Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
and that is one difference between you and I, I suppose. There aren't very many natural formations in his videos. Occasional I guess but not many. The majority of the photos are of locations/structures which have been obviously worked on. You can be critical of his videos but why would you do that given that he's only providing pictures of really cool places that, otherwise, you would never really see? It's all about forming your own opinion after all. We don't have to agree on things but these videos should make all of us think about the same questions. who why how ...

my view is that if one knows what to look for - and I've tried to point out things to look for and consider - ...most of this work is anomalous. Have you read what Tsurgi wrote about moving massive weights? There is a reality for moving large stones (let alone lifting them) which existed then as it does now. Trilithon stones should bother people.

Nature may form round stones...but certainly not often. That's not the point. The point is to introduce oneself to new things which may or may not broaden ones personal knowledge base. Rightly or wrongly dismiss info but at least you've had a chance to consider same. I dismiss the hammer and chisel theory based on the elephant carver - rightly or wrongly but of course I think I'm right. ;)

edited to add

These cut marks from the 33:11 min mark...you think primitive tools did this into hard rock? [www.youtube.com]

This isn't what one would expect to see using the types of saws that people have told me did this. It used to be all about the copper with sand abrasives...nu huh.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 27-Nov-17 06:11 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1452 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 274 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 348 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 305 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 369 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 217 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 232 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 143 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 173 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 170 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 140 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 216 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 319 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 159 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 216 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 195 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 227 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 110 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 141 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 176 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 95 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 106 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 136 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 115 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 196 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 147 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 149 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 178 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 202 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 200 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 210 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 209 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 161 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 182 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 251 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 119 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 200 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 219 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 177 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 264 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 177 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 148 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 142 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 247 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 161 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 244 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 207 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 178 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 154 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 216 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 133 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 202 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 212 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 227 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 196 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 195 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 230 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 148 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 204 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 235 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 302 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 315 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 260 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 228 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 231 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 225 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 255 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 227 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 199 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 221 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.