Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Corpuscles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Hi Audrey

> Please help. I may need these special spectacles
> that Racho talks about BUT where is the
> column you speak of?

The column is presumed, by the hole left in the rock. Something round was cut out of the rock. You could call it a stool, or pillar, whatever. Racho is saying, why cut a round long piece when it would be sensible to cut a square chunk of rock and then finish it into a column/pillar/stool.

> What are the dimensions of the semi circular bore
> hole? How big is the total block seeming to me
> sedimentary conglomerate? What is the geological
> description of the rock?

How the hell am I supposed to know. Google works just as well for you. Would the answers really make a difference as to why cut a round piece instead of square?

> Did AE ever mummify bodies? Why, if not for
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Did they ever include grave goods for the
> afterlife? Pre dynastic and after?
>
> Did Qin Shi Hung really make all that terracotta
> army? Why ? Was it not a burial with religious
> /superstitious reasons?

I don't care WHY the AE mummified. The AE didn't build the pyramids.

I don't consider the terracotta army to be ancient, no more than I consider Rome to be ancient. Because religion motivated Qin Shi Hung (if it did), does not mean religion motivated the pyramid builders. Anymore than it means religion motivates me.

> Do you think that human anthropomorphic figures
> with animal heads were real entities? Or was it
> religious /superstitious reasons?
> Don't you think they were 'gods' if not what is
> your better explanation?

I don't care. The AE squatters didn't build the pyramids.

> Have you read any or several versions of the Book
> of Coming Forth by day?

Have read the entire book. Even indexed it. And it has nothing to do with the pyramid builders.

> How can you dismiss
> religious /superstitious reasons? Was it all about
> a geyser powered unworkable insane construction
> technique?

The geyser remark has nothing to do with religious motives. Don't know how you can see a connection.
Could it be, you just wanted to make fun of someone?

Dismiss religious reasons for what exactly? Building pyramids? Well that's easy, the AE didn't build the pyramids so we don't know the motives of the real builders. Pretty shallow actually, to assume it was religion based, especially when the engineering screams mechanical based.

He who knows all the answers has not been asked all the questions - Confucius

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1755 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 360 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 54 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 41 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 428 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 385 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 465 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 292 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 313 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 212 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 230 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 236 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 208 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 290 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 397 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 222 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 286 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 264 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 299 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 179 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 223 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 248 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 157 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 173 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 203 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 178 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 264 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 212 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 210 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 249 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 273 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 267 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 289 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 312 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 239 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 268 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 339 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 189 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 282 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 329 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 241 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 351 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 249 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 219 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 207 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 317 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 253 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 327 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 269 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 238 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 223 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 294 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 199 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 283 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 287 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 310 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 259 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 269 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 291 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 215 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 299 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 316 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 365 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 392 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 323 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 294 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 302 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 281 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 324 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 296 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 264 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 291 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.