Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
cladking Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Corpuscles Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Someone has to give them more solid
> > ground (no pun intended) to work on!
>
> All human knowledge is merely theory and always
> has been. "Theory" is not some inviolable
> doctrine that is carved in stone but rather the
> sum total of human knowledge as based principally
> (now days) on experiment.
>
> The lack of solid ground in any endeavor is no
> excuse to begin inventing explanations and
> dressing it up as theory and this is what has been
> happening. Suggesting that the "Great Saw Palace"
> has nothing to do with cutting stone is exactly
> the kind of "science" that has been getting done.
> They postulate all the answers like "ancient
> people were technologically primitive and
> scientifically ignorant" and then ask other people
> to solve all these mysteries for them.
>
> It is archaeology, anthropology, and linguistics
> founded on quicksand and it is not anyone else's
> duty to find solid ground for them. It is THEIR
> job. Get on with it or get out of the way soick
> someone else can.


In a discussion of Stonework, you refer to a lack of solid ground.

forget the 'facinating' ....replace the thought with serendipity


while you are at it please share with us the "solid ground" on which you base your notion of Geyser powered Block elevation


Warw

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1557 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 315 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 385 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 346 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 426 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 258 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 277 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 179 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 199 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 204 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 168 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 255 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 360 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 192 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 253 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 233 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 266 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 145 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 189 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 214 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 116 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 142 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 169 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 143 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 225 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 174 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 180 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 220 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 240 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 235 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 260 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 273 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 202 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 235 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 303 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 150 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 244 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 287 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 213 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 313 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 217 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 187 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 179 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 286 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 222 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 283 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 241 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 209 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 192 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 255 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 167 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 255 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 254 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 278 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 231 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 240 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 264 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 181 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 249 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 279 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 336 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 360 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 293 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 264 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 276 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 253 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 295 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 265 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 233 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 260 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.