Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Someone has to give them more solid
> > ground (no pun intended) to work on!
>
> All human knowledge is merely theory and always
> has been. "Theory" is not some inviolable
> doctrine that is carved in stone but rather the
> sum total of human knowledge as based principally
> (now days) on experiment.
>
> The lack of solid ground in any endeavor is no
> excuse to begin inventing explanations and
> dressing it up as theory and this is what has been
> happening. Suggesting that the "Great Saw Palace"
> has nothing to do with cutting stone is exactly
> the kind of "science" that has been getting done.
> They postulate all the answers like "ancient
> people were technologically primitive and
> scientifically ignorant" and then ask other people
> to solve all these mysteries for them.
>
> It is archaeology, anthropology, and linguistics
> founded on quicksand and it is not anyone else's
> duty to find solid ground for them. It is THEIR
> job. Get on with it or get out of the way soick
> someone else can.


In a discussion of Stonework, you refer to a lack of solid ground.

forget the 'facinating' ....replace the thought with serendipity


while you are at it please share with us the "solid ground" on which you base your notion of Geyser powered Block elevation


Warw

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1424 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 260 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 331 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 288 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 352 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 194 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 217 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 133 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 159 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 156 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 128 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 202 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 304 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 141 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 189 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 173 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 200 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 97 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 130 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 161 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 90 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 98 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 118 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 101 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 178 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 129 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 128 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 165 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 176 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 173 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 193 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 186 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 149 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 167 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 217 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 103 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 170 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 193 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 161 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 239 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 158 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 136 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 133 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 228 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 144 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 224 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 192 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 160 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 138 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 199 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 125 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 182 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 191 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 210 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 180 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 182 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 214 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 137 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 184 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 214 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 289 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 301 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 247 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 213 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 212 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 211 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 241 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 213 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 186 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 204 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.