Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it "makes no difference to you" then why all
> the huffing and puffing? Why don't you just adhere
> to Racho's advice and don't respond to posts which
> get you all hot and bothered?

Interesting sexual connotation you use there. Might it be a way of belittling the poster? Especially a woman poster? Warning..... chauvinistic remarks are not good for your health.
If I want yours or Racho's or Ori's advice, I'll ask for it. Don't worry about what I respond to.
FYI, am not hot and bothered. Neither sexually nor in anger. But if you want to make it sexual, good luck with that.

> Unlike yourself who appears quite content to not
> only immerse herself in sub-standard rubbish but
> also takes considerable time to defend it, there
> are others who prefer a higher standard of proof.

And your higher standards of proof for the natural formation of giant spheres is ...??
Am waiting for that "educational context" that presents the same volume of material as in the video.
You hinted that you had come across such. Or was that just a way to trash a video that does you no harm?

> Considering his ongoing crusade for such lofty
> levels I would have thought that Dr. Femano would
> also appreciate work of a higher quality.

I wouldn't worry about Ori. You should worry about your claim of "educational context".

> But really your attack post is just another thinly
> veiled defense of Dr Femano and the crackpot
> label. From what I can gather this isn't the first
> time you have selflessly done so.

Not defending Ori at all, what the hell does he have to do with it? You are reading too many corpuscles.
Am defending Vlad, or are you not astute enough to pick that up. You really need to get over the Ori obsession.

> Wacko or crackpot?
>
> Matters little to me as well.

Then why use it? It must matter to you, since you use it to covertly insult someone.

> Do you also think that the seagulls at Niagara
> Falls are UFOs?

Have no idea what you're talking about. I've never heard of the Niagara Falls seagulls. What do they have to do with giant stone spheres anyways? Or was that just an unnecessary way of insulting someone?

Evidently you have no desire to discuss giant stone spheres or unusual stone work of any kind. Your objective is ...??

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1819 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 383 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 69 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 67 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 446 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 410 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 493 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 322 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 340 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 229 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 257 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 261 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 224 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 312 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 414 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 245 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 306 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 285 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 320 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 198 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 240 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 272 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 190 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 188 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 225 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 199 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 287 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 232 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 231 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 265 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 291 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 289 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 319 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 330 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 260 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 287 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 357 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 206 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 305 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 356 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 259 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 372 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 273 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 243 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 222 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 349 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 273 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 342 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 286 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 257 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 239 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 313 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 220 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 299 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 305 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 332 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 281 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 289 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 309 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 231 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 321 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 338 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 384 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 413 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 341 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 316 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 321 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 304 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 343 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 314 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 283 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 308 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.