Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it "makes no difference to you" then why all
> the huffing and puffing? Why don't you just adhere
> to Racho's advice and don't respond to posts which
> get you all hot and bothered?

Interesting sexual connotation you use there. Might it be a way of belittling the poster? Especially a woman poster? Warning..... chauvinistic remarks are not good for your health.
If I want yours or Racho's or Ori's advice, I'll ask for it. Don't worry about what I respond to.
FYI, am not hot and bothered. Neither sexually nor in anger. But if you want to make it sexual, good luck with that.

> Unlike yourself who appears quite content to not
> only immerse herself in sub-standard rubbish but
> also takes considerable time to defend it, there
> are others who prefer a higher standard of proof.

And your higher standards of proof for the natural formation of giant spheres is ...??
Am waiting for that "educational context" that presents the same volume of material as in the video.
You hinted that you had come across such. Or was that just a way to trash a video that does you no harm?

> Considering his ongoing crusade for such lofty
> levels I would have thought that Dr. Femano would
> also appreciate work of a higher quality.

I wouldn't worry about Ori. You should worry about your claim of "educational context".

> But really your attack post is just another thinly
> veiled defense of Dr Femano and the crackpot
> label. From what I can gather this isn't the first
> time you have selflessly done so.

Not defending Ori at all, what the hell does he have to do with it? You are reading too many corpuscles.
Am defending Vlad, or are you not astute enough to pick that up. You really need to get over the Ori obsession.

> Wacko or crackpot?
>
> Matters little to me as well.

Then why use it? It must matter to you, since you use it to covertly insult someone.

> Do you also think that the seagulls at Niagara
> Falls are UFOs?

Have no idea what you're talking about. I've never heard of the Niagara Falls seagulls. What do they have to do with giant stone spheres anyways? Or was that just an unnecessary way of insulting someone?

Evidently you have no desire to discuss giant stone spheres or unusual stone work of any kind. Your objective is ...??

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1578 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 324 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 391 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 352 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 433 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 263 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 284 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 187 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 205 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 211 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 177 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 265 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 372 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 198 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 262 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 239 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 276 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 153 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 196 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 221 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 127 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 147 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 177 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 152 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 234 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 181 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 186 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 226 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 248 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 243 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 268 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 280 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 213 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 238 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 313 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 162 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 257 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 298 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 220 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 327 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 228 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 196 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 185 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 294 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 232 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 302 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 248 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 217 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 202 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 261 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 176 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 262 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 266 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 286 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 236 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 248 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 271 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 192 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 273 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 293 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 340 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 369 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 300 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 270 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 282 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 259 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 301 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 271 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 240 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 266 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.