Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
and that is one difference between you and I, I suppose. There aren't very many natural formations in his videos. Occasional I guess but not many. The majority of the photos are of locations/structures which have been obviously worked on. You can be critical of his videos but why would you do that given that he's only providing pictures of really cool places that, otherwise, you would never really see? It's all about forming your own opinion after all. We don't have to agree on things but these videos should make all of us think about the same questions. who why how ...

my view is that if one knows what to look for - and I've tried to point out things to look for and consider - ...most of this work is anomalous. Have you read what Tsurgi wrote about moving massive weights? There is a reality for moving large stones (let alone lifting them) which existed then as it does now. Trilithon stones should bother people.

Nature may form round stones...but certainly not often. That's not the point. The point is to introduce oneself to new things which may or may not broaden ones personal knowledge base. Rightly or wrongly dismiss info but at least you've had a chance to consider same. I dismiss the hammer and chisel theory based on the elephant carver - rightly or wrongly but of course I think I'm right. ;)

edited to add

These cut marks from the 33:11 min mark...you think primitive tools did this into hard rock? [www.youtube.com]

This isn't what one would expect to see using the types of saws that people have told me did this. It used to be all about the copper with sand abrasives...nu huh.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 27-Nov-17 06:11 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1423 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 259 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 331 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 288 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 349 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 194 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 216 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 133 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 158 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 156 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 126 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 201 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 303 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 140 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 189 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 172 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 199 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 96 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 129 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 160 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 89 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 97 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 118 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 100 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 178 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 129 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 125 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 164 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 176 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 173 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 193 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 185 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 148 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 166 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 217 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 101 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 170 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 193 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 160 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 239 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 158 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 135 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 133 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 227 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 144 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 223 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 191 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 159 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 136 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 199 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 122 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 182 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 190 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 210 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 179 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 181 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 213 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 136 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 184 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 213 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 288 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 299 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 247 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 213 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 212 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 211 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 240 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 211 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 186 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 204 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.