Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [www.youtube.com]
>
> Hi Audrey
>
> I'm at the 32:27 min mark of this vid and what
> strikes me as very odd is this photo...if one is
> going to extract a column from rock, you wouldn't
> finish it in situ ie: the walls of where the rock
> 'column' was removed wouldn't be sort of refined
> or polished in the shape of a column but would be
> squared off and finished w curve later. y/n?
> Hammer and chiseled in this way? Wouldn't it be
> much simpler (considering what this guy went thru
> to carve a baby elephant with modern tungsten
> chisel)
> [www.youtube.com] ) to
> simply remove in a haphazard manner and finish
> later? ...obviously my logic is correct but simply
> trying to give some perspective of how odd this
> one simple picture is and I understand that you
> also get this. ;)
>
> Given how long and arduous the baby elephant
> creation was...if others watch these vids, it
> should be easily understood/recognized just how
> much labour would have had to been
> endured/employed in order to create all of the
> stonework demonstrated in these vids. It took
> Ronald Rae ( an artist btw) many months- and he
> really didn't remove that much material- in order
> to arrive at his granite work of art.
> Meanwhile...we have caverns of removed material
> and stucco'd walls in the Crete labyrinth. Bronze
> chisels guys...really?
>
> Corps...want to take a crack at introducing some
> other form of 'logic' which keeps all of this work
> within normal orthodox explanations?
Enigma's need
> to be solved but...none of this is logical given
> the tools we are supposed to believe achieved
> same. Armies of skilled people working with hand
> held chisels?
>
> The cut marks that are displayed, shortly after
> the above min mark...considering the effort to cut
> mm's with the saws we are supposed to believe did
> this...seems just too stupid to believe this is
> what accomplished the work. Was every person in
> society focused on banging away at hard rock?
> Without modern cranes, we couldn't accomplish
> Baalbek temple. Even if they built contraptions to
> lift the rock 50+ feet up, to be placed on these
> massive columns, the question which enters my mind
> is always...how did they remove the ropes from the
> final resting position?
>
> Just as a matter of interest...can you imagine the
> skill level of creating this simple dome that is
> in Syria?
>
> [www.youtube.com]
> 11:22 min mark. Heavy as hell and yet so
> skillfully placed so as to remain in place to this
> very day. I often wonder what in hell happened to
> decimate these ancient places? Barring
> explosives...even sledgehammers would take a long
> time to accomplish this destruction. Always looks
> like massive catastrophic event.


Hi Racho

I would be happy to give it a shot but a few things first:

1. What video at 32:27? The first one top new posted vlad007? shows a half drill hole no column. Alternately the subject of OP vid only goes to 32.24?

2. I don't know how many times I need to emphasise I DO NOT think all stone workings are correctly described by orthodox archaeology.
There are many, many enigma's all over the world.

However, IMHO, these folk do themselves harm or detract from their objective by; including workings that can easily have rational modern day explanations (more when you advise the correct time stamp); AND including things that clearly have been photo shopped; or not showing the full honest picture (eg 1:51 of the OP vid shows clearly there is a wide open entrance to the claimed "cave").

Pls check your timestamp ? or better post the screenshot?

Cheers

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1427 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 261 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 331 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 291 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 353 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 196 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 218 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 134 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 159 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 157 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 128 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 203 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 306 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 142 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 192 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 173 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 202 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 98 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 130 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 161 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 90 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 98 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 119 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 102 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 179 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 130 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 128 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 168 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 177 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 176 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 193 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 188 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 150 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 169 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 219 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 104 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 172 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 195 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 161 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 240 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 160 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 136 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 133 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 230 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 148 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 227 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 193 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 160 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 140 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 199 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 125 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 183 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 193 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 212 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 180 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 182 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 214 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 137 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 187 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 214 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 289 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 302 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 247 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 214 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 214 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 212 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 242 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 216 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 187 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 207 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.