Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
Audrey Wrote:

> I think people aren't watching enough of the vid
> to get the point of it. It opens with Vlad
> stooping to enter a cave, the opening not being
> large enough to walk into. She (narrator) calls
> this a "prehistoric" quarry. The vid switches
> between modern and prehistoric quarries, in order
> to show the difference between cut marks, cut
> widths and style. From the comments made I gather
> they are fully aware of which ones are modern. If
> the cave, that she calls "prehistoric", is
> actually modern, I have to wonder why 'modern'
> didn't enlarge the opening and instead went with
> the back breaking work of removing stones through
> a very small opening. Geesh even the old west
> miners blasted openings they could work through
> with donkeys, carts and shovels. I don't know that
> she should call the prehistoric site a "quarry".
> Doesn't look to be a mine as no minerals are
> mentioned. I lean towards it being a shelter.

Prehistoric quarry or not, I don't know of any modern tool that'll make that flush, deep, right angled, blind cut.
Which is what the Russian guy's making a big deal of. He knows what he's looking at.

Diagram without the roof for clarity.

How about a disc cutter with a square disc! No that wouldn't work would it ;)

You're right, they're making a comparison between an ancient working and a modern soviet era quarry.







Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 14-Nov-17 21:14 by Jon Ellison.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1528 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 304 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 378 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 338 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 405 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 250 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 269 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 168 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 192 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 195 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 161 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 240 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 351 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 184 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 245 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 225 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 257 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 134 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 167 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 199 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 109 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 128 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 153 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 137 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 217 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 167 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 171 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 206 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 232 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 228 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 244 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 259 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 192 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 220 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 291 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 142 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 237 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 266 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 206 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 298 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 211 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 171 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 168 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 273 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 194 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 275 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 235 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 202 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 175 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 246 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 159 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 243 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 241 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 263 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 224 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 226 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 257 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 174 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 241 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 269 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 328 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 351 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 287 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 256 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 268 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 247 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 287 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 259 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 226 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 254 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.