Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Audrey

> Please help. I may need these special spectacles
> that Racho talks about BUT where is the
> column you speak of?

The column is presumed, by the hole left in the rock. Something round was cut out of the rock. You could call it a stool, or pillar, whatever. Racho is saying, why cut a round long piece when it would be sensible to cut a square chunk of rock and then finish it into a column/pillar/stool.

> What are the dimensions of the semi circular bore
> hole? How big is the total block seeming to me
> sedimentary conglomerate? What is the geological
> description of the rock?

How the hell am I supposed to know. Google works just as well for you. Would the answers really make a difference as to why cut a round piece instead of square?

> Did AE ever mummify bodies? Why, if not for
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Did they ever include grave goods for the
> afterlife? Pre dynastic and after?
>
> Did Qin Shi Hung really make all that terracotta
> army? Why ? Was it not a burial with religious
> /superstitious reasons?

I don't care WHY the AE mummified. The AE didn't build the pyramids.

I don't consider the terracotta army to be ancient, no more than I consider Rome to be ancient. Because religion motivated Qin Shi Hung (if it did), does not mean religion motivated the pyramid builders. Anymore than it means religion motivates me.

> Do you think that human anthropomorphic figures
> with animal heads were real entities? Or was it
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Don't you think they were 'gods' if not what is
> your better explanation?

I don't care. The AE squatters didn't build the pyramids.

> Have you read any or several versions of the Book
> of Coming Forth by day?

Have read the entire book. Even indexed it. And it has nothing to do with the pyramid builders.

> How can you dismiss
> religious /superstitious reasons? Was it all about
> a geyser powered unworkable insane construction
> technique?

The geyser remark has nothing to do with religious motives. Don't know how you can see a connection.
Could it be, you just wanted to make fun of someone?

Dismiss religious reasons for what exactly? Building pyramids? Well that's easy, the AE didn't build the pyramids so we don't know the motives of the real builders. Pretty shallow actually, to assume it was religion based, especially when the engineering screams mechanical based.

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1577 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 324 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 390 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 351 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 433 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 263 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 284 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 187 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 205 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 211 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 177 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 265 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 371 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 198 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 261 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 238 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 276 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 153 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 196 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 221 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 126 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 147 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 177 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 152 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 234 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 181 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 186 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 226 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 248 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 243 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 268 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 280 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 212 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 238 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 312 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 162 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 256 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 296 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 219 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 326 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 228 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 196 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 185 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 294 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 232 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 301 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 248 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 217 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 202 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 261 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 176 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 262 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 265 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 286 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 236 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 248 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 271 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 192 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 272 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 292 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 339 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 369 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 300 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 270 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 281 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 259 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 301 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 270 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 239 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 266 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.