sub-standard rubbish but
> also takes considerable time to defend it, there
> are others who prefer a higher standard of proof.

And your higher standards of proof for the natural formation of giant spheres is ...??
Am waiting for that "educational context" that presents the same volume of material as in the video.
You hinted that you had come across such. Or was that just a way to trash a video that does you no harm?

> Considering his ongoing crusade for such lofty
> levels I would have thought that Dr. Femano would
> also appreciate work of a higher quality.

I wouldn't worry about Ori. You should worry about your claim of "educational context".

> But really your attack post is just another thinly
> veiled defense of Dr Femano and the crackpot
> label. From what I can gather this isn't the first
> time you have selflessly done so.

Not defending Ori at all, what the hell does he have to do with it? You are reading too many corpuscles.
Am defending Vlad, or are you not astute enough to pick that up. You really need to get over the Ori obsession.

> Wacko or crackpot?
>
> Matters little to me as well.

Then why use it? It must matter to you, since you use it to covertly insult someone.

> Do you also think that the seagulls at Niagara
> Falls are UFOs?

Have no idea what you're talking about. I've never heard of the Niagara Falls seagulls. What do they have to do with giant stone spheres anyways? Or was that just an unnecessary way of insulting someone?

Evidently you have no desire to discuss giant stone spheres or unusual stone work of any kind. Your objective is ...??

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1435 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 268 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 340 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 297 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 358 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 205 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 227 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 138 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 164 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 164 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 135 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 211 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 310 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 149 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 199 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 184 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 213 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 105 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 133 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 169 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 93 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 102 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 126 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 106 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 187 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 137 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 139 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 172 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 186 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 186 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 204 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 200 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 155 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 177 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 232 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 110 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 183 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 207 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 169 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 255 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 168 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 143 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 138 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 237 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 154 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 234 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 199 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 171 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 146 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 208 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 129 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 192 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 201 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 217 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 188 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 188 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 224 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 142 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 193 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 225 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 293 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 307 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 254 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 222 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 221 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 218 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 249 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 220 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 194 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 215 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.