Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
and that is one difference between you and I, I suppose. There aren't very many natural formations in his videos. Occasional I guess but not many. The majority of the photos are of locations/structures which have been obviously worked on. You can be critical of his videos but why would you do that given that he's only providing pictures of really cool places that, otherwise, you would never really see? It's all about forming your own opinion after all. We don't have to agree on things but these videos should make all of us think about the same questions. who why how ...

my view is that if one knows what to look for - and I've tried to point out things to look for and consider - ...most of this work is anomalous. Have you read what Tsurgi wrote about moving massive weights? There is a reality for moving large stones (let alone lifting them) which existed then as it does now. Trilithon stones should bother people.

Nature may form round stones...but certainly not often. That's not the point. The point is to introduce oneself to new things which may or may not broaden ones personal knowledge base. Rightly or wrongly dismiss info but at least you've had a chance to consider same. I dismiss the hammer and chisel theory based on the elephant carver - rightly or wrongly but of course I think I'm right. ;)

edited to add

These cut marks from the 33:11 min mark...you think primitive tools did this into hard rock? [www.youtube.com]

This isn't what one would expect to see using the types of saws that people have told me did this. It used to be all about the copper with sand abrasives...nu huh.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 27-Nov-17 06:11 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1564 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 317 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 388 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 347 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 427 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 259 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 279 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 182 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 200 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 206 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 169 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 259 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 362 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 194 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 257 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 236 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 268 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 147 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 190 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 218 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 119 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 143 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 171 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 147 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 228 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 175 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 181 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 221 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 243 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 238 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 263 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 274 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 204 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 236 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 306 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 152 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 251 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 291 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 215 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 316 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 221 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 191 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 180 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 289 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 226 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 285 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 243 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 212 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 195 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 256 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 169 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 256 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 256 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 283 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 232 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 242 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 266 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 183 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 252 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 285 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 337 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 362 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 295 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 265 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 278 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 256 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 297 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 267 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 235 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 263 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.