Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I'm very sorry but in the world in which I exist superstition, barbarism, and primitiveness are forces of destruction and death. No amount of superstition can make one strong, no amount of barbarism can make one wise, and no amount of primitiveness can make one knowledgeable. One dies with these characteristics rather than thrives and gives birth to modern man who alone occupies the crown of creation.

It is quite obvious that we have it ALL WRONG today. Nowhere did I say that I must be right, merely that the soft sciences have it all wrong. Until they can speak of ancient accomplishments and how they did it without invoking superstition, barbarism, and primitiveness you can be certain they are wrong.

My theory is merely one possible explanation for past accomplishments but there are many others. One could make a better case that ancient magic was effective and caused stones to shed weight and grow wings than that superstition shaped or lifted them.

Such is the way of reality today and it was just as true in 2750 BC when the pyramids were built.

You want to turn this around on me but the problem isn't me or any other fringe theorist. The problem is archaeology. The problem is Egyptology. The problem is soft science which really isn't science at all and hardly makes a pretense at it.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1453 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 274 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 348 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 305 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 369 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 218 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 232 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 143 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 173 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 170 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 140 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 216 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 319 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 159 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 216 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 195 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 227 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 110 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 142 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 176 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 95 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 106 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 136 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 115 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 196 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 147 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 149 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 178 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 202 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 200 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 210 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 209 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 162 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 182 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 251 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 119 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 200 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 219 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 177 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 264 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 177 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 148 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 142 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 247 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 161 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 244 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 208 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 178 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 154 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 216 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 133 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 202 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 212 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 227 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 197 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 195 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 230 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 148 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 204 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 235 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 302 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 315 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 260 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 228 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 231 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 225 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 255 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 227 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 199 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 222 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.