Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I'm very sorry but in the world in which I exist superstition, barbarism, and primitiveness are forces of destruction and death. No amount of superstition can make one strong, no amount of barbarism can make one wise, and no amount of primitiveness can make one knowledgeable. One dies with these characteristics rather than thrives and gives birth to modern man who alone occupies the crown of creation.

It is quite obvious that we have it ALL WRONG today. Nowhere did I say that I must be right, merely that the soft sciences have it all wrong. Until they can speak of ancient accomplishments and how they did it without invoking superstition, barbarism, and primitiveness you can be certain they are wrong.

My theory is merely one possible explanation for past accomplishments but there are many others. One could make a better case that ancient magic was effective and caused stones to shed weight and grow wings than that superstition shaped or lifted them.

Such is the way of reality today and it was just as true in 2750 BC when the pyramids were built.

You want to turn this around on me but the problem isn't me or any other fringe theorist. The problem is archaeology. The problem is Egyptology. The problem is soft science which really isn't science at all and hardly makes a pretense at it.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1556 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 314 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 385 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 345 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 425 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 257 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 276 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 178 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 199 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 203 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 167 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 255 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 359 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 191 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 253 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 232 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 265 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 143 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 188 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 214 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 115 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 140 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 169 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 143 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 225 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 173 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 178 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 219 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 239 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 235 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 259 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 270 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 202 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 232 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 302 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 149 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 244 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 286 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 212 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 311 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 217 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 187 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 179 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 286 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 218 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 283 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 241 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 209 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 192 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 254 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 166 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 254 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 253 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 274 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 231 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 239 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 263 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 180 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 249 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 279 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 335 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 359 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 292 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 263 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 275 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 253 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 293 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 265 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 233 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 260 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.