Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Someone has to give them more solid
> > ground (no pun intended) to work on!
>
> All human knowledge is merely theory and always
> has been. "Theory" is not some inviolable
> doctrine that is carved in stone but rather the
> sum total of human knowledge as based principally
> (now days) on experiment.
>
> The lack of solid ground in any endeavor is no
> excuse to begin inventing explanations and
> dressing it up as theory and this is what has been
> happening. Suggesting that the "Great Saw Palace"
> has nothing to do with cutting stone is exactly
> the kind of "science" that has been getting done.
> They postulate all the answers like "ancient
> people were technologically primitive and
> scientifically ignorant" and then ask other people
> to solve all these mysteries for them.
>
> It is archaeology, anthropology, and linguistics
> founded on quicksand and it is not anyone else's
> duty to find solid ground for them. It is THEIR
> job. Get on with it or get out of the way soick
> someone else can.


In a discussion of Stonework, you refer to a lack of solid ground.

forget the 'facinating' ....replace the thought with serendipity


while you are at it please share with us the "solid ground" on which you base your notion of Geyser powered Block elevation


Warw

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1755 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 360 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 54 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 41 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 428 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 385 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 465 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 292 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 313 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 212 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 230 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 236 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 208 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 290 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 397 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 222 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 286 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 264 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 299 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 179 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 223 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 248 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 157 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 173 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 203 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 178 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 264 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 212 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 210 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 249 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 273 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 267 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 289 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 312 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 239 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 268 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 339 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 189 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 282 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 329 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 242 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 351 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 249 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 219 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 207 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 317 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 253 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 327 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 269 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 238 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 223 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 294 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 199 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 283 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 287 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 310 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 259 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 269 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 291 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 215 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 299 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 316 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 365 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 392 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 323 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 294 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 302 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 281 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 324 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 296 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 264 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 291 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.