Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you can answer how the Serapeum boxes were
> situated & carved as per Dunn's
> measurements...I'll really be impressed. ;)

Hi Racho

"Chalk and cheese" comparison or.... beach sandstone(claim in vid now clarified as) limestone and granite.

I doubt there is an active Egyptologist on the planet who is unaware of the enigma or questions posed by Serapeum and or Chris Dunns work. Maybe it could be solved by a vid with some melodramatic music and wild 'woo woo' guesswork commentary? Very entertaining for some.

I am glad you noticed the very large (split by column) natural light entrance to the "cave". But it makes for more melodrama if one starts at a little erosion hole though, hey!? Very disingenuous right from the start.

Did you notice Vlad standing at other sites where there was a deep hole trench below his feet. I suggest the area has been bulldozed to the face. See Thanos picture of the buildings, train lines and the manicured surrounds in other parts.

I could go on to give you my take on what could have happened (seems obvious to me) but that would be more speculation on inadequate data and vague unskilled speculation in the first place.
However, I see you now have a gathering of "experts" to help boost the woo factor!

If Putin gave you research funds to solve the story, where would you start your investigation ? What things would you want to discount (* and learn about) before claiming ancient age and unknown technology!?

Cheers for now I leave you to it

Thanks

Edit*



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 14-Nov-17 23:18 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1574 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 323 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 389 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 350 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 432 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 262 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 282 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 186 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 204 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 210 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 176 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 263 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 370 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 196 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 260 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 238 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 274 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 151 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 195 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 220 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 125 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 146 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 176 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 151 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 233 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 179 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 185 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 225 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 247 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 241 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 266 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 279 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 210 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 238 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 312 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 160 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 255 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 295 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 218 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 326 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 226 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 195 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 184 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 292 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 230 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 298 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 247 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 215 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 199 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 260 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 175 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 261 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 264 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 285 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 235 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 247 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 269 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 191 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 268 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 291 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 339 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 368 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 299 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 269 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 281 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 258 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 300 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 270 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 239 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 266 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.