Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it "makes no difference to you" then why all
> the huffing and puffing? Why don't you just adhere
> to Racho's advice and don't respond to posts which
> get you all hot and bothered?

Interesting sexual connotation you use there. Might it be a way of belittling the poster? Especially a woman poster? Warning..... chauvinistic remarks are not good for your health.
If I want yours or Racho's or Ori's advice, I'll ask for it. Don't worry about what I respond to.
FYI, am not hot and bothered. Neither sexually nor in anger. But if you want to make it sexual, good luck with that.

> Unlike yourself who appears quite content to not
> only immerse herself in sub-standard rubbish but
> also takes considerable time to defend it, there
> are others who prefer a higher standard of proof.

And your higher standards of proof for the natural formation of giant spheres is ...??
Am waiting for that "educational context" that presents the same volume of material as in the video.
You hinted that you had come across such. Or was that just a way to trash a video that does you no harm?

> Considering his ongoing crusade for such lofty
> levels I would have thought that Dr. Femano would
> also appreciate work of a higher quality.

I wouldn't worry about Ori. You should worry about your claim of "educational context".

> But really your attack post is just another thinly
> veiled defense of Dr Femano and the crackpot
> label. From what I can gather this isn't the first
> time you have selflessly done so.

Not defending Ori at all, what the hell does he have to do with it? You are reading too many corpuscles.
Am defending Vlad, or are you not astute enough to pick that up. You really need to get over the Ori obsession.

> Wacko or crackpot?
>
> Matters little to me as well.

Then why use it? It must matter to you, since you use it to covertly insult someone.

> Do you also think that the seagulls at Niagara
> Falls are UFOs?

Have no idea what you're talking about. I've never heard of the Niagara Falls seagulls. What do they have to do with giant stone spheres anyways? Or was that just an unnecessary way of insulting someone?

Evidently you have no desire to discuss giant stone spheres or unusual stone work of any kind. Your objective is ...??

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1951 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 425 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 104 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 122 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 478 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 457 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 556 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 360 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 374 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 260 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 286 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 294 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 253 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 355 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 460 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 278 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 344 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 320 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 356 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 230 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 274 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 307 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 221 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 219 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 259 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 230 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 320 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 264 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 261 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 298 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 330 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 324 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 362 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 378 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 304 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 324 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 399 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 248 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 354 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 402 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 291 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 446 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 306 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 289 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 253 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 385 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 315 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 373 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 318 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 291 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 272 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 357 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 252 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 331 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 338 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 376 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 314 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 326 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 343 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 264 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 358 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 384 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 417 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 468 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 394 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 351 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 355 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 338 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 373 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 348 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 316 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 344 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.