Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I'm very sorry but in the world in which I exist superstition, barbarism, and primitiveness are forces of destruction and death. No amount of superstition can make one strong, no amount of barbarism can make one wise, and no amount of primitiveness can make one knowledgeable. One dies with these characteristics rather than thrives and gives birth to modern man who alone occupies the crown of creation.

It is quite obvious that we have it ALL WRONG today. Nowhere did I say that I must be right, merely that the soft sciences have it all wrong. Until they can speak of ancient accomplishments and how they did it without invoking superstition, barbarism, and primitiveness you can be certain they are wrong.

My theory is merely one possible explanation for past accomplishments but there are many others. One could make a better case that ancient magic was effective and caused stones to shed weight and grow wings than that superstition shaped or lifted them.

Such is the way of reality today and it was just as true in 2750 BC when the pyramids were built.

You want to turn this around on me but the problem isn't me or any other fringe theorist. The problem is archaeology. The problem is Egyptology. The problem is soft science which really isn't science at all and hardly makes a pretense at it.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1574 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 323 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 389 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 350 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 432 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 263 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 282 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 186 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 204 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 210 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 177 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 263 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 370 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 196 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 260 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 238 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 274 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 151 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 195 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 220 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 125 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 146 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 176 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 151 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 233 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 179 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 186 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 225 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 247 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 241 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 266 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 279 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 210 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 238 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 312 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 160 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 255 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 295 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 218 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 326 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 226 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 195 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 184 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 292 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 230 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 298 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 248 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 215 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 199 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 260 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 175 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 262 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 264 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 285 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 236 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 247 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 269 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 191 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 268 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 291 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 339 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 368 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 299 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 269 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 281 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 258 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 300 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 270 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 239 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 266 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.