Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
[www.youtube.com]

Hi Audrey

I'm at the 32:27 min mark of this vid and what strikes me as very odd is this photo...if one is going to extract a column from rock, you wouldn't finish it in situ ie: the walls of where the rock 'column' was removed wouldn't be sort of refined or polished in the shape of a column but would be squared off and finished w curve later. y/n? Hammer and chiseled in this way? Wouldn't it be much simpler (considering what this guy went thru to carve a baby elephant with modern tungsten chisel) [www.youtube.com] ) to simply remove in a haphazard manner and finish later? ...obviously my logic is correct but simply trying to give some perspective of how odd this one simple picture is and I understand that you also get this. ;)

Given how long and arduous the baby elephant creation was...if others watch these vids, it should be easily understood/recognized just how much labour would have had to been endured/employed in order to create all of the stonework demonstrated in these vids. It took Ronald Rae ( an artist btw) many months- and he really didn't remove that much material- in order to arrive at his granite work of art. Meanwhile...we have caverns of removed material and stucco'd walls in the Crete labyrinth. Bronze chisels guys...really?

Corps...want to take a crack at introducing some other form of 'logic' which keeps all of this work within normal orthodox explanations? Enigma's need to be solved but...none of this is logical given the tools we are supposed to believe achieved same. Armies of skilled people working with hand held chisels?

The cut marks that are displayed, shortly after the above min mark...considering the effort to cut mm's with the saws we are supposed to believe did this...seems just too stupid to believe this is what accomplished the work. Was every person in society focused on banging away at hard rock? Without modern cranes, we couldn't accomplish Baalbek temple. Even if they built contraptions to lift the rock 50+ feet up, to be placed on these massive columns, the question which enters my mind is always...how did they remove the ropes from the final resting position?

Just as a matter of interest...can you imagine the skill level of creating this simple dome that is in Syria?

[www.youtube.com] 11:22 min mark. Heavy as hell and yet so skillfully placed so as to remain in place to this very day. I often wonder what in hell happened to decimate these ancient places? Barring explosives...even sledgehammers would take a long time to accomplish this destruction. Always looks like massive catastrophic event.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 27-Nov-17 02:06 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1494 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 291 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 366 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 323 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 387 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 239 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 253 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 155 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 182 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 184 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 152 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 229 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 339 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 175 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 233 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 212 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 245 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 122 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 156 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 188 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 101 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 115 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 142 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 127 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 205 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 159 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 163 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 193 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 220 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 220 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 229 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 240 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 180 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 204 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 271 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 129 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 223 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 246 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 195 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 283 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 194 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 160 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 156 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 259 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 177 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 261 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 224 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 194 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 164 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 232 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 144 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 224 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 229 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 245 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 212 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 213 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 247 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 162 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 225 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 252 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 319 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 335 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 277 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 245 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 250 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 236 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 277 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 248 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 215 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 240 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.