Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Someone has to give them more solid
> > ground (no pun intended) to work on!
>
> All human knowledge is merely theory and always
> has been. "Theory" is not some inviolable
> doctrine that is carved in stone but rather the
> sum total of human knowledge as based principally
> (now days) on experiment.
>
> The lack of solid ground in any endeavor is no
> excuse to begin inventing explanations and
> dressing it up as theory and this is what has been
> happening. Suggesting that the "Great Saw Palace"
> has nothing to do with cutting stone is exactly
> the kind of "science" that has been getting done.
> They postulate all the answers like "ancient
> people were technologically primitive and
> scientifically ignorant" and then ask other people
> to solve all these mysteries for them.
>
> It is archaeology, anthropology, and linguistics
> founded on quicksand and it is not anyone else's
> duty to find solid ground for them. It is THEIR
> job. Get on with it or get out of the way soick
> someone else can.


In a discussion of Stonework, you refer to a lack of solid ground.

forget the 'facinating' ....replace the thought with serendipity


while you are at it please share with us the "solid ground" on which you base your notion of Geyser powered Block elevation


Warw

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1473 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 283 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 358 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 314 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 380 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 225 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 244 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 151 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 178 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 180 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 143 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 225 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 332 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 166 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 224 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 202 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 233 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 118 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 148 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 181 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 99 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 112 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 139 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 121 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 202 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 157 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 155 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 189 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 214 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 207 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 220 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 223 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 173 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 192 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 265 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 123 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 215 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 228 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 186 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 273 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 188 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 157 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 152 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 255 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 173 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 251 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 219 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 187 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 160 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 225 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 142 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 214 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 223 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 238 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 202 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 208 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 242 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 157 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 217 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 246 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 315 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 325 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 269 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 239 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 241 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 231 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 268 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 238 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 210 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 232 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.