Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Audrey

> Please help. I may need these special spectacles
> that Racho talks about BUT where is the
> column you speak of?

The column is presumed, by the hole left in the rock. Something round was cut out of the rock. You could call it a stool, or pillar, whatever. Racho is saying, why cut a round long piece when it would be sensible to cut a square chunk of rock and then finish it into a column/pillar/stool.

> What are the dimensions of the semi circular bore
> hole? How big is the total block seeming to me
> sedimentary conglomerate? What is the geological
> description of the rock?

How the hell am I supposed to know. Google works just as well for you. Would the answers really make a difference as to why cut a round piece instead of square?

> Did AE ever mummify bodies? Why, if not for
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Did they ever include grave goods for the
> afterlife? Pre dynastic and after?
>
> Did Qin Shi Hung really make all that terracotta
> army? Why ? Was it not a burial with religious
> /superstitious reasons?

I don't care WHY the AE mummified. The AE didn't build the pyramids.

I don't consider the terracotta army to be ancient, no more than I consider Rome to be ancient. Because religion motivated Qin Shi Hung (if it did), does not mean religion motivated the pyramid builders. Anymore than it means religion motivates me.

> Do you think that human anthropomorphic figures
> with animal heads were real entities? Or was it
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Don't you think they were 'gods' if not what is
> your better explanation?

I don't care. The AE squatters didn't build the pyramids.

> Have you read any or several versions of the Book
> of Coming Forth by day?

Have read the entire book. Even indexed it. And it has nothing to do with the pyramid builders.

> How can you dismiss
> religious /superstitious reasons? Was it all about
> a geyser powered unworkable insane construction
> technique?

The geyser remark has nothing to do with religious motives. Don't know how you can see a connection.
Could it be, you just wanted to make fun of someone?

Dismiss religious reasons for what exactly? Building pyramids? Well that's easy, the AE didn't build the pyramids so we don't know the motives of the real builders. Pretty shallow actually, to assume it was religion based, especially when the engineering screams mechanical based.

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1557 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 315 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 385 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 346 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 426 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 258 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 277 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 179 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 199 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 204 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 168 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 256 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 360 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 192 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 254 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 233 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 267 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 145 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 189 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 214 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 116 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 142 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 170 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 144 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 225 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 174 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 180 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 220 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 241 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 236 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 260 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 273 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 202 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 235 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 303 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 150 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 244 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 288 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 213 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 313 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 217 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 188 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 180 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 287 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 222 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 284 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 241 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 210 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 193 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 255 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 167 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 255 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 254 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 278 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 231 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 241 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 264 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 181 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 250 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 280 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 336 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 360 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 293 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 264 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 276 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 254 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 295 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 266 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 233 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 260 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.