Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Someone has to give them more solid
> > ground (no pun intended) to work on!
>
> All human knowledge is merely theory and always
> has been. "Theory" is not some inviolable
> doctrine that is carved in stone but rather the
> sum total of human knowledge as based principally
> (now days) on experiment.
>
> The lack of solid ground in any endeavor is no
> excuse to begin inventing explanations and
> dressing it up as theory and this is what has been
> happening. Suggesting that the "Great Saw Palace"
> has nothing to do with cutting stone is exactly
> the kind of "science" that has been getting done.
> They postulate all the answers like "ancient
> people were technologically primitive and
> scientifically ignorant" and then ask other people
> to solve all these mysteries for them.
>
> It is archaeology, anthropology, and linguistics
> founded on quicksand and it is not anyone else's
> duty to find solid ground for them. It is THEIR
> job. Get on with it or get out of the way soick
> someone else can.


In a discussion of Stonework, you refer to a lack of solid ground.

forget the 'facinating' ....replace the thought with serendipity


while you are at it please share with us the "solid ground" on which you base your notion of Geyser powered Block elevation


Warw

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1951 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 426 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
another cave ...more oddities 104 Racho 16-Jan-20 22:12
Re: another cave ...similar thing in China 122 forumfan 18-Jan-20 14:12
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 479 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 459 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 558 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 361 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 375 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 261 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 287 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 295 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 254 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 356 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 461 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 279 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 345 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 322 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 357 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 231 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 274 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 308 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 222 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 220 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 260 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 230 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 321 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 265 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 263 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 299 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 331 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 325 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 363 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 382 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 306 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 326 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 399 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 249 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 355 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 403 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 292 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 448 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 308 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 290 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 254 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 386 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 317 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 375 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 319 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 292 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 273 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 359 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 252 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 332 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 340 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 377 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 315 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 328 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 344 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 265 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 359 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 385 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 418 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 469 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 395 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 352 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 356 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 338 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 375 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 349 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 317 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 346 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.