Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [www.youtube.com]
>
> Hi Audrey
>
> I'm at the 32:27 min mark of this vid and what
> strikes me as very odd is this photo...if one is
> going to extract a column from rock, you wouldn't
> finish it in situ ie: the walls of where the rock
> 'column' was removed wouldn't be sort of refined
> or polished in the shape of a column but would be
> squared off and finished w curve later. y/n?
> Hammer and chiseled in this way? Wouldn't it be
> much simpler (considering what this guy went thru
> to carve a baby elephant with modern tungsten
> chisel)
> [www.youtube.com] ) to
> simply remove in a haphazard manner and finish
> later? ...obviously my logic is correct but simply
> trying to give some perspective of how odd this
> one simple picture is and I understand that you
> also get this. ;)
>
> Given how long and arduous the baby elephant
> creation was...if others watch these vids, it
> should be easily understood/recognized just how
> much labour would have had to been
> endured/employed in order to create all of the
> stonework demonstrated in these vids. It took
> Ronald Rae ( an artist btw) many months- and he
> really didn't remove that much material- in order
> to arrive at his granite work of art.
> Meanwhile...we have caverns of removed material
> and stucco'd walls in the Crete labyrinth. Bronze
> chisels guys...really?
>
> Corps...want to take a crack at introducing some
> other form of 'logic' which keeps all of this work
> within normal orthodox explanations?
Enigma's need
> to be solved but...none of this is logical given
> the tools we are supposed to believe achieved
> same. Armies of skilled people working with hand
> held chisels?
>
> The cut marks that are displayed, shortly after
> the above min mark...considering the effort to cut
> mm's with the saws we are supposed to believe did
> this...seems just too stupid to believe this is
> what accomplished the work. Was every person in
> society focused on banging away at hard rock?
> Without modern cranes, we couldn't accomplish
> Baalbek temple. Even if they built contraptions to
> lift the rock 50+ feet up, to be placed on these
> massive columns, the question which enters my mind
> is always...how did they remove the ropes from the
> final resting position?
>
> Just as a matter of interest...can you imagine the
> skill level of creating this simple dome that is
> in Syria?
>
> [www.youtube.com]
> 11:22 min mark. Heavy as hell and yet so
> skillfully placed so as to remain in place to this
> very day. I often wonder what in hell happened to
> decimate these ancient places? Barring
> explosives...even sledgehammers would take a long
> time to accomplish this destruction. Always looks
> like massive catastrophic event.


Hi Racho

I would be happy to give it a shot but a few things first:

1. What video at 32:27? The first one top new posted vlad007? shows a half drill hole no column. Alternately the subject of OP vid only goes to 32.24?

2. I don't know how many times I need to emphasise I DO NOT think all stone workings are correctly described by orthodox archaeology.
There are many, many enigma's all over the world.

However, IMHO, these folk do themselves harm or detract from their objective by; including workings that can easily have rational modern day explanations (more when you advise the correct time stamp); AND including things that clearly have been photo shopped; or not showing the full honest picture (eg 1:51 of the OP vid shows clearly there is a wide open entrance to the claimed "cave").

Pls check your timestamp ? or better post the screenshot?

Cheers

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1490 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 290 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 365 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 320 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 385 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 234 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 251 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 155 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 181 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 183 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 152 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 228 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 338 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 175 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 232 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 209 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 242 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 122 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 154 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 187 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 101 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 114 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 141 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 126 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 205 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 158 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 163 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 192 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 218 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 217 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 228 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 238 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 178 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 203 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 271 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 129 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 220 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 244 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 193 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 280 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 194 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 159 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 155 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 258 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 176 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 257 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 222 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 192 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 164 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 230 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 144 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 222 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 226 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 244 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 209 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 211 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 247 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 161 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 222 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 251 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 317 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 335 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 275 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 245 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 248 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 233 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 275 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 247 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 215 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 238 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.