Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
and that is one difference between you and I, I suppose. There aren't very many natural formations in his videos. Occasional I guess but not many. The majority of the photos are of locations/structures which have been obviously worked on. You can be critical of his videos but why would you do that given that he's only providing pictures of really cool places that, otherwise, you would never really see? It's all about forming your own opinion after all. We don't have to agree on things but these videos should make all of us think about the same questions. who why how ...

my view is that if one knows what to look for - and I've tried to point out things to look for and consider - ...most of this work is anomalous. Have you read what Tsurgi wrote about moving massive weights? There is a reality for moving large stones (let alone lifting them) which existed then as it does now. Trilithon stones should bother people.

Nature may form round stones...but certainly not often. That's not the point. The point is to introduce oneself to new things which may or may not broaden ones personal knowledge base. Rightly or wrongly dismiss info but at least you've had a chance to consider same. I dismiss the hammer and chisel theory based on the elephant carver - rightly or wrongly but of course I think I'm right. ;)

edited to add

These cut marks from the 33:11 min mark...you think primitive tools did this into hard rock? [www.youtube.com]

This isn't what one would expect to see using the types of saws that people have told me did this. It used to be all about the copper with sand abrasives...nu huh.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 27-Nov-17 06:11 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1752 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 360 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 54 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 37 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 426 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 385 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 464 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 290 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 311 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 211 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 229 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 236 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 206 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 290 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 397 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 221 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 286 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 263 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 299 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 177 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 221 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 248 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 157 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 173 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 203 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 176 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 263 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 209 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 208 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 249 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 272 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 266 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 289 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 309 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 236 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 265 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 338 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 186 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 282 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 327 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 239 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 348 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 248 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 218 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 207 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 314 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 252 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 326 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 266 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 237 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 222 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 287 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 197 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 281 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 284 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 307 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 256 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 269 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 291 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 212 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 298 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 315 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 363 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 390 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 323 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 292 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 302 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 279 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 322 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 295 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 263 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 288 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.