Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Someone has to give them more solid
> > ground (no pun intended) to work on!
>
> All human knowledge is merely theory and always
> has been. "Theory" is not some inviolable
> doctrine that is carved in stone but rather the
> sum total of human knowledge as based principally
> (now days) on experiment.
>
> The lack of solid ground in any endeavor is no
> excuse to begin inventing explanations and
> dressing it up as theory and this is what has been
> happening. Suggesting that the "Great Saw Palace"
> has nothing to do with cutting stone is exactly
> the kind of "science" that has been getting done.
> They postulate all the answers like "ancient
> people were technologically primitive and
> scientifically ignorant" and then ask other people
> to solve all these mysteries for them.
>
> It is archaeology, anthropology, and linguistics
> founded on quicksand and it is not anyone else's
> duty to find solid ground for them. It is THEIR
> job. Get on with it or get out of the way soick
> someone else can.


In a discussion of Stonework, you refer to a lack of solid ground.

forget the 'facinating' ....replace the thought with serendipity


while you are at it please share with us the "solid ground" on which you base your notion of Geyser powered Block elevation


Warw

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1518 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 299 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 374 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 333 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 393 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 245 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 265 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 164 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 186 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 190 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 155 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 237 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 346 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 182 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 241 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 220 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 252 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 127 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 163 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 195 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 106 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 122 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 147 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 132 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 212 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 164 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 167 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 200 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 228 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 224 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 237 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 253 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 187 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 213 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 282 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 136 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 232 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 261 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 203 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 292 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 205 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 167 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 163 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 268 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 185 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 270 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 229 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 199 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 169 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 240 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 154 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 234 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 236 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 258 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 218 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 223 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 254 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 169 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 235 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 263 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 325 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 346 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 283 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 251 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 261 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 244 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 284 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 254 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 221 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 248 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.