Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it "makes no difference to you" then why all
> the huffing and puffing? Why don't you just adhere
> to Racho's advice and don't respond to posts which
> get you all hot and bothered?

Interesting sexual connotation you use there. Might it be a way of belittling the poster? Especially a woman poster? Warning..... chauvinistic remarks are not good for your health.
If I want yours or Racho's or Ori's advice, I'll ask for it. Don't worry about what I respond to.
FYI, am not hot and bothered. Neither sexually nor in anger. But if you want to make it sexual, good luck with that.

> Unlike yourself who appears quite content to not
> only immerse herself in sub-standard rubbish but
> also takes considerable time to defend it, there
> are others who prefer a higher standard of proof.

And your higher standards of proof for the natural formation of giant spheres is ...??
Am waiting for that "educational context" that presents the same volume of material as in the video.
You hinted that you had come across such. Or was that just a way to trash a video that does you no harm?

> Considering his ongoing crusade for such lofty
> levels I would have thought that Dr. Femano would
> also appreciate work of a higher quality.

I wouldn't worry about Ori. You should worry about your claim of "educational context".

> But really your attack post is just another thinly
> veiled defense of Dr Femano and the crackpot
> label. From what I can gather this isn't the first
> time you have selflessly done so.

Not defending Ori at all, what the hell does he have to do with it? You are reading too many corpuscles.
Am defending Vlad, or are you not astute enough to pick that up. You really need to get over the Ori obsession.

> Wacko or crackpot?
>
> Matters little to me as well.

Then why use it? It must matter to you, since you use it to covertly insult someone.

> Do you also think that the seagulls at Niagara
> Falls are UFOs?

Have no idea what you're talking about. I've never heard of the Niagara Falls seagulls. What do they have to do with giant stone spheres anyways? Or was that just an unnecessary way of insulting someone?

Evidently you have no desire to discuss giant stone spheres or unusual stone work of any kind. Your objective is ...??

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1455 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 274 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 348 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 306 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 370 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 218 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 233 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 143 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 174 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 171 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 140 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 217 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 320 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 160 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 216 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 195 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 228 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 111 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 143 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 176 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 95 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 107 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 136 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 115 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 196 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 147 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 149 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 179 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 203 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 200 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 210 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 210 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 162 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 183 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 253 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 119 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 204 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 219 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 177 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 266 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 178 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 149 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 143 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 249 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 161 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 245 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 209 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 180 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 155 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 217 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 133 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 203 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 214 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 227 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 199 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 196 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 231 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 149 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 205 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 235 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 302 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 316 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 260 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 231 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 231 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 225 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 257 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 228 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 200 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 222 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.