Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Someone has to give them more solid
> > ground (no pun intended) to work on!
>
> All human knowledge is merely theory and always
> has been. "Theory" is not some inviolable
> doctrine that is carved in stone but rather the
> sum total of human knowledge as based principally
> (now days) on experiment.
>
> The lack of solid ground in any endeavor is no
> excuse to begin inventing explanations and
> dressing it up as theory and this is what has been
> happening. Suggesting that the "Great Saw Palace"
> has nothing to do with cutting stone is exactly
> the kind of "science" that has been getting done.
> They postulate all the answers like "ancient
> people were technologically primitive and
> scientifically ignorant" and then ask other people
> to solve all these mysteries for them.
>
> It is archaeology, anthropology, and linguistics
> founded on quicksand and it is not anyone else's
> duty to find solid ground for them. It is THEIR
> job. Get on with it or get out of the way soick
> someone else can.


In a discussion of Stonework, you refer to a lack of solid ground.

forget the 'facinating' ....replace the thought with serendipity


while you are at it please share with us the "solid ground" on which you base your notion of Geyser powered Block elevation


Warw

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1457 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 276 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 350 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 307 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 373 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 218 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 235 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 144 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 174 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 172 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 141 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 219 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 321 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 161 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 218 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 196 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 229 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 112 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 144 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 176 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 96 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 108 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 137 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 116 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 197 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 149 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 151 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 180 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 203 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 200 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 212 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 213 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 163 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 185 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 255 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 120 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 204 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 221 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 178 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 266 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 179 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 149 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 145 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 250 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 164 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 246 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 210 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 180 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 156 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 219 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 135 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 205 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 214 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 229 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 199 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 198 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 233 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 150 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 207 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 238 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 303 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 317 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 261 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 232 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 231 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 225 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 258 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 229 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 201 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 223 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.