Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I may have been confused a little because beginning shows him entering a cave but after watching again, seems to connect to a larger opening. That being said, I noticed a few things which made me interested in the first place. As interpreter comments, the cuts are fairly fine - some sort of tool seems to be clear because of uniform cut width but doesn't really fit saw profile throughout as some cuts are curved. If argument is that a chisel was used...where are the chisel marks on the back wall (any wall for that matter) where the block was removed. Why would they go to the trouble of smoothing out all the walls rather than what we see in a modern quarry as seen in this vid?

This was underground so ...anyone able to show me the actual machinery Stalin's group used to create this? I fully realize that this rock isn't all that hard but this underground quarry doesn't have the same marks as the other quarry...why quarry this with handheld tools when it's so much easier to open mine with large machinery that is also able to be moved/carried with machinery? I think that's why they showed the tool marks/method of cut signature from the abandoned quarry - they don't match = different tools for sure - both in the fine cuts as well as the larger 'Petraesque' extractions. Two different types of large machinery. Another thing that came to mind is that the large scale removal of stone, in the Petra syle I'm referring to, is that the remval doesn't seem to be practical in the way it was done - wasteful comes to mind. Anyway...we have 2 different types of machining evident, in my view. Very confusing is to realize that, at the 27:40 min mark, they didn't leave a readily accessible opening with which to remove all of this stone. Wheelbarrows? For all the rock removed...no opening for this heavy equipment to even drive in there?

Even if I'm totally wrong ie: ya, Stalin or someone else in modern times did this work...I couldn't help but notice that there were similar hillside abodes on the bluff opposite where this quarry is located. It struck me last night, after watching this vid: [www.youtube.com] (of if want to listen to an expert on same...this vid: [www.youtube.com] ... that there really isn't an explanation for how the Serapeum boxes were moved into those confined tunnels and then lowered into place. I realize is a change of subject but it's probably the best example of a truly perplexing mystery.

...sorry, can't fit enough people in to budge these boxes let alone drop them perfectly into their cubbyhole. One can believe otherwise...because they are there so must of have possible sort of idea, but I really have my doubts as to whether we could move them today without creating specialized heavy duty machinery - and certainly not made with wood or ropes. Whatever they were moved in on, if rollers comes to mind, would still be there because there is no way to lift those boxes in order to remove them.

Corpuscles,

Yes, I watched the vid about rocks being alive or 'mushrooms'...don't agree with the narrator on conclusion with that vid but doesn't mean that we then throw out everything seen beforehand. Maybe it's nothing or maybe there is some sort of crystalline growth sort of answer there. ...doesn't interest me at all.

I did notice that there were large square chunks cut out of the Cliffside on opposing bluff - the same side as the underground 'city'...this could certainly be modern (I think likely) so why dig Petra style when so much easier to cut from topside?

If you can answer how the Serapeum boxes were situated & carved as per Dunn's measurements...I'll really be impressed. ;)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 14-Nov-17 06:49 by Racho.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1506 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 295 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 371 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 328 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 390 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 243 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 259 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 163 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 186 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 187 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 152 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 235 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 344 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 179 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 239 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 218 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 249 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 124 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 160 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 192 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 103 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 119 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 146 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 131 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 210 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 162 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 163 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 198 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 225 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 222 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 234 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 245 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 184 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 206 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 276 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 134 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 230 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 253 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 198 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 286 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 199 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 163 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 159 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 265 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 180 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 268 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 227 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 198 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 167 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 236 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 148 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 225 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 231 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 250 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 217 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 218 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 250 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 165 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 230 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 258 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 322 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 343 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 280 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 249 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 256 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 241 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 278 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 252 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 220 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 244 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.