Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Racho Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If you can answer how the Serapeum boxes were
> situated & carved as per Dunn's
> measurements...I'll really be impressed. ;)

Hi Racho

"Chalk and cheese" comparison or.... beach sandstone(claim in vid now clarified as) limestone and granite.

I doubt there is an active Egyptologist on the planet who is unaware of the enigma or questions posed by Serapeum and or Chris Dunns work. Maybe it could be solved by a vid with some melodramatic music and wild 'woo woo' guesswork commentary? Very entertaining for some.

I am glad you noticed the very large (split by column) natural light entrance to the "cave". But it makes for more melodrama if one starts at a little erosion hole though, hey!? Very disingenuous right from the start.

Did you notice Vlad standing at other sites where there was a deep hole trench below his feet. I suggest the area has been bulldozed to the face. See Thanos picture of the buildings, train lines and the manicured surrounds in other parts.

I could go on to give you my take on what could have happened (seems obvious to me) but that would be more speculation on inadequate data and vague unskilled speculation in the first place.
However, I see you now have a gathering of "experts" to help boost the woo factor!

If Putin gave you research funds to solve the story, where would you start your investigation ? What things would you want to discount (* and learn about) before claiming ancient age and unknown technology!?

Cheers for now I leave you to it

Thanks

Edit*



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 14-Nov-17 23:18 by Corpuscles.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1527 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 304 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 378 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 338 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 405 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 248 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 269 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 168 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 192 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 195 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 161 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 240 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 351 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 184 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 244 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 224 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 256 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 134 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 166 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 199 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 109 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 127 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 152 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 137 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 217 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 167 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 171 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 205 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 231 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 228 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 244 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 259 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 192 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 220 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 291 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 141 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 236 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 265 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 206 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 297 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 210 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 171 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 168 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 273 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 194 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 274 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 234 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 202 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 174 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 246 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 159 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 242 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 241 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 263 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 223 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 226 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 257 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 174 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 241 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 269 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 328 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 351 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 286 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 256 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 268 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 247 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 286 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 259 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 226 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 254 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.