Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Barbelo Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If it "makes no difference to you" then why all
> the huffing and puffing? Why don't you just adhere
> to Racho's advice and don't respond to posts which
> get you all hot and bothered?

Interesting sexual connotation you use there. Might it be a way of belittling the poster? Especially a woman poster? Warning..... chauvinistic remarks are not good for your health.
If I want yours or Racho's or Ori's advice, I'll ask for it. Don't worry about what I respond to.
FYI, am not hot and bothered. Neither sexually nor in anger. But if you want to make it sexual, good luck with that.

> Unlike yourself who appears quite content to not
> only immerse herself in sub-standard rubbish but
> also takes considerable time to defend it, there
> are others who prefer a higher standard of proof.

And your higher standards of proof for the natural formation of giant spheres is ...??
Am waiting for that "educational context" that presents the same volume of material as in the video.
You hinted that you had come across such. Or was that just a way to trash a video that does you no harm?

> Considering his ongoing crusade for such lofty
> levels I would have thought that Dr. Femano would
> also appreciate work of a higher quality.

I wouldn't worry about Ori. You should worry about your claim of "educational context".

> But really your attack post is just another thinly
> veiled defense of Dr Femano and the crackpot
> label. From what I can gather this isn't the first
> time you have selflessly done so.

Not defending Ori at all, what the hell does he have to do with it? You are reading too many corpuscles.
Am defending Vlad, or are you not astute enough to pick that up. You really need to get over the Ori obsession.

> Wacko or crackpot?
>
> Matters little to me as well.

Then why use it? It must matter to you, since you use it to covertly insult someone.

> Do you also think that the seagulls at Niagara
> Falls are UFOs?

Have no idea what you're talking about. I've never heard of the Niagara Falls seagulls. What do they have to do with giant stone spheres anyways? Or was that just an unnecessary way of insulting someone?

Evidently you have no desire to discuss giant stone spheres or unusual stone work of any kind. Your objective is ...??

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1752 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 360 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 54 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 38 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 427 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 385 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 464 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 290 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 311 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 211 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 229 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 236 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 207 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 290 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 397 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 221 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 286 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 263 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 299 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 177 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 222 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 248 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 157 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 173 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 203 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 176 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 263 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 210 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 210 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 249 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 272 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 266 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 289 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 309 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 236 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 265 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 338 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 186 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 282 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 327 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 240 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 349 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 248 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 218 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 207 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 314 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 252 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 326 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 266 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 237 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 222 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 291 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 197 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 283 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 284 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 307 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 257 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 269 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 291 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 212 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 298 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 315 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 363 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 390 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 323 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 292 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 302 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 279 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 322 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 295 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 264 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 288 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.