Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you can answer how the Serapeum boxes were
> situated & carved as per Dunn's
> measurements...I'll really be impressed. ;)

Hi Racho

"Chalk and cheese" comparison or.... beach sandstone(claim in vid now clarified as) limestone and granite.

I doubt there is an active Egyptologist on the planet who is unaware of the enigma or questions posed by Serapeum and or Chris Dunns work. Maybe it could be solved by a vid with some melodramatic music and wild 'woo woo' guesswork commentary? Very entertaining for some.

I am glad you noticed the very large (split by column) natural light entrance to the "cave". But it makes for more melodrama if one starts at a little erosion hole though, hey!? Very disingenuous right from the start.

Did you notice Vlad standing at other sites where there was a deep hole trench below his feet. I suggest the area has been bulldozed to the face. See Thanos picture of the buildings, train lines and the manicured surrounds in other parts.

I could go on to give you my take on what could have happened (seems obvious to me) but that would be more speculation on inadequate data and vague unskilled speculation in the first place.
However, I see you now have a gathering of "experts" to help boost the woo factor!

If Putin gave you research funds to solve the story, where would you start your investigation ? What things would you want to discount (* and learn about) before claiming ancient age and unknown technology!?

Cheers for now I leave you to it

Thanks

Edit*



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 14-Nov-17 23:18 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1752 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 360 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 54 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 37 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 426 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 385 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 464 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 290 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 311 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 211 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 229 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 236 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 206 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 290 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 397 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 221 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 286 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 263 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 299 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 177 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 222 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 248 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 157 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 173 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 203 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 176 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 263 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 209 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 208 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 249 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 272 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 266 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 289 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 309 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 236 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 265 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 338 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 186 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 282 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 327 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 239 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 348 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 248 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 218 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 207 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 314 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 252 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 326 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 266 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 237 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 222 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 287 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 197 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 281 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 284 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 307 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 256 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 269 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 291 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 212 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 298 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 315 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 363 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 390 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 323 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 292 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 302 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 279 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 322 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 295 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 263 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 288 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.