Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it "makes no difference to you" then why all
> the huffing and puffing? Why don't you just adhere
> to Racho's advice and don't respond to posts which
> get you all hot and bothered?

Interesting sexual connotation you use there. Might it be a way of belittling the poster? Especially a woman poster? Warning..... chauvinistic remarks are not good for your health.
If I want yours or Racho's or Ori's advice, I'll ask for it. Don't worry about what I respond to.
FYI, am not hot and bothered. Neither sexually nor in anger. But if you want to make it sexual, good luck with that.

> Unlike yourself who appears quite content to not
> only immerse herself in sub-standard rubbish but
> also takes considerable time to defend it, there
> are others who prefer a higher standard of proof.

And your higher standards of proof for the natural formation of giant spheres is ...??
Am waiting for that "educational context" that presents the same volume of material as in the video.
You hinted that you had come across such. Or was that just a way to trash a video that does you no harm?

> Considering his ongoing crusade for such lofty
> levels I would have thought that Dr. Femano would
> also appreciate work of a higher quality.

I wouldn't worry about Ori. You should worry about your claim of "educational context".

> But really your attack post is just another thinly
> veiled defense of Dr Femano and the crackpot
> label. From what I can gather this isn't the first
> time you have selflessly done so.

Not defending Ori at all, what the hell does he have to do with it? You are reading too many corpuscles.
Am defending Vlad, or are you not astute enough to pick that up. You really need to get over the Ori obsession.

> Wacko or crackpot?
>
> Matters little to me as well.

Then why use it? It must matter to you, since you use it to covertly insult someone.

> Do you also think that the seagulls at Niagara
> Falls are UFOs?

Have no idea what you're talking about. I've never heard of the Niagara Falls seagulls. What do they have to do with giant stone spheres anyways? Or was that just an unnecessary way of insulting someone?

Evidently you have no desire to discuss giant stone spheres or unusual stone work of any kind. Your objective is ...??

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1473 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 283 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 358 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 314 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 381 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 226 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 245 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 152 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 178 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 180 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 144 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 225 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 332 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 166 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 224 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 202 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 234 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 118 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 149 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 181 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 99 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 112 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 139 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 121 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 202 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 157 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 155 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 189 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 214 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 207 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 221 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 223 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 173 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 192 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 265 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 123 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 215 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 229 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 187 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 273 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 189 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 157 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 153 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 255 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 173 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 251 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 220 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 187 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 160 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 225 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 142 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 214 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 223 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 238 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 202 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 208 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 242 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 157 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 218 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 246 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 315 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 326 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 270 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 239 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 242 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 231 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 270 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 239 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 210 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 232 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.