Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you can answer how the Serapeum boxes were
> situated & carved as per Dunn's
> measurements...I'll really be impressed. ;)

Hi Racho

"Chalk and cheese" comparison or.... beach sandstone(claim in vid now clarified as) limestone and granite.

I doubt there is an active Egyptologist on the planet who is unaware of the enigma or questions posed by Serapeum and or Chris Dunns work. Maybe it could be solved by a vid with some melodramatic music and wild 'woo woo' guesswork commentary? Very entertaining for some.

I am glad you noticed the very large (split by column) natural light entrance to the "cave". But it makes for more melodrama if one starts at a little erosion hole though, hey!? Very disingenuous right from the start.

Did you notice Vlad standing at other sites where there was a deep hole trench below his feet. I suggest the area has been bulldozed to the face. See Thanos picture of the buildings, train lines and the manicured surrounds in other parts.

I could go on to give you my take on what could have happened (seems obvious to me) but that would be more speculation on inadequate data and vague unskilled speculation in the first place.
However, I see you now have a gathering of "experts" to help boost the woo factor!

If Putin gave you research funds to solve the story, where would you start your investigation ? What things would you want to discount (* and learn about) before claiming ancient age and unknown technology!?

Cheers for now I leave you to it

Thanks

Edit*



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 14-Nov-17 23:18 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1452 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 274 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 348 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 305 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 369 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 217 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 232 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 143 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 173 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 170 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 140 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 216 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 319 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 159 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 216 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 195 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 227 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 110 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 142 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 176 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 95 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 106 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 136 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 115 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 196 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 147 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 149 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 178 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 202 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 200 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 210 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 209 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 161 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 182 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 251 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 119 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 200 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 219 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 177 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 264 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 177 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 148 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 142 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 247 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 161 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 244 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 207 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 178 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 154 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 216 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 133 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 202 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 212 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 227 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 196 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 195 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 230 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 148 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 204 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 235 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 302 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 315 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 260 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 228 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 231 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 225 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 255 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 227 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 199 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 221 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.