Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Someone has to give them more solid
> > ground (no pun intended) to work on!
>
> All human knowledge is merely theory and always
> has been. "Theory" is not some inviolable
> doctrine that is carved in stone but rather the
> sum total of human knowledge as based principally
> (now days) on experiment.
>
> The lack of solid ground in any endeavor is no
> excuse to begin inventing explanations and
> dressing it up as theory and this is what has been
> happening. Suggesting that the "Great Saw Palace"
> has nothing to do with cutting stone is exactly
> the kind of "science" that has been getting done.
> They postulate all the answers like "ancient
> people were technologically primitive and
> scientifically ignorant" and then ask other people
> to solve all these mysteries for them.
>
> It is archaeology, anthropology, and linguistics
> founded on quicksand and it is not anyone else's
> duty to find solid ground for them. It is THEIR
> job. Get on with it or get out of the way soick
> someone else can.


In a discussion of Stonework, you refer to a lack of solid ground.

forget the 'facinating' ....replace the thought with serendipity


while you are at it please share with us the "solid ground" on which you base your notion of Geyser powered Block elevation


Warw

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1528 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 305 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 378 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 338 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 406 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 250 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 270 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 169 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 192 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 195 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 161 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 240 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 352 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 184 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 245 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 225 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 257 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 135 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 167 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 199 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 109 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 129 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 153 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 137 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 217 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 167 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 171 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 207 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 232 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 228 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 244 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 260 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 192 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 220 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 291 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 143 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 237 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 266 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 206 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 298 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 211 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 171 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 168 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 273 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 194 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 275 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 235 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 202 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 175 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 247 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 159 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 243 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 241 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 263 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 224 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 226 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 258 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 174 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 241 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 269 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 328 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 352 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 287 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 256 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 268 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 247 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 287 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 259 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 226 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 254 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.