Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> and that is one difference between you and I, I
> suppose. There aren't very many natural formations
> in his videos. Occasional I guess but not many.
> The majority of the photos are of
> locations/structures which have been obviously
> worked on. You can be critical of his videos but
> why would you do that given that he's only
> providing pictures of really cool places that,
> otherwise, you would never really see? It's all
> about forming your own opinion after all. We don't
> have to agree on things but these videos should
> make all of us think about the same questions. who
> why how ...
>
> my view is that if one knows what to look for -
> and I've tried to point out things to look for and
> consider - ...most of this work is anomalous. Have
> you read what Tsurgi wrote about moving massive
> weights? There is a reality for moving large
> stones (let alone lifting them) which existed then
> as it does now. Trilithon stones should bother
> people.
>
> Nature may form round stones...but certainly not
> often. That's not the point. The point is to
> introduce oneself to new things which may or may
> not broaden ones personal knowledge base. Rightly
> or wrongly dismiss info but at least you've had a
> chance to consider same. I dismiss the hammer and
> chisel theory based on the elephant carver -
> rightly or wrongly but of course I think I'm
> right. ;)
>
> edited to add
>
> These cut marks from the 33:11 min mark...you
> think primitive tools did this into hard rock?
> [www.youtube.com]
>
> This isn't what one would expect to see using the
> types of saws that people have told me did this.
> It used to be all about the copper with sand
> abrasives...nu huh.

I also noticed on the sidebar of that video is a link to the giant column at Germany's Felsenmeer.
There is some very interesting machine work represented there, some of it strikes me as being done by more than one technology (or culture) having its way with those blocks of stone, including direct linear saw cuts as well as wedge cuts. Also note the sharp inside corner at 8:03.

______________________________________________________________
How can any of us ever know, when all we can do is think?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 27-Nov-17 15:37 by Origyptian.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1728 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 356 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 51 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 31 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 423 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 378 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 459 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 286 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 305 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 206 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 224 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 232 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 202 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 286 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 392 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 216 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 281 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 259 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 295 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 174 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 217 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 244 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 152 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 168 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 198 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 172 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 256 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 206 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 204 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 244 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 267 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 262 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 287 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 306 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 233 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 260 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 334 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 182 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 278 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 322 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 236 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 346 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 244 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 214 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 201 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 310 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 249 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 323 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 264 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 234 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 218 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 282 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 194 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 277 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 282 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 304 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 254 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 264 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 288 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 209 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 295 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 312 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 361 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 386 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 320 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 290 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 299 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 275 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 319 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 292 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 260 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 286 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.