Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Audrey

> Please help. I may need these special spectacles
> that Racho talks about BUT where is the
> column you speak of?

The column is presumed, by the hole left in the rock. Something round was cut out of the rock. You could call it a stool, or pillar, whatever. Racho is saying, why cut a round long piece when it would be sensible to cut a square chunk of rock and then finish it into a column/pillar/stool.

> What are the dimensions of the semi circular bore
> hole? How big is the total block seeming to me
> sedimentary conglomerate? What is the geological
> description of the rock?

How the hell am I supposed to know. Google works just as well for you. Would the answers really make a difference as to why cut a round piece instead of square?

> Did AE ever mummify bodies? Why, if not for
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Did they ever include grave goods for the
> afterlife? Pre dynastic and after?
>
> Did Qin Shi Hung really make all that terracotta
> army? Why ? Was it not a burial with religious
> /superstitious reasons?

I don't care WHY the AE mummified. The AE didn't build the pyramids.

I don't consider the terracotta army to be ancient, no more than I consider Rome to be ancient. Because religion motivated Qin Shi Hung (if it did), does not mean religion motivated the pyramid builders. Anymore than it means religion motivates me.

> Do you think that human anthropomorphic figures
> with animal heads were real entities? Or was it
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Don't you think they were 'gods' if not what is
> your better explanation?

I don't care. The AE squatters didn't build the pyramids.

> Have you read any or several versions of the Book
> of Coming Forth by day?

Have read the entire book. Even indexed it. And it has nothing to do with the pyramid builders.

> How can you dismiss
> religious /superstitious reasons? Was it all about
> a geyser powered unworkable insane construction
> technique?

The geyser remark has nothing to do with religious motives. Don't know how you can see a connection.
Could it be, you just wanted to make fun of someone?

Dismiss religious reasons for what exactly? Building pyramids? Well that's easy, the AE didn't build the pyramids so we don't know the motives of the real builders. Pretty shallow actually, to assume it was religion based, especially when the engineering screams mechanical based.

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1427 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 261 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 331 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 291 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 353 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 196 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 218 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 134 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 159 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 157 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 128 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 203 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 306 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 142 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 192 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 174 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 202 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 98 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 130 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 161 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 90 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 98 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 119 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 102 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 179 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 130 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 128 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 168 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 177 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 176 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 193 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 188 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 150 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 169 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 219 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 104 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 172 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 195 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 161 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 240 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 160 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 136 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 133 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 230 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 148 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 227 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 193 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 160 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 140 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 199 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 125 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 183 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 193 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 212 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 180 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 182 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 214 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 137 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 187 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 214 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 289 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 302 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 247 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 214 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 214 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 212 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 242 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 216 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 187 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 207 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.