Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you can answer how the Serapeum boxes were
> situated & carved as per Dunn's
> measurements...I'll really be impressed. ;)

Hi Racho

"Chalk and cheese" comparison or.... beach sandstone(claim in vid now clarified as) limestone and granite.

I doubt there is an active Egyptologist on the planet who is unaware of the enigma or questions posed by Serapeum and or Chris Dunns work. Maybe it could be solved by a vid with some melodramatic music and wild 'woo woo' guesswork commentary? Very entertaining for some.

I am glad you noticed the very large (split by column) natural light entrance to the "cave". But it makes for more melodrama if one starts at a little erosion hole though, hey!? Very disingenuous right from the start.

Did you notice Vlad standing at other sites where there was a deep hole trench below his feet. I suggest the area has been bulldozed to the face. See Thanos picture of the buildings, train lines and the manicured surrounds in other parts.

I could go on to give you my take on what could have happened (seems obvious to me) but that would be more speculation on inadequate data and vague unskilled speculation in the first place.
However, I see you now have a gathering of "experts" to help boost the woo factor!

If Putin gave you research funds to solve the story, where would you start your investigation ? What things would you want to discount (* and learn about) before claiming ancient age and unknown technology!?

Cheers for now I leave you to it

Thanks

Edit*



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 14-Nov-17 23:18 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1556 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 314 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 385 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 345 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 425 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 256 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 276 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 178 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 199 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 203 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 166 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 255 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 359 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 191 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 253 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 232 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 265 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 143 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 188 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 214 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 115 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 140 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 169 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 143 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 225 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 173 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 178 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 219 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 239 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 235 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 259 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 270 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 202 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 232 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 302 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 149 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 244 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 286 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 212 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 311 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 217 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 187 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 179 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 286 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 218 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 283 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 240 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 209 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 192 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 254 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 166 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 254 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 253 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 274 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 230 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 239 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 263 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 180 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 249 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 279 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 335 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 359 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 292 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 263 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 275 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 253 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 293 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 265 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 233 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 260 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.