Mysteries :  The Official GrahamHancock.com forums
For serious discussion of the controversies, approaches and enigmas surrounding the origins and development of the human species and of human civilization. (NB: for more ‘out there’ posts we point you in the direction of the ‘Paranormal & Supernatural’ Message Board). 
Welcome! Log InRegister
I'm very sorry but in the world in which I exist superstition, barbarism, and primitiveness are forces of destruction and death. No amount of superstition can make one strong, no amount of barbarism can make one wise, and no amount of primitiveness can make one knowledgeable. One dies with these characteristics rather than thrives and gives birth to modern man who alone occupies the crown of creation.

It is quite obvious that we have it ALL WRONG today. Nowhere did I say that I must be right, merely that the soft sciences have it all wrong. Until they can speak of ancient accomplishments and how they did it without invoking superstition, barbarism, and primitiveness you can be certain they are wrong.

My theory is merely one possible explanation for past accomplishments but there are many others. One could make a better case that ancient magic was effective and caused stones to shed weight and grow wings than that superstition shaped or lifted them.

Such is the way of reality today and it was just as true in 2750 BC when the pyramids were built.

You want to turn this around on me but the problem isn't me or any other fringe theorist. The problem is archaeology. The problem is Egyptology. The problem is soft science which really isn't science at all and hardly makes a pretense at it.

Man fears the pyramid, time fears man.

Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
No other explanation ...high tech 1426 Racho 11-Nov-17 21:39
sorry to all...but at the 21 min mark and a few minutes after 260 Racho 11-Nov-17 22:08
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 331 D-Archer 12-Nov-17 08:57
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 290 Thanos5150 12-Nov-17 17:31
Not megalithic 353 Racho 14-Nov-17 06:40
Re: Not megalithic 195 Audrey 14-Nov-17 18:08
Re: Not megalithic 218 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 20:33
Re: Not megalithic 134 Audrey 14-Nov-17 21:56
Re: Not megalithic 159 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 157 Audrey 14-Nov-17 22:49
Re: Not megalithic 128 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 23:33
Re: Not megalithic 203 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:49
Re: Not megalithic 304 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 07:35
Re: Not megalithic 142 Audrey 15-Nov-17 22:23
Re: Not megalithic 189 Racho 27-Nov-17 01:46
Re: Not megalithic 173 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 02:28
Re: Not megalithic 201 Racho 27-Nov-17 02:52
Stone Spheres Are Natural Formations 98 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 05:37
I think the point is proven 130 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:04
Re: I think the point is proven ; 161 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 11:02
dismissive 90 Racho 27-Nov-17 16:48
Re: I think the point is proven 98 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 15:36
Let's learn about the science/realities associated with cutting stone 119 Racho 27-Nov-17 06:41
Re: Not megalithic 101 Origyptian 27-Nov-17 06:50
I Second That 178 Barbelo 27-Nov-17 20:52
wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 130 Racho 27-Nov-17 23:26
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 128 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 23:46
Re: wow...talk about being unhinged/triggered 167 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 00:00
you start... 176 Racho 28-Nov-17 03:53
Re: you start... 176 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:15
Re: I Second That 193 Audrey 28-Nov-17 01:43
Wacko or Crackpot? 188 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 02:30
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 150 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 02:49
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 168 Audrey 28-Nov-17 03:38
Re: Wacko or Crackpot? 218 Barbelo 28-Nov-17 05:23
Re: Not megalithic 103 Corpuscles 27-Nov-17 20:03
Re: Not megalithic 171 Audrey 28-Nov-17 00:11
Re: Not megalithic 193 Corpuscles 28-Nov-17 00:55
Re: Not megalithic 161 Audrey 28-Nov-17 02:02
Re: Not megalithic 240 Warwick 29-Nov-17 21:08
Re: Not megalithic 159 Origyptian 15-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 136 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:10
Re: Not megalithic 133 Jon Ellison 15-Nov-17 23:32
Re: Not megalithic 229 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 145 Origyptian 16-Nov-17 02:43
Re: Not megalithic 227 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 21:58
Re: Not megalithic 193 Jon Ellison 14-Nov-17 22:14
Re: Not megalithic 160 Origyptian 14-Nov-17 22:38
Re: Not megalithic 140 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 22:55
Re: Not megalithic 199 Thanos5150 14-Nov-17 23:02
Re: Not megalithic 125 Audrey 14-Nov-17 23:46
Re: Not megalithic 183 Corpuscles 15-Nov-17 00:09
Re: Not megalithic 192 Audrey 15-Nov-17 01:15
Re: Not megalithic 212 Thanos5150 15-Nov-17 00:26
Re: Not megalithic 180 Corpuscles 14-Nov-17 22:47
Re: Not megalithic 182 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:47
Re: Not megalithic 214 Audrey 15-Nov-17 04:06
Re: Not megalithic 137 Warwick 18-Nov-17 00:59
Re: Not megalithic 185 Racho 15-Nov-17 06:26
Re: Not megalithic 214 Warwick 18-Nov-17 01:01
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 289 Origyptian 12-Nov-17 14:37
Re: No other explanation ...high tech 302 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 17:48
There Has Never Been Solid Ground 247 cladking 12-Nov-17 19:10
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 214 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 20:06
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground 213 cladking 12-Nov-17 20:55
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 212 Corpuscles 12-Nov-17 21:26
Re: There Has Never Been Solid Ground!!!!!!!!!!! 241 cladking 12-Nov-17 21:42
Facinating 214 Warwick 14-Nov-17 20:23
Re: Facinating 187 cladking 14-Nov-17 21:33
Re: Facinating 205 Warwick 15-Nov-17 02:51


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.