Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you can answer how the Serapeum boxes were
> situated & carved as per Dunn's
> measurements...I'll really be impressed. ;)

Hi Racho

"Chalk and cheese" comparison or.... beach sandstone(claim in vid now clarified as) limestone and granite.

I doubt there is an active Egyptologist on the planet who is unaware of the enigma or questions posed by Serapeum and or Chris Dunns work. Maybe it could be solved by a vid with some melodramatic music and wild 'woo woo' guesswork commentary? Very entertaining for some.

I am glad you noticed the very large (split by column) natural light entrance to the "cave". But it makes for more melodrama if one starts at a little erosion hole though, hey!? Very disingenuous right from the start.

Did you notice Vlad standing at other sites where there was a deep hole trench below his feet. I suggest the area has been bulldozed to the face. See Thanos picture of the buildings, train lines and the manicured surrounds in other parts.

I could go on to give you my take on what could have happened (seems obvious to me) but that would be more speculation on inadequate data and vague unskilled speculation in the first place.
However, I see you now have a gathering of "experts" to help boost the woo factor!

If Putin gave you research funds to solve the story, where would you start your investigation ? What things would you want to discount (* and learn about) before claiming ancient age and unknown technology!?

Cheers for now I leave you to it

Thanks

Edit*



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 14-Nov-17 23:18 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1494 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 291 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 366 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 321 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 386 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 235 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 252 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 155 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 182 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 184 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 152 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 228 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 339 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 175 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 232 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 211 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 243 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 122 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 156 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 188 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 101 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 114 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 141 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 126 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 205 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 159 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 163 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 193 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 219 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 217 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 229 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 239 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 180 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 203 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 271 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 129 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 222 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 244 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 194 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 281 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 194 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 159 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 156 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 258 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 176 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 261 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 223 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 193 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 164 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 231 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 144 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 222 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 229 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 245 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 210 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 212 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 247 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 162 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 224 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 252 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 319 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 335 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 276 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 245 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 250 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 234 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 275 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 248 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 215 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 240 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.