Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it "makes no difference to you" then why all
> the huffing and puffing? Why don't you just adhere
> to Racho's advice and don't respond to posts which
> get you all hot and bothered?

Interesting sexual connotation you use there. Might it be a way of belittling the poster? Especially a woman poster? Warning..... chauvinistic remarks are not good for your health.
If I want yours or Racho's or Ori's advice, I'll ask for it. Don't worry about what I respond to.
FYI, am not hot and bothered. Neither sexually nor in anger. But if you want to make it sexual, good luck with that.

> Unlike yourself who appears quite content to not
> only immerse herself in sub-standard rubbish but
> also takes considerable time to defend it, there
> are others who prefer a higher standard of proof.

And your higher standards of proof for the natural formation of giant spheres is ...??
Am waiting for that "educational context" that presents the same volume of material as in the video.
You hinted that you had come across such. Or was that just a way to trash a video that does you no harm?

> Considering his ongoing crusade for such lofty
> levels I would have thought that Dr. Femano would
> also appreciate work of a higher quality.

I wouldn't worry about Ori. You should worry about your claim of "educational context".

> But really your attack post is just another thinly
> veiled defense of Dr Femano and the crackpot
> label. From what I can gather this isn't the first
> time you have selflessly done so.

Not defending Ori at all, what the hell does he have to do with it? You are reading too many corpuscles.
Am defending Vlad, or are you not astute enough to pick that up. You really need to get over the Ori obsession.

> Wacko or crackpot?
>
> Matters little to me as well.

Then why use it? It must matter to you, since you use it to covertly insult someone.

> Do you also think that the seagulls at Niagara
> Falls are UFOs?

Have no idea what you're talking about. I've never heard of the Niagara Falls seagulls. What do they have to do with giant stone spheres anyways? Or was that just an unnecessary way of insulting someone?

Evidently you have no desire to discuss giant stone spheres or unusual stone work of any kind. Your objective is ...??

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1511 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 296 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 373 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 329 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 392 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 244 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 261 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 164 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 186 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 188 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 154 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 235 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 344 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 179 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 239 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 218 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 251 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 127 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 160 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 193 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 105 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 119 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 147 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 132 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 211 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 163 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 167 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 200 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 226 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 224 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 235 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 251 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 186 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 209 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 279 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 135 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 230 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 255 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 200 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 289 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 202 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 165 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 160 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 267 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 182 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 269 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 228 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 198 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 168 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 237 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 149 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 231 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 234 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 251 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 218 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 220 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 253 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 169 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 230 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 260 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 323 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 344 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 282 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 250 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 258 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 243 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 281 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 254 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 221 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 245 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.